Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Rheumatology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Dutch juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients, carers and clinicians create a research agenda together following the James Lind Alliance method: a study protocol

Authors: Casper G. Schoemaker, Wineke Armbrust, Joost F. Swart, Sebastiaan J. Vastert, Jorg van Loosdregt, Anouk Verwoerd, Caroline Whiting, Katherine Cowan, Wendy Olsder, Els Versluis, Rens van Vliet, Marlous J. Fernhout, Sanne L. Bookelman, Jeannette Cappon, J. Merlijn van den Berg, Ellen Schatorjé, Petra C. E. Hissink Muller, Sylvia Kamphuis, Joke de Boer, Otto T. H. M. Lelieveld, Janjaap van der Net, Karin R. Jongsma, Annemiek van Rensen, Christine Dedding, Nico M. Wulffraat

Published in: Pediatric Rheumatology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Research on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) should support patients, caregivers/parents (carers) and clinicians to make important decisions in the consulting room and eventually to improve the lives of patients with JIA. Thus far these end-users of JIA-research have rarely been involved in the prioritisation of future research.

Main body

Dutch organisations of patients, carers and clinicians will collaboratively develop a research agenda for JIA, following the James Lind Alliance (JLA) methodology. In a ‘Priority Setting Partnership’ (PSP), they will gradually establish a top 10 list of the most important unanswered research questions for JIA. In this process the input from clinicians, patients and their carers will be equally valued. Additionally, focus groups will be organised to involve young people with JIA. The involvement of all contributors will be monitored and evaluated. In this manner, the project will contribute to the growing body of literature on how to involve young people in agenda setting in a meaningful way.

Conclusion

A JIA research agenda established through the JLA method and thus co-created by patients, carers and clinicians will inform researchers and research funders about the most important research questions for JIA. This will lead to research that really matters.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Macleod MR, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):101–4.CrossRef Macleod MR, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):101–4.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Crowe S, et al. Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch. Res Involv Engagem. 2015;1:2.CrossRef Crowe S, et al. Patients’, clinicians’ and the research communities’ priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch. Res Involv Engagem. 2015;1:2.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abma TA, Broerse JE. Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expect. 2010;13(2):160–73.CrossRef Abma TA, Broerse JE. Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expect. 2010;13(2):160–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Manafo E, et al. Patient and public engagement in priority setting: a systematic rapid review of the literature. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193579.CrossRef Manafo E, et al. Patient and public engagement in priority setting: a systematic rapid review of the literature. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193579.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tong A, et al. Children’s experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(9):1392–404.CrossRef Tong A, et al. Children’s experiences of living with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(9):1392–404.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bate J, et al. Public and patient involvement in paediatric research. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016;101(3):158–61.CrossRef Bate J, et al. Public and patient involvement in paediatric research. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016;101(3):158–61.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Gomez-Ramirez O, et al. A recurring rollercoaster ride: a qualitative study of the emotional experiences of parents of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016;14(1):13.CrossRef Gomez-Ramirez O, et al. A recurring rollercoaster ride: a qualitative study of the emotional experiences of parents of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016;14(1):13.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eyckmans L, et al. What does it mean to grow up with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? A qualitative study on the perspectives of patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(4):459–65.CrossRef Eyckmans L, et al. What does it mean to grow up with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? A qualitative study on the perspectives of patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(4):459–65.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bryant J, et al. Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014;12:23.CrossRef Bryant J, et al. Health research priority setting in selected high income countries: a narrative review of methods used and recommendations for future practice. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014;12:23.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McDonagh JE, Bateman B. ‘Nothing about us without us’: considerations for research involving young people. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2012;97(2):55–60.CrossRef McDonagh JE, Bateman B. ‘Nothing about us without us’: considerations for research involving young people. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2012;97(2):55–60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Parsons S, et al. Study protocol: determining what young people with rheumatic disease consider important to research (the young People's opinions underpinning rheumatology research - YOURR project). Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:22.CrossRef Parsons S, et al. Study protocol: determining what young people with rheumatic disease consider important to research (the young People's opinions underpinning rheumatology research - YOURR project). Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:22.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bird D, Culley L, Lakhanpaul M. Why collaborate with children in health research: an analysis of the risks and benefits of collaboration with children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2013;98(2):42–8.CrossRef Bird D, Culley L, Lakhanpaul M. Why collaborate with children in health research: an analysis of the risks and benefits of collaboration with children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2013;98(2):42–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference van Staa A, et al. Exciting but exhausting: experiences with participatory research with chronically ill adolescents. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):95–107.CrossRef van Staa A, et al. Exciting but exhausting: experiences with participatory research with chronically ill adolescents. Health Expect. 2010;13(1):95–107.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tunnicliffe DJ, et al. Healthcare and research priorities of adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: a mixed-methods study. J Rheumatol. 2017;44(4):444–51.CrossRef Tunnicliffe DJ, et al. Healthcare and research priorities of adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus: a mixed-methods study. J Rheumatol. 2017;44(4):444–51.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Parsons S, et al. What do young people with rheumatic disease believe to be important to research about their condition? A UK-wide study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):53.CrossRef Parsons S, et al. What do young people with rheumatic disease believe to be important to research about their condition? A UK-wide study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15(1):53.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Abma TA, et al. Patient involvement in research programming and implementation: a responsive evaluation of the dialogue model for research agenda setting. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2449–64.CrossRef Abma TA, et al. Patient involvement in research programming and implementation: a responsive evaluation of the dialogue model for research agenda setting. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2449–64.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Broerse JE, et al. Involving burn survivors in agenda setting on burn research: an added value? Burns. 2010;36(2):217–31.CrossRef Broerse JE, et al. Involving burn survivors in agenda setting on burn research: an added value? Burns. 2010;36(2):217–31.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference van Furth EF, van der Meer A, Cowan K. Top 10 research priorities for eating disorders. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(8):706–7.CrossRef van Furth EF, van der Meer A, Cowan K. Top 10 research priorities for eating disorders. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(8):706–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schoemaker CG, Prakken ABJ, Furth EF. Patients and physicians creating a research agenda together: the method of the British James Lind Alliance. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161(0):D1764.PubMed Schoemaker CG, Prakken ABJ, Furth EF. Patients and physicians creating a research agenda together: the method of the British James Lind Alliance. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2017;161(0):D1764.PubMed
22.
25.
go back to reference Dedding CW, et al. Kinderen en jongeren actief in wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Ethiek, methoden en resultaten van onderzoek met en door jeugd. Houten: LannooCampus; 2013. Dedding CW, et al. Kinderen en jongeren actief in wetenschappelijk onderzoek. Ethiek, methoden en resultaten van onderzoek met en door jeugd. Houten: LannooCampus; 2013.
26.
go back to reference Schalkers I, Dedding CW, Bunders JF. ‘[I would like] a place to be alone, other than the toilet’—Children’s perspectives on paediatric hospital care in the Netherlands. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2066–78.CrossRef Schalkers I, Dedding CW, Bunders JF. ‘[I would like] a place to be alone, other than the toilet’—Children’s perspectives on paediatric hospital care in the Netherlands. Health Expect. 2015;18(6):2066–78.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Madden M, Morley R. Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance pressure ulcer priority setting partnership. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:12.CrossRef Madden M, Morley R. Exploring the challenge of health research priority setting in partnership: reflections on the methodology used by the James Lind Alliance pressure ulcer priority setting partnership. Res Involv Engagem. 2016;2:12.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference de Wit MP, et al. European league against rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(5):722–6.CrossRef de Wit MP, et al. European league against rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(5):722–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dutch juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients, carers and clinicians create a research agenda together following the James Lind Alliance method: a study protocol
Authors
Casper G. Schoemaker
Wineke Armbrust
Joost F. Swart
Sebastiaan J. Vastert
Jorg van Loosdregt
Anouk Verwoerd
Caroline Whiting
Katherine Cowan
Wendy Olsder
Els Versluis
Rens van Vliet
Marlous J. Fernhout
Sanne L. Bookelman
Jeannette Cappon
J. Merlijn van den Berg
Ellen Schatorjé
Petra C. E. Hissink Muller
Sylvia Kamphuis
Joke de Boer
Otto T. H. M. Lelieveld
Janjaap van der Net
Karin R. Jongsma
Annemiek van Rensen
Christine Dedding
Nico M. Wulffraat
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1546-0096
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12969-018-0276-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Pediatric Rheumatology 1/2018 Go to the issue