Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tobacco Induced Diseases 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Associations of attitudes towards electronic cigarettes with advertisement exposure and social determinants: a cross sectional study

Authors: Benjamin Reinhold, Rebecca Fischbein, Surya Sruthi Bhamidipalli, Jennifer Bryant, Deric R. Kenne

Published in: Tobacco Induced Diseases | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The exposure of young adults to electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) advertisements has risen rapidly. E-cigarette ads have been shown to increase short term perceived acceptability of using e-cigarettes in places where traditional cigarettes are banned. We set out to investigate if advertising exposure was related to perceptions of harm, addictiveness, and acceptability of use of e-cigarettes in places where traditional cigarettes are banned.

Methods

Using a cross-sectional design, 6037 students at a large Midwestern university between the ages of 18–24 were surveyed about e-cigarette use and smoking status. Bivariate analyses were performed associating perception of harm, addictiveness, and acceptability of e-cigarette use in places where smoking is banned with demographic and other background factors, and e-cigarette advertising exposure through different media channels. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore the relationship of these factors on perceptions of harm, addictiveness and acceptability of e-cigarette use in places where smoking is banned.

Results

More than a quarter (27.4%) of respondents had used an e-cigarette, greater than half (53.2%) had seen an advertisement on TV and 42.0% had seen an advertisement on the Internet. Logistic regressions revealed that being white, male, an e-cigarette user, a smoker, having a mother who smoked, and Internet advertisement exposure were associated with lower perceived harm of e-cigarettes. The same factors, plus having seen advertisements on TV, were associated with increased likelihood of perceiving e-cigarette use in bars, stores, at work and in a dorm as acceptable. Perceiving use of e-cigarettes as acceptable in classrooms was also associated with the aforementioned factors and also included race. Only being male and an e-cigarette user were associated with lower perceived addictiveness of e-cigarettes.

Conclusions

E-cigarette use is increasing in adolescents and young adults, as is exposure to e-cigarette advertising. Independent of nicotine use and demographics factors, e-cigarette advertising is associated with increased beliefs in acceptability of e-cigarette use in places where cigarettes are banned. E-cigarette advertisements may be responsible for normalizing e-cigarette use. Exposure to internet e-cigarette advertisements was associated with lower perceived harm; this may be due to the false health claims often made in internet advertisements.
Literature
1.
go back to reference United States Department of Health and Human Services: The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress A Report of the Surgeon General. A Rep Surg Gen 2014:1081. United States Department of Health and Human Services: The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress A Report of the Surgeon General. A Rep Surg Gen 2014:1081.
2.
go back to reference Nutt D, King LA, Saulsbury W, Blakemore C. Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet. 2016;369:1047–53.CrossRef Nutt D, King LA, Saulsbury W, Blakemore C. Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet. 2016;369:1047–53.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Miech RA, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2014: Volume I, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2015. p. 599. Miech RA, Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2014: Volume I, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2015. p. 599.
5.
go back to reference Fairchild A, Bayer R, Colgrove J. The renormalization of smoking? E-cigarettes and the tobacco “endgame”. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(4):293–5.CrossRefPubMed Fairchild A, Bayer R, Colgrove J. The renormalization of smoking? E-cigarettes and the tobacco “endgame”. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(4):293–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dutra LM, Glantz SA. High international electronic cigarette use among never smoker adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:595–7.CrossRefPubMed Dutra LM, Glantz SA. High international electronic cigarette use among never smoker adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:595–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Allen JG, Flanigan SS, Leblanc M, Vallarino J, Macnaughton P, Stewart JH, Christiani DC. Flavoring chemicals in e-cigarettes: diacetyl, 2,3-pentanedione, and acetoin in a sample of 51 products, including fruit-, candy-, and cocktail-flavored e-cigarettes. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:733–9.CrossRefPubMed Allen JG, Flanigan SS, Leblanc M, Vallarino J, Macnaughton P, Stewart JH, Christiani DC. Flavoring chemicals in e-cigarettes: diacetyl, 2,3-pentanedione, and acetoin in a sample of 51 products, including fruit-, candy-, and cocktail-flavored e-cigarettes. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:733–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Deeming tobacco products to be subject to the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, as amended by the family smoking prevention and control act. Fed Regist. 2016;80:1–195. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Deeming tobacco products to be subject to the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, as amended by the family smoking prevention and control act. Fed Regist. 2016;80:1–195.
9.
go back to reference Duke JC, Lee YO, Kim AE, Watson KA, Arnold KY, Nonnemaker JM, Porter L. Exposure to electronic cigarette television advertisements among youth and young adults. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e29–36.CrossRefPubMed Duke JC, Lee YO, Kim AE, Watson KA, Arnold KY, Nonnemaker JM, Porter L. Exposure to electronic cigarette television advertisements among youth and young adults. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e29–36.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cobb NK, Brookover J, Cobb CO. Forensic analysis of online marketing for electronic nicotine delivery systems. Tob Control. 2015;24:128–31.CrossRefPubMed Cobb NK, Brookover J, Cobb CO. Forensic analysis of online marketing for electronic nicotine delivery systems. Tob Control. 2015;24:128–31.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Link AR, Cawkwell PB, Shelley DR, Sherman SE. An exploration of online behaviors and social media use among hookah and electronic-cigarette users. Addict Behav Rep. 2015;2:37–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Link AR, Cawkwell PB, Shelley DR, Sherman SE. An exploration of online behaviors and social media use among hookah and electronic-cigarette users. Addict Behav Rep. 2015;2:37–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Farrelly MC, Duke JC, Crankshaw EC, Eggers ME, Lee YO, Nonnemaker JM, Kim AE, Porter L. A randomized trial of the effect of E-cigarette TV advertisements on intentions to use E-cigarettes. Am J Prev Med. 2016;49:686–93.CrossRef Farrelly MC, Duke JC, Crankshaw EC, Eggers ME, Lee YO, Nonnemaker JM, Kim AE, Porter L. A randomized trial of the effect of E-cigarette TV advertisements on intentions to use E-cigarettes. Am J Prev Med. 2016;49:686–93.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference SAS. SAS/STAT 9.3 User’s guide. User’s guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc; 2011. p. 8640. SAS. SAS/STAT 9.3 User’s guide. User’s guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc; 2011. p. 8640.
14.
go back to reference De Vries H, Engels R, Kremers S, Wetzels J, Mudde A. Parents’ and friends’ smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: findings from six European countries. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:627–36.CrossRefPubMed De Vries H, Engels R, Kremers S, Wetzels J, Mudde A. Parents’ and friends’ smoking status as predictors of smoking onset: findings from six European countries. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:627–36.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lynn P. Weighting for Non-Response. Surv Stat Comput 1996. Lynn P. Weighting for Non-Response. Surv Stat Comput 1996.
16.
go back to reference Primack BA, Soneji S, Stoolmiller M, Fine MJ, Sargent JD. Progression to traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:1018–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Primack BA, Soneji S, Stoolmiller M, Fine MJ, Sargent JD. Progression to traditional cigarette smoking after electronic cigarette use among US adolescents and young adults. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:1018–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Pearson JL, Richardson A, Niaura RS, Vallone DM, Abrams DB. e-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1758–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pearson JL, Richardson A, Niaura RS, Vallone DM, Abrams DB. e-cigarette awareness, use, and harm perceptions in US adults. Am J Public Health. 2012;102:1758–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ma GX, Shive S, Legos P, Tan Y. Ethnic differences in adolescent smoking behaviors, sources of tobacco, knowledge and attitudes toward restriction policies. Addict Behav. 2003;28:249–68.CrossRefPubMed Ma GX, Shive S, Legos P, Tan Y. Ethnic differences in adolescent smoking behaviors, sources of tobacco, knowledge and attitudes toward restriction policies. Addict Behav. 2003;28:249–68.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Berg CJ, Lessard L, Parelkar PP, Thrasher J, Kegler MC, Escoffery C, Goldade K, Ahluwalia JS. College student reactions to smoking bans in public, on campus and at home. Health Educ Res. 2011;26:106–18.CrossRefPubMed Berg CJ, Lessard L, Parelkar PP, Thrasher J, Kegler MC, Escoffery C, Goldade K, Ahluwalia JS. College student reactions to smoking bans in public, on campus and at home. Health Educ Res. 2011;26:106–18.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Berg CJ, Stratton E, Schauer GL, Lewis M, Wang Y, Windle M, Kegler M. Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50:79–89.CrossRefPubMed Berg CJ, Stratton E, Schauer GL, Lewis M, Wang Y, Windle M, Kegler M. Perceived harm, addictiveness, and social acceptability of tobacco products and marijuana among young adults: marijuana, hookah, and electronic cigarettes win. Subst Use Misuse. 2015;50:79–89.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Halpern-Felsher BL, Biehl M, Kropp RY, Rubinstein ML. Perceived risks and benefits of smoking: differences among adolescents with different smoking experiences and intentions. Prev Med (Baltim). 2004;39:559–67.CrossRef Halpern-Felsher BL, Biehl M, Kropp RY, Rubinstein ML. Perceived risks and benefits of smoking: differences among adolescents with different smoking experiences and intentions. Prev Med (Baltim). 2004;39:559–67.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Groves RM. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q. 2006;70:646–75.CrossRef Groves RM. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opin Q. 2006;70:646–75.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Peytchev A. Consequences of survey nonresponse. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2013;645:88–111.CrossRef Peytchev A. Consequences of survey nonresponse. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2013;645:88–111.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Couper MP. The promises and perils of web surveys. In: Westlake A, Sykes W, Manners T, Rigg M, editors. In the challenge of the internet. Proceedings of the ASC international conference on survey research methods. London: Association for Survey Computing; 2001. p. 35. Couper MP. The promises and perils of web surveys. In: Westlake A, Sykes W, Manners T, Rigg M, editors. In the challenge of the internet. Proceedings of the ASC international conference on survey research methods. London: Association for Survey Computing; 2001. p. 35.
26.
go back to reference McCabe SE. Gender differences in collegiate risk factors for heavy episodic drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63:49–56.CrossRefPubMed McCabe SE. Gender differences in collegiate risk factors for heavy episodic drinking. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63:49–56.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Deutskens E, de Ruyter K, Wetzels M, Oosterveld P. Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: an experimental study. Mark Lett. 2004;15:21–36.CrossRef Deutskens E, de Ruyter K, Wetzels M, Oosterveld P. Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: an experimental study. Mark Lett. 2004;15:21–36.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Associations of attitudes towards electronic cigarettes with advertisement exposure and social determinants: a cross sectional study
Authors
Benjamin Reinhold
Rebecca Fischbein
Surya Sruthi Bhamidipalli
Jennifer Bryant
Deric R. Kenne
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Tobacco Induced Diseases / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1617-9625
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12971-017-0118-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Tobacco Induced Diseases 1/2017 Go to the issue