Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Assessing quality of maternity care in Hungary: expert validation and testing of the mother-centered prenatal care (MCPC) survey instrument

Authors: Nicholas Rubashkin, Imre Szebik, Petra Baji, Zsuzsa Szántó, Éva Susánszky, Saraswathi Vedam

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Instruments to assess quality of maternity care in Central and Eastern European (CEE) region are scarce, despite reports of poor doctor-patient communication, non-evidence-based care, and informal cash payments. We validated and tested an online questionnaire to study maternity care experiences among Hungarian women.

Methods

Following literature review, we collated validated items and scales from two previous English-language surveys and adapted them to the Hungarian context. An expert panel assessed items for clarity and relevance on a 4-point ordinal scale. We calculated item-level Content Validation Index (CVI) scores. We designed 9 new items concerning informal cash payments, as well as 7 new “model of care” categories based on mode of payment. The final questionnaire (N = 111 items) was tested in two samples of Hungarian women, representative (N = 600) and convenience (N = 657). We conducted bivariate analysis and thematic analysis of open-ended responses.

Results

Experts rated pre-existing English-language items as clear and relevant to Hungarian women’s maternity care experiences with an average CVI for included questions of 0.97. Significant differences emerged across the model of care categories in terms of informal payments, informed consent practices, and women’s perceptions of autonomy. Thematic analysis (N = 1015) of women’s responses identified 13 priority areas of the maternity care experience, 9 of which were addressed by the questionnaire.

Conclusions

We developed and validated a comprehensive questionnaire that can be used to evaluate respectful maternity care, evidence-based practice, and informal cash payments in CEE region and beyond.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rao JK, Anderson L, Inui T, Frankel RM. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care. 2007;45(4):340–9. Rao JK, Anderson L, Inui T, Frankel RM. Communication interventions make a difference in conversations between physicians and patients: a systematic review of the evidence. Med Care. 2007;45(4):340–9.
3.
go back to reference Iida M, Horiuchi S, Porter SE, Pope R, Graham L, Patel S. The relationship between women-centred care and women's birth experiences: a comparison between birth centres, clinics, and hospitals in Japan. Midwifery. 2012;28(4):398–405.CrossRefPubMed Iida M, Horiuchi S, Porter SE, Pope R, Graham L, Patel S. The relationship between women-centred care and women's birth experiences: a comparison between birth centres, clinics, and hospitals in Japan. Midwifery. 2012;28(4):398–405.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tuncalp O, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gulmezoglu AM, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1045–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tuncalp O, Were WM, MacLennan C, Oladapo OT, Gulmezoglu AM, Bahl R, et al. Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns-the WHO vision. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1045–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Miller S, Lalonde A. The global epidemic of abuse and disrespect during childbirth: history, evidence, interventions, and FIGO’s mother-baby friendly birthing facilities initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Feb 2015;123(2):93–4. Miller S, Lalonde A. The global epidemic of abuse and disrespect during childbirth: history, evidence, interventions, and FIGO’s mother-baby friendly birthing facilities initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Feb 2015;123(2):93–4.
6.
go back to reference Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. Bohren MA, Vogel JP, Hunter EC, Lutsiv O, Makh SK, Souza JP, et al. The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: a mixed-methods systematic review. PLoS Med. 2015;12(6):e1001847. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pmed.​1001847.
7.
go back to reference Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, Mooney MD, Levitz CE, Schumacher AE, et al. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. Sep 2014;384(9947):957–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang H, Liddell CA, Coates MM, Mooney MD, Levitz CE, Schumacher AE, et al. Global, regional, and national levels of neonatal, infant, and under-5 mortality during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. Sep 2014;384(9947):957–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Miteniece E, Pavlova M, Rechel B, Groot W. Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in central and eastern European countries: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 2017;177:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Miteniece E, Pavlova M, Rechel B, Groot W. Barriers to accessing adequate maternal care in central and eastern European countries: a systematic literature review. Soc Sci Med. 2017;177:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Danichevski K, McKee M, Balabanova D. Prescribing in maternity care in Russia: the legacy of soviet medicine. Health Policy. 2008;85(2):242–51.CrossRefPubMed Danichevski K, McKee M, Balabanova D. Prescribing in maternity care in Russia: the legacy of soviet medicine. Health Policy. 2008;85(2):242–51.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Arsenijevic J, Pavlova M, Groot W. Shortcomings of maternity care in Serbia. Birth. 2014;41(1):14–25.CrossRefPubMed Arsenijevic J, Pavlova M, Groot W. Shortcomings of maternity care in Serbia. Birth. 2014;41(1):14–25.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Colombini M, Rechel B, Mayhew SH. Access of Roma to sexual and reproductive health services: qualitative findings from Albania, Bulgaria and Macedonia. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(5):522–34.CrossRefPubMed Colombini M, Rechel B, Mayhew SH. Access of Roma to sexual and reproductive health services: qualitative findings from Albania, Bulgaria and Macedonia. Glob Public Health. 2012;7(5):522–34.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hagymasy L, Gaal J. A comparative study of vertical and horizontal deliveries in the presence and with the assistance of the woman’s partner. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;19(2):98–103.CrossRefPubMed Hagymasy L, Gaal J. A comparative study of vertical and horizontal deliveries in the presence and with the assistance of the woman’s partner. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;19(2):98–103.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Farkasne S, Velkei E. “Birth Guide: About the Hungarian Birth Services” (Születéskalauz: a magyarorszagi szuleszeti intezmenyek szolgaltatasairol). First ed. Budapest: Merce Egyesulet; 2001. 265 p. Farkasne S, Velkei E. “Birth Guide: About the Hungarian Birth Services” (Születéskalauz: a magyarorszagi szuleszeti intezmenyek szolgaltatasairol). First ed. Budapest: Merce Egyesulet; 2001. 265 p.
14.
go back to reference ASSPRO. The price of a childbirth: out-of-pocket payments for maternity care in central and eastern europe. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht University; 2013. ASSPRO. The price of a childbirth: out-of-pocket payments for maternity care in central and eastern europe. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht University; 2013.
15.
go back to reference Falkingham J. Poverty, out-of-pocket payments and access to health care: evidence from Tajikistan. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:247–58.CrossRefPubMed Falkingham J. Poverty, out-of-pocket payments and access to health care: evidence from Tajikistan. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:247–58.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cohen N. Informal payments for health care--the phenomenon and its context. Health Econ Policy Law. 2012;7(3):285–308.CrossRefPubMed Cohen N. Informal payments for health care--the phenomenon and its context. Health Econ Policy Law. 2012;7(3):285–308.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Stepurko T, Pavlova M, Levenets O, Gryga I, Groot W. Informal patient payments in maternity hospitals in Kiev Ukraine. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2013;28(2):169–87.CrossRef Stepurko T, Pavlova M, Levenets O, Gryga I, Groot W. Informal patient payments in maternity hospitals in Kiev Ukraine. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2013;28(2):169–87.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Major survey findings of listening to mothers (SM) III: pregnancy and birth: report of the third National U.S. survey of Women's childbearing experiences. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23(1):9–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Declercq ER, Sakala C, Corry MP, Applebaum S, Herrlich A. Major survey findings of listening to mothers (SM) III: pregnancy and birth: report of the third National U.S. survey of Women's childbearing experiences. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23(1):9–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Vedam S, Stoll K, Martin K, Rubashkin N, Partridge S, Thordarson D, et al. The Mother's autonomy in decision making (MADM) scale: patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171804. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171804. Vedam S, Stoll K, Martin K, Rubashkin N, Partridge S, Thordarson D, et al. The Mother's autonomy in decision making (MADM) scale: patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0171804. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0171804.
20.
go back to reference Vedam S, Stoll K, Rubashkin N, Martin K, Miller-Vedam Z, Hayes-Klein H, et al. The mothers on respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth. . Social science and medicine. PopulHealth. 2017; In press, January 2017 Vedam S, Stoll K, Rubashkin N, Martin K, Miller-Vedam Z, Hayes-Klein H, et al. The mothers on respect (MOR) index: measuring quality, safety, and human rights in childbirth. . Social science and medicine. PopulHealth. 2017; In press, January 2017
21.
go back to reference Baji P, Pavlova M, Gulacsi L, Groot W. Exploring consumers’ attitudes towards informal patient payments using the combined method of cluster and multinomial regression analysis the case of Hungary. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:62. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-13-62. Baji P, Pavlova M, Gulacsi L, Groot W. Exploring consumers’ attitudes towards informal patient payments using the combined method of cluster and multinomial regression analysis the case of Hungary. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:62. doi:10.​1186/​1472-6963-13-62.
22.
go back to reference Szende A, Culyer AJ. The inequity of informal payments for health care: the case of Hungary. Health Policy. 2006;75(3):262–71.CrossRefPubMed Szende A, Culyer AJ. The inequity of informal payments for health care: the case of Hungary. Health Policy. 2006;75(3):262–71.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gaal P, McKee M. Informal payments for health care and the theory of ‘INXIT. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2004;19(2):163–78.CrossRef Gaal P, McKee M. Informal payments for health care and the theory of ‘INXIT. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2004;19(2):163–78.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stepurko T, Pavlova M, Gryga I, Groot W. Empirical studies on informal patient payments for health care services: a systematic and critical review of research methods and instruments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;19(10):273.CrossRef Stepurko T, Pavlova M, Gryga I, Groot W. Empirical studies on informal patient payments for health care services: a systematic and critical review of research methods and instruments. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;19(10):273.CrossRef
25.
26.
27.
go back to reference Schilling LS, Dixon J, Knafl K, Grey M, Ives B, Lynn MR. Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nurs Res. 2007;56(5):361–6.CrossRefPubMed Schilling LS, Dixon J, Knafl K, Grey M, Ives B, Lynn MR. Determining content validity of a self-report instrument for adolescents using a heterogeneous expert panel. Nurs Res. 2007;56(5):361–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Adler NE, Stewart J. Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:252–60.CrossRefPubMed Adler NE, Stewart J. Using team science to address health disparities: MacArthur network as case example. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:252–60.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD004667. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD004667. doi:10.​1002/​14651858.​CD004667.​pub5.
30.
go back to reference Saito S, Nomura N, Noguchi Y, Tezuka I. Translatability of family concepts into the Japanese culture: using the family environment scale. Fam Process. 1996;35(2):239–57.CrossRefPubMed Saito S, Nomura N, Noguchi Y, Tezuka I. Translatability of family concepts into the Japanese culture: using the family environment scale. Fam Process. 1996;35(2):239–57.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, Schrandt S, Sheridan S, Gerson J, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1033–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, Schrandt S, Sheridan S, Gerson J, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1033–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Baji P, Rubashkin N, Szebik I, Stoll K, Vedam S. Informal cash payments for birth in Hungary: are women paying to secure a known provider, respect, or quality of care? Soc Sci Med. 2017;189:86–95.CrossRefPubMed Baji P, Rubashkin N, Szebik I, Stoll K, Vedam S. Informal cash payments for birth in Hungary: are women paying to secure a known provider, respect, or quality of care? Soc Sci Med. 2017;189:86–95.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessing quality of maternity care in Hungary: expert validation and testing of the mother-centered prenatal care (MCPC) survey instrument
Authors
Nicholas Rubashkin
Imre Szebik
Petra Baji
Zsuzsa Szántó
Éva Susánszky
Saraswathi Vedam
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0413-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Reproductive Health 1/2017 Go to the issue