Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Commentary

Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research

Authors: Suzanne Day, Robin Mason, Stephanie Lagosky, Paula A. Rochon

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Both sex (biological factors) and gender (socio-cultural factors) shape health. To produce the best possible health research evidence, it is essential to integrate sex and gender considerations throughout the research process. Despite growing recognition of the importance of these factors, progress towards sex and gender integration as standard practice has been both slow and uneven in health research. In this commentary, we examine the challenges of integrating sex and gender from the research perspective, as well as strategies that can be used by researchers, funders and journal editors to address these challenges. Barriers to the integration of sex and gender in health research include problems with inconsistent terminology, difficulties in applying the concepts of sex and gender, failure to recognise the impact of sex and gender, and challenges with data collection and datasets. We analyse these barriers as strategic points of intervention for improving the integration of sex and gender at all stages of the research process. To assess the relative success of these strategies in any given study, researchers, funders and journal editors would benefit from a tool to evaluate the quality of sex and gender integration in order to establish benchmarks in research excellence. These assessment tools are needed now amidst growing institutional recognition that both sex and gender are necessary elements for advancing the quality and utility of health research evidence.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Coen S, Banister E. What a difference sex and gender make: a gender, sex and health research casebook. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2012. Coen S, Banister E. What a difference sex and gender make: a gender, sex and health research casebook. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2012.
4.
go back to reference Greaves L. Why put gender and sex into health research? In: Oliffe JL, Greaves L, editors. Designing and Conducting Gender, Sex and Health Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2011. p. 3–14. Greaves L. Why put gender and sex into health research? In: Oliffe JL, Greaves L, editors. Designing and Conducting Gender, Sex and Health Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2011. p. 3–14.
8.
go back to reference Ovseiko PV, Greenhalgh T, Adam P, Grant J, Hinrichs-Krapels S, Graham KE, Valentine PA, Sued O, Boukhris OF, Al Olaqi NM, Al Rahbi IS, Dowd AM, Bice S, Heiden TL, Fischer MD, Dopson S, Norton R, Pollitt A, Wooding S, Balling GV, Jakobsen U, Kuhlmann E, Klinge I, Pololi LH, Jagsi R, Smith HL, Etzkowitz H, Neilsen MW, Carrion C, Solans-Domènech M, Vizcaino E, Naing L, Cheok QHN, Eckelmann B, Simuyemba MC, Msiska T, Declich G, Edmunds LD, Kiparoglou V, Buchan AMJ, Williamson C, Lord GM, Channon KM, Surender R, Buchan AM. A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ovseiko PV, Greenhalgh T, Adam P, Grant J, Hinrichs-Krapels S, Graham KE, Valentine PA, Sued O, Boukhris OF, Al Olaqi NM, Al Rahbi IS, Dowd AM, Bice S, Heiden TL, Fischer MD, Dopson S, Norton R, Pollitt A, Wooding S, Balling GV, Jakobsen U, Kuhlmann E, Klinge I, Pololi LH, Jagsi R, Smith HL, Etzkowitz H, Neilsen MW, Carrion C, Solans-Domènech M, Vizcaino E, Naing L, Cheok QHN, Eckelmann B, Simuyemba MC, Msiska T, Declich G, Edmunds LD, Kiparoglou V, Buchan AMJ, Williamson C, Lord GM, Channon KM, Surender R, Buchan AM. A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Johnson J, Sharman Z, Vissandjeé B, Stewart DE. Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact? PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnson J, Sharman Z, Vissandjeé B, Stewart DE. Does a change in health research funding policy related to the integration of sex and gender have an impact? PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Johnson J, Beaudet A. Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader. Can J Public Health. 2013;104(1):e80–1. Johnson J, Beaudet A. Sex and gender reporting in health research: why Canada should be a leader. Can J Public Health. 2013;104(1):e80–1.
11.
go back to reference Mazure CM, Jones DP. Twenty years and still counting: including women as participants and studying sex and gender in biomedical research. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mazure CM, Jones DP. Twenty years and still counting: including women as participants and studying sex and gender in biomedical research. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Nieuwenhoven L, Klinge I. Scientific excellence in applying sex- and gender-sensitive methods in biomedical and health research. J Women’s Health. 2010;19(2):313–21.CrossRef Nieuwenhoven L, Klinge I. Scientific excellence in applying sex- and gender-sensitive methods in biomedical and health research. J Women’s Health. 2010;19(2):313–21.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nowatzki N, Grant KR. Sex is not enough: the need for gender-based analysis in health research. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32(4):263–77.CrossRefPubMed Nowatzki N, Grant KR. Sex is not enough: the need for gender-based analysis in health research. Health Care Women Int. 2011;32(4):263–77.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Oertelt-Prigione S. Sex and gender in medical literature. In: Oertelt-Prigione S, Regitz-Zagrosek V, editors. Sex and Gender Aspects in Clinical Medicine. London: Springer; 2012. p. 9–15.CrossRef Oertelt-Prigione S. Sex and gender in medical literature. In: Oertelt-Prigione S, Regitz-Zagrosek V, editors. Sex and Gender Aspects in Clinical Medicine. London: Springer; 2012. p. 9–15.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ritz SA, Antle DM, Côté J, Deroy K, Fraleigh N, Messing K, Parent L, St-Pierre J, Vaillancourt C, Mergler D. First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. FASEB J. 2014;28(1):4–13.CrossRefPubMed Ritz SA, Antle DM, Côté J, Deroy K, Fraleigh N, Messing K, Parent L, St-Pierre J, Vaillancourt C, Mergler D. First steps for integrating sex and gender considerations into basic experimental biomedical research. FASEB J. 2014;28(1):4–13.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sharman Z, Johnson J. Towards the inclusion of gender and sex in health research and funding: an institutional perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1812–6.CrossRefPubMed Sharman Z, Johnson J. Towards the inclusion of gender and sex in health research and funding: an institutional perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1812–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schiebinger L, Stefanick ML. Gender matters in biological research and medical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(2):136–8.CrossRefPubMed Schiebinger L, Stefanick ML. Gender matters in biological research and medical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(2):136–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Greyson DL, Becu AR, Morgan SG. Sex, drugs and gender roles: mapping the use of sex and gender based analysis in pharmaceutical policy research. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greyson DL, Becu AR, Morgan SG. Sex, drugs and gender roles: mapping the use of sex and gender based analysis in pharmaceutical policy research. Int J Equity Health. 2010;9:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Gahagan J, Gray K, Whynacht A. Sex and gender matter in health research: addressing health inequities in health research reporting. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gahagan J, Gray K, Whynacht A. Sex and gender matter in health research: addressing health inequities in health research reporting. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14:12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Oertelt-Prigione S, Parol R, Krohn S, Preißner R, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Analysis of sex and gender-specific research reveals a common increase in publications and marked differences between disciplines. BMC Med. 2010;8:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oertelt-Prigione S, Parol R, Krohn S, Preißner R, Regitz-Zagrosek V. Analysis of sex and gender-specific research reveals a common increase in publications and marked differences between disciplines. BMC Med. 2010;8:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Philips SP, Hamberg K. Doubly blind: a systematic review of gender in randomised controlled trials. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:29597.CrossRef Philips SP, Hamberg K. Doubly blind: a systematic review of gender in randomised controlled trials. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:29597.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference King BM. Point: a call for proper usage of “gender” and “sex” in biomedical publications. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298(6):R1700–1.CrossRefPubMed King BM. Point: a call for proper usage of “gender” and “sex” in biomedical publications. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2010;298(6):R1700–1.CrossRefPubMed
23.
25.
go back to reference Fausto-Sterling A. The bare bones of sex: part 1 – sex and gender. Signs. 2005;30(2):1491–527.CrossRef Fausto-Sterling A. The bare bones of sex: part 1 – sex and gender. Signs. 2005;30(2):1491–527.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in cardiovascular disease. In: Oertelt-Prigione S, Regitz-Zagrosek V, editors. Sex and gender aspects in clinical medicine. London: Springer; 2012. p. 17–44.CrossRef Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and gender differences in cardiovascular disease. In: Oertelt-Prigione S, Regitz-Zagrosek V, editors. Sex and gender aspects in clinical medicine. London: Springer; 2012. p. 17–44.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Christianson M, Alex L, Wiklund AF, Hammarström A, Lundman B. Sex and gender traps and springboards: a focus group study among gender researchers in medicine and health sciences. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(8):739–55.CrossRefPubMed Christianson M, Alex L, Wiklund AF, Hammarström A, Lundman B. Sex and gender traps and springboards: a focus group study among gender researchers in medicine and health sciences. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(8):739–55.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Schiebinger L, Klinge I. Gendered innovation in health and medicine. Gender. 2015;7(2):29–50.CrossRef Schiebinger L, Klinge I. Gendered innovation in health and medicine. Gender. 2015;7(2):29–50.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Springer KW, Stellman JM, Jordan-Young RM. Beyond a catalogue of differences: a theoretical frame and good practice guidelines for researching sex/gender in human health. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1817–24.CrossRefPubMed Springer KW, Stellman JM, Jordan-Young RM. Beyond a catalogue of differences: a theoretical frame and good practice guidelines for researching sex/gender in human health. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1817–24.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Messing K, Stellman JM. Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: the importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res. 2006;101(2):149–62.CrossRefPubMed Messing K, Stellman JM. Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: the importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res. 2006;101(2):149–62.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1712–20.CrossRefPubMed Hankivsky O. Women’s health, men’s health, and gender and health: implications of intersectionality. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(11):1712–20.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Hammarström A, Johansson K, Annandale E, Ahlgren C, Aléx L, Christianson M, Elwér S, Eriksson C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Gilenstam K, Gustafsson PE, Harryson L, Lehti A, Stenberg G, Verdonk P. Central gender theoretical concepts in health research: the state of the art. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(2):185–90.CrossRefPubMed Hammarström A, Johansson K, Annandale E, Ahlgren C, Aléx L, Christianson M, Elwér S, Eriksson C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, Gilenstam K, Gustafsson PE, Harryson L, Lehti A, Stenberg G, Verdonk P. Central gender theoretical concepts in health research: the state of the art. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(2):185–90.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sims ST, Stefanick ML, Kronenberg F, Sachedina NA, Schiebinger L. Gendered innovations: a new approach for nursing science. Biol Res Nurs. 2010;12(2):156–61.CrossRefPubMed Sims ST, Stefanick ML, Kronenberg F, Sachedina NA, Schiebinger L. Gendered innovations: a new approach for nursing science. Biol Res Nurs. 2010;12(2):156–61.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Holdcroft A, Snidvongs S, Berkley KJ. Incorporating gender and sex dimensions in medical research. Interdiscipl Sci Rev. 2011;36(2):180–92.CrossRef Holdcroft A, Snidvongs S, Berkley KJ. Incorporating gender and sex dimensions in medical research. Interdiscipl Sci Rev. 2011;36(2):180–92.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Miller VM, Walter AR, Faubion SS. Sex differences research, precision medicine, and the future of women’s health. J Women's Health. 2015;24(12):969–71.CrossRef Miller VM, Walter AR, Faubion SS. Sex differences research, precision medicine, and the future of women’s health. J Women's Health. 2015;24(12):969–71.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Johnson J, Greaves L, Repta R. Better science with sex and gender: facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health research. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Johnson J, Greaves L, Repta R. Better science with sex and gender: facilitating the use of a sex and gender-based analysis in health research. Int J Equity Health. 2009;8:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Doull M, Welch V, Puil L, Runnels V, Coen SE, Shea B, O’Neill J, Borkoff C, Tudiver S, Boscoe M. Development and evaluation of ‘briefing notes’ as a novel knowledge translation tool to aid the implementation of sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e110786.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Doull M, Welch V, Puil L, Runnels V, Coen SE, Shea B, O’Neill J, Borkoff C, Tudiver S, Boscoe M. Development and evaluation of ‘briefing notes’ as a novel knowledge translation tool to aid the implementation of sex/gender analysis in systematic reviews: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e110786.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference McGregor AJ, Madsen TE, Clyne B. Foundations for a novel emergency medicine subspecialty: sex, gender, and women's health. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(12):1469–77.CrossRefPubMed McGregor AJ, Madsen TE, Clyne B. Foundations for a novel emergency medicine subspecialty: sex, gender, and women's health. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(12):1469–77.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Tomás C, Yago T, Eguiluz M, Samitier ML, Oliveros T, Palacios G. A tool to assess sex-gender when selecting health research projects. Aten Primaria. 2015;47(4):220–7.CrossRefPubMed Tomás C, Yago T, Eguiluz M, Samitier ML, Oliveros T, Palacios G. A tool to assess sex-gender when selecting health research projects. Aten Primaria. 2015;47(4):220–7.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Blackless M, Charuvastra A, Derryck A, Fausto-Sterling A, Lauzanne K, Lee E. How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. Am J Hum Biol. 2000;12(2):151–66.CrossRefPubMed Blackless M, Charuvastra A, Derryck A, Fausto-Sterling A, Lauzanne K, Lee E. How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. Am J Hum Biol. 2000;12(2):151–66.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Fausto-Sterling A. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books; 2000. Fausto-Sterling A. Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books; 2000.
47.
go back to reference Bauer GR, Hammond R, Travers R, Kaay M, Hohenadel KM, Boyce M. “I don’t think this is theoretical; this is our lives”: how erasure impacts health care for transgender people. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20(5):348–61.CrossRefPubMed Bauer GR, Hammond R, Travers R, Kaay M, Hohenadel KM, Boyce M. “I don’t think this is theoretical; this is our lives”: how erasure impacts health care for transgender people. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2009;20(5):348–61.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Integrating and evaluating sex and gender in health research
Authors
Suzanne Day
Robin Mason
Stephanie Lagosky
Paula A. Rochon
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0147-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue