Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Knowledge mobilisation for chronic disease prevention: the case of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre

Authors: Sonia Wutzke, Samantha Rowbotham, Abby Haynes, Penelope Hawe, Paul Kelly, Sally Redman, Seanna Davidson, Jackie Stephenson, Marge Overs, Andrew Wilson

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Cross-sectoral, multidisciplinary partnership research is considered one of the most effective means of facilitating research-informed policy and practice, particularly for addressing complex problems such as chronic disease. Successful research partnerships tend to be underpinned by a range of features that enable knowledge mobilisation (KMb), seeking to connect academic researchers with decision-makers and practitioners to improve the nature, quality and use of research. This paper contributes to the growing discourse on partnership approaches by illustrating how knowledge mobilisation strategies are operationalised within the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre (the Centre), a national collaboration of academics, policy-makers and practitioners established to develop systems approaches for the prevention of lifestyle-related chronic diseases.

Methods

We undertook interviews with key academics, policy, and practice partners and funding representatives at the mid-point of the Centre’s initial 5-year funding cycle. We aimed to explore how the Centre is functioning in practice, to develop a conceptual model of KMb within the Centre for use in further evaluation, and to identify ways of strengthening our approach to partnership research. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was used to identify the key mechanisms underpinning the Centre’s KMb approach.

Results

Six key mechanisms appeared to facilitate KMb within our Centre, namely Engagement, Partnerships, Co-production, Capacity and Skills, Knowledge Integration, and Adaptive Learning and Improvement. We developed a conceptual model that articulated these mechanisms in relation to the structures and processes that support them, as well as the Centre’s goals. Findings also informed adaptations designed to strengthen the Centre.

Conclusions

Findings provide insights into the practical realities of operationalising KMb strategies within a research partnership. Overall, the centre is perceived to be progressing towards its KMb goals, but challenges include stakeholders from different settings understanding each other’s contexts and working together effectively, and ensuring knowledge generated across different projects within the Centre is integrated into a more comprehensive understanding of chronic disease prevention policy and practice. Our conceptual model is now informing ongoing developmental evaluation activities within the Centre, where it is being tested and refined.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gray JAM. Evidence-based Health Care and Public Health. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009. Gray JAM. Evidence-based Health Care and Public Health. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2009.
2.
go back to reference Redman S, Turner T, Davies H, Williamson A, Haynes A, Brennan S, Milat A, O'Connor D, Blyth F, Jorm L, et al. The SPIRIT Action Framework: a structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. Soc Sci Med. 2015;136-137:147–55.CrossRef Redman S, Turner T, Davies H, Williamson A, Haynes A, Brennan S, Milat A, O'Connor D, Blyth F, Jorm L, et al. The SPIRIT Action Framework: a structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. Soc Sci Med. 2015;136-137:147–55.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637–44.CrossRef Kessler R, Glasgow RE. A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(6):637–44.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25(Supplement 1):i20–4.CrossRef Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25(Supplement 1):i20–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Kreuter MW, Arrington BA, True WR. Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward? Public Health Rep. 2006;121(1):97–103.CrossRef Brownson RC, Kreuter MW, Arrington BA, True WR. Translating scientific discoveries into public health action: how can schools of public health move us forward? Public Health Rep. 2006;121(1):97–103.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
7.
go back to reference Campbell DM, Redman S, Jorm L, Cooke M, Zwi AB, Rychetnik L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Australia New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6:21.CrossRef Campbell DM, Redman S, Jorm L, Cooke M, Zwi AB, Rychetnik L. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Australia New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6:21.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:2.CrossRef Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:2.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Choi BCK, Pang T, Lin V, Puska P, Sherman G, Goddard M, Ackland MJ, Sainsbury P, Stachenko S, Morrison H, et al. Can scientists and policy makers work together? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(8):632.CrossRef Choi BCK, Pang T, Lin V, Puska P, Sherman G, Goddard M, Ackland MJ, Sainsbury P, Stachenko S, Morrison H, et al. Can scientists and policy makers work together? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(8):632.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis JL, Tremblay É. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly. 2010;88(4):444–83.CrossRef Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis JL, Tremblay É. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: a narrative systematic review of the literature. The Milbank Quarterly. 2010;88(4):444–83.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77404.CrossRef Liverani M, Hawkins B, Parkhurst JO. Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77404.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Glob Environ Chang. 2011;21(3):995–1004.CrossRef Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E. Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic. Glob Environ Chang. 2011;21(3):995–1004.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dawes SS, Cresswell AM, Pardo TA. From “need to know” to “need to share”: Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Adm Rev. 2009;69(3):392–402.CrossRef Dawes SS, Cresswell AM, Pardo TA. From “need to know” to “need to share”: Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Adm Rev. 2009;69(3):392–402.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Webster F, Brouwers MC, Baxter NN, Finelli A, Gallinger S. How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation? BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:545.CrossRef Gagliardi AR, Webster F, Brouwers MC, Baxter NN, Finelli A, Gallinger S. How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation? BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:545.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Trochim WM, Marcus SE, Masse LC, Moser RP, Weld PC. The evaluation of large research initiatives: a participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. Am J Eval. 2008;29(1):8–28.CrossRef Trochim WM, Marcus SE, Masse LC, Moser RP, Weld PC. The evaluation of large research initiatives: a participatory integrative mixed-methods approach. Am J Eval. 2008;29(1):8–28.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Edelstein H. Collaborative research partnerships for knowledge mobilisation. Evid Policy. 2016;12:199–216.CrossRef Edelstein H. Collaborative research partnerships for knowledge mobilisation. Evid Policy. 2016;12:199–216.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mosher J, Anucha U, Appiah H, Levesque S. From research to action: four theories and their implications for knowledge mobilization. Scholarly Res Commun. 2014;5(3):0301161.CrossRef Mosher J, Anucha U, Appiah H, Levesque S. From research to action: four theories and their implications for knowledge mobilization. Scholarly Res Commun. 2014;5(3):0301161.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ward V. Why, whose, what and how? A framework for knowledge mobilisers. Evid Policy. 2016;13(3):477–97.CrossRef Ward V. Why, whose, what and how? A framework for knowledge mobilisers. Evid Policy. 2016;13(3):477–97.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HT. Using Evidence: How Research can Inform Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.CrossRef Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HT. Using Evidence: How Research can Inform Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2007.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Allender S, Nichols M, Foulkes C, Reynolds R, Waters E, King L, Gill T, Armstrong R, Swinburn B. The development of a network for community-based obesity prevention: the CO-OPS Collaboration. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):132.CrossRef Allender S, Nichols M, Foulkes C, Reynolds R, Waters E, King L, Gill T, Armstrong R, Swinburn B. The development of a network for community-based obesity prevention: the CO-OPS Collaboration. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):132.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hinchcliff R, Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Is it worth engaging in multi-stakeholder health services research collaborations? Reflections on key benefits, challenges and enabling mechanisms. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(2):124–8.CrossRef Hinchcliff R, Greenfield D, Braithwaite J. Is it worth engaging in multi-stakeholder health services research collaborations? Reflections on key benefits, challenges and enabling mechanisms. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(2):124–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Phipps D, Shapson S. Knowledge mobilisation builds local research collaborations for social innovation. Evid Policy. 2009;5(3):211–27.CrossRef Phipps D, Shapson S. Knowledge mobilisation builds local research collaborations for social innovation. Evid Policy. 2009;5(3):211–27.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Heaton J, Day J, Britten N. Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study. Implement Sci. 2016;11:20.CrossRef Heaton J, Day J, Britten N. Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: an illustrative case study. Implement Sci. 2016;11:20.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J, Burton RC, Wilkinson J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Baker R, Dopson S, Graham ID, Staniszewska S, Thompson C, et al. Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016;11:17.CrossRef Rycroft-Malone J, Burton RC, Wilkinson J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Baker R, Dopson S, Graham ID, Staniszewska S, Thompson C, et al. Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016;11:17.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Best A, Holmes B. Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods. Evid Policy. 2010;6(2):145–59.CrossRef Best A, Holmes B. Systems thinking, knowledge and action: towards better models and methods. Evid Policy. 2010;6(2):145–59.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S. Collaboration & Team Science: A Field Guide. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2010. Bennett LM, Gadlin H, Levine-Finley S. Collaboration & Team Science: A Field Guide. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2010.
29.
go back to reference Wilson A, Wutzke S, Overs M. The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre: systems thinking to prevent lifestyle-related chronic illness. Public Health Res Pract. 2014;25(1) pii: e2511401. Wilson A, Wutzke S, Overs M. The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre: systems thinking to prevent lifestyle-related chronic illness. Public Health Res Pract. 2014;25(1) pii: e2511401.
30.
go back to reference National Health and Medical Research Council. Partnership Centres for Better Health - frequently asked questions. Canberra: Australian Government; 2016. National Health and Medical Research Council. Partnership Centres for Better Health - frequently asked questions. Canberra: Australian Government; 2016.
31.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: WHO; 2013. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
32.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2011. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
33.
go back to reference Rycroft-Malone J. Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016;11:17.CrossRef Rycroft-Malone J. Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016;11:17.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Wutzke S, Redman S, Bauman A, Hawe P, Shiell A, Thackway S, Wilson A. A new model of collaborative research: experiences from one of Australia's NHMRC Partnership Centres for Better Health. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(1) pii: 2711706. Wutzke S, Redman S, Bauman A, Hawe P, Shiell A, Thackway S, Wilson A. A new model of collaborative research: experiences from one of Australia's NHMRC Partnership Centres for Better Health. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(1) pii: 2711706.
35.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. Patton MQ. Developmental Evaluation: Applying Complexity Concepts to Enhance Innovation and Use. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
36.
go back to reference Hummelbrunner R. Systems thinking and evaluation. Evaluation. 2011;17(4):395–403.CrossRef Hummelbrunner R. Systems thinking and evaluation. Evaluation. 2011;17(4):395–403.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference van den Hoonaard WC. Sensitizing concepts. In: Given LM, editor. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008. p. 812–4. van den Hoonaard WC. Sensitizing concepts. In: Given LM, editor. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008. p. 812–4.
38.
go back to reference Hanney SR, Grant J, Wooding S, Buxton MJ. Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's ‘Arthritis Research Campaign. Health Res Policy Syst. 2004;2:4.CrossRef Hanney SR, Grant J, Wooding S, Buxton MJ. Proposed methods for reviewing the outcomes of health research: the impact of funding by the UK's ‘Arthritis Research Campaign. Health Res Policy Syst. 2004;2:4.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2014 REF: Assessment Framework and Guidance on Submissions. Panel A Criteria. REF (01/2012). London: Higher Education Funding Council for England; 2012. Higher Education Funding Council for England. 2014 REF: Assessment Framework and Guidance on Submissions. Panel A Criteria. REF (01/2012). London: Higher Education Funding Council for England; 2012.
40.
go back to reference Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Making an Impact: A Preferred Framework and Indicators to Measure Returns on Investment in Health Research. Ottawa: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences; 2009. Canadian Academy of Health Sciences. Making an Impact: A Preferred Framework and Indicators to Measure Returns on Investment in Health Research. Ottawa: Canadian Academy of Health Sciences; 2009.
41.
go back to reference Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, Walt G. Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:134.CrossRef Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasant A, Walt G. Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:134.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Br Med J. 2000;320(7227):114–6.CrossRef Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Br Med J. 2000;320(7227):114–6.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Graham ID, Tetroe JM. Getting evidence into policy and practice: perspective of a health research funder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18(1):46–50.PubMedPubMedCentral Graham ID, Tetroe JM. Getting evidence into policy and practice: perspective of a health research funder. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18(1):46–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Boyle D, Coote A, Sherwood C, Slay J. Right Here, Right Now: Taking Co-production into the Mainstream. London: Nesta; 2010. Boyle D, Coote A, Sherwood C, Slay J. Right Here, Right Now: Taking Co-production into the Mainstream. London: Nesta; 2010. 
47.
go back to reference Palumbo R. Contextualizing co-production of health care: a systematic literature review. Int J Public Sector Manage. 2016;29:72–90.CrossRef Palumbo R. Contextualizing co-production of health care: a systematic literature review. Int J Public Sector Manage. 2016;29:72–90.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Fawcett SB, Lewis RK, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Richter KP, Williams EL, Copple B. Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: the case of Project Freedom. Health Ed Behav. 1997;24(6):812–28.CrossRef Fawcett SB, Lewis RK, Paine-Andrews A, Francisco VT, Richter KP, Williams EL, Copple B. Evaluating community coalitions for prevention of substance abuse: the case of Project Freedom. Health Ed Behav. 1997;24(6):812–28.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Lakhani J, Benzies K, Hayden KA. Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: a comprehensive review of the literature. Clin Invest Med. 2012;35(5):E226.CrossRef Lakhani J, Benzies K, Hayden KA. Attributes of interdisciplinary research teams: a comprehensive review of the literature. Clin Invest Med. 2012;35(5):E226.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Green L. From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations. Am J Health Behav. 2001;25(3):165–78.CrossRef Green L. From research to “best practices” in other settings and populations. Am J Health Behav. 2001;25(3):165–78.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Gamble J. A Developmental Evaluation Primer. Montreal: The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation; 2008. Gamble J. A Developmental Evaluation Primer. Montreal: The J.W. McConnell Family Foundation; 2008.
52.
go back to reference Riley BL, Robinson KL, Gamble J, Finegood DT, Sheppard D, Penney TL, Best A. Knowledge to action for solving complex problems: insights from a review of nine international cases. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2015;35(3):47–53.CrossRef Riley BL, Robinson KL, Gamble J, Finegood DT, Sheppard D, Penney TL, Best A. Knowledge to action for solving complex problems: insights from a review of nine international cases. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2015;35(3):47–53.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Manzano A. The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation. 2016;22(3):342–60.CrossRef Manzano A. The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation. 2016;22(3):342–60.CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Langer L, Tripney J, Gough D. The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making. London: EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London; 2016. Langer L, Tripney J, Gough D. The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making. London: EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London; 2016.
55.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T. Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Mays N. Co-production of Research for Policy: When Should we Attempt It? Sydney: 1st Sax Institute Knowledge Mobilisation Conference; 2018. Mays N. Co-production of Research for Policy: When Should we Attempt It? Sydney: 1st Sax Institute Knowledge Mobilisation Conference; 2018.
57.
go back to reference Holmes BJ, Best A, Davies H, Hunter D, Kelly MP, Marshall M, Rycroft-Malone J. Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action. Evid Policy. 2017;13(3):539–60.CrossRef Holmes BJ, Best A, Davies H, Hunter D, Kelly MP, Marshall M, Rycroft-Malone J. Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: a call to action. Evid Policy. 2017;13(3):539–60.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Maxwell JA. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012. Maxwell JA. A Realist Approach for Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2012.
59.
go back to reference QSR International Pty Ltd: NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 10. 2012. QSR International Pty Ltd: NVivo qualitative data analysis software. Version 10. 2012.
Metadata
Title
Knowledge mobilisation for chronic disease prevention: the case of the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre
Authors
Sonia Wutzke
Samantha Rowbotham
Abby Haynes
Penelope Hawe
Paul Kelly
Sally Redman
Seanna Davidson
Jackie Stephenson
Marge Overs
Andrew Wilson
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0379-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue