Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China

Authors: Xue Yang, Mingsheng Chen, Jinglin Du, Zhonghua Wang

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

China has recently made efforts to integrate urban and rural basic medical insurance systems in order to ensure both urban and rural enrollees obtain unified benefits. However, whether the distribution of government healthcare subsides has become more equitable remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to analyze determinants of and inequality in net inpatient care benefits under the integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.

Methods

Data were obtained from a nationally representative household survey, the Fifth National Health Services Survey (2013), conducted in Anhui province. A multiple regression model and concentration index (CI) was used to estimate related factors and inequality of inpatient care net benefits.

Results

Findings indicated that individuals received more inpatient care benefits when urban and rural social healthcare systems were integrated. Factors associated with net benefits included gender, age, marital status, retirement, educational level, history of chronic diseases, health status, willingness to seek inpatient care and per capita income. The rich were found to disproportionately benefit from inpatient care, and the CI of net benefits for integrated insurance enrollees was the lowest among all three available health insurance schemes. These findings indicate that the recent unification of urban-rural social health insurances reduces inequality in net benefits from government subsidies. Some socioeconomic factors, such as per capita income, 60 years of age and over, history of chronic disease and high educational level positively influence inequality.

Conclusion

In China, accelerating the integration of urban and rural medical insurance systems is an effective way to increase equity of benefit in urban and rural areas. Strategies aimed at reducing inpatient benefit inequality must address socioeconomic factors influencing healthcare outcomes.
Footnotes
1
According to the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, China’s administrative regions are divided into provincial administrative regions, county administrative regions and township administrative regions. County-level units in our study represents County Administrative Region, such as municipal district, county, autonomous county, county-level city, autonomous banner, forest region and special administrative region.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference World Health Organization. The world health report 2013: research for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.CrossRef World Health Organization. The world health report 2013: research for universal health coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yip W, Hsiao W, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):833–42.CrossRef Yip W, Hsiao W, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A. Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet. 2012;379(9818):833–42.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhu K, Zhang L, Yuan S, et al. Health financing and integration of urban and rural residents’ basic medical insurance systems in China[J]. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):194.CrossRef Zhu K, Zhang L, Yuan S, et al. Health financing and integration of urban and rural residents’ basic medical insurance systems in China[J]. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):194.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yuan T, Qiu Y. Experience and enlightenment of urban and rural areas in China medical insurance[J]. Social Security Studies, 2016. Yuan T, Qiu Y. Experience and enlightenment of urban and rural areas in China medical insurance[J]. Social Security Studies, 2016.
8.
go back to reference Xu Y. The pattern of Unified Management of Medical Insurance for urban and rural residents is basically formed [J]. China Health Insurance. 2018;2:13–5. Xu Y. The pattern of Unified Management of Medical Insurance for urban and rural residents is basically formed [J]. China Health Insurance. 2018;2:13–5.
10.
go back to reference Asuming P. Getting the poor to enroll in health insurance, and its effect on utilization of health care and health: evidence from a field experiment in Ghana [J]. Job Market Paper-Columbia University; 2013. Asuming P. Getting the poor to enroll in health insurance, and its effect on utilization of health care and health: evidence from a field experiment in Ghana [J]. Job Market Paper-Columbia University; 2013.
11.
go back to reference Lu JFR, Hsiao WC. Does universal health insurance make health care unaffordable? Lessons from Taiwan[J]. Health Aff. 2003;22(3):77–88.CrossRef Lu JFR, Hsiao WC. Does universal health insurance make health care unaffordable? Lessons from Taiwan[J]. Health Aff. 2003;22(3):77–88.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Makinen M, Waters H, Rauch M, Almagambetova N, Bitran R, Gilson L, McIntyre D, Pannarunothai S, Prieto AL, Ubilla G, Ram S. Inequalities in health care use and expenditures: empirical data from eight developing countries and countries in transition. Bull WHO. 2000;78(1):55–65.PubMed Makinen M, Waters H, Rauch M, Almagambetova N, Bitran R, Gilson L, McIntyre D, Pannarunothai S, Prieto AL, Ubilla G, Ram S. Inequalities in health care use and expenditures: empirical data from eight developing countries and countries in transition. Bull WHO. 2000;78(1):55–65.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Wagstaff A. Benefit incidence analysis: are government health expenditures more pro-rich than we think? Health Econ. 2012;21(4):351–66.CrossRef Wagstaff A. Benefit incidence analysis: are government health expenditures more pro-rich than we think? Health Econ. 2012;21(4):351–66.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Huang N, Yip W, Chou YJ, et al. The distribution of net benefits under the National Health Insurance programme in Taiwan. Health Policy Plan. 2007;22:49–59.CrossRef Huang N, Yip W, Chou YJ, et al. The distribution of net benefits under the National Health Insurance programme in Taiwan. Health Policy Plan. 2007;22:49–59.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mtei G, Makawia S, Ally M, et al. Who pays and who benefits from health care? An assessment of equity in health care financing and benefit distribution in Tanzania [J]. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(Suppl 1(suppl_1)):i23.CrossRef Mtei G, Makawia S, Ally M, et al. Who pays and who benefits from health care? An assessment of equity in health care financing and benefit distribution in Tanzania [J]. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(Suppl 1(suppl_1)):i23.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference National Health Insurance Fund: Actuarial valuation report of the National Health Insurance Fund. Dar-es-Salaam: M/S iPrint Ltd; 2010. National Health Insurance Fund: Actuarial valuation report of the National Health Insurance Fund. Dar-es-Salaam: M/S iPrint Ltd; 2010.
17.
go back to reference Mtei G, Mulligan J A. Community health funds in Tanzania: a literature review.[J]. Community Health Funds in Tanzania A Literature Review, 2007. Mtei G, Mulligan J A. Community health funds in Tanzania: a literature review.[J]. Community Health Funds in Tanzania A Literature Review, 2007.
18.
go back to reference Macha J, Harris B, Garshong B, et al. Factors influencing the burden of health care financing and the distribution of health care benefits in Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa. Health Policy & Planning. 2012;27(suppl 1(suppl_1)):i46–54.CrossRef Macha J, Harris B, Garshong B, et al. Factors influencing the burden of health care financing and the distribution of health care benefits in Ghana, Tanzania and South Africa. Health Policy & Planning. 2012;27(suppl 1(suppl_1)):i46–54.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chen M, Fang G, Wang L, et al. Who benefits from government healthcare subsidies? An assessment of the equity of healthcare benefits distribution in China [J]. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119840.CrossRef Chen M, Fang G, Wang L, et al. Who benefits from government healthcare subsidies? An assessment of the equity of healthcare benefits distribution in China [J]. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119840.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wang H, Yip W, Zhang L, et al. Community-based health insurance in poor rural China: the distribution of net benefits. Health Policy Plan. 2005;20(6):366–74.CrossRef Wang H, Yip W, Zhang L, et al. Community-based health insurance in poor rural China: the distribution of net benefits. Health Policy Plan. 2005;20(6):366–74.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pan J, Tian S, Zhou Q, et al. Benefit distribution of social health insurance: evidence from china’s urban resident basic medical insurance. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:853–9.CrossRef Pan J, Tian S, Zhou Q, et al. Benefit distribution of social health insurance: evidence from china’s urban resident basic medical insurance. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31:853–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Qing-yue MENG, Yan JIAO, Bao-rong YU, et al. Comparing the distribution of new rural cooperate medical scheme benefits among income groups in Shandong and Ningxia. Chinese Health Economics. 2008;27(11):41–3. Qing-yue MENG, Yan JIAO, Bao-rong YU, et al. Comparing the distribution of new rural cooperate medical scheme benefits among income groups in Shandong and Ningxia. Chinese Health Economics. 2008;27(11):41–3.
23.
go back to reference Wang L, Wang A, Fitzgerald G, et al. Who benefited from the new rural cooperative medical system in China? A case study on Anhui Province. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):195.CrossRef Wang L, Wang A, Fitzgerald G, et al. Who benefited from the new rural cooperative medical system in China? A case study on Anhui Province. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):195.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Junxiang LIU, Xuping ZHANG, Hongjun CHEN, Zhaoxia LUO. Fairness of urban and rural basic medical insurance reform—based on the investigation of Hunan Province. Chinese Medical Ethics. 2015;28(4):542–5. Junxiang LIU, Xuping ZHANG, Hongjun CHEN, Zhaoxia LUO. Fairness of urban and rural basic medical insurance reform—based on the investigation of Hunan Province. Chinese Medical Ethics. 2015;28(4):542–5.
25.
go back to reference Yuan S, Rehnberg C, Sun X, et al. Income related inequalities in New Cooperative Medical Scheme: a five-year empirical study of Junan County in China. Int. J. Equity Health, 13,1(2014-05-16). 2014;13(1):1–15.CrossRef Yuan S, Rehnberg C, Sun X, et al. Income related inequalities in New Cooperative Medical Scheme: a five-year empirical study of Junan County in China. Int. J. Equity Health, 13,1(2014-05-16). 2014;13(1):1–15.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference LI Y. Research of Prediction and Equity of Utilization of Health Service of Residents in China.(Doctoral dissertation)Shandong University,china,2016. LI Y. Research of Prediction and Equity of Utilization of Health Service of Residents in China.(Doctoral dissertation)Shandong University,china,2016.
27.
go back to reference Xin-xin JIA, Hong-yan HU, Xuan-xuan WANG, et al. Analysis on self-rated health status and its influencing factors among Chinese residents aged 15 and above. Chinese Journal of Health Policy. 2016;9(6):62–7. Xin-xin JIA, Hong-yan HU, Xuan-xuan WANG, et al. Analysis on self-rated health status and its influencing factors among Chinese residents aged 15 and above. Chinese Journal of Health Policy. 2016;9(6):62–7.
28.
go back to reference Wang J, Meng QY, Yip W, et al. Correlation between subjective well-being and health status of rural residents [J]. Journal of Shandong University. 2008;46(9):919–21. Wang J, Meng QY, Yip W, et al. Correlation between subjective well-being and health status of rural residents [J]. Journal of Shandong University. 2008;46(9):919–21.
29.
go back to reference O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, and Lindelow M. Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. World Bank Institute Learning Resources Series 2007; 159–164. O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, and Lindelow M. Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation. World Bank Institute Learning Resources Series 2007; 159–164.
30.
go back to reference Wagstaff A, Van DE, Watanabe N. On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. Washington D. 2003;112(1):207–23. Wagstaff A, Van DE, Watanabe N. On decomposing the causes of health sector inequalities with an application to malnutrition inequalities in Vietnam. Washington D. 2003;112(1):207–23.
31.
go back to reference O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Rannan-Eliya RP, Somanathan A, Adhikari SR, Harbianto D, Garg CG, Hanvoravongchai P, Huq MN, Karan A, Leung GM, Ng C-W, Pande BR, Tin K, Tisayaticom K, Trisnantoro L, Zhang Y, Zhao Y [J]. The World Bank Economic Review. 2007;21(1):93–123.CrossRef O’Donnell O, van Doorslaer E, Rannan-Eliya RP, Somanathan A, Adhikari SR, Harbianto D, Garg CG, Hanvoravongchai P, Huq MN, Karan A, Leung GM, Ng C-W, Pande BR, Tin K, Tisayaticom K, Trisnantoro L, Zhang Y, Zhao Y [J]. The World Bank Economic Review. 2007;21(1):93–123.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Vaughan K, Akwataghibe N, Fakunle B, et al. Who benefits from the Obio Community Health Insurance Scheme in Rivers State, Nigeria? A benefit incidence analysis. Int Health. 2016;8(6):405–12.CrossRef Vaughan K, Akwataghibe N, Fakunle B, et al. Who benefits from the Obio Community Health Insurance Scheme in Rivers State, Nigeria? A benefit incidence analysis. Int Health. 2016;8(6):405–12.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Zhong-liang ZHOU, Jian-min GAO. ZHANG Jun-sheng, analyzing the benefit equity in China’s basic health insurance system. Chinese Health Economics. 2013;32(7):21–3. Zhong-liang ZHOU, Jian-min GAO. ZHANG Jun-sheng, analyzing the benefit equity in China’s basic health insurance system. Chinese Health Economics. 2013;32(7):21–3.
34.
go back to reference Feng SY, et al. The Public Benefit Equity of Integrated Medical Insurance System. The Chinese Health Service Management. 2015;32(9):670–2. Feng SY, et al. The Public Benefit Equity of Integrated Medical Insurance System. The Chinese Health Service Management. 2015;32(9):670–2.
35.
go back to reference Xu L, Jian WY. Empirical study on the benefit equity of essential health insurance system in China [J]. Medicine & Society. 2010;23(11):45–7. Xu L, Jian WY. Empirical study on the benefit equity of essential health insurance system in China [J]. Medicine & Society. 2010;23(11):45–7.
36.
go back to reference Gu H, Kou Y, Yan Z, et al. Income related inequality and influencing factors: a study for the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure in rural China [J]. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):727.CrossRef Gu H, Kou Y, Yan Z, et al. Income related inequality and influencing factors: a study for the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure in rural China [J]. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):727.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Castroleal F, Dayton J, Demery L, et al. Public spending on health care in Africa: do the poor benefit? Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):66. Castroleal F, Dayton J, Demery L, et al. Public spending on health care in Africa: do the poor benefit? Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(1):66.
38.
go back to reference Kuwawenaruwa A, Makawia S, et al. Promoting universal financial protection: a case study of new management; of community health insurance in Tanzania. Health Research Policy & Systems. 2013;11(1):21.CrossRef Kuwawenaruwa A, Makawia S, et al. Promoting universal financial protection: a case study of new management; of community health insurance in Tanzania. Health Research Policy & Systems. 2013;11(1):21.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China
Authors
Xue Yang
Mingsheng Chen
Jinglin Du
Zhonghua Wang
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0891-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018 Go to the issue