Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Medical termination of pregnancy service delivery in the context of decentralization: social and structural influences

Authors: Alana Hulme-Chambers, Samantha Clune, Jane Tomnay

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Medical termination of pregnancy (MToP) is a safe and acceptable abortion option. Depending on country context, MToP can be administered by general practitioners and mid-level healthcare providers in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy. Like other high-income countries, a range of social and structural barriers to MToP service provision exist in Australia. To counter some of these barriers, geographic decentralization of MToP was undertaken in rural Victoria, Australia, through training service providers about MToP to increase service delivery opportunities. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors that enabled and challenged the decentralization process.

Methods

Face-to-face and telephone interviews were undertaken between April and June 2016 with a purposeful sample of six training providers and 13 general practitioners (GP) and nurse training participants. Study participants were asked about their perceptions of motivations, enablers and challenges to MToP provision. A published conceptual framework of synergies between decentralization and service delivery was used to analyse the study findings.

Results

Three key themes emerged from the study findings. First, the effort to decentralize MToP was primarily supported by motivations related to making service access more equitable as well as the willingness of training providers to devolve their informal power, in the form of MToP medical expertise, to training participants. Next, the enablers for MToP decentralization included changes in the regulatory environment relating to decriminalization of abortion and availability of required medication, formation of partnerships to deliver training, provision of MToP clinical resources and local collegial support. Finally, challenges to MToP decentralization were few but significant. These included a lack of a state-wide strategy for service provision, provider concerns about coping with service demand, and provider stigma in the form of perceived negative community or collegial attitudes. These were significant enough to create caution for GPs and nurses considering service provision.

Conclusions

Decentralization concepts offer an innovative way for reframing and tackling issues associated with improving MToP service delivery. There is scope for more research about MToP decentralization in other country contexts. These findings are important for informing future rural MToP service expansion efforts that improve equity in service access.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kmietowicz Z. Medical abortions more common than surgery for first time in 2014 in England and Wales. BMJ. 2015;350:h3177.CrossRef Kmietowicz Z. Medical abortions more common than surgery for first time in 2014 in England and Wales. BMJ. 2015;350:h3177.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fink G, Gerber S, Dean G. Misoprostol in abortion care. Review and update. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2017;6:100–8.CrossRef Fink G, Gerber S, Dean G. Misoprostol in abortion care. Review and update. Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2017;6:100–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 143: medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:676–92.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 143: medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:676–92.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388:258–67.CrossRef Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388:258–67.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Renner R-M, Brahmi D, Kapp N. Who can provide effective and safe termination of pregnancy care? A systematic review. BJOG. 2013;120:23–31.CrossRef Renner R-M, Brahmi D, Kapp N. Who can provide effective and safe termination of pregnancy care? A systematic review. BJOG. 2013;120:23–31.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kopp Kallner H, Gomperts R, Salomonsson E, et al. The efficacy, safety and acceptability of medical termination of pregnancy provided by standard care by doctors or by nurse-midwives: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. BJOG. 2015;122:510–7.CrossRef Kopp Kallner H, Gomperts R, Salomonsson E, et al. The efficacy, safety and acceptability of medical termination of pregnancy provided by standard care by doctors or by nurse-midwives: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. BJOG. 2015;122:510–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Baird B. Medical abortion in Australia: a short history. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(46):169–76.CrossRef Baird B. Medical abortion in Australia: a short history. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23(46):169–76.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference de Moel-Mandel C, Shelley JM. The legal and non-legal barriers to abortion access in Australia: a review of the evidence. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(2):114–22.CrossRef de Moel-Mandel C, Shelley JM. The legal and non-legal barriers to abortion access in Australia: a review of the evidence. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(2):114–22.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference de Costa C. Medical abortion: the Australian experience. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012;7(1):25–30.CrossRef de Costa C. Medical abortion: the Australian experience. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2012;7(1):25–30.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tomnay J, Coelli L, Davidson A, et al. Providing accessible medical abortion services in a Victorian rural community: a description and audit of service delivery and contraception follow up. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;16:175–80.CrossRef Tomnay J, Coelli L, Davidson A, et al. Providing accessible medical abortion services in a Victorian rural community: a description and audit of service delivery and contraception follow up. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;16:175–80.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dawson A, Nicolls R, Bateson D, et al. Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2017;14:39.CrossRef Dawson A, Nicolls R, Bateson D, et al. Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study. Reprod Health. 2017;14:39.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grossman D, Goldstone P. Mifepristone by prescription: a dream in the United States but reality in Australia. Contraception. 2015;92:186–9.CrossRef Grossman D, Goldstone P. Mifepristone by prescription: a dream in the United States but reality in Australia. Contraception. 2015;92:186–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EMH. Conceptualising abortion stigma. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11:625–39.CrossRef Kumar A, Hessini L, Mitchell EMH. Conceptualising abortion stigma. Cult Health Sex. 2009;11:625–39.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hanschmidt F, Linde K, Hilbert A, et al. Abortion stigma: a systematic review. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48:169–77.CrossRef Hanschmidt F, Linde K, Hilbert A, et al. Abortion stigma: a systematic review. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016;48:169–77.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Keogh L, Newton D, Bayly C, et al. Intended and unintended consequences of abortion law reform: perspectives of abortion experts in Victoria, Australia. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017;43:18–24.CrossRef Keogh L, Newton D, Bayly C, et al. Intended and unintended consequences of abortion law reform: perspectives of abortion experts in Victoria, Australia. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2017;43:18–24.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hulme-Chambers A, Temple-Smith M, Davidson A, et al. Australian women’s experiences of a rural medical termination of pregnancy service: a qualitative study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;15:23–7.CrossRef Hulme-Chambers A, Temple-Smith M, Davidson A, et al. Australian women’s experiences of a rural medical termination of pregnancy service: a qualitative study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;15:23–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Doran F, Hornibrook J. Rural New South Wales women’s access to abortion services: highlights from an exploratory qualitative study. Aust J Rural Health. 2014;22:121–6.CrossRef Doran F, Hornibrook J. Rural New South Wales women’s access to abortion services: highlights from an exploratory qualitative study. Aust J Rural Health. 2014;22:121–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Astbury-Ward E, Parry O, Carnwell R. Stigma, abortion and disclosure – findings from a qualitative study. J Sex Med. 2012;9:3137–47.CrossRef Astbury-Ward E, Parry O, Carnwell R. Stigma, abortion and disclosure – findings from a qualitative study. J Sex Med. 2012;9:3137–47.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mohammed J, North N, Ashton T. Decentralisation; the question of management capacity: a response to recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(1):61–3.CrossRef Mohammed J, North N, Ashton T. Decentralisation; the question of management capacity: a response to recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(1):61–3.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Regmi K. Health service decentralization: an overview. In: Regmi K, editor. Decentralizing health services: a global perspective. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 1–15.CrossRef Regmi K. Health service decentralization: an overview. In: Regmi K, editor. Decentralizing health services: a global perspective. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 1–15.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Peckham S. Decentralisation – a portmanteau concept that promises much but fails to deliver? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(12):729–32.CrossRef Peckham S. Decentralisation – a portmanteau concept that promises much but fails to deliver? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(12):729–32.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Peckham S, Exworthy M, Powell M, Greener I. Decentralisation, centralisation and devolution in publicly funded health services: decentralisation as an organisational model for health care in England, Report for the National co-ordinating Centre for NHS service delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO). London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2005. Peckham S, Exworthy M, Powell M, Greener I. Decentralisation, centralisation and devolution in publicly funded health services: decentralisation as an organisational model for health care in England, Report for the National co-ordinating Centre for NHS service delivery and Organisation R & D (NCCSDO). London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2005.
27.
go back to reference Bossert TJ, Mitchell AD. Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:39–48.CrossRef Bossert TJ, Mitchell AD. Health sector decentralization and local decision-making: decision space, institutional capacities and accountability in Pakistan. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:39–48.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mohammed J, North N, Ashton T. Decentralisation of health services in Fiji: a decision space analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(3):173–81.CrossRef Mohammed J, North N, Ashton T. Decentralisation of health services in Fiji: a decision space analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(3):173–81.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dawson A, Bateson D, Estoesta J, Sullivan E. Towards comprehensive early abortion service delivery in high income countries: insights for improving universal access to abortion in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:612.CrossRef Dawson A, Bateson D, Estoesta J, Sullivan E. Towards comprehensive early abortion service delivery in high income countries: insights for improving universal access to abortion in Australia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:612.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Grindlay K, Lane K, Grossman D. Women’s and providers’ experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23(2):e117–22.CrossRef Grindlay K, Lane K, Grossman D. Women’s and providers’ experiences with medical abortion provided through telemedicine: a qualitative study. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23(2):e117–22.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Berer M, Hoggart L. Medical abortion pills have the potential to change everything about abortion. Contraception. 2018;97:79–81.CrossRef Berer M, Hoggart L. Medical abortion pills have the potential to change everything about abortion. Contraception. 2018;97:79–81.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Moore P, Stephens K. Can we decentralise abortion services in Victoria? A case study of collaboration in northeast Victoria. In: Public Health Association Australia 2nd National Sexual & Reproductive Health Conference; 2014. Moore P, Stephens K. Can we decentralise abortion services in Victoria? A case study of collaboration in northeast Victoria. In: Public Health Association Australia 2nd National Sexual & Reproductive Health Conference; 2014.
33.
go back to reference Baird B. ‘Happy abortionists’. Considering the place of doctors in the practice of abortion in Australia since the early 1990s. Aust Fem Stud. 2015;29:419–34.CrossRef Baird B. ‘Happy abortionists’. Considering the place of doctors in the practice of abortion in Australia since the early 1990s. Aust Fem Stud. 2015;29:419–34.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Harris LH, Debbink M, Martin L, Hassinger J. Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: findings from a pilot study of the providers share workshop. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1062–70.CrossRef Harris LH, Debbink M, Martin L, Hassinger J. Dynamics of stigma in abortion work: findings from a pilot study of the providers share workshop. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73:1062–70.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference de Costa C, Douglas H, Hamblin J, Ramsay P, Shircore S. Abortion law across Australia – a review of nine jurisdictions. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:105–11.CrossRef de Costa C, Douglas H, Hamblin J, Ramsay P, Shircore S. Abortion law across Australia – a review of nine jurisdictions. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55:105–11.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Emmel N. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research. A realist approach. London: Sage; 2013.CrossRef Emmel N. Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research. A realist approach. London: Sage; 2013.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods.3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods.3rd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2002.
39.
go back to reference Bossert TJ. Decentralization of health systems: challenges and global issues of the twenty-first century. In: Regmi K, editor. Decentralizing health services: a global perspective. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 199–207.CrossRef Bossert TJ. Decentralization of health systems: challenges and global issues of the twenty-first century. In: Regmi K, editor. Decentralizing health services: a global perspective. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 199–207.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Sumah AM, Baatiema L, Abimbola S. The impacts of decentralisation on health-related equity: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy. 2016;1(20):1183–92.CrossRef Sumah AM, Baatiema L, Abimbola S. The impacts of decentralisation on health-related equity: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy. 2016;1(20):1183–92.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Jelinska K, Yanow S. Putting abortion pills into women’s hands: realizing the full potential of medical abortion. Contraception. 2018;97:86–9.CrossRef Jelinska K, Yanow S. Putting abortion pills into women’s hands: realizing the full potential of medical abortion. Contraception. 2018;97:86–9.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg JR, Kavanaugh ML, De Zordo S, Becker D. Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(3S):S49–54.CrossRef Norris A, Bessett D, Steinberg JR, Kavanaugh ML, De Zordo S, Becker D. Abortion stigma: A reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences. Womens Health Issues. 2011;21(3S):S49–54.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Liwanag HJ, Wyss K. Assessing decentralisation is a challenging but necessary task if it should continue as a reform strategy: reflections from the systematic review by Sumah, Baatiema, and Abimola. Health Policy. 2017;121:468–70.CrossRef Liwanag HJ, Wyss K. Assessing decentralisation is a challenging but necessary task if it should continue as a reform strategy: reflections from the systematic review by Sumah, Baatiema, and Abimola. Health Policy. 2017;121:468–70.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Udaphyay UD. Innovative models are needed for equitable abortion access in the USA. Lancet. 2017;2:e493. Udaphyay UD. Innovative models are needed for equitable abortion access in the USA. Lancet. 2017;2:e493.
47.
go back to reference Black K, Bateson D. Medical abortion is fundamental to women’s health care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57:245–7.CrossRef Black K, Bateson D. Medical abortion is fundamental to women’s health care. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57:245–7.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kirkman M, Rowe H, Hardiman A, Rosenthal D. Abortion is a difficult solution to a problem. A discursive analysis of interviews with women considering or undergoing abortion in Australia. Women's Stud Int Forum. 2011;34:121–9.CrossRef Kirkman M, Rowe H, Hardiman A, Rosenthal D. Abortion is a difficult solution to a problem. A discursive analysis of interviews with women considering or undergoing abortion in Australia. Women's Stud Int Forum. 2011;34:121–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Medical termination of pregnancy service delivery in the context of decentralization: social and structural influences
Authors
Alana Hulme-Chambers
Samantha Clune
Jane Tomnay
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0888-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2018 Go to the issue