Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Prognostic significance of sealed-off perforation in colon cancer: a prospective cohort study

Authors: Kil-yong Lee, Ji Won Park, Inho Song, Ki-young Lee, Sangsik Cho, Yoon-Hye Kwon, Min Jung Kim, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Perforated colon cancer is a rare complication, but has a high risk of recurrence. However, most studies have not distinguished sealed-off perforation from free perforation, and the prognosis is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcome of colon cancer with sealed-off perforation.

Methods

Eighty-six consecutive patients who underwent resection for colon cancer with sealed-off or free perforation were included. We defined sealed-off perforation as a colon perforation with localized abscess identified on operative, computed tomography, or pathologic findings, with no evidence of free perforation, including fecal contamination and dirty fluid collection in the peritoneal cavity. Oncologic outcomes were compared between patients with colon cancer with sealed-off perforation and free perforation using a log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.

Results

The sealed-off perforation group included 62 patients, and 24 patients were in the free perforation group. TNM stage and lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion were similar between the groups. The median follow-up period was 28.9 months (range 0–159). The sealed-off perforation group had better prognosis compared with the free perforation group in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), although there were no statistically significant differences in PFS (5-year PFS 53.7% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.148; 5-year OS 53.6% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.001). However, in multivariable analysis using the Cox progression test, sealed-off perforation did not show a significant effect on cancer progression (p = 0.138) and OS (p = 0.727).

Conclusions

Colon cancer with sealed-off perforation showed no difference in prognosis compared with free perforation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Biondo S, Martí-Ragué J, Kreisler E, et al. A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;189:377–83.CrossRefPubMed Biondo S, Martí-Ragué J, Kreisler E, et al. A prospective study of outcomes of emergency and elective surgeries for complicated colonic cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;189:377–83.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Crowder VH Jr, Cohn I Jr. Perforation in cancer of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1967;10:415–20.CrossRefPubMed Crowder VH Jr, Cohn I Jr. Perforation in cancer of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1967;10:415–20.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference McGregor JR, O’Dwyer PJ. The surgical management of obstruction and perforation of the left colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:203–8.PubMed McGregor JR, O’Dwyer PJ. The surgical management of obstruction and perforation of the left colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993;177:203–8.PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Liska D, Stocchi L, Karagkounis G, et al. Incidence, patterns, and predictors of locoregional recurrence in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1093–9.CrossRefPubMed Liska D, Stocchi L, Karagkounis G, et al. Incidence, patterns, and predictors of locoregional recurrence in colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1093–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Benson AB, Venook AP, Cederquist L, et al. Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2017;15:370–398. Benson AB, Venook AP, Cederquist L, et al. Colon cancer, version 1.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2017;15:370–398.
7.
go back to reference Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. The role of the in situ local inflammatory response in predicting recurrence and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:451–66.CrossRefPubMed Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC. The role of the in situ local inflammatory response in predicting recurrence and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38:451–66.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Carraro PG, Segala M, Orlotti C, et al. Outcome of large-bowel perforation in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1421–6.CrossRefPubMed Carraro PG, Segala M, Orlotti C, et al. Outcome of large-bowel perforation in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1421–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, et al. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e493–503.CrossRefPubMed Diakos CI, Charles KA, McMillan DC, et al. Cancer-related inflammation and treatment effectiveness. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:e493–503.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Metadata
Title
Prognostic significance of sealed-off perforation in colon cancer: a prospective cohort study
Authors
Kil-yong Lee
Ji Won Park
Inho Song
Ki-young Lee
Sangsik Cho
Yoon-Hye Kwon
Min Jung Kim
Seung-Bum Ryoo
Seung-Yong Jeong
Kyu Joo Park
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1530-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2018 Go to the issue