Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Review

Evidence for Health I: Producing evidence for improving health and reducing inequities

Authors: Anne Andermann, Tikki Pang, John N Newton, Adrian Davis, Ulysses Panisset

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

In an ideal world, researchers and decision-makers would be involved from the outset in co-producing evidence, with local health needs assessments informing the research agenda and research evidence informing the actions taken to improve health. The first step in improving the health of individuals and populations is therefore gaining a better understanding of what the main health problems are, and of these, which are the most urgent priorities by using both quantitative data to develop a health portrait and qualitative data to better understand why the local population thinks that addressing certain health challenges should be prioritized in their context. Understanding the causes of these health problems often involves analytical research, such as case-control and cohort studies, or qualitative studies to better understand how more complex exposures lead to specific health problems (e.g. by interviewing local teenagers discovering that watching teachers smoke in the school yard, peer pressure, and media influence smoking initiation among youth). Such research helps to develop a logic model to better map out the proximal and distal causes of poor health and to determine potential pathways for intervening and impacting health outcomes. Rarely is there a single ‘cure’ or stand-alone intervention, but rather, a continuum of strategies are needed from diagnosis and treatment of patients already affected, to disease prevention, health promotion and addressing the upstream social determinants of health. Research for developing and testing more upstream interventions must often go beyond randomized controlled trials, which are expensive, less amenable to more complex interventions, and can be associated with certain ethical challenges. Indeed, a much neglected area of the research cycle is implementation and evaluation research, which often involves quasi-experimental research study designs as well as qualitative research, to better understand how to derive the greatest benefit from existing interventions and ways of maximizing health improvements in specific local contexts. There is therefore a need to alter current incentive structures within the research enterprise to place greater emphasis on implementation and evaluation research conducted in collaboration with knowledge users who are in a position to use the findings in practice to improve health.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andermann A. Evidence for health: from patient choice to global policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Andermann A. Evidence for health: from patient choice to global policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
3.
go back to reference Gielen AC, Green LW. The impact of policy, environmental, and educational interventions: a synthesis of the evidence from two public health success stories. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(1 Suppl):20S–34.CrossRefPubMed Gielen AC, Green LW. The impact of policy, environmental, and educational interventions: a synthesis of the evidence from two public health success stories. Health Educ Behav. 2015;42(1 Suppl):20S–34.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Liu S, Wang W, Zhang J, He Y, Yao C, Zeng Z, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Chinese adults, China National Nutrition and Health Survey, 2002. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(1):A13.PubMed Liu S, Wang W, Zhang J, He Y, Yao C, Zeng Z, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in Chinese adults, China National Nutrition and Health Survey, 2002. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(1):A13.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Program Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2005.
6.
go back to reference Theodorou M, Samara K, Pavlakis A, Middleton N, Polyzos N, Maniadakis N. The public’s and doctors’ perceived role in participation in setting health care priorities in Greece. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010;51(3):200–8.PubMed Theodorou M, Samara K, Pavlakis A, Middleton N, Polyzos N, Maniadakis N. The public’s and doctors’ perceived role in participation in setting health care priorities in Greece. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2010;51(3):200–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Gruskin S, Daniels N. Process is the point: justice and human rights: priority setting and fair deliberative process. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(9):1573–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gruskin S, Daniels N. Process is the point: justice and human rights: priority setting and fair deliberative process. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(9):1573–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Smith AM, Adams R, Bushell F. Qualitative health needs assessment of a former mining community. Community Pract. 2010;83(2):27–30.PubMed Smith AM, Adams R, Bushell F. Qualitative health needs assessment of a former mining community. Community Pract. 2010;83(2):27–30.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004;328:1519–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004;328:1519–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Towns S, DiFranza JR, Jayasuriya G, Marshall T, Shah S. Smoking cessation in adolescents: targeted approaches that work. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015. Ahead of print. Towns S, DiFranza JR, Jayasuriya G, Marshall T, Shah S. Smoking cessation in adolescents: targeted approaches that work. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2015. Ahead of print.
12.
go back to reference Dhala A, Pinsker K, Prezant DJ. Respiratory health consequences of environmental tobacco smoke. Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(1):139–56.PubMed Dhala A, Pinsker K, Prezant DJ. Respiratory health consequences of environmental tobacco smoke. Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(1):139–56.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hopkins DP, Briss PA, Ricard CJ, Husten CG, Carande-Kulis VG, Fielding JE, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(2 Suppl):16–66.CrossRefPubMed Hopkins DP, Briss PA, Ricard CJ, Husten CG, Carande-Kulis VG, Fielding JE, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001;20(2 Suppl):16–66.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. on behalf of the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 1993;270(21):2598–601.CrossRefPubMed Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. on behalf of the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA. 1993;270(21):2598–601.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hargreaves JR, Copas AJ, Beard E, Osrin D, Lewis JJ, Davey C, et al. Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial. Trials. 2015;16:350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hargreaves JR, Copas AJ, Beard E, Osrin D, Lewis JJ, Davey C, et al. Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial. Trials. 2015;16:350.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Leroy JL, Habicht JP, Pelto G, Bertozzi SM. Current priorities in health research funding and lack of impact on the number of child deaths per year. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(2):219–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leroy JL, Habicht JP, Pelto G, Bertozzi SM. Current priorities in health research funding and lack of impact on the number of child deaths per year. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(2):219–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Madon T, Hofman KJ, Kupfer L, Glass RI. Public health. Implementation science. Science. 2007;318(5857):1728–9.CrossRefPubMed Madon T, Hofman KJ, Kupfer L, Glass RI. Public health. Implementation science. Science. 2007;318(5857):1728–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Blalock A. Evaluation research and the performance management movement: from estrangement to useful integration? Evaluation. 1999;5(2):117–49.CrossRef Blalock A. Evaluation research and the performance management movement: from estrangement to useful integration? Evaluation. 1999;5(2):117–49.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Parry D, Salsberg J, Macaulay A. A guide to researcher and knowledge-user collaboration in health research [online course]. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2009. Parry D, Salsberg J, Macaulay A. A guide to researcher and knowledge-user collaboration in health research [online course]. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2009.
28.
go back to reference Pratt B, Loff B. Health research systems: promoting health equity or economic competitiveness? Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:55–62.CrossRefPubMed Pratt B, Loff B. Health research systems: promoting health equity or economic competitiveness? Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:55–62.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Evans P, Meslin E, Marteau T, Caufield T. Deflating the genomic bubble. Science. 2011;331(6019):861–2.CrossRefPubMed Evans P, Meslin E, Marteau T, Caufield T. Deflating the genomic bubble. Science. 2011;331(6019):861–2.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evidence for Health I: Producing evidence for improving health and reducing inequities
Authors
Anne Andermann
Tikki Pang
John N Newton
Adrian Davis
Ulysses Panisset
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0087-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue