Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Dutch translation and cross-cultural validation of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT)

Authors: Karen M van Leeuwen, Judith E Bosmans, Aaltje PD Jansen, Stacey E Rand, Ann-Marie Towers, Nick Smith, Kamilla Razik, Birgit Trukeschitz, Maurits W van Tulder, Henriette E van der Horst, Raymond W Ostelo

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit was developed to measure outcomes of social care in England. In this study, we translated the four level self-completion version (SCT-4) of the ASCOT for use in the Netherlands and performed a cross-cultural validation.

Methods

The ASCOT SCT-4 was translated into Dutch following international guidelines, including two forward and back translations. The resulting version was pilot tested among frail older adults using think-aloud interviews. Furthermore, using a subsample of the Dutch ACT-study, we investigated test-retest reliability and construct validity and compared response distributions with data from a comparable English study.

Results

The pilot tests showed that translated items were in general understood as intended, that most items were reliable, and that the response distributions of the Dutch translation and associations with other measures were comparable to the original English version. Based on the results of the pilot tests, some small modifications and a revision of the Dignity items were proposed for the final translation, which were approved by the ASCOT development team. The complete original English version and the final Dutch translation can be obtained after registration on the ASCOT website (http://​www.​pssru.​ac.​uk/​ascot).

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary evidence that the Dutch translation of the ASCOT is valid, reliable and comparable to the original English version. We recommend further research to confirm the validity of the modified Dutch ASCOT translation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Department of Health. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services. London: The Stationery Office; 2006. Department of Health. Our Health, Our Care, Our Say: A New Direction for Community Services. London: The Stationery Office; 2006.
3.
go back to reference Secretary of State for Health: Caring for Our Future : Reforming Care and Support. 2012. Secretary of State for Health: Caring for Our Future : Reforming Care and Support. 2012.
4.
go back to reference Lipszyc B, Sail E, Xavier A: Long-Term Care: Need, Use and Expenditure in the EU-27. 2012. Lipszyc B, Sail E, Xavier A: Long-Term Care: Need, Use and Expenditure in the EU-27. 2012.
5.
go back to reference Waldhausen A. Care Services in Crisis? Frankfurt: Long-Term Care in Times of European Economic and Financial Crisis; 2014. Waldhausen A. Care Services in Crisis? Frankfurt: Long-Term Care in Times of European Economic and Financial Crisis; 2014.
6.
go back to reference Netten A, Burge P, Malley J, Potoglou D, Towers A-M, Brazier J, et al. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:1–166.CrossRefPubMed Netten A, Burge P, Malley J, Potoglou D, Towers A-M, Brazier J, et al. Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16:1–166.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference The EuroQol Group. EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.CrossRef The EuroQol Group. EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Grewal I, Lewis J, Flynn T, Brown J, Bond J, Coast J. Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: preferences or capabilities? SocSciMed. 2006;62:1891–901. Grewal I, Lewis J, Flynn T, Brown J, Bond J, Coast J. Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: preferences or capabilities? SocSciMed. 2006;62:1891–901.
10.
go back to reference Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–82.CrossRefPubMed Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Lewis J, Louviere JJ, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–82.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Makai P, Brouwer WBF, Koopmanschap MA, Stolk EA, Nieboer AP. Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:83–93.CrossRefPubMed Makai P, Brouwer WBF, Koopmanschap MA, Stolk EA, Nieboer AP. Quality of life instruments for economic evaluations in health and social care for older people: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:83–93.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–91.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Muntinga ME, Hoogendijk EO, Van Leeuwen KM, Van Hout HPJ, Twisk JWR, Van der Horst HE, et al. Implementing the chronic care model for frail older adults in the Netherlands: study protocol of ACT (frail older adults: care in transition). BMC Geriatr. 2012;12:19.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Muntinga ME, Hoogendijk EO, Van Leeuwen KM, Van Hout HPJ, Twisk JWR, Van der Horst HE, et al. Implementing the chronic care model for frail older adults in the Netherlands: study protocol of ACT (frail older adults: care in transition). BMC Geriatr. 2012;12:19.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
14.
go back to reference Netten A, Beadle-Brown J, Caiels J, Forder J, Malley J, Smith N, Trukeshitz B, Towers AM, Welch E, Windle K: Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit v2.1: Main Guidance. Volume PSSRU disc. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2011. [PSSRU discussion paper 2716/3] Netten A, Beadle-Brown J, Caiels J, Forder J, Malley J, Smith N, Trukeshitz B, Towers AM, Welch E, Windle K: Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit v2.1: Main Guidance. Volume PSSRU disc. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit; 2011. [PSSRU discussion paper 2716/3]
15.
go back to reference Sen A. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1985. Sen A. Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1985.
16.
go back to reference Nussbaum M, Sen A. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.CrossRef Nussbaum M, Sen A. The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Netten A, Ryan M, Smith P, Skatun D, Healey A, Knapp M, et al. The Development of a Measure of Social Care Outcome for Older People. Volume PSSRU Disc. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2002 [PSSRU Discussion Paper 1690]. Netten A, Ryan M, Smith P, Skatun D, Healey A, Knapp M, et al. The Development of a Measure of Social Care Outcome for Older People. Volume PSSRU Disc. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2002 [PSSRU Discussion Paper 1690].
18.
go back to reference Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005. Willis GB. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2005.
19.
go back to reference Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:229–38. 0962–9343 (Print).CrossRefPubMed Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:229–38. 0962–9343 (Print).CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Trukeschitz B. Worauf es letztlich ankommt: Ergebnisqualität in der Langzeitpflege und -betreuung. Kurswechsel 2011;4:22–35. Trukeschitz B. Worauf es letztlich ankommt: Ergebnisqualität in der Langzeitpflege und -betreuung. Kurswechsel 2011;4:22–35.
21.
go back to reference Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:797–45.CrossRef Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. International consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes: results of the COSMIN study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:797–45.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Malley JN, Towers A-M, Netten AP, Brazier JE, Forder JE, Flynn T. An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:21. 1477–7525 (Electronic).CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Malley JN, Towers A-M, Netten AP, Brazier JE, Forder JE, Flynn T. An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:21. 1477–7525 (Electronic).CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213–20.CrossRefPubMed Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213–20.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–9.CrossRefPubMed De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Forder J, Malley J, Towers A-M, Netten A. Using cost-effectiveness estimates from survey data to guide commissioning: an application to home care. Health Econ. 2014;23:979–92.CrossRefPubMed Forder J, Malley J, Towers A-M, Netten A. Using cost-effectiveness estimates from survey data to guide commissioning: an application to home care. Health Econ. 2014;23:979–92.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Dutch translation and cross-cultural validation of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT)
Authors
Karen M van Leeuwen
Judith E Bosmans
Aaltje PD Jansen
Stacey E Rand
Ann-Marie Towers
Nick Smith
Kamilla Razik
Birgit Trukeschitz
Maurits W van Tulder
Henriette E van der Horst
Raymond W Ostelo
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0249-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2015 Go to the issue