Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2/2017

01-06-2017 | Family Planning (A Burke, Section Editor)

Misoprostol in Abortion Care: Review and Update

Authors: Geetha Fink, Sharon Gerber, Gillian Dean

Published in: Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We seek to update readers on misoprostol use in abortion care. We discuss literature on misoprostol use in first trimester medication abortion, second trimester induction abortion, management of early pregnancy loss, and first and second trimester surgical abortion. We review publications investigating efficacy, acceptability, and safety of misoprostol doses, routes of administration, use with mifepristone and osmotic dilators, and timing in relation to mifepristone or surgery.

Recent Findings

In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration approved updated labeling for medication abortion: mifepristone 200 mg oral followed in 24–48 h by misoprostol 800 mcg buccal through 70 days gestation. Intervals less than 24 h decrease efficacy. The addition of mifepristone to misoprostol for second trimester induction abortion decreases time from misoprostol to complete uterine evacuation. Misoprostol may be used alone or in combination with osmotic dilators or mifepristone for cervical preparation for surgical abortion. Routine cervical priming with misoprostol is not recommended in the first trimester. Same-day cervical preparation with misoprostol may be used from the late first trimester through 18–20 weeks, although additional mechanical dilation may be required. After 18–20 weeks, misoprostol may be used with overnight osmotic dilators, although mifepristone may be preferred to avoid misoprostol side effects and enhance ease of the surgical procedure.

Summary

Misoprostol plays an indispensable role in abortion care and may be administered in doses of 400–800 mcg by oral, buccal, vaginal, and sublingual routes. More studies are needed to assess variations in dose and timing and to determine upper gestational age limits for same-day preparation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference • Goldberg AB, Allen RH. Misoprostol before first trimester surgical abortion: a patient-centered approach. Contraception. 2016;94(5):576–7. This letter to the editor argues against routine cervical preparation for surgical abortion in the first trimester and advocates instead for an individualized approach to cervical priming. CrossRefPubMed • Goldberg AB, Allen RH. Misoprostol before first trimester surgical abortion: a patient-centered approach. Contraception. 2016;94(5):576–7. This letter to the editor argues against routine cervical preparation for surgical abortion in the first trimester and advocates instead for an individualized approach to cervical priming. CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(1):88–92.CrossRefPubMed Zieman M, Fong SK, Benowitz NL, Banskter D, Darney PD. Absorption kinetics of misoprostol with oral or vaginal administration. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(1):88–92.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Danielsson KG, Marions L, Rodriguez A, Spur BW, Wong PY, Bygdeman M. Comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol on uterine contractility. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(2):275–80.PubMed Danielsson KG, Marions L, Rodriguez A, Spur BW, Wong PY, Bygdeman M. Comparison between oral and vaginal administration of misoprostol on uterine contractility. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(2):275–80.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC. Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):332–6.CrossRefPubMed Tang OS, Schweer H, Seyberth HW, Lee SW, Ho PC. Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):332–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schaff EA, DiCenzo R, Fielding SL. Comparison of misoprostol plasma concentrations following buccal and sublingual administration. Contraception. 2005;71(1):22–5.CrossRefPubMed Schaff EA, DiCenzo R, Fielding SL. Comparison of misoprostol plasma concentrations following buccal and sublingual administration. Contraception. 2005;71(1):22–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Meckstroth KR, Whitaker AK, Bertisch S, Goldberg AB, Darney PD. Misoprostol administered by epithelial routes: drug absorption and uterine response. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3 Pt 1):582–90.CrossRefPubMed Meckstroth KR, Whitaker AK, Bertisch S, Goldberg AB, Darney PD. Misoprostol administered by epithelial routes: drug absorption and uterine response. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3 Pt 1):582–90.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 143: medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):676–92.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 143: medical management of first-trimester abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):676–92.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Medical management of first-trimester abortion. Contraception. 2014;89(3):148–61. Medical management of first-trimester abortion. Contraception. 2014;89(3):148–61.
9.
go back to reference Trussell J, Nucatola D, Fjerstad M, Lichtenberg ES. Reduction in infection-related mortality since modifications in the regimen of medical abortion. Contraception. 2014;89(3):193–6.CrossRefPubMed Trussell J, Nucatola D, Fjerstad M, Lichtenberg ES. Reduction in infection-related mortality since modifications in the regimen of medical abortion. Contraception. 2014;89(3):193–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A. Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(18):1241–7.CrossRefPubMed Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A. Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(18):1241–7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Peyron R, Aubeny E, Targosz V, Silvestre L, Renault M, Elkik F, et al. Early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) and the orally active prostaglandin misoprostol. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(21):1509–13.CrossRefPubMed Peyron R, Aubeny E, Targosz V, Silvestre L, Renault M, Elkik F, et al. Early termination of pregnancy with mifepristone (RU 486) and the orally active prostaglandin misoprostol. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(21):1509–13.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Aubeny E, Peyron R, Turpin CL, Renault M, Targosz V, Silvestre L, et al. Termination of early pregnancy (up to 63 days of amenorrhea) with mifepristone and increasing doses of misoprostol [corrected]. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1995;40(Suppl 2):85–91.PubMed Aubeny E, Peyron R, Turpin CL, Renault M, Targosz V, Silvestre L, et al. Termination of early pregnancy (up to 63 days of amenorrhea) with mifepristone and increasing doses of misoprostol [corrected]. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1995;40(Suppl 2):85–91.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Schaff EA, Eisinger SH, Stadalius LS, Franks P, Gore BZ, Poppema S. Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion. Contraception. 1999;59(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMed Schaff EA, Eisinger SH, Stadalius LS, Franks P, Gore BZ, Poppema S. Low-dose mifepristone 200 mg and vaginal misoprostol for abortion. Contraception. 1999;59(1):1–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference World Health Organisation Task Force on Post-ovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training, World Health Organisation. Comparison of two doses of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for early medical abortion: a randomised trial. BJOG. 2000;107(4):524–30.CrossRef World Health Organisation Task Force on Post-ovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training, World Health Organisation. Comparison of two doses of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol for early medical abortion: a randomised trial. BJOG. 2000;107(4):524–30.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schaff EA, Fielding SL, Westhoff C. Randomized trial of oral versus vaginal misoprostol at one day after mifepristone for early medical abortion. Contraception. 2001;64(2):81–5.CrossRefPubMed Schaff EA, Fielding SL, Westhoff C. Randomized trial of oral versus vaginal misoprostol at one day after mifepristone for early medical abortion. Contraception. 2001;64(2):81–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Winikoff B, Dzuba IG, Creinin MD, Crowden WA, Goldberg AB, Gonzales J, et al. Two distinct oral routes of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1303–10.CrossRefPubMed Winikoff B, Dzuba IG, Creinin MD, Crowden WA, Goldberg AB, Gonzales J, et al. Two distinct oral routes of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(6):1303–10.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference • Winikoff B, Dzuba IG, Chong E, Goldberg AB, Lichtenberg ES, Ball C, et al. Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1070–6. This study provides evidence in support of the effectiveness and acceptability of outpatient medical abortion through 70 days gestation. PubMed • Winikoff B, Dzuba IG, Chong E, Goldberg AB, Lichtenberg ES, Ball C, et al. Extending outpatient medical abortion services through 70 days of gestational age. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):1070–6. This study provides evidence in support of the effectiveness and acceptability of outpatient medical abortion through 70 days gestation. PubMed
19.
go back to reference Fjerstad M, Sivin I, Lichtenberg ES, Trussell J, Cleland K, Cullins V. Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days. Contraception. 2009;80(3):282–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fjerstad M, Sivin I, Lichtenberg ES, Trussell J, Cleland K, Cullins V. Effectiveness of medical abortion with mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 59 gestational days. Contraception. 2009;80(3):282–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Cleland K, Creinin MD, Nucatola D, Nshom M, Trussell J. Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):166–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cleland K, Creinin MD, Nucatola D, Nshom M, Trussell J. Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):166–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Gatter M, Cleland K, Nucatola DL. Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days. Contraception. 2015;91(4):269–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gatter M, Cleland K, Nucatola DL. Efficacy and safety of medical abortion using mifepristone and buccal misoprostol through 63 days. Contraception. 2015;91(4):269–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference •• Chen MJ, Creinin MD. Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):12–21. This systematic review of over 33,000 medical abortion cases provides evidence in support of the effectiveness of the evidence-based regimen for medical abortion; this regimen is the one subsequently included in the updated FDA labeling for mifepristone. CrossRefPubMed •• Chen MJ, Creinin MD. Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(1):12–21. This systematic review of over 33,000 medical abortion cases provides evidence in support of the effectiveness of the evidence-based regimen for medical abortion; this regimen is the one subsequently included in the updated FDA labeling for mifepristone. CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tendler R, Bornstein J, Kais M, Masri I, Odeh M. Early versus late misoprostol administration after mifepristone for medical abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1051–4.CrossRefPubMed Tendler R, Bornstein J, Kais M, Masri I, Odeh M. Early versus late misoprostol administration after mifepristone for medical abortion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(5):1051–4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tsereteli T, Chong E, Louie K, Bokhua Z, Winikoff B. Acceptability and feasibility of 400 mug buccal misoprostol after 200 mg mifepristone for early medical abortion in Georgia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(5):367–71.CrossRefPubMed Tsereteli T, Chong E, Louie K, Bokhua Z, Winikoff B. Acceptability and feasibility of 400 mug buccal misoprostol after 200 mg mifepristone for early medical abortion in Georgia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(5):367–71.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Bracken H, Dabash R, Tsertsvadze G, Posohova S, Shah M, Hajri S, et al. A two-pill sublingual misoprostol outpatient regimen following mifepristone for medical abortion through 70 days’ LMP: a prospective comparative open-label trial. Contraception. 2014;89(3):181–6.CrossRefPubMed Bracken H, Dabash R, Tsertsvadze G, Posohova S, Shah M, Hajri S, et al. A two-pill sublingual misoprostol outpatient regimen following mifepristone for medical abortion through 70 days’ LMP: a prospective comparative open-label trial. Contraception. 2014;89(3):181–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Costescu D, Guilbert E, Bernardin J, Black A, Dunn S, Fitzsimmons B, et al. Medical abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38(4):366–89.CrossRefPubMed Costescu D, Guilbert E, Bernardin J, Black A, Dunn S, Fitzsimmons B, et al. Medical abortion. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016;38(4):366–89.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Marwah S, Gupta S, Batra NP, Bhasin V, Sarna V, Kaur N. A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal vs oral prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) in management of first trimester missed abortion. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(5):QC14–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Marwah S, Gupta S, Batra NP, Bhasin V, Sarna V, Kaur N. A comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of vaginal vs oral prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) in management of first trimester missed abortion. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(5):QC14–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Gamble SB, Strauss LT, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008;57(13):1–32.PubMed Gamble SB, Strauss LT, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S, et al. Abortion surveillance—United States, 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008;57(13):1–32.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Dabash R, Chelli H, Hajri S, Shochet T, Raghavan S, Winikoff B. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of mifepristone or placebo before buccal misoprostol for abortion at 14-21 weeks of pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(1):40–4.CrossRefPubMed Dabash R, Chelli H, Hajri S, Shochet T, Raghavan S, Winikoff B. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of mifepristone or placebo before buccal misoprostol for abortion at 14-21 weeks of pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;130(1):40–4.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference • Abbas DF, Blum J, Ngoc NT, Nga NT, Chi HT, Martin R, et al. Simultaneous administration compared with a 24-hour mifepristone-misoprostol interval in second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):1077–83. This study supports the use of mifepristone administration 24 h prior to misoprostol for medical abortion in the second trimester with an overall reduction in time from misoprostol administration to delivery. CrossRefPubMed • Abbas DF, Blum J, Ngoc NT, Nga NT, Chi HT, Martin R, et al. Simultaneous administration compared with a 24-hour mifepristone-misoprostol interval in second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):1077–83. This study supports the use of mifepristone administration 24 h prior to misoprostol for medical abortion in the second trimester with an overall reduction in time from misoprostol administration to delivery. CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Borgatta L, Kapp N, Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester. Contraception. 2011;84(1):4–18.CrossRefPubMed Borgatta L, Kapp N, Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Labor induction abortion in the second trimester. Contraception. 2011;84(1):4–18.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Milani F, Sharami SH, Arjmandi S. Comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy terminations. J Family Reprod Health. 2014;8(1):41–4.PubMedPubMedCentral Milani F, Sharami SH, Arjmandi S. Comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy terminations. J Family Reprod Health. 2014;8(1):41–4.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Dickinson JE, Jennings BG, Doherty DA. Mifepristone and oral, vaginal, or sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1162–8.CrossRefPubMed Dickinson JE, Jennings BG, Doherty DA. Mifepristone and oral, vaginal, or sublingual misoprostol for second-trimester abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1162–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Cetin C, Buyukkurt S, Seydaoglu G, Kahveci B, Soysal C, Ozgunen FT. Comparison of two misoprostol regimens for mid-trimester pregnancy terminations after FIGO’s misoprostol dosage recommendation in 2012. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1314–7.CrossRefPubMed Cetin C, Buyukkurt S, Seydaoglu G, Kahveci B, Soysal C, Ozgunen FT. Comparison of two misoprostol regimens for mid-trimester pregnancy terminations after FIGO’s misoprostol dosage recommendation in 2012. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1314–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Louie KS, Chong E, Tsereteli T, Avagyan G, Abrahamyan R, Winikoff B. Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone followed by unlimited dosing of buccal misoprostol in Armenia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(1):76–80.CrossRefPubMed Louie KS, Chong E, Tsereteli T, Avagyan G, Abrahamyan R, Winikoff B. Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone followed by unlimited dosing of buccal misoprostol in Armenia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2017;22(1):76–80.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Allen RH, Goldberg AB. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks’ gestation). Contraception. 2016;93(4):277–91.CrossRefPubMed Allen RH, Goldberg AB. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks’ gestation). Contraception. 2016;93(4):277–91.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference •• Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks’ gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014;89(2):75–84. These guidelines by the Society of Family Planning support same-day cervical preparation up to 18 weeks’ gestation; providers highly skilled in dilation and evacuation may consider same-day cervical preparation at later gestations. CrossRefPubMed •• Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks’ gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014;89(2):75–84. These guidelines by the Society of Family Planning support same-day cervical preparation up to 18 weeks’ gestation; providers highly skilled in dilation and evacuation may consider same-day cervical preparation at later gestations. CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference O’Connell K, Jones HE, Simon M, Saporta V, Paul M, Lichtenberg ES, et al. First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members. Contraception. 2009;79(5):385–92.CrossRefPubMed O’Connell K, Jones HE, Simon M, Saporta V, Paul M, Lichtenberg ES, et al. First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members. Contraception. 2009;79(5):385–92.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Kapp N, Lohr PA, Ngo TD, Hayes JL. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD007207. Kapp N, Lohr PA, Ngo TD, Hayes JL. Cervical preparation for first trimester surgical abortion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(2):CD007207.
43.
go back to reference Patel A, Talmont E, Morfesis J, Pelta M, Gatter M, Momtaz MR, et al. Adequacy and safety of buccal misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to termination of second-trimester pregnancy. Contraception. 2006;73(4):420–30.CrossRefPubMed Patel A, Talmont E, Morfesis J, Pelta M, Gatter M, Momtaz MR, et al. Adequacy and safety of buccal misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to termination of second-trimester pregnancy. Contraception. 2006;73(4):420–30.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Saav I, Kopp Kallner H, Fiala C, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical dilatation 1 or 3 h prior to surgical abortion: a double-blinded RCT. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1314–22.CrossRefPubMed Saav I, Kopp Kallner H, Fiala C, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical dilatation 1 or 3 h prior to surgical abortion: a double-blinded RCT. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(6):1314–22.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Meirik O, My Huong NT, Piaggio G, Bergel E, von Hertzen H, WHO Research Group on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Complications of first-trimester abortion by vacuum aspiration after cervical preparation with and without misoprostol: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9828):1817–24.CrossRefPubMed Meirik O, My Huong NT, Piaggio G, Bergel E, von Hertzen H, WHO Research Group on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Complications of first-trimester abortion by vacuum aspiration after cervical preparation with and without misoprostol: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9828):1817–24.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Bartz D, Maurer R, Allen RH, Fortin J, Kuang B, Goldberg AB. Buccal misoprostol compared with synthetic osmotic cervical dilator before surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):57–63.CrossRefPubMed Bartz D, Maurer R, Allen RH, Fortin J, Kuang B, Goldberg AB. Buccal misoprostol compared with synthetic osmotic cervical dilator before surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):57–63.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Ohannessian A, Baumstarck K, Maruani J, Cohen-Solal E, Auquier P, Agostini A. Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical ripening in surgical abortion between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;201:151–5.CrossRefPubMed Ohannessian A, Baumstarck K, Maruani J, Cohen-Solal E, Auquier P, Agostini A. Mifepristone and misoprostol for cervical ripening in surgical abortion between 12 and 14 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;201:151–5.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Newmann S, Dalve-Endres A, Drey EA, Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Contraception. 2008;77(4):308–14.CrossRefPubMed Newmann S, Dalve-Endres A, Drey EA, Society of Family Planning. Clinical guidelines. Cervical preparation for surgical abortion from 20 to 24 weeks’ gestation. Contraception. 2008;77(4):308–14.CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Boraas CM, Achilles SL, Cremer ML, Chappell CA, Lim SE, Chen BA. Synthetic osmotic dilators with adjunctive misoprostol for same-day dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2016;94(5):467–72.CrossRefPubMed Boraas CM, Achilles SL, Cremer ML, Chappell CA, Lim SE, Chen BA. Synthetic osmotic dilators with adjunctive misoprostol for same-day dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2016;94(5):467–72.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Maurer KA, Jacobson JC, Turok DK. Same-day cervical preparation with misoprostol prior to second trimester D&E: a case series. Contraception. 2013;88(1):116–21.CrossRefPubMed Maurer KA, Jacobson JC, Turok DK. Same-day cervical preparation with misoprostol prior to second trimester D&E: a case series. Contraception. 2013;88(1):116–21.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Grossman D, Constant D, Lince-Deroche N, Harries J, Kluge J. A randomized trial of misoprostol versus laminaria before dilation and evacuation in South Africa. Contraception. 2014;90(3):234–41.CrossRefPubMed Grossman D, Constant D, Lince-Deroche N, Harries J, Kluge J. A randomized trial of misoprostol versus laminaria before dilation and evacuation in South Africa. Contraception. 2014;90(3):234–41.CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Casey FE, Ye PP, Perritt JD, Moreno-Ruiz NL, Reeves MF. A randomized controlled trial evaluating same-day mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2016;94(2):127–33.CrossRefPubMed Casey FE, Ye PP, Perritt JD, Moreno-Ruiz NL, Reeves MF. A randomized controlled trial evaluating same-day mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2016;94(2):127–33.CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Drey EA, Benson LS, Sokoloff A, Steinauer JE, Roy G, Jackson RA. Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21-23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014;89(4):307–13.CrossRefPubMed Drey EA, Benson LS, Sokoloff A, Steinauer JE, Roy G, Jackson RA. Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21-23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014;89(4):307–13.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference • Goldberg AB, Fortin JA, Drey EA, Dean G, Lichtenberg ES, Bednarek PH, et al. Cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation using adjunctive misoprostol or mifepristone compared with overnight osmotic dilators alone: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):599–609. This study supports use of adjunctive medication in addition to osmotic dilators for late second trimester dilation and evacuation procedures and found that mifepristone was better tolerated than misoprostol. CrossRefPubMed • Goldberg AB, Fortin JA, Drey EA, Dean G, Lichtenberg ES, Bednarek PH, et al. Cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation using adjunctive misoprostol or mifepristone compared with overnight osmotic dilators alone: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):599–609. This study supports use of adjunctive medication in addition to osmotic dilators for late second trimester dilation and evacuation procedures and found that mifepristone was better tolerated than misoprostol. CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Allen RH, Goldberg AB, Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks’ gestation). SFP Guideline 20071. Contraception. 2007;76(2):139–56.CrossRefPubMed Allen RH, Goldberg AB, Board of Society of Family Planning. Cervical dilation before first-trimester surgical abortion (<14 weeks’ gestation). SFP Guideline 20071. Contraception. 2007;76(2):139–56.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Misoprostol in Abortion Care: Review and Update
Authors
Geetha Fink
Sharon Gerber
Gillian Dean
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports / Issue 2/2017
Electronic ISSN: 2161-3303
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13669-017-0202-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports 2/2017 Go to the issue

Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) (R Anchan, Section Editor)

Genetic Screening and Early Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

Care for the Transgender Patient (C Unger, Section Editor)

Reproductive and Obstetrical Care for Transgender Patients