Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tobacco Induced Diseases 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Short report

Are political views related to smoking and support for tobacco control policies? A survey across 28 European countries

Authors: Filippos T. Filippidis, Charis Girvalaki, Enkeleint-Aggelos Mechili, Constantine I. Vardavas

Published in: Tobacco Induced Diseases | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

General political views are rarely considered when discussing public support for tobacco control policies and tobacco use. The aim of this study was to explore potential associations between political views, smoking and support for tobacco control policies.

Methods

We analysed responses from 22,313 individuals aged ≥15 years from 28 European Union (EU) member states, who self-reported their political views (far-left [1–2 on a scale 1–10]; centre-left (3-4); centre (5-6); centre-right (7-8); and far-right (9-10) in wave 82.4 of the Eurobarometer survey in 2014. We ran multi-level logistic regression models to explore associations between political views and smoking, as well as support for tobacco control policies, adjusting for socio-demographic factors.

Results

Compared to those placing themselves at the political centre, people with far-left political views were more likely to be current smokers (Odds Ratio [OR] = 1.13; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.01–1.26), while those in the centre-right were the least likely to smoke (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76–0.93). Similar associations were found for having ever been a smoker. Respondents on the left side of the political spectrum were more likely to support tobacco control policies and those on the centre-right were less likely to support them, as compared to those at the political centre, after controlling for smoking status.

Conclusions

General political views may be associated not only with support for tobacco control policies, but even with smoking behaviours, which should be taken into account when discussing these issues at a population level. Further research is needed to explore the implications of these findings.
Literature
4.
go back to reference European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 429. Attitudes of Europeans towards tobacco. In.; 2015. European Commission: Special Eurobarometer 429. Attitudes of Europeans towards tobacco. In.; 2015.
5.
go back to reference Pega F, Kawachi I, Rasanathan K, Lundberg O. Politics, policies and population health: a commentary on Mackenbach, Hu and Looman (2013). Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:176–9.CrossRefPubMed Pega F, Kawachi I, Rasanathan K, Lundberg O. Politics, policies and population health: a commentary on Mackenbach, Hu and Looman (2013). Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:176–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pabayo R, Kawachi I, Muennig P. Political party affiliation, political ideology and mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(5):423–31.CrossRefPubMed Pabayo R, Kawachi I, Muennig P. Political party affiliation, political ideology and mortality. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(5):423–31.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Subramanian SV, Perkins JM. Are republicans healthier than democrats? Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(3):930–1.CrossRefPubMed Subramanian SV, Perkins JM. Are republicans healthier than democrats? Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(3):930–1.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Subramanian SV, Huijts T, Perkins JM. Association between political ideology and health in Europe. Eur J Pub Health. 2009;19(5):455–7.CrossRef Subramanian SV, Huijts T, Perkins JM. Association between political ideology and health in Europe. Eur J Pub Health. 2009;19(5):455–7.CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Gelman A, Shor B, Bafumi J, Park D. Rich state, poor state, red state, blue state: What's the matter with Connecticut? Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 2008;2(4):345–67.CrossRef Gelman A, Shor B, Bafumi J, Park D. Rich state, poor state, red state, blue state: What's the matter with Connecticut? Quarterly Journal of Political Science. 2008;2(4):345–67.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kelleher C, Timoney A, Friel S, McKeown D. Indicators of deprivation, voting patterns, and health status at area level in the Republic of Ireland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(1):36–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kelleher C, Timoney A, Friel S, McKeown D. Indicators of deprivation, voting patterns, and health status at area level in the Republic of Ireland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(1):36–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Page A, Morrell S, Taylor R. Suicide and political regime in new South Wales and Australia during the 20th century. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(10):766–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Page A, Morrell S, Taylor R. Suicide and political regime in new South Wales and Australia during the 20th century. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(10):766–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Gruber J, Mullainathan S: Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? National Bureau of economic research working paper series 2002, No. 8872.CrossRef Gruber J, Mullainathan S: Do cigarette taxes make smokers happier? National Bureau of economic research working paper series 2002, No. 8872.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tung GJ, Vernick JS, Stuart EA, Webster DW. Political factors affecting the enactment of state-level clean indoor air laws. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(6):e92–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tung GJ, Vernick JS, Stuart EA, Webster DW. Political factors affecting the enactment of state-level clean indoor air laws. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(6):e92–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference European Commission: Eurobarometer 82.4, November–December 2014. GESIS Data Archive: ZA5933, dataset version 5.0.0 (2014). In.: TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels; 2014. European Commission: Eurobarometer 82.4, November–December 2014. GESIS Data Archive: ZA5933, dataset version 5.0.0 (2014). In.: TNS OPINION & SOCIAL, Brussels; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Fox AM, Feng W, Yumkham R. State political ideology, policies and health behaviors: the case of tobacco. Soc Sci Med. 2017;181:139–47.CrossRefPubMed Fox AM, Feng W, Yumkham R. State political ideology, policies and health behaviors: the case of tobacco. Soc Sci Med. 2017;181:139–47.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Filippidis FT, Agaku IT, Vardavas CI. The association between peer, parental influence and tobacco product features and earlier age of onset of regular smoking among adults in 27 European countries. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25(5):814–8.CrossRef Filippidis FT, Agaku IT, Vardavas CI. The association between peer, parental influence and tobacco product features and earlier age of onset of regular smoking among adults in 27 European countries. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25(5):814–8.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Anker TB. Analysis of the paternalistic justification of an agenda setting public health policy: the case of tobacco plain packaging. Public Health Ethics. 2016;9(2):208–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Anker TB. Analysis of the paternalistic justification of an agenda setting public health policy: the case of tobacco plain packaging. Public Health Ethics. 2016;9(2):208–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Fooks GJ, Smith J, Lee K, Holden C. Controlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of article 5.3 of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control. Glob Health. 2017;13(1):12.CrossRef Fooks GJ, Smith J, Lee K, Holden C. Controlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of article 5.3 of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control. Glob Health. 2017;13(1):12.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference European Comission. Directive 2014/40/EU Of The European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/health/tobacco/docs/dir_201440_en.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2017. European Comission. Directive 2014/40/EU Of The European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. 2014. http://​ec.​europa.​eu/​health/​tobacco/​docs/​dir_​201440_​en.​pdf. Accessed 10 June 2017.
Metadata
Title
Are political views related to smoking and support for tobacco control policies? A survey across 28 European countries
Authors
Filippos T. Filippidis
Charis Girvalaki
Enkeleint-Aggelos Mechili
Constantine I. Vardavas
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Tobacco Induced Diseases / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1617-9625
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0151-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Tobacco Induced Diseases 1/2017 Go to the issue