Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Reproductive Health
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Culture Clash? Investigating constructions of sexual and reproductive health from the perspective of 1.5 generation migrants in Australia using Q methodology

Authors: T. Dune, J. Perz, Z. Mengesha, D. Ayika

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In Australia, those who migrate as children or adolescents (1.5 generation migrants) may have entered a new cultural environment at a crucial time in their psychosexual development. These migrants may have to contend with constructions of sexual and reproductive health from at least two cultures which may be at conflict on the matter. This study was designed to investigate the role of culture in constructions of sexual and reproductive health and health care seeking behaviour from the perspective of 1.5 generation migrants.

Methods

Forty-two adults from various ethno-cultural backgrounds took part in this Q methodological study. Online, participants rank-ordered forty-two statements about constructions of sexual and reproductive health and health seeking behaviours based on the level to which they agreed or disagreed with them. Participants then answered a series of questions about the extent to which their ethnic/cultural affiliations influenced their identity. A by-person factor analysis was then conducted, with factors extracted using the centroid technique and a varimax rotation.

Results

A seven-factor solution provided the best conceptual fit for constructions of sexual and reproductive health and help-seeking. Factor A compared progressive and traditional sexual and reproductive health values. Factor B highlighted migrants’ experiences through two cultural lenses. Factor C explored migrant understandings of sexual and reproductive health in the context of culture. Factor D explained the role of culture in migrants’ intimate relationships, beliefs about migrant sexual and reproductive health and engagement of health care services. Factor E described the impact of culture on sexual and reproductive health related behaviour. Factor F presented the messages migrant youth are given about sexual and reproductive health. Lastly, Factor G compared constructions of sexual and reproductive health across cultures.

Conclusions

This study has demonstrated that when the cultural norms of migrants’ country of origin are maintained it has a significant influence on how 1.5 generation migrants construct, experience and understand various aspects of sexual and reproductive health. Policy makers, health care professionals and resettlement service providers are advised to engage with migrant parents and youth in exploring, discussing, reframing and reconstructing SRH in an Australian context.
Literature
1.
OECD-UNDESA. World Migration in Figures. In: OECD-UNDESA. 2013.
2.
Department of Social Services. The people of Australia-Australia’s multicultural policy. 2013.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. In: Government A, editor. WHERE DO MIGRANTS LIVE? 4102.0 - Australian Social Trends. Canberra: ACT; 2014.
4.
5.
Poulsen M, Johnston R. The ghetto model and ethnic concentration in Australian cities. Urban Geography. 2000;21(1):26–44.CrossRef
6.
Thomas M. Vietnamese in Australia. In: Encyclopedia of Diasporas. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 1141–9.CrossRef
7.
Salant T, Lauderdale DS. Measuring culture: a critical review of acculturation and health in Asian immigrant populations. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57(1):71–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Dawson MT, Gifford S, Amezquita R. Donde hay doctor?: folk and cosmopolitan medicine for sexual health among Chilean women living in Australia. Culture, Health & Sexuality. 2000;2(1):51–68.CrossRef
9.
Dawson MT, Gifford SM. Social change, migration and sexual health: Chilean women in Chile and Australia. Women & health. 2004;38(4):39–56.CrossRef
10.
Ussher JM, Rhyder-Obid M, Perz J, Rae M, Wong TWK, Newman P. Purity, Privacy and Procreation: Constructions and Experiences of Sexual and Reproductive Health in Assyrian and Karen Women Living in Australia. Sexuality & Culture. 2012;16(4):467–85.CrossRef
11.
Dune T, Mapedzahama V, Hawkes G, Minichiello V, Pitts M. African Migrant Women’s Understanding and Construction of Sexuality in Australia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. 2015;2:38–50.
12.
Mengesha ZB, Dune T, Perz J. Culturally and linguistically diverse women’s views and experiences of accessing sexual and reproductive health care in Australia: a systematic review. Sexual health. 2016;13(4):299–310.
13.
14.
Minnis A, Doherty I, Cheng H, Otero-Sabogal R, Padian N. Immigration and sexual partner risk among Latino adolescents in San Francisco. J Immigr Minor Health. 2010;12(6):900–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Pham VH. Cultural Crossroads: The Formation of Vietnamese American Consciousness for the 1.5 Generation. In: The Online Archive of California. he Regents of The University of California. 1994.
16.
Park K. “I Really Do Feel I’m 1.5!”: The Construction of Self and Community by Young Korean Americans. Amerasia Journal. 1999;25(1):139–63.CrossRef
17.
Nakash O, Nagar M, Shoshani A, Zubida H, Harper RA. The effect of acculturation and discrimination on mental health symptoms and risk behaviors among adolescent migrants in Israel. Cult Divers Ethn Minor Psychol. 2012;18(3):228.CrossRef
18.
Fresnoza-Flot A. The Bumpy Landscape of Family Reunification: Experiences of First-and 1.5-generation Filipinos in France. J Ethn Migr Stud. 2015;41(7):1152–71.CrossRef
19.
Waite L, Cook J. Belonging among diasporic African communities in the UK: Plurilocal homes and simultaneity of place attachments. Emotion, Space and Society. 2011;4(4):238–48.CrossRef
20.
Wang B, Collins FL. Becoming cosmopolitan? Hybridity and intercultural encounters amongst 1.5 generation Chinese migrants in New Zealand. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2016;1–19.
21.
Dune T, Mapedzahama V. Culture Clash: Shona (Zimbabwean) migrant women’s experiences with communicating about sexual health and wellbeing across cultures and generations. African Journal of Reproductive Health in press.
22.
23.
Raffaelli M, Kang H, Guarini T. Exploring the immigrant paradox in adolescent sexuality: An ecological perspective. 2012.
24.
Morales-Alemán MM, Scarinci IC. Correlates and predictors of sexual health among adolescent Latinas in the United States: A systematic review of the literature, 2004–2015. Prev Med. 2016;87:183–93.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q Methodological Research: Theory, Method and Interpretation. London: Sage Publications; 2012.
26.
Perz J, Ussher JM, Gilbert E. Constructions of sex and intimacy after cancer: Q methodology study of people with cancer, their partners, and health professionals. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Coogan J, Herrington N. Q methodology: an overview. RESEARCH IN SECONDARY TEACHER EDUCATION. 2011;1(2):24–8.
28.
Rogers SR. Q Methodology. In: Smith JA, Harre R, Van Langenhove L, editors. Rethinking methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.
29.
30.
Brown SR. Political Subjectivity, Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1980.
31.
Watts S, Stenner P. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qual Res Psychol. 2005;2(1):67–91.CrossRef
32.
Hwang W-C. Acculturative family distancing: Theory, research, and clinical practice. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 2006;43(4):397.CrossRef
33.
Wray A, Ussher JM, Perz J. Constructions and experiences of sexual health among young, heterosexual, unmarried Muslim women immigrants in Australia. Cult Health Sex. 2014;16(1):76–89.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Chavura S. The Secularization Thesis and the Secular State: Reflections with Special Attention to Debates in Australia. Religion and the State: A Comparative Sociology. 2011;65:92.
35.
Hussainy SY, Stewart K, Chapman CB, Taft AJ, Amir LH, Hobbs MK, Shelley JM, Smith AM. Provision of the emergency contraceptive pill without prescription: attitudes and practices of pharmacists in Australia. Contraception. 2011;83(2):159–66.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Smerecnik C, Schaalma H, Gerjo K, Meijer S, Poelman J. An exploratory study of Muslim adolescents’ views on sexuality: Implications for sex education and prevention. BMC Public Health. 2010;10(1):533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Marston C, King E. Factors that shape young people’s sexual behaviour: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1581–6.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Levitt P. Migrant Philanthropy in Latin America: Move Over United Way. ReVista: Harvard Review of Latin America. 2002.
39.
Steinberg L. Cognitive and affective development in adolescence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(2):69–74.CrossRefPubMed
40.
McCormack L, Bann C, Squiers L, Berkman ND, Squire C, Schillinger D, Ohene-Frempong J, Hibbard J. Measuring health literacy: a pilot study of a new skills-based instrument. J Health Commun. 2010;15(S2):51–71.CrossRefPubMed
41.
42.
Australian Youth Forum. National strategy for young australians. In. Edited by Government A. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Culture Clash? Investigating constructions of sexual and reproductive health from the perspective of 1.5 generation migrants in Australia using Q methodology
Authors
T. Dune
J. Perz
Z. Mengesha
D. Ayika
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0310-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Reproductive Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research

Management of pregnancy at and beyond 41 completed weeks of gestation in low-risk women: a secondary analysis of two WHO multi-country surveys on maternal and newborn health

Review

Human rights in childbirth, narratives and restorative justice: a review

Research

Discordance in self-report and observation data on mistreatment of women by providers during childbirth in Uttar Pradesh, India

Research

Utilization of mobile phones for accessing menstrual regulation services among low-income women in Bangladesh: a qualitative analysis

Research

Educational status as determinant of men’s knowledge about vasectomy in Dangila town administration, Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia

Commentary

A never-before opportunity to strengthen investment and action on adolescent contraception, and what we must do to make full use of it