Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Commentary

Development of the Good Health Research Practice course: ensuring quality across all health research in humans

Authors: Patricia Henley, Varalakshmi Elango, Olaf Horstick, Riris Andono Ahmad, Christine Maure, Pascal Launois, Corinne Merle, Jamila Nabieva, Yodi Mahendradhata

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Quality and ethics need to be embedded into all areas of research with human participants. Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines are international ethical and scientific quality standards for designing, conducting, recording and reporting trials involving human participants. Compliance with GCP is expected to provide public assurance that the rights, safety and wellbeing of participants are protected and that the clinical research data are credible. However, whilst GCP guidelines, particularly their principles, are recommended across all research types, it is difficult for non-clinical trial research to fit in with the exacting requirements of GCP. There is therefore a need for guidance that allows health researchers to adhere to the principles of GCP, which will improve the quality and ethical conduct of all research involving human participants. These concerns have led to the development of the Good Health Research Practice (GHRP) course. Its goal is to ensure that research is conducted to the highest possible standards, similar to the conduct of trials to GCP. The GHRP course provides training and guidance to ensure quality and ethical conduct across all health-related research. The GHRP course has been run so far on eight occasions. Feedback from delegates has been overwhelmingly positive, with most delegates stating that the course was useful in developing their research protocols and documents. Whilst most training in research starts with a guideline, GHRP has started with a course and the experience gained over running the courses will be used to write a standardised guideline for the conduct of health-related research outside the realm of clinical trials, so that researchers, funders and ethics committees do not try to fit non-trials into clinical trials standards.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ravinetto RM, Talisuna A, De Crop M, van Loen H, Menten J, Van Overmeir C, et al. Challenges of non-commercial multicentre North–South collaborative clinical trials. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(2):237–41. doi:10.1111/tmi.12036.CrossRefPubMed Ravinetto RM, Talisuna A, De Crop M, van Loen H, Menten J, Van Overmeir C, et al. Challenges of non-commercial multicentre North–South collaborative clinical trials. Trop Med Int Health. 2013;18(2):237–41. doi:10.​1111/​tmi.​12036.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Whitworth JAG, Kokwaro G, Kinyanjui S, Snewin VA, Tanner M, Walport M, et al. Strengthening capacity for health research in Africa. Lancet. 2008;372:1590–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Whitworth JAG, Kokwaro G, Kinyanjui S, Snewin VA, Tanner M, Walport M, et al. Strengthening capacity for health research in Africa. Lancet. 2008;372:1590–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Franzen SR, Chandler C, Enquselassie F, Siribaddana S, Atashili J, Angus B, et al. Understanding the investigators: a qualitative study investigating the barriers and enablers to the implementation of local investigator-initiated clinical trials in Ethiopia. BMJ Open. 2013;3(11):e003616. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003616.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Franzen SR, Chandler C, Enquselassie F, Siribaddana S, Atashili J, Angus B, et al. Understanding the investigators: a qualitative study investigating the barriers and enablers to the implementation of local investigator-initiated clinical trials in Ethiopia. BMJ Open. 2013;3(11):e003616. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2013-003616.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: WHO; 2002. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
6.
go back to reference Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies (Updated Edition). Geneva: WHO; 2009. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Studies (Updated Edition). Geneva: WHO; 2009.
7.
go back to reference WHO. Guidelines for good clinical practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products. Geneva: WHO; 1995. WHO. Guidelines for good clinical practice (GCP) for trials on pharmaceutical products. Geneva: WHO; 1995.
8.
go back to reference International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6. Rockville: ICH; 1996. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6. Rockville: ICH; 1996.
9.
go back to reference Mahendradhata Y, Nabieva J, Ahmad RA, Henley P, Launois P, Merle C, et al. Promoting good health research practices in low- and middle-income countries. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:32474.CrossRef Mahendradhata Y, Nabieva J, Ahmad RA, Henley P, Launois P, Merle C, et al. Promoting good health research practices in low- and middle-income countries. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:32474.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of the Good Health Research Practice course: ensuring quality across all health research in humans
Authors
Patricia Henley
Varalakshmi Elango
Olaf Horstick
Riris Andono Ahmad
Christine Maure
Pascal Launois
Corinne Merle
Jamila Nabieva
Yodi Mahendradhata
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0193-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Go to the issue