Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

The psychometric properties of the German version of the WHOQOL-OLD in the German population aged 60 and older

Authors: Ines Conrad, Herbert Matschinger, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Carolin von Gottberg, Reinhold Kilian

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The WHOQOL-OLD is an instrument for the assessment of subjective quality of life in elderly people. It is based on the WHO definition of quality of life and is available in more than 20 languages. However, in most countries, the psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-OLD have been assessed only on the basis of small local samples and not in representative studies. In this study, the psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-OLD are evaluated based on a representative sample of Germany's elderly population.

Methods

Face-to-face interviews with 1133 respondents from the German population aged 60 years and older were conducted. Quality of life was assessed by means of the WHOQOL-BREF, the WHOQOL-OLD and the SF12. Moreover, the GDS, the DemTect and the IADL were applied for the assessment of depressive symptoms, cognitive capacities and capacity for carrying out daily activities. Psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-OLD were evaluated by means of classical and probabilistic test theory, confirmatory factor analysis and multivariate regression model.

Results

Cronbach's alpha was found to be above 0.85 for four and above .75 for two of the six facets of the WHOQOL-OLD. IRT analyses indicated that all items of the WHOQOL-OLD contribute considerably to the measurement of the associated facets. While the six-facet structure of the WHOQOL-OLD was well supported by the results of the confirmatory factor analysis, a common latent factor for the WHOQOL-OLD total scale could not be identified. Correlations with other quality of life measures and multivariate regression models with GDS, IADL and the DemTect indicate a good criterion validity of all six WHOQOL-OLD facets.

Conclusions

Study results confirm that the good psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-OLD that have been found in international studies could be replicated in a representative study of the German population. These results suggest that the WHOQOL-OLD is an instrument that is well suited to identify the needs and the wishes of an aging population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
World population ageing 1950–2021. United Nations, New York; 2002.
2.
3.
Maintaining prosperity in an ageing society. OECD, Paris; 1999.
4.
Blane D, Higgs P, Hyde M, Wiggins R: Life course influences on quality of life in early old age. Soc Sci Med 2004, 58: 2171–2179. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.028CrossRefPubMed
5.
Baltes PB, Smith J: New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young old to the dilemma of the fourth age. Gerontology 2003, 49: 123–136. 10.1159/000067946CrossRefPubMed
6.
Haywood KL, Garratt AM, Schmidt LJ, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R: Health status and quality of life of life in older people: a review. National Centre for Health Outcomes Development, Oxford; 2004.
7.
Bowling A: Measuring health. Open University Press, Buckingham; 1997.
8.
Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S: Development of the WHOQOL-Old Module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 2197–2214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9CrossRefPubMed
9.
Sarvimäki A, Stenbock-Hult B: Quality of life in old age described as a sence of well-being, meaning and value. J Adv Nurs 2000, 32: 1025–1033. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01568.xCrossRefPubMed
10.
Higgs P, Hyde M, Wiggins R, Blane D: Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension. Soc Policy Adm 2003, 37: 239–252. 10.1111/1467-9515.00336CrossRef
11.
Hunt S: The problem of quality of life. Qual Life Res 1997, 6: 205–212.PubMed
12.
Study protocol for the World Health Organisation project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL) Qual Life Res 1993, 2: 153–159. 10.1007/BF00435734
13.
Kuyken W, Orley J (Eds): The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument: The WHOQOL In Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springer, Berlin; 1994:41–57. 10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_4
14.
Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment Psychol Med 1998, 28: 551–558. 10.1017/S0033291798006667
15.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and General Psychometric Properties Soc Sci Med 1998, 46: 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4
16.
Power M, Bullinger M, Harper A: The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the Universality of Quality of Life in 15 Different Cultural Groups Worldwide. Health Psychol 1999, 18: 495–505. 10.1037/0278-6133.18.5.495CrossRefPubMed
17.
Skevington S: Advancing cross-cultural research on quality of life: observations drawn from the WHOQOL development. Qual Life Res 2002, 11: 135–144. 10.1023/A:1015013312456CrossRefPubMed
18.
Saxena S, Carlson D, Billington R, Orley J: The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-BREF): The importance of its items for cross-cultural research. Qual Life Res 2001, 10: 711–721. 10.1023/A:1013867826835CrossRefPubMed
19.
Angermeyer M, Kilian R, Matschinger H: WHOQOL-100 und WHOQOL-BREF. Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Version der WHO Instrumente zur Erfassung von Lebensqualität. Hogrefe, Göttingen; 2000.
20.
Winkler I, Buyantugs L, Petscheleit A, Kilian R, Angermeyer M: Die interkulturelle Erfassung der Lebensqualität im Alter: Das WHOQOL-OLD-Projekt. Z f Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie 2003, 16: 177–192. 10.1024/1011-6877.16.4.177CrossRef
21.
Liu R, Wu S, Hao Y, Gu J, Fang J, Cai N, Zhang J: The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013, 11: 156. 10.1186/1477-7525-11-156PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
Kalbe E, Kessler J, Calabrese P, Smith R, Passmore AP, Brand M, Bullock R: DemTect: a new, sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004, 19: 136–143. 10.1002/gps.1042CrossRefPubMed
23.
Winkler I, Matschinger H, Angermeyer M: The WHOQOL-OLD – A questionnaire for the intercultural measuring of quality of life in the elderly. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2006, 56: 63–69. 10.1055/s-2005-915334CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Kovar MG, Lawton MP: Functional disability: activities and instrumental activities of daily living. In Focus on assessment techniques. Volume 14. Edited by: Lawton MP, Teresi JA. Springer, New York; 1994:57–75.
26.
Lawton MP, Brody EM: Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969, 9: 179–186. 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179CrossRefPubMed
27.
Edelen MO, Reeve BB: Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Qual Life Res 2007, 16: 5–18. 10.1007/s11136-007-9198-0CrossRefPubMed
28.
Reeve BB, Hays RD, Chih-Hung C, Perfetto EM: Applying item response theory to enhance health outcomes assessment. Qual Life Res 2007, 16: 1–3. 10.1007/s11136-007-9220-6CrossRef
29.
Cook KF, Teal CR, Bjorner JB, Cella D, Chih-Hung C, Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Hays RD, McHorney CA, Ocepek-Welikson K, Raczek AE, Teresi JA, Reeve BB: IRT health outcomes data analysis project: an overview and summary. Qual Life Res 2007, 16: 121–132. 10.1007/s11136-007-9177-5CrossRefPubMed
30.
Dorans NJ: Linking scores from multiple health outcome instruments. Qual Life Res 2007, 16: 85–94. 10.1007/s11136-006-9155-3CrossRefPubMed
31.
Masters GN: A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982, 47: 149–174. 10.1007/BF02296272CrossRef
32.
Masters GN: The analysis of partial credit scoring. Appl Meas Educ 1988, 1: 279–297. 10.1207/s15324818ame0104_2CrossRef
33.
Wright BD, Masters GN: Rating scale analysis. MESA Press, Chicago; 1982.
34.
Rasch G: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. The University of Chicago (Originally published 1960), Chicago; 1980.
35.
Rost J: Measuring attitudes with a threshold model drawing on a traditional scaling concept. Appl Psychol Meas 1988, 12: 397–409. 10.1177/014662168801200408CrossRef
36.
Masters GN, Wright BD: The essential process in a family of measurement models. Psychometrika 1984, 49: 529–544. 10.1007/BF02302590CrossRef
37.
Verhelst ND, Verstralen HHFM: Some considerations on the partial credit model. Psicologica 2008, 29: 229–254.
38.
Wright BD, Masters GN: Computation of OUTFIT and INFIT statistics. Rasch Meas Trans 1990, 3(4):84–85.
39.
Bond TG, Fox CM: Applying the Rasch model. L. Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ; 2007.
40.
Smith RM: Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. J Appl Meas 2000, 1: 199–218.PubMed
41.
Smith RM: Polytomous mean-square fit statistics. Rasch Meas Trans 1996, 10: 516–517.
42.
Linacre JM, Wright BD: Reasonable mean square fit values. Rasch MeasTrans 1994, 83: 370.
43.
Rost J, von Davier M: A conditional item-fit index for Rasch models. Appl Psychol Meas 1994, 18: 171–182. 10.1177/014662169401800206CrossRef
44.
Andrich D: Rasch Models for Measurement. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park; 1988.
45.
von Davier M: WINMIRA; a program system for analysis with the Rasch Model, with the Latent Class Analysis and with the Mixed Rasch Model. IPN, Kiel; 2001.
46.
Jöreskog KG: Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika 1971, 36: 109–133. 10.1007/BF02291393CrossRef
47.
Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus user's guide. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles; 2012.
48.
Mair P, Hatzinger R: Extended Rasch modeling: the eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. J Stat Softw 2007, 20: 1–20.CrossRef
49.
Rizopoulos D: An R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw 2006, 17: 1–25. 10.1360/jos170001CrossRef
50.
Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. StataCorp LP, TX; 2013.
51.
Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S: Development of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 2197–2214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9CrossRefPubMed
52.
Halvorsrud L, Kalfoss M, Diseth A: Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD module. Scand J Caring Sci 2008, 22: 292–305. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00523.xCrossRefPubMed
53.
Chachamovich E, Fleck MP, Trentini C, Power M: Brazilian WHOQOL-OLD Module version: a Rasch analysis of a new instrument. Rev Saude Publica 2008, 42: 308–316. 10.1590/S0034-89102008000200017CrossRefPubMed
54.
Fleck MP, Chachamovich E, Trentini CM: WHOQOL-OLD Project: method and focus group results in Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 2003, 37: 793–799. 10.1590/S0034-89102003000600016CrossRefPubMed
55.
Leplege A, Perret-Guillaume C, Ecosse E, Hervy MP, Ankri J, von SN: A new instrument to measure quality of life in older people: the French version of the WHOQOL-OLD. Rev Med Interne 2013, 34: 78–84. 10.1016/j.revmed.2012.07.011CrossRefPubMed
56.
Eser S, Saatli G, Eser E, Baydur H, Fidaner C: The reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-Old). Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2010, 21: 37–48.PubMed
57.
Fang J, Power M, Lin Y, Zhang J, Hao Y, Chatterji S: Development of short versions for the WHOQOL-OLD module. Gerontologist 2012, 52: 66–78. 10.1093/geront/gnr085CrossRefPubMed
58.
Lucas-Carrasco R, Laidlaw K, Power MJ: Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL-OLD for Spanish older adults. Aging Ment Health 2011, 15: 595–604. 10.1080/13607863.2010.548054CrossRefPubMed
59.
Halvorsrud L, Kirkevold M, Diseth A, Kalfoss M: Quality of life model: predictors of quality of life among sick older adults. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2010, 24: 241–259. 10.1891/1541-6577.24.4.241CrossRefPubMed
60.
Chachamovich E, Fleck M, Laidlaw K, Power M: Impact of major depression and subsyndromal symptoms on quality of life and attitudes toward aging in an international sample of older adults. Gerontologist 2008, 48: 593–602. 10.1093/geront/48.5.593CrossRefPubMed
61.
Molzahn AE, Kalfoss M, Schick MK, Skevington SM: Comparing the importance of different aspects of quality of life to older adults across diverse cultures. Age Ageing 2011, 40: 192–199. 10.1093/ageing/afq156CrossRefPubMed
62.
Dragomirecka E, Bartonova J, Eisemann M, Kalfoss M, Kilian R, Martiny K, von Steinbuechel N, Schmidt S: Demographic and psychosocial correlates of quality of life in the elderly from a cross-cultural perspective. Clin Psychol Psychother 2008, 15: 193–204. 10.1002/cpp.571CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The psychometric properties of the German version of the WHOQOL-OLD in the German population aged 60 and older
Authors
Ines Conrad
Herbert Matschinger
Steffi Riedel-Heller
Carolin von Gottberg
Reinhold Kilian
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0105-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research

Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index

Research

Chronic inflammation and quality of life in older adults: a cross-sectional study using biomarkers to predict emotional and relational outcomes

Research

Could baseline health-related quality of life (QoL) predict overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer? The results of the GERCOR OPTIMOX 1 study

Research

Italian translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the PedsQL™ 3.0 Diabetes Module questionnaire in children with type 1 diabetes and their parents

Review

Patients' expectations from dental implants: a systematic review of the literature

Research

The impact of preoperative patient characteristics on health states after total hip replacement and related satisfaction thresholds: a cohort study