Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Type 2 Diabetes | Research

The validity of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) in Hungarian patients with type 2 diabetes

Authors: Agnes Vincze, Antonia Losonczi, Adrienne Stauder

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A wide range of measuring instruments are available for diabetes self-management. According to several studies, a relatively new instrument, the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ), shows a consistent relationship with outcomes of diabetes treatment as well, such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Furthermore, the questionnaire is short, but covers the main aspects of diabetes management. Given the increasing prevalence of diabetes in Hungary, our goal was to adapt this user-friendly questionnaire and analyze its validity.

Methods

After the standard translation process, we analyzed a sample of 221 people. The construct validity of the questionnaire was tested with HbA1c and body mass index. Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 values were tested via Pearson correlations. Known-groups validity of the DSMQ in relation to groups based on glycemic control levels was investigated using one-way ANOVA.

Results

The “sum scale” of the questionnaire and the HbA1c values show an inverse relationship (r = − 0.253, p < 0.01). Body mass index was related to the “sum scale” (r = − 0.214, p < 0.01) and to the “physical activity” (r = − 0.219, p < 0.01), while questionnaire results reflecting medication adherence correlated with the “glucose management” (r = − 0.291, p < 0.01), “health-care use” subscale (r = 0.236, p < 0.01) and the “sum scale” (r = 0.281, p < 0.01). A significant difference (F = 6.225, p = 0.002) was found between the DSMQ mean scores of the three groups, defined by good, medium, and poor glycemic control levels.

Conclusions

The Hungarian version of the DSMQ was considered a valid tool for the measurement of diabetes self-management. With its help, problematic areas of self-management could be uncovered, and interventions can be improved.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50.CrossRef Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004;291(3):335–42.CrossRef Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004;291(3):335–42.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Arnold LW, Wang Z. The HbA1c and all-cause mortality relationship in patients with type 2 diabetes is J-shaped: a meta-analysis of observational studies. The review of diabetic studies. RDS. 2014;11(2):138–52.PubMed Arnold LW, Wang Z. The HbA1c and all-cause mortality relationship in patients with type 2 diabetes is J-shaped: a meta-analysis of observational studies. The review of diabetic studies. RDS. 2014;11(2):138–52.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Domjan BA, Ferencz V, Tanczer T, Szili-Janicsek Z, Barkai L, Hidvegi T, et al. Large increase in the prevalence of self-reported diabetes based on a nationally representative survey in Hungary. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(2):107–11.CrossRef Domjan BA, Ferencz V, Tanczer T, Szili-Janicsek Z, Barkai L, Hidvegi T, et al. Large increase in the prevalence of self-reported diabetes based on a nationally representative survey in Hungary. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(2):107–11.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lu Y, Xu J, Zhao W, Han HR. Measuring self-care in persons with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2016;39(2):131–84.CrossRef Lu Y, Xu J, Zhao W, Han HR. Measuring self-care in persons with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2016;39(2):131–84.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Barnett AH. Treating to goal: challenges of current management. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151(Suppl 2):T3–7 ((discussion T29–30)).CrossRef Barnett AH. Treating to goal: challenges of current management. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151(Suppl 2):T3–7 ((discussion T29–30)).CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schmitt A, Gahr A, Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Huber J, Haak T. The diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:138.CrossRef Schmitt A, Gahr A, Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Huber J, Haak T. The diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ): development and evaluation of an instrument to assess diabetes self-care activities associated with glycaemic control. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:138.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schmitt A, Reimer A, Hermanns N, Huber J, Ehrmann D, Schall S, et al. Assessing diabetes self-management with the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) can help analyse behavioural problems related to reduced glycaemic control. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150774.CrossRef Schmitt A, Reimer A, Hermanns N, Huber J, Ehrmann D, Schall S, et al. Assessing diabetes self-management with the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) can help analyse behavioural problems related to reduced glycaemic control. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150774.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bukhsh A, Lee SWH, Pusparajah P, Schmitt A, Khan TM. Psychometric properties of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) in Urdu. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):200.CrossRef Bukhsh A, Lee SWH, Pusparajah P, Schmitt A, Khan TM. Psychometric properties of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) in Urdu. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):200.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mehravar F, Mansournia MA, Holakouie-Naieni K, Nasli-Esfahani E, Mansournia N, Almasi-Hashiani A. Associations between diabetes self-management and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Epidemiol Health. 2016;38:e2016004.CrossRef Mehravar F, Mansournia MA, Holakouie-Naieni K, Nasli-Esfahani E, Mansournia N, Almasi-Hashiani A. Associations between diabetes self-management and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Epidemiol Health. 2016;38:e2016004.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thojampa S, Mawn B. Psychometric evaluation of the Thai translation of the diabetes self-management questionnaire in type 2 diabetes. Int J Nurs Sci. 2017;4(3):236–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Thojampa S, Mawn B. Psychometric evaluation of the Thai translation of the diabetes self-management questionnaire in type 2 diabetes. Int J Nurs Sci. 2017;4(3):236–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. J Pers Assess. 2003;80(3):217–22.CrossRef Streiner DL. Being inconsistent about consistency: when coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matter. J Pers Assess. 2003;80(3):217–22.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Costa DS. Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: a conceptual or an empirical distinction? Qual Life Res. 2015;24(9):2057–65.CrossRef Costa DS. Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: a conceptual or an empirical distinction? Qual Life Res. 2015;24(9):2057–65.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Konerding U. Which kind of psychometrics is adequate for patient satisfaction questionnaires? Patient Prefer Adher. 2016;10:2083–90.CrossRef Konerding U. Which kind of psychometrics is adequate for patient satisfaction questionnaires? Patient Prefer Adher. 2016;10:2083–90.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Mark Res. 2001;38(2):269–77.CrossRef Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Mark Res. 2001;38(2):269–77.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010a;63(7):737–45.CrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010a;63(7):737–45.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010b;19(4):539–49.CrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010b;19(4):539–49.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Stat Soc). 2002;165(2):233–53.CrossRef Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Stat Soc). 2002;165(2):233–53.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.CrossRef Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417–32.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013.
21.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: LEA; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: LEA; 1988.
22.
go back to reference Michalos AC. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Canada: Springer Reference; 2014. p. 151.CrossRef Michalos AC. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Canada: Springer Reference; 2014. p. 151.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Khunti K, Gomes MB, Pocock S, Shestakova MV, Pintat S, Fenici P, et al. Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):427–37.CrossRef Khunti K, Gomes MB, Pocock S, Shestakova MV, Pintat S, Fenici P, et al. Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(2):427–37.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The validity of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) in Hungarian patients with type 2 diabetes
Authors
Agnes Vincze
Antonia Losonczi
Adrienne Stauder
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Type 2 Diabetes
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01595-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2020 Go to the issue