Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Thrombosis Journal 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

A survey of thrombosis experts evaluating practices and opinions regarding venous thromboprophylaxis in patients post major abdominal surgery

Authors: Bader Al Rawahi, Grégoire Le Gal, Rebecca Auer, Marc Carrier

Published in: Thrombosis Journal | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery are at high risk for developing venous thromboembolism in the post-operative period. Current evidence-based guidelines recommend routine pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patient at moderate to high risk post major abdominal surgery. However, the type of agent, dose and duration of thromboprophylaxis remain unclear. We sought to survey current clinical practice and assess for potential clinical equipoise regarding pharmacological thromboprophylaxis post major abdominal surgery.

Methods

An electronic survey targeting thrombosis expert members of Thrombosis Canada was conducted.

Results

The total response rate was 52.3% (45/86). All thrombosis experts recommended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for high risk patients post major abdominal surgery. Over 68% of the thrombosis experts recommended thromboprophylaxis during hospitalization only. The majority of the participants recommended using LMWH (85.9%) over UFH (10.1%). Approximately a third of the surveyed thrombosis experts estimated the incidence of overall VTE at 7 to 10 days post-operatively in patients who do not receive thromboprophylaxis post major abdominal surgery to be between 4 and 6%. A total of 55.3% of the thrombosis experts estimated the incidence of PE to be between 0.5 and 1.0% for the same patient population. The risk of major bleeding episode was estimated to be between 0.5 and 1% in patients receiving 7 to 10 days of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the post-operative period by a majority of the thrombosis experts (68.4%). However, approximately 80% of thrombosis experts believed that there is still some clinical equipoise around the use of thromboprophylaxis post discharge (up to 7 to 10 days) in high risk adult patients post major abdominal surgery.

Conclusions

Thrombosis experts recommend LMWH prophylaxis post major abdominal surgery. There is still, however, significant clinical equipoise regarding the duration of thromboprophylaxis (hospitalization only vs. total to 7–10 days). The result of the survey might not be generalizable to non-academic centers and to other countries.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Merli G. Diagnostic assessment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2005;118(Suppl 8A):3S–12S.CrossRefPubMed Merli G. Diagnostic assessment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2005;118(Suppl 8A):3S–12S.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Michael K. Gould, David A. Garcia, Sherry M. Wren, Paul J. Karanicolas, Juan I. Arcelus, John A. Heit, Charles M. Samama. “Prevention of VTE in Nonorthopedic Surgical Patients. Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines,” Chest, 2012. Michael K. Gould, David A. Garcia, Sherry M. Wren, Paul J. Karanicolas, Juan I. Arcelus, John A. Heit, Charles M. Samama. “Prevention of VTE in Nonorthopedic Surgical Patients. Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines,” Chest, 2012.
5.
go back to reference Ceara Tess Cunningham, Hude Quan, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Tom Noseworthy, Cynthia A Beck, Elijah Dixon, Susan Samuel, William A Ghali, Lindsay L Sykes and Nathalie Jetté. “Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.” BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2015:pp. 5:32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z. Ceara Tess Cunningham, Hude Quan, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Tom Noseworthy, Cynthia A Beck, Elijah Dixon, Susan Samuel, William A Ghali, Lindsay L Sykes and Nathalie Jetté. “Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.” BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2015:pp. 5:32. doi: 10.​1186/​s12874-015-0016-z.
6.
go back to reference Mismetti P, Laporte S, Darmon J, Buchmüller A, Decousus H. Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88(7):913–30.CrossRefPubMed Mismetti P, Laporte S, Darmon J, Buchmüller A, Decousus H. Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88(7):913–30.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A survey of thrombosis experts evaluating practices and opinions regarding venous thromboprophylaxis in patients post major abdominal surgery
Authors
Bader Al Rawahi
Grégoire Le Gal
Rebecca Auer
Marc Carrier
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Thrombosis Journal / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1477-9560
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-016-0126-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Thrombosis Journal 1/2017 Go to the issue