Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation

Authors: Rong Liu, Shaomin Wu, Yuantao Hao, Jing Gu, Jiqian Fang, Nanqiao Cai, Jinxin Zhang

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Under the circumstance of global population aging, the issue on how to facilitate the quality of life (QOL) for older people brings us grand challenge. On the way to solve this problem, it is inextricable to measure QOL for older people accurately at onset. This study is aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-OLD).

Methods

We received 1005 valid WHOQOL-OLD questionnaires from 1050 respondents who were 60 and older by quota sampling method. To calculate the test-retest correlation coefficient we re-interviewed 101 participants from the community. Psychometric properties were evaluated from the aspect of feasibility, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity and discriminant validity.

Results

Missing item responses took up 0.0%-2.7% in the scale. The WHOQOL-OLD showed satisfactory reliability with Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients ranging from 0.711 (Social participation) to 0.842 (Sensory ability) for each domain. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) presenting test-retest reliability were all over 0.7. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.084 (a little more than 0.08) and comparative fit index (CFI) 0.95 (>0.90) which meant acceptable construct validity. There were higher correlation coefficients between items and their hypothesized domains than other domains (P < 0.001), indicating good content validity. The results of t-test showed good discriminant validity of the WHOQOL-OLD between the healthy group and the unhealthy group (P < 0.0083).

Conclusion

The Chinese version of WHOQOL-OLD showed good feasibility, reliability and validity in this study. However, before it can be used national-widely, further research should be conducted in other areas of China.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Morgan SP, Zhigang G, Hayford SR: China’s below-replacement fertility: recent trends and future prospects. Popul Dev Rev 2009, 35: 605–629. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00298.xPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Morgan SP, Zhigang G, Hayford SR: China’s below-replacement fertility: recent trends and future prospects. Popul Dev Rev 2009, 35: 605–629. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00298.xPubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Peng X: China’s demographic history and future challenges. Science 2011, 333: 581–587. 10.1126/science.1209396PubMedCrossRef Peng X: China’s demographic history and future challenges. Science 2011, 333: 581–587. 10.1126/science.1209396PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference De Luca d’Alessandro E, Bonacci S, Giraldi G: Aging populations: the health and quality of life of the elderly. Clin Ter 2011, 162: e13-e18.PubMed De Luca d’Alessandro E, Bonacci S, Giraldi G: Aging populations: the health and quality of life of the elderly. Clin Ter 2011, 162: e13-e18.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Diener E, Suh E: Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 1997, 40: 189–216. 10.1023/A:1006859511756CrossRef Diener E, Suh E: Measuring quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research 1997, 40: 189–216. 10.1023/A:1006859511756CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Power M, Kuyken W, Orley J: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46: 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef Power M, Kuyken W, Orley J: The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46: 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Engel GL: The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977, 196: 129–136. 10.1126/science.847460PubMedCrossRef Engel GL: The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977, 196: 129–136. 10.1126/science.847460PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bowling A: Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1991. Bowling A: Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1991.
9.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL: Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118: 622–629. 10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009PubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL: Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118: 622–629. 10.7326/0003-4819-118-8-199304150-00009PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Power M, Schmidt S: WHOQOL-OLD Manual. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2004. Power M, Schmidt S: WHOQOL-OLD Manual. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2004.
11.
go back to reference Power MJ, Green AM: Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module. Qual Life Res 2010, 19: 571–584. 10.1007/s11136-010-9616-6PubMedCrossRef Power MJ, Green AM: Development of the WHOQOL disabilities module. Qual Life Res 2010, 19: 571–584. 10.1007/s11136-010-9616-6PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS: PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 2001, 39: 800–812. 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006PubMedCrossRef Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS: PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care 2001, 39: 800–812. 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Harper A, Power M: Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med 1998, 28: 551–558.CrossRef Harper A, Power M: Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med 1998, 28: 551–558.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Gandek B: Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51: 903–912. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00081-XPubMedCrossRef Ware JE Jr, Gandek B: Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51: 903–912. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00081-XPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference World Health Organization: WHOQOL User Manual: Programme on Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998. World Health Organization: WHOQOL User Manual: Programme on Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.
16.
go back to reference Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology SYSU: Instruments for quality of life assessment. In WHOQOL-BREF. Beijing: Chinese Standard Publishing House; 1999. Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology SYSU: Instruments for quality of life assessment. In WHOQOL-BREF. Beijing: Chinese Standard Publishing House; 1999.
17.
go back to reference Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S: Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 2197–2214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9PubMedCrossRef Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S: Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 2197–2214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Eser S, Saatli G, Eser E, Baydur H, Fidaner C: The reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-Old). Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2010, 21: 37–48.PubMed Eser S, Saatli G, Eser E, Baydur H, Fidaner C: The reliability and validity of the Turkish Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument-Older Adults Module (WHOQOL-Old). Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2010, 21: 37–48.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Halvorsrud L, Kalfoss M, Diseth A: Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD module. Scand J Caring Sci 2008, 22: 292–305. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00523.xPubMedCrossRef Halvorsrud L, Kalfoss M, Diseth A: Reliability and validity of the Norwegian WHOQOL-OLD module. Scand J Caring Sci 2008, 22: 292–305. 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00523.xPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sudnongbua S, LaGrow S, Boddy J: Feelings of abandonment and quality of life among older persons in rural northeast Thailand. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2010, 25: 257–269. 10.1007/s10823-010-9126-6PubMedCrossRef Sudnongbua S, LaGrow S, Boddy J: Feelings of abandonment and quality of life among older persons in rural northeast Thailand. J Cross Cult Gerontol 2010, 25: 257–269. 10.1007/s10823-010-9126-6PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fleck MP, Chachamovich E, Trentini C: Development and validation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Rev Saude Publica 2006, 40: 785–791. 10.1590/S0034-89102006000600007PubMedCrossRef Fleck MP, Chachamovich E, Trentini C: Development and validation of the Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. Rev Saude Publica 2006, 40: 785–791. 10.1590/S0034-89102006000600007PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sun X: Study on statistical methods for development of WHOQOL-OLD. Sun Yat-sen University: Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology; 2003. Sun X: Study on statistical methods for development of WHOQOL-OLD. Sun Yat-sen University: Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology; 2003.
24.
go back to reference Nunnally JC, Bernstein I: Psychometric theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. Nunnally JC, Bernstein I: Psychometric theory. 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
25.
go back to reference Hu L-t, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary J 1999, 6: 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef Hu L-t, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary J 1999, 6: 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Cresswell SL, Eklund RC: The convergent and discriminant validity of burnout measures in sport: a multi-trait/multi-method analysis. J Sports Sci 2006, 24: 209–220. 10.1080/02640410500131431PubMedCrossRef Cresswell SL, Eklund RC: The convergent and discriminant validity of burnout measures in sport: a multi-trait/multi-method analysis. J Sports Sci 2006, 24: 209–220. 10.1080/02640410500131431PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lucas Carrasco R: International perspective on quality of life in older adults. The WHOQOL OLD project. Vertex 2007, 18: 130–137.PubMed Lucas Carrasco R: International perspective on quality of life in older adults. The WHOQOL OLD project. Vertex 2007, 18: 130–137.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ye RF, Zhang ML, Deng WP: Correlative analysis between received support, anticipated support and quality of life in retired elderly patients. Chin J of Behav Med Sci 2008, 17: 217–219. Ye RF, Zhang ML, Deng WP: Correlative analysis between received support, anticipated support and quality of life in retired elderly patients. Chin J of Behav Med Sci 2008, 17: 217–219.
30.
go back to reference Guo AM, Weng XQ, Wu AN: Analysis on quality of life of elderly in urban area. China Public Health 2002, 18: 3. Guo AM, Weng XQ, Wu AN: Analysis on quality of life of elderly in urban area. China Public Health 2002, 18: 3.
31.
go back to reference Luo M, Zhang LY, Han Y: Study on older adults quality of life in urban-area nursing house in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics 2009, 9: 2. Luo M, Zhang LY, Han Y: Study on older adults quality of life in urban-area nursing house in Beijing. Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics 2009, 9: 2.
32.
go back to reference Sun X, Hao Y, Fang J: Item selection in development of WHOQOL - OLD. Chin Ment Health J 2004, 18: 455–457. 454 Sun X, Hao Y, Fang J: Item selection in development of WHOQOL - OLD. Chin Ment Health J 2004, 18: 455–457. 454
33.
go back to reference Bei W, Gao HL, Liu XQ: A Study on applicability of WHOQOL-OLD module in Chinese elderly patients with prostatic hyperplasia. Chinese Journal of Nursing 2006, 41: 687–690. Bei W, Gao HL, Liu XQ: A Study on applicability of WHOQOL-OLD module in Chinese elderly patients with prostatic hyperplasia. Chinese Journal of Nursing 2006, 41: 687–690.
34.
go back to reference Han QS: Situation of and problems in present social participation of older people and the countermeasures. Journal of Nanjing College for Population Programme Management 2007, 23: 4. Han QS: Situation of and problems in present social participation of older people and the countermeasures. Journal of Nanjing College for Population Programme Management 2007, 23: 4.
35.
go back to reference Wang B, Gao HL, Liu XQ: A Study on applicability of WHOQOL-OLD module in Chinese elderly patients with prostatic hyperplasia. Chinese Journal of Nursing 2006, 41: 687–690. Wang B, Gao HL, Liu XQ: A Study on applicability of WHOQOL-OLD module in Chinese elderly patients with prostatic hyperplasia. Chinese Journal of Nursing 2006, 41: 687–690.
36.
go back to reference Bowling A: The psychometric properties of the older people’s quality of life questionnaire, compared with the CASP-19 and the WHOQOL-OLD. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2009, 2009: 298950.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bowling A: The psychometric properties of the older people’s quality of life questionnaire, compared with the CASP-19 and the WHOQOL-OLD. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2009, 2009: 298950.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Wu Y, Huxley R, Li L, Anna V, Xie G, Yao C, Woodward M, Li X, Chalmers J, Gao R: Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China data from the China national nutrition and health survey 2002. Circulation 2008, 118: 2679–2686. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788166PubMedCrossRef Wu Y, Huxley R, Li L, Anna V, Xie G, Yao C, Woodward M, Li X, Chalmers J, Gao R: Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China data from the China national nutrition and health survey 2002. Circulation 2008, 118: 2679–2686. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.788166PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Phillips MR, Yang G, Zhang Y, Wang L, Ji H, Zhou M: Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case–control psychological autopsy study. Lancet 2002, 360: 1728–1736. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11681-3PubMedCrossRef Phillips MR, Yang G, Zhang Y, Wang L, Ji H, Zhou M: Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case–control psychological autopsy study. Lancet 2002, 360: 1728–1736. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11681-3PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Liu M, Wu B, Wang W-Z, Lee L-M, Zhang S-H, Kong L-Z: Stroke in China: epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies. The Lancet Neurology 2007, 6: 456–464. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70004-2PubMedCrossRef Liu M, Wu B, Wang W-Z, Lee L-M, Zhang S-H, Kong L-Z: Stroke in China: epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies. The Lancet Neurology 2007, 6: 456–464. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70004-2PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Cui G, Liu Q: Regional market segments of China: opportunities and barriers in a big emerging market. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2000, 17: 55–72. 10.1108/07363760010309546CrossRef Cui G, Liu Q: Regional market segments of China: opportunities and barriers in a big emerging market. Journal of Consumer Marketing 2000, 17: 55–72. 10.1108/07363760010309546CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation
Authors
Rong Liu
Shaomin Wu
Yuantao Hao
Jing Gu
Jiqian Fang
Nanqiao Cai
Jinxin Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-156

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2013 Go to the issue