Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Vaccination | Research article

Effect of evidence updates on key determinants of measles vaccination impact: a DynaMICE modelling study in ten high-burden countries

Authors: Han Fu, Kaja Abbas, Petra Klepac, Kevin van Zandvoort, Hira Tanvir, Allison Portnoy, Mark Jit

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Model-based estimates of measles burden and the impact of measles-containing vaccine (MCV) are crucial for global health priority setting. Recently, evidence from systematic reviews and database analyses have improved our understanding of key determinants of MCV impact. We explore how representations of these determinants affect model-based estimation of vaccination impact in ten countries with the highest measles burden.

Methods

Using Dynamic Measles Immunisation Calculation Engine (DynaMICE), we modelled the effect of evidence updates for five determinants of MCV impact: case-fatality risk, contact patterns, age-dependent vaccine efficacy, the delivery of supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) to zero-dose children, and the basic reproduction number. We assessed the incremental vaccination impact of the first (MCV1) and second (MCV2) doses of routine immunisation and SIAs, using metrics of total vaccine-averted cases, deaths, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) over 2000–2050. We also conducted a scenario capturing the effect of COVID-19 related disruptions on measles burden and vaccination impact.

Results

Incorporated with the updated data sources, DynaMICE projected 253 million measles cases, 3.8 million deaths and 233 million DALYs incurred over 2000–2050 in the ten high-burden countries when MCV1, MCV2, and SIA doses were implemented. Compared to no vaccination, MCV1 contributed to 66% reduction in cumulative measles cases, while MCV2 and SIAs reduced this further to 90%. Among the updated determinants, shifting from fixed to linearly-varying vaccine efficacy by age and from static to time-varying case-fatality risks had the biggest effect on MCV impact. While varying the basic reproduction number showed a limited effect, updates on the other four determinants together resulted in an overall reduction of vaccination impact by 0.58%, 26.2%, and 26.7% for cases, deaths, and DALYs averted, respectively. COVID-19 related disruptions to measles vaccination are not likely to change the influence of these determinants on MCV impact, but may lead to a 3% increase in cases over 2000–2050.

Conclusions

Incorporating updated evidence particularly on vaccine efficacy and case-fatality risk reduces estimates of vaccination impact moderately, but its overall impact remains considerable. High MCV coverage through both routine immunisation and SIAs remains essential for achieving and maintaining low incidence in high measles burden settings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strebel PM, Papania MJ, Gastañaduy PA, Goodson JL. 37 - Measles Vaccines. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, Edwards KM, editors. Plotkin's Vaccines (Seventh Edition): Elsevier; 2018. p. 579–618. e21. Strebel PM, Papania MJ, Gastañaduy PA, Goodson JL. 37 - Measles Vaccines. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, Edwards KM, editors. Plotkin's Vaccines (Seventh Edition): Elsevier; 2018. p. 579–618. e21.
3.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Measles vaccines: WHO position paper - April 2017. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2017;92(17):205–27. World Health Organization. Measles vaccines: WHO position paper - April 2017. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2017;92(17):205–27.
4.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Framework for verifying elimination of measles and rubella. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013;88(9):89–99. World Health Organization. Framework for verifying elimination of measles and rubella. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013;88(9):89–99.
11.
go back to reference Prem K, van Zandvoort K, Klepac P, Eggo RM, Davies NG, Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, et al. Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: an update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era. Plos Comput Bio. 2021;17(7):e1009098.CrossRef Prem K, van Zandvoort K, Klepac P, Eggo RM, Davies NG, Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group, et al. Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: an update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era. Plos Comput Bio. 2021;17(7):e1009098.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.CrossRef GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of evidence updates on key determinants of measles vaccination impact: a DynaMICE modelling study in ten high-burden countries
Authors
Han Fu
Kaja Abbas
Petra Klepac
Kevin van Zandvoort
Hira Tanvir
Allison Portnoy
Mark Jit
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02157-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Medicine 1/2021 Go to the issue