Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research

Decomposition of socioeconomic inequalities in cigarette smoking: the case of Namibia

Authors: Zunda Chisha, Chijioke O. Nwosu, John Ele-Ojo Ataguba

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Namibia has one of the highest levels of income inequality in the world. Increased smoking prevalence, especially among the youth, may leave the country facing the spectre of higher smoking-related disease prevalence in the years to come. This study examines socioeconomic inequalities in smoking in Namibia and explores the drivers of this inequality.

Methods

Data are obtained from the Namibia 2013 Demographic and Health Survey, a nationally representative survey. Concentration curves and indices are calculated for cigarette smoking prevalence and intensity to assess the respective inequalities. Smoking intensity is defined as the number of cigarette sticks smoked within the last 24 h before the survey. We use a decomposition technique to identify the contribution of various covariates to socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence and intensity.

Results

The concentration indices for socioeconomic inequality in cigarette smoking prevalence and smoking intensity are estimated at 0.021 and 0.135, respectively. This suggests that cigarette smoking is more prevalent among the wealthy and that they smoke more frequently compared to less wealthy Namibians. For smoking intensity, the biggest statistically significant contributors to inequality are marital status, wealth and region dummy variables while for smoking prevalence, education and place of dwelling (urban vs rural) are the main contributors.

Conclusion

While overall inequality in smoking prevalence and intensity is focused among the wealthy, the contribution of region of residence and education warrant some attention from policy makers. Based on our results, we suggest an assessment of compliance and enforcement of the Tobacco Products Control Act, that initially focuses on regions with reportedly low education statistics followed by an appropriate implementation strategy to address the challenges identified in implementing effective tobacco control interventions.
Footnotes
1
The sample for the 2013 Namibia DHS is a stratified sample selected in two stages. In the first stage,
554 enumeration areas (EAs)—269 in urban areas and 285 in rural areas—are selected with a stratified probability proportional to size selection from the sampling frame. The size of an EA is defined according to the number of households residing in the EA, as recorded in the 2011 Population and Housing Census.
Stratification is achieved by separating every region into urban and rural areas. Therefore, the 13 regions
are stratified into 26 sampling strata (13 rural strata and 13 urban strata). Samples are selected
independently in every stratum, with a predetermined number of EAs selected. A complete household
listing and mapping operation is carried out in all selected clusters. In the second stage, a fixed number
of 20 households is selected in every urban and rural cluster according to equal probability systematic
sampling.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tomori O, Omaswa F, Bekure S, Blecher E, Devotsu R, Haile-Mariam D, et al. Preventing a tobacco epidemic in Africa: a call for effective action to support health, social, and economic development 2014; Tomori O, Omaswa F, Bekure S, Blecher E, Devotsu R, Haile-Mariam D, et al. Preventing a tobacco epidemic in Africa: a call for effective action to support health, social, and economic development 2014;
3.
go back to reference Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Karvonen S, Lahelma E. Socioeconomic status and smoking: analysing inequalities with multiple indicators Eur J Public Health Oxford University Press; 2005;15:262–9. Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Karvonen S, Lahelma E. Socioeconomic status and smoking: analysing inequalities with multiple indicators Eur J Public Health Oxford University Press; 2005;15:262–9.
4.
go back to reference Hosseinpoor AR, Parker LA, Tursan d’Espaignet E, Chatterji S. Socioeconomic inequality in smoking in low-income and middle-income countries: results from the world health survey. PLoS One. 2012;7. Hosseinpoor AR, Parker LA, Tursan d’Espaignet E, Chatterji S. Socioeconomic inequality in smoking in low-income and middle-income countries: results from the world health survey. PLoS One. 2012;7.
5.
go back to reference Sala-i-Martın X. On the health poverty trap. In: Health and economic growth: findings and policy implications. Cambridge: MIT press; 2005. Sala-i-Martın X. On the health poverty trap. In: Health and economic growth: findings and policy implications. Cambridge: MIT press; 2005.
6.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute and World Health Organization. Monograph 21 the economics of tobacco and Tob Control 2016. National Cancer Institute and World Health Organization. Monograph 21 the economics of tobacco and Tob Control 2016.
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017. 2017. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017. 2017.
11.
go back to reference Allen L, Williams J, Townsend N, Mikkelsen B, Roberts N, Foster C, et al. Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Heal Elsevier. 2017;5:e277–89.CrossRef Allen L, Williams J, Townsend N, Mikkelsen B, Roberts N, Foster C, et al. Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Heal Elsevier. 2017;5:e277–89.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1248:107–23.CrossRef Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munafò M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1248:107–23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference The Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services (MoHSS) and ICF International. The Namibia Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Windhoek, Namibia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: MoHSS and ICF International. 2014. The Namibia Ministry of Health and Social Services (MoHSS) and ICF International. The Namibia Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Windhoek, Namibia, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: MoHSS and ICF International. 2014.
15.
go back to reference Rutstein O.S. and Johnson K. DHS Comparative Reports No.6: The DHS Wealth Index. 2004. Rutstein O.S. and Johnson K. DHS Comparative Reports No.6: The DHS Wealth Index. 2004.
19.
go back to reference Erreygers G. Correcting the concentration index. J Health Econ Elsevier. 2009;28:504–15.CrossRef Erreygers G. Correcting the concentration index. J Health Econ Elsevier. 2009;28:504–15.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wagstaff A. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Econ Wiley Online Library. 2005;14:429–32. Wagstaff A. The bounds of the concentration index when the variable of interest is binary, with an application to immunization inequality. Health Econ Wiley Online Library. 2005;14:429–32.
21.
go back to reference Erreygers G. Correcting the concentration index: a reply to Wagstaff. J Health Econ Elsevier. 2009;28:521–4.CrossRef Erreygers G. Correcting the concentration index: a reply to Wagstaff. J Health Econ Elsevier. 2009;28:521–4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ataguba JE, Ojo KO, Ichoku HE. Explaining socio-economic inequalities in immunization coverage in Nigeria. Health Policy Plan Oxford University Press; 2016;31:1212–24. Ataguba JE, Ojo KO, Ichoku HE. Explaining socio-economic inequalities in immunization coverage in Nigeria. Health Policy Plan Oxford University Press; 2016;31:1212–24.
24.
go back to reference Khang Y-H, Cho H-J. Socioeconomic inequality in cigarette smoking: trends by gender, age, and socioeconomic position in South Korea, 1989–2003. Prev Med (Baltim) Elsevier. 2006;42:415–22.CrossRef Khang Y-H, Cho H-J. Socioeconomic inequality in cigarette smoking: trends by gender, age, and socioeconomic position in South Korea, 1989–2003. Prev Med (Baltim) Elsevier. 2006;42:415–22.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2011. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2011.
26.
go back to reference Government of the Republic of Namibia. Government Gazette of the Republic of Nambia. 2010 p. 1–26. Government of the Republic of Namibia. Government Gazette of the Republic of Nambia. 2010 p. 1–26.
27.
go back to reference Government of the Republic of Namibia. Government Gazette of the Republic of Nambia. 2014. Government of the Republic of Namibia. Government Gazette of the Republic of Nambia. 2014.
28.
go back to reference Tam J, van Walbeek C. Tobacco control in Namibia: the importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference. Tob Control. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014;23:518–23. Tam J, van Walbeek C. Tobacco control in Namibia: the importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference. Tob Control. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2014;23:518–23.
29.
go back to reference Levy DT, Chaloupka F, Gitchell J. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. J Public Heal Manag Pract LWW. 2004;10:338–53.CrossRef Levy DT, Chaloupka F, Gitchell J. The effects of tobacco control policies on smoking rates: a tobacco control scorecard. J Public Heal Manag Pract LWW. 2004;10:338–53.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wakefield M, Chaloupka F. Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tob Control BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2000;9:177–86. Wakefield M, Chaloupka F. Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tob Control BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2000;9:177–86.
31.
go back to reference Hassmiller KM, Warner KE, Mendez D, Levy DT, Romano E. Nondaily smokers: who are they. Am J Public Health American Public Health Association. 2003;93:1321–7.CrossRef Hassmiller KM, Warner KE, Mendez D, Levy DT, Romano E. Nondaily smokers: who are they. Am J Public Health American Public Health Association. 2003;93:1321–7.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Lloyd-Richardson EE, Papandonatos G, Kazura A, Stanton C, Niaura R. Differentiating stages of smoking intensity among adolescents: stage-specific psychological and social influences. J Consult Clin Psychol American Psychological Association. 2002;70:998.CrossRef Lloyd-Richardson EE, Papandonatos G, Kazura A, Stanton C, Niaura R. Differentiating stages of smoking intensity among adolescents: stage-specific psychological and social influences. J Consult Clin Psychol American Psychological Association. 2002;70:998.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Heal BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013;67:190–3.CrossRef Lorenc T, Petticrew M, Welch V, Tugwell P. What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. J Epidemiol Community Heal BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2013;67:190–3.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lee AJ, Crombie IK, Smith WCS, Tunstall-Pedoe HD. Cigarette smoking and employment status. Soc Sci Med Elsevier. 1991;33:1309–12.CrossRef Lee AJ, Crombie IK, Smith WCS, Tunstall-Pedoe HD. Cigarette smoking and employment status. Soc Sci Med Elsevier. 1991;33:1309–12.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Decomposition of socioeconomic inequalities in cigarette smoking: the case of Namibia
Authors
Zunda Chisha
Chijioke O. Nwosu
John Ele-Ojo Ataguba
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-0912-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2019 Go to the issue