Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Review

A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework

Authors: Joanna C Moullin, Daniel Sabater-Hernández, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Shalom I Benrimoj

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Implementation science and knowledge translation have developed across multiple disciplines with the common aim of bringing innovations to practice. Numerous implementation frameworks, models, and theories have been developed to target a diverse array of innovations. As such, it is plausible that not all frameworks include the full range of concepts now thought to be involved in implementation. Users face the decision of selecting a single or combining multiple implementation frameworks. To aid this decision, the aim of this review was to assess the comprehensiveness of existing frameworks.

Methods

A systematic search was undertaken in PubMed to identify implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare published from 2004 to May 2013. Additionally, titles and abstracts from Implementation Science journal and references from identified papers were reviewed. The orientation, type, and presence of stages and domains, along with the degree of inclusion and depth of analysis of factors, strategies, and evaluations of implementation of included frameworks were analysed.

Results

Frameworks were assessed individually and grouped according to their targeted innovation. Frameworks for particular innovations had similar settings, end-users, and ‘type’ (descriptive, prescriptive, explanatory, or predictive). On the whole, frameworks were descriptive and explanatory more often than prescriptive and predictive. A small number of the reviewed frameworks covered an implementation concept(s) in detail, however, overall, there was limited degree and depth of analysis of implementation concepts. The core implementation concepts across the frameworks were collated to form a Generic Implementation Framework, which includes the process of implementation (often portrayed as a series of stages and/or steps), the innovation to be implemented, the context in which the implementation is to occur (divided into a range of domains), and influencing factors, strategies, and evaluations.

Conclusions

The selection of implementation framework(s) should be based not solely on the healthcare innovation to be implemented, but include other aspects of the framework’s orientation, e.g., the setting and end-user, as well as the degree of inclusion and depth of analysis of the implementation concepts. The resulting generic structure provides researchers, policy-makers, health administrators, and practitioners a base that can be used as guidance for their implementation efforts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Brownson R, Colditz G, Proctor E. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: translating science to practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.CrossRef
3.
4.
5.
Lomas J. Improving research dissemination and uptake in the health sector: beyond the sound of one hand clapping. Ontario: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Hamilton; 1997.
6.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
7.
Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? Milbank Q. 2003;81:221–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The Challenge of Innovation Implementation. Acad Manage Rev. 1996;21:1055–80.
9.
Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, Friedman RM, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.
10.
Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:26–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Lomas J. Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;703:226–37.CrossRef
12.
Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Rabin BA, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Kreuter MW, Weaver NL. A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14:117–23.CrossRefPubMed
15.
May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43:535–54.CrossRef
16.
Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82:581–629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Flottorp S, Oxman A, Krause J, Musila N, Wensing M, Godycki-Cwirko M, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;3:CD005470.PubMed
20.
Davies P, Walker AE, Grimshaw JM. A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implement Sci. 2010;5:14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Scott S, Albrecht L, O’Leary K, Ball G, Hartling L, Hofmeyer A, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Ward V, House A, Hamer S. Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: a thematic analysis of the literature. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2009;14:156–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Wilson PM, Petticrew M, Calnan MW, Nazareth I. Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks. Implement Sci. 2010;5:91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Wiltsey Stirman S, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
26.
Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:337–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Farley K, Thompson C, Hanbury A, Chambers D. Exploring the feasibility of conjoint analysis as a tool for prioritizing innovations for implementation. Implement Sci. 2013;8:56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Flaspohler PD, Anderson-Butcher D, Wandersman A. Supporting implementation of expanded school mental health services: application of the interactive systems framework in Ohio. Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2008;1:38–48.CrossRef
29.
Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Community Psychol. 2012;50:462–80.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T. Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice: linking evidence to action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
32.
Rubenstein-Montano B, Liebowitz J, Buchwalter J, McCaw D, Newman B, Rebeck K. A systems thinking framework for knowledge management. Decis Support Syst. 2001;31:5–16.CrossRef
33.
Aarons G, Hurlburt M, Horwitz S. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:4–23.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Fixsen DL, Blase KA, Naoom SF, Wallace F. Core implementation components. Res Soc Work Pract. 2009;19:531–40.CrossRef
35.
36.
Rycroft-Malone J, Seers K, Chandler J, Hawkes C, Crichton N, Allen C, et al. The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework. Implement Sci. 2013;8:28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Mendel P, Meredith LS, Schoenbaum M, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Interventions in organizational and community context: a framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2008;35:21–37.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41:327–50.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Johnson K, Hays C, Center H, Daley C. Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: a sustainability planning model. Eval Program Plann. 2004;27:135–49.CrossRef
41.
42.
Schell S, Luke D, Schooley M, Elliott M, Herbers S, Mueller N, et al. Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework. Implement Sci. 2013;8:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Wandersman A, Duffy J, Flaspohler P, Noonan R, Lubell K, Stillman L, et al. Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41:171–81.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Racine DP. Reliable effectiveness: a theory on sustaining and replicating worthwhile innovations. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006;33:356–87.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Ballard N. Factors associated with success and breakdown of shared governance. J Nurs Adm. 2010;40:411–6.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Bradley EH, Fund C. Translating research into practice: speeding the adoption of innovative health care programs. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2004;724:1–12.
47.
Helfrich CD, Weiner BJ, McKinney MM, Minasian L. Determinants of implementation effectiveness. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64:279–303.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Joseph V, West RM, Shickle D, Keen J, Clamp S. Key challenges in the development and implementation of telehealth projects. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17:71–7.CrossRefPubMed
49.
50.
May C. Agency and implementation: understanding the embedding of healthcare innovations in practice. Soc Sci Med. 2013;78:26–33.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM). Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:228–43.PubMed
52.
Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004;180:S57.PubMed
53.
Lehman WE, Simpson DD, Knight DK, Flynn PM. Integration of treatment innovation planning and implementation: strategic process models and organizational challenges. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011;25:252.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
54.
Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337:963–5.CrossRef
55.
Stetler CB, Damschroder LJ, Helfrich CD, Hagedorn HJ. A guide for applying a revised version of the PARIHS framework for implementation. Implement Sci. 2011;6:99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
56.
Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) Network Technology Transfer Workgroup. Research to practice in addiction treatment: key terms and a field-driven model of technology transfer. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011;41:169–78.CrossRef
57.
Berta W, Teare GF, Gilbart E, Ginsburg LS, Lemieux-Charles L, Davis D, et al. The contingencies of organizational learning in long-term care: factors that affect innovation adoption. Health Care Manage Rev. 2005;30:282–92.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Carey M, Buchan H, Sanson-Fisher R. The cycle of change: implementing best-evidence clinical practice. Int J Qual Health Care. 2009;21:37–43.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6:26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Hader JM, White R, Lewis S, Foreman JL, McDonald PW, Thompson LG. Doctors’ views of clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative exploration using innovation theory. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13:601–6.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Kontos PC, Poland BD. Mapping new theoretical and methodological terrain for knowledge translation: contributions from critical realism and the arts. Implement Sci. 2009;4:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
Baumbusch JL, Kirkham SR, Khan KB, McDonald H, Semeniuk P, Tan E, et al. Pursuing common agendas: a collaborative model for knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Res Nurs Health. 2008;31:130–40.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Best A, Hiatt RA, Norman CD. Knowledge integration: conceptualizing communications in cancer control systems. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71:319–27.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Edgar L, Herbert R, Lambert S, MacDonald JA, Dubois S, Latimer M. The joint venture model of knowledge utilization: a guide for change in nursing. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006;19:41–55.CrossRef
65.
66.
Landry R, Amara N, Pablos-Mendes A, Shademani R, Gold I. The knowledge-value chain: a conceptual framework for knowledge translation in health. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84:597–602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
67.
Latimer MA, Ritchie JA, Johnston CC. Individual nurse and organizational context considerations for better knowledge use in pain care. J Pediatr Nurs. 2010;25:274–81.CrossRefPubMed
68.
Palmer D, Kramlich D. An introduction to the multisystem model of knowledge integration and translation. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2011;34:29–38.CrossRefPubMed
69.
Gauthier N, Ellis K, Bol N, Stolee P. Beyond knowledge transfer: a model of knowledge integration in a clinical setting. Healthc Manage Forum. 2005;18:33–7.CrossRefPubMed
70.
MacRobert M. A leadership focus on evidence-based practice: tools for successful implementation. Prof Case Manag. 2008;13:97–101.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L, Stillwell SB. Evidence-based practice, step by step: sustaining evidence-based practice through organizational policies and an innovative model. Am J Nurs. 2011;111:57–60.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Olade RA. Strategic collaborative model for evidence-based nursing practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1:60–8.CrossRefPubMed
73.
Reavy K, Tavernier S. Nurses reclaiming ownership of their practice: implementation of an evidence-based practice model and process. J Contin Educ Nur. 2008;39:166–72.CrossRef
74.
Vratny A, Shriver D. A conceptual model for growing evidence-based practice. Nurs Adm Q. 2007;31:162–70.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Glisson C, Schoenwald SK. The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children’s mental health treatments. Ment Health Serv Res. 2005;7:243–59.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Kilbourne AM, Neumann MS, Pincus HA, Bauer MS, Stall R. Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implement Sci. 2007;2:42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
77.
78.
Chambers D, Glasgow R, Stange K. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. 2013;8:117.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
79.
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
80.
Green L, Kreuter M. The PRECEDE–PROCEED model. In: Health promotion planning: an educational approach. 3rd ed. Mountain View (CA): Mayfield Publishing Company; 1999. p. 32–43.
81.
Lomas J. Retailing research: increasing the role of evidence in clinical services for childbirth. Milbank Q. 1993;71:439–75.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework
Authors
Joanna C Moullin
Daniel Sabater-Hernández
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos
Shalom I Benrimoj
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0005-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research

Conditions for sustainability of Academic Collaborative Centres for Public Health in the Netherlands: a mixed methods design

Research

Balancing the personal, local, institutional, and global: multiple case study and multidimensional scaling analysis of African experiences in addressing complexity and political economy in health research capacity strengthening

Research

Feasibility of establishing a biosafety level 3 tuberculosis culture laboratory of acceptable quality standards in a resource-limited setting: an experience from Uganda

Research

Role and use of evidence in policymaking: an analysis of case studies from the health sector in Nigeria

Research

Utilization of research findings for health policy making and practice: evidence from three case studies in Bangladesh

Review

Building an Australasian paramedicine research agenda: a narrative review