Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Thrombosis Journal 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Original clinical investigation

Analysis of the accuracy of the Wells scale in assessing the probability of lower limb deep vein thrombosis in primary care patients practice

Authors: Małgorzata Dybowska, Witold Z Tomkowski, Paweł Kuca, Rafał Ubysz, Adam Jóźwik, Dariusz Chmielewski

Published in: Thrombosis Journal | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The clinical picture of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is nonspecific. Therefore assessment of the probability of occurrence of DVT plays a very important part in making a correct diagnosis of DVT.
The aim of our prospective study was to assess the accuracy of the Wells scale in primary care setting in diagnostic procedure of suspected deep vein thrombosis.

Methods

In the period of 20 - months (from 2007 to 2009) a group of residents from one of the urban districts of Warsaw, who reported to family doctors (22 primary care physicians were involved in the study) with symptoms of DVT were assessed on the probability of occurrence of deep vein thrombosis using the Wells scale. Family doctors were aware of symptoms of DVT and inclusion patients to this study was based on clinical suspicion of DVT.
Patients were divided into three groups, reflecting probability of DVT of the lower limbs.
To confirm DVT a compression ultrasound (CUS) test was established.
We analyzed the relationship between a qualitative variable and a variable defined on an original scale (incidence of DVT versus Wells scale count) using the Mann–Whitney test. Chi-square test compared rates of DVT events in all clinical probability groups.
Patient were follow up during 3 months in primary care setting.

Results

In the period of 20 months (from 2007 to 2009) a total number of 1048 patients (male: 250 , female: 798 mean age: 61.4) with symptoms suggestive of DVT of the lower extremities entered the study. Among the 100 patients classified in the group with a high probability of DVT of the lower extremities, 40 (40%) patients (proximal DVT - 13; distal DVT - 27) were diagnosed with it (95% CI [30.94% -49.80%]). In the group with a moderate probability consisting of 302 patients, DVT of the lower extremities was diagnosed in 19 (6.29%) patients (95% CI [4.06% -9.62%]), (proximal DVT – 1; distal DVT - 18). Of the 646 patients with a low probability of DVT of the lower extremities distal DVT was diagnosed in 1 (0.15%) patient (95% CI [0.03% -0.87%]).

Conclusion

The Wells scale used in primary care setting demonstrated a high degree of accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep - vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet. 1997;350:1795–8.CrossRefPubMed Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, Guy F, Mitchell M, Gray L, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep - vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet. 1997;350:1795–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KG. The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:100–7.CrossRefPubMed Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KG. The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:100–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference van der Velde EF, Toll DB, ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Oudega R, Stoffers HE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of 2 clinical decision rules to rule out deep vein thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:31–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed van der Velde EF, Toll DB, ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Oudega R, Stoffers HE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Comparing the diagnostic performance of 2 clinical decision rules to rule out deep vein thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:31–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bernardi E, Villalta S, Polistena P, Simioni P, et al. A simple ultrasound approach for detection of recurrent proximal-vein thrombosis. Circulation. 1993;88:1730–5.CrossRefPubMed Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bernardi E, Villalta S, Polistena P, Simioni P, et al. A simple ultrasound approach for detection of recurrent proximal-vein thrombosis. Circulation. 1993;88:1730–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tomkowski WZ, Davidson BL, Wisniewska J, Malek G, Kober J, Kuca P, et al. Accuracy of compression ultrasound in screening for deep venous thrombosis in acutely ill medical patients. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97:191–4.PubMed Tomkowski WZ, Davidson BL, Wisniewska J, Malek G, Kober J, Kuca P, et al. Accuracy of compression ultrasound in screening for deep venous thrombosis in acutely ill medical patients. Thromb Haemost. 2007;97:191–4.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Toll DB, Oudega R, Bulten RJ, Hoes AW, Moons KG. Excluding deep vein thrombosis safely in primary care. J Fam Pract. 2006;55:613–8.PubMed Toll DB, Oudega R, Bulten RJ, Hoes AW, Moons KG. Excluding deep vein thrombosis safely in primary care. J Fam Pract. 2006;55:613–8.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857–72.CrossRefPubMed Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857–72.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Büller HR, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Hoes AW, Joore MA, Moons KG, Oudega R, et al. Safely ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:229–35.CrossRefPubMed Büller HR, Ten Cate-Hoek AJ, Hoes AW, Joore MA, Moons KG, Oudega R, et al. Safely ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:229–35.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Analysis of the accuracy of the Wells scale in assessing the probability of lower limb deep vein thrombosis in primary care patients practice
Authors
Małgorzata Dybowska
Witold Z Tomkowski
Paweł Kuca
Rafał Ubysz
Adam Jóźwik
Dariusz Chmielewski
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Thrombosis Journal / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1477-9560
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-015-0050-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Thrombosis Journal 1/2015 Go to the issue