Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

The Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Patients with End Stage Liver Disease in the United States: An Analysis from UNOS Database

Author: Yefei Zhang

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Share 35 policy was instituted in June 2013 by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in order to reduce death on liver transplant waiting list. The effect of this policy on racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation has not been examined.

Methods

A total of 14,585 adult patients registered for liver transplantation between 2012 and 2015 were identified from UNOS database. Logistic and proportional hazards models were used to model the effects of race and ethnicity on access to liver transplantation. Stratification on pre- and post-Share 35 periods was performed to compare the first 18 months of Share 35 policy to an equivalent time period before.

Results

Comparison of the pre- and post-Share 35 periods showed significantly decreased time on waiting list and increased numbers of minorities having access to liver transplantation. Hispanic recipients still experienced significantly longer waiting time (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.53–0.88) before they received liver transplantation after Share 35 policy took effect.

Conclusion

The Share 35 policy did not lead to improved access to liver transplantation among minorities but eliminated the previously observed racial and ethnic disparities in transplant rates as well as shortened the waiting time.
Literature
1.
2.
Nguyen GC, Thuluvath PJ. Racial disparity in liver disease: biological, cultural, or socioeconomic factors. Hepatology. 2008;47(3):1058–66.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Carrion AF, Ghanta R, Carrasquillo O, et al. Chronic liver disease in the Hispanic population of the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;9(10):834–e110.CrossRef
4.
5.
Quillin III RC, Wilson GC, Wima K, et al. Neighborhood level effects of socioeconomic status on liver transplant selection and recipient survival. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1934–41.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Moylan CA, Brady CW, Johnson JL, Smith AD, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Muir AJ. Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score. JAMA. 2008;300:2371–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
Kemmer N. Ethnic disparities in liver transplantation. Gastroenterol Hapatol. 2011;7(5):302–7.
9.
Higgins RSD, Fishman JA. Disparities in solid organ transplantation for ethnic minorities: facts and solutions. Am J Transplant. 2006;6(11):2556–62.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Mathur AK, Schaubel DE, Gong Q, Guidinger MK, Merion RM. Racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:1033–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Gentry SE, Massie AB, Cheek SW, et al. Addressing geographic disparities in liver transplantation through redistricting. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:2052–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
14.
Zorzi D, Rastellini C, Freeman DH, Elias G, Duchini A, Cicalese L. Increase in mortality rate of liver transplant candidates residing in specific geographic areas: analysis of UNOS data. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:2188–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Harper AM, Baker AS. The UNOS OPTN waiting list: 1988–1995. Clin Transpl 1995; 69–84
16.
Mathur AK, Sonnenday CJ, Merion RM. Race and ethnicity in access to and outcomes of liver transplantation: a critical literature review. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:2662–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Roberts JP, Dykstra DM, Goodrich NP, Rush SH, Merion RM, Port FK. Geographic differences in event rates by Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:2470–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Trotter JF, Osgood MJ. MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes. JAMA. 2004;291:1871–4.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Wears RL. Advanced statistics: statistical methods for analyzing cluster and cluster-randomized data. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9(4):330–41.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Reid AE, Resnick M, Chang Y, Buerstatte N, Weissman JS. Disparity in use of orthotopic liver transplantation among blacks and whites. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:834–41.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Massie AB, Chow EKH, Wickliffe CE, et al. Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:659–67.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Annamalai A, Ayoub W, Sundaram V, Klein A. First look: one year since inception of regional Share 35 policy. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:1585–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
25.
Layden JE, Cotler SJ, Grim SA, Fischer MJ, Lucey MR, Clark NM. The impact of donor and recipient race on survival after hepatitis C-related liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2012;93(4):444–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Norvell JP, Levitsky J. Donor and recipient effects on graft and patient survival. Clin Liver Dis. 2013;2(4):152–5.CrossRef
27.
Zhang Y. Impact of donor recipient gender and race/ethnicity mismatch on graft outcomes in patients with end stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation. Progress in Transplantation 2016; Nov 28. doi: 10.​1177/​1526924816679839​.
28.
29.
Bryce CL, Angus DC, Arnold RM, et al. Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services. Am H Transplant. 2009;9:2092–101.CrossRef
30.
Ananthakrishnan AN, Saeian K. Racial differences in liver transplantation outcomes in the MELD era. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:901–10.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Yoo HY, Thuluvath PJ. Outcome of liver transplantation in adult recipients: influence of neighborhood income, education, and insurance. Liver Transpl. 2004;10:235–43.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Thammana RV, Knechtle SJ, Romero R, et al. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in pediatric and young adult liver transplant outcomes. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:100–15.CrossRefPubMed
33.
McAlpine DD, Beebe TJ, Davern M, Call KT. Agreement between self-reported and administrative race and ethnicity data among Medicaid enrollees in Minnesota. Health Serv Res. 2007;42(6 Pt 2):2373–88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Hamillton NS, Edelman D, Weinberger M, Jackson GL. Concordance between self-reported race/ethnicity and that recorded in a Veteran Affairs electronic medical record. N C Med J. 2009;70(4):296–300.
35.
Mersha TB, Abebe T. Self-reported race/ethnicity in the age of genomic research: its potential impact on understanding health disparities. Hum Denomics. 2015;9(1):1.CrossRef
36.
Cheng S, Powell B. Misclassification by whom? A comment on Campbell and Troyer. Am Sociol Rev. 2007;76(2):347–55.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplantation for Patients with End Stage Liver Disease in the United States: An Analysis from UNOS Database
Author
Yefei Zhang
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0552-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2017 Go to the issue

Erratum

Erratum to: Trends and determinants of inequities in childhood stunting in Bangladesh from 1996/7 to 2014

Research

Expectations of health care quality among rural Maya villagers in Sololá Department, Guatemala: a qualitative analysis

Research

Healthcare expenditure on Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians at high risk of cardiovascular disease

Research

Trends in socioeconomic inequalities among adult male hardcore smokers in Vietnam: 2010–2015

Research

How equitable is the uptake of conditional cash transfers for maternity care in India? Evidence from the Janani Suraksha Yojana scheme in Odisha and Jharkhand

Research

“Evolution and financial cost of socioeconomic inequalities in ambulatory care sensitive conditions: an ecological study for Portugal, 2000–2014”