Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Population Health Metrics 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research

Small area synthetic estimates of smoking prevalence during pregnancy in England

Authors: Lisa Szatkowski, Samantha J. Fahy, Tim Coleman, Joanna Taylor, Liz Twigg, Graham Moon, Jo Leonardi-Bee

Published in: Population Health Metrics | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Complete and accurate data on maternal smoking prevalence during pregnancy are not available at a local geographical scale in England. We employ a synthetic estimation approach to predict the expected prevalence of smoking during pregnancy and smoking at delivery by Primary Care Trust (PCT).

Methods

Multilevel logistic regression models were used with data from the 2010 Infant Feeding Survey and 2011 Census to predict the probability of mothers (a) smoking at any point during pregnancy and (b) smoking at delivery, according to age, deprivation, and the ethnic profile of the home area. These probabilities were applied to demographic information on mothers giving birth from 2010/11 Hospital Episode Statistics data to produce expected counts, and prevalence figures, of smokers by PCT, with Bayesian 95 % credible intervals. The expected prevalence of smoking at delivery by PCT was compared with midwife-collected Smoking at the Time of Delivery (SATOD) data using a Bland-Altman plot.

Results

The expected prevalence of smoking during pregnancy by PCT ranged from 8.1 % (95 % CI 5.6–1.0) to 31.6 % (27.5–34.8). The expected prevalence of smoking at delivery ranged from 2.5 % (1.4–4.0) to 17.1 % (13.7–20.4). Figures for expected smoking prevalence at delivery showed some agreement with SATOD, though SATOD data were generally higher than the synthetic estimates (mean difference 2.99 %).

Conclusions

It is possible to derive good estimates of expected smoking prevalence during pregnancy for small areas, potentially at much lower cost than conducting large surveys. Such data may be useful to help plan and commission smoking cessation services and monitor their effectiveness.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health. Healthy Lives, healthy people: a tobacco control plan for England. London: Department of Health; 2011. Department of Health. Healthy Lives, healthy people: a tobacco control plan for England. London: Department of Health; 2011.
4.
go back to reference Action on Smoking and Health. Smoking cessation in pregnancy: A call to action. London: ASH; 2013. Action on Smoking and Health. Smoking cessation in pregnancy: A call to action. London: ASH; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Health and Social Care Information Centre. Infant Feeding Survey - UK, 2010: Appendix A, Survey methodology. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2012. Health and Social Care Information Centre. Infant Feeding Survey - UK, 2010: Appendix A, Survey methodology. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre; 2012.
8.
go back to reference Twigg L, Moon G, Walker S. The smoking epidemic in England. London: Health Development Agency; 2004. Twigg L, Moon G, Walker S. The smoking epidemic in England. London: Health Development Agency; 2004.
9.
go back to reference Twigg L, Moon G, Jones K. Predicting small-area health-related behaviour: a comparison of smoking and drinking indicators. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(7–8):1109–20.CrossRefPubMed Twigg L, Moon G, Jones K. Predicting small-area health-related behaviour: a comparison of smoking and drinking indicators. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(7–8):1109–20.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Moon G, Quarendon G, Barnard S, Twigg L, Blyth B. Fat nation: Deciphering the distinctive geographies of obesity in England. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(1):20–31.CrossRefPubMed Moon G, Quarendon G, Barnard S, Twigg L, Blyth B. Fat nation: Deciphering the distinctive geographies of obesity in England. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(1):20–31.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Scarborough P, Allender S, Rayner M, Goldacre M. Validation of model-based estimates (synthetic estimates) of the prevalence of risk factors for coronary heart disease for wards in England. Health Place. 2009;15:596–605.CrossRefPubMed Scarborough P, Allender S, Rayner M, Goldacre M. Validation of model-based estimates (synthetic estimates) of the prevalence of risk factors for coronary heart disease for wards in England. Health Place. 2009;15:596–605.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B. MLwiN Version 2.3. University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling. 2014. Rasbash J, Charlton C, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B. MLwiN Version 2.3. University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling. 2014.
16.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX
17.
go back to reference Leckie G, Charlton C. runmlwin - A Program to Run the MLwiN Multilevel Modelling Software from within Stata. J Stat Software. 2013;52(11):1–40. Leckie G, Charlton C. runmlwin - A Program to Run the MLwiN Multilevel Modelling Software from within Stata. J Stat Software. 2013;52(11):1–40.
18.
go back to reference Browne W. MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v2.26. University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling: MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v2.26. University of Bristol. 2012. Browne W. MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v2.26. University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling: MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v2.26. University of Bristol. 2012.
20.
go back to reference Taylor J. Small area synthetic estimation of perceptions of alcohol and drug-related anti-social behaviour: PhD thesis, University of Portsmouth; 2013. Taylor J. Small area synthetic estimation of perceptions of alcohol and drug-related anti-social behaviour: PhD thesis, University of Portsmouth; 2013.
21.
go back to reference Pickering K, Scholes S, Bajekal M. Synthetic estimation of healthy lifestyles indicators: Stage 2 report. London: National Centre for Social Research; 2004. Pickering K, Scholes S, Bajekal M. Synthetic estimation of healthy lifestyles indicators: Stage 2 report. London: National Centre for Social Research; 2004.
23.
go back to reference NHS Blackpool. Strengths and weaknesses of SATOD as a measure of success: The Blackpool experience. NHS Blackpool, Blackpool; 2012. NHS Blackpool. Strengths and weaknesses of SATOD as a measure of success: The Blackpool experience. NHS Blackpool, Blackpool; 2012.
24.
go back to reference Dietz PM, Homa D, England LJ, Burley K, Tong VT, Dube SR, et al. Estimates of nondisclosure of cigarette smoking among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(3):355–9.CrossRefPubMed Dietz PM, Homa D, England LJ, Burley K, Tong VT, Dube SR, et al. Estimates of nondisclosure of cigarette smoking among pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(3):355–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics. Characteristics of Birth 2, England and Wales, 2010. London: Office for National Statistics; 2011. Office for National Statistics. Characteristics of Birth 2, England and Wales, 2010. London: Office for National Statistics; 2011.
26.
go back to reference Royal College of Physicians. Passive smoking and children. A report by the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physician. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2010. Royal College of Physicians. Passive smoking and children. A report by the Tobacco Advisory Group of the Royal College of Physician. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2010.
Metadata
Title
Small area synthetic estimates of smoking prevalence during pregnancy in England
Authors
Lisa Szatkowski
Samantha J. Fahy
Tim Coleman
Joanna Taylor
Liz Twigg
Graham Moon
Jo Leonardi-Bee
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Population Health Metrics / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-7954
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-015-0067-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Population Health Metrics 1/2015 Go to the issue