Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

LC-PROM: Validation of a patient reported outcomes measure for liver cirrhosis patients

Authors: Ying Zhang, Yuanyuan Yang, Jing Lv, Yanbo Zhang

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study is to develop a specific patient-reported scale of liver cirrhosis according to the Patient Reported Outcome guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and to examine its capacity to fill gaps in this field.

Methods

A conceptual framework was developed and a preliminary item pool developed through literature review and interviews of 10 patients with liver cirrhosis. With the preliminary items, we performed a pilot survey that included a cognitive test with patients and interviews with experts; the focus was on content and language of the scale. In the item selection stage, seven statistical methods including discrete trends method, discrimination analysis, exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach’s α coefficient, correlation coefficient, test-retest reliability, Item-Response Theory were applied to survey data from 200 subjects (150 liver cirrhosis patients and 50 controls). This produced the preliminary Liver Cirrhosis Patient-reported Outcome Measure (LC-PROM). In the next stage, we conducted the survey with 620 subjects (500 patients and 120 controls) to validate reliability, validity and acceptability of this scale.

Results

The 55 items and 13 dimensions addressed four domains: physical, psychological, social, and therapeutic. Cronbach’s α coefficients were 0.921 for the total scale; the confirmatory factor analysis, t-tests and ANOVA supported scale validity; the model fit index as Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA), Root Mean Square Residual (RMR), Normed Fit Index (NFI), Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) and Incremental Fit Index (IFI) met the criterion generally. The acceptance ratio and response rate indicated good feasibility.

Conclusions

This study developed an accurate and stable patient-reported outcome scale of liver cirrhosis, which is able to evaluate clinical effects effectively, is helpful to patients in recognizing their health condition, and contributes to clinical decision making both for patients and physicians. Additionally, the LC-PROM can perform as an ultimate assessment of medical and health care effects and can inform clinical trials of new drugs for liver cirrhosis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(7):743–60.CrossRefPubMed Sprangers MA, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(7):743–60.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference U.S. Department of Health and Human Service,FDA,Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry-Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims [EB/OL]. (2009-03-07) [2015-05-10]. http://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-7525-4-79. U.S. Department of Health and Human Service,FDA,Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research,Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry-Patient Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims [EB/OL]. (2009-03-07) [2015-05-10]. http://​hqlo.​biomedcentral.​com/​articles/​10.​1186/​1477-7525-4-79.
4.
go back to reference Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115–23.CrossRefPubMed Greenhalgh J. The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? Qual Life Res. 2009;18:115–23.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A, Brown P, Lynch P, Brown J. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomised controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:714–24.CrossRefPubMed Velikova G, Booth L, Smith A, Brown P, Lynch P, Brown J. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomised controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:714–24.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yanbo Z. Latent Variable Analysis[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2009. p. 1–5. Yanbo Z. Latent Variable Analysis[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press; 2009. p. 1–5.
7.
go back to reference Hambleton RK, Hariharan S. Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing; 1985. p. 1–9.CrossRef Hambleton RK, Hariharan S. Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing; 1985. p. 1–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dodd BG, De ARJ, Koch WR. Computerized adaptive testing with Polytomous items. Appl Psychol Meas. 1995;19(1):5–22.CrossRef Dodd BG, De ARJ, Koch WR. Computerized adaptive testing with Polytomous items. Appl Psychol Meas. 1995;19(1):5–22.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Seock-Ho K, Cohen AS. A comparison of linking and concurrent calibration under the graded response model. Appl Psychol Meas. 2002;26(1):25–41.CrossRef Seock-Ho K, Cohen AS. A comparison of linking and concurrent calibration under the graded response model. Appl Psychol Meas. 2002;26(1):25–41.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gutteling JJ, De Man RA, Busschbach JJ, Darlington AS. Overview of research on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Neth J Med. 2007;65:227–34.PubMed Gutteling JJ, De Man RA, Busschbach JJ, Darlington AS. Overview of research on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Neth J Med. 2007;65:227–34.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Bao Z, Qiu D, Ma X. Evaluation of QOL Scale of Chronic Liver Disease[J].Chinese. Hepatology. 2008;13(4):332–3. Bao Z, Qiu D, Ma X. Evaluation of QOL Scale of Chronic Liver Disease[J].Chinese. Hepatology. 2008;13(4):332–3.
12.
go back to reference Haimiao Z, Jingping Z, Yongai Z. Research on the Influencing Factors of the Quality of Life in Hospitalized Patients with Hepatic Cirrhosis [J]. J Med Res. 2013;42(10):110–2. Haimiao Z, Jingping Z, Yongai Z. Research on the Influencing Factors of the Quality of Life in Hospitalized Patients with Hepatic Cirrhosis [J]. J Med Res. 2013;42(10):110–2.
13.
go back to reference Atsushi Tanaka, Kentaro Kikuchi, Ryo Miura etal. Validation of the Japanese version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic viral hepatitis[J]. doi:10.1111/hepr.12524. Atsushi Tanaka, Kentaro Kikuchi, Ryo Miura etal. Validation of the Japanese version of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) for the assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with chronic viral hepatitis[J]. doi:10.​1111/​hepr.​12524.
14.
go back to reference Bajaj JS, Thacker LR, Wade JB, et al. PROMIS computerised adaptive tests are dynamic instruments to measure health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(9):1123–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bajaj JS, Thacker LR, Wade JB, et al. PROMIS computerised adaptive tests are dynamic instruments to measure health-related quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(9):1123–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;35(273):185–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;35(273):185–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980;34:281–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Backett EM, Williams J, Papp E. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980;34:281–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19(8):787–805.CrossRefPubMed Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19(8):787–805.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Simone M, Simone M, Der Plas V, Hansen BE, De Boer JB, et al. The Liver Disease Symptom Index 2.0; Validation of a disease-specific questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1469–81.CrossRef Simone M, Simone M, Der Plas V, Hansen BE, De Boer JB, et al. The Liver Disease Symptom Index 2.0; Validation of a disease-specific questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:1469–81.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chuanghong W, Qiwen D, Xiaoshu J, et al. Preliminary Use of the CLDQ in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients [J]. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2003;11:60–2. Chuanghong W, Qiwen D, Xiaoshu J, et al. Preliminary Use of the CLDQ in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients [J]. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2003;11:60–2.
21.
go back to reference Younossi ZM, Guyatt G, Kiwi M, et al. Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 1999;45:295–300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Younossi ZM, Guyatt G, Kiwi M, et al. Development of a disease specific questionnaire to measure health related quality of life in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut. 1999;45:295–300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
LC-PROM: Validation of a patient reported outcomes measure for liver cirrhosis patients
Authors
Ying Zhang
Yuanyuan Yang
Jing Lv
Yanbo Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0482-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016 Go to the issue