Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Autopsy | Commentary

Validations of verbal autopsies – comment on ‘automated versus physician assignment of cause of death for verbal autopsies: randomized trial of 9374 deaths in 117 villages in India’

Author: Michel Garenne

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

Verbal autopsy (VA) is a method for assessing causes of death by interviewing relatives of a diseased person and gathering as much information as possible on the diseases, signs, symptoms, treatments, and circumstances of the death. The gathering of such information can be made by informal interviews or through the use of a questionnaire, and is then treated either by knowledgeable persons (e.g., trained physicians) or by a computer in order to obtain the probable causes of death (underlying, immediate, associated). VA using a standardized questionnaire was first used on a small scale in the 1980s and became popular in the 1990s [1, 2]. From the beginning, the issue of validation was crucial. The reliability of the final assessment of the individual cause of death or of the distribution of deaths by cause are two different, though closely related issues, which require separate interpretations and have different implications. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garenne M, Fontaine O. Assessing probable causes of deaths using a standardized questionnaire. A study in rural Senegal. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(3):248–53.CrossRef Garenne M, Fontaine O. Assessing probable causes of deaths using a standardized questionnaire. A study in rural Senegal. Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(3):248–53.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kahn K, Tollman SM, Garenne M, Gear JSS. Validation and application of verbal autopsies in a rural area of South Africa. Tropical Med Int Health. 2000;5(11):824–31.CrossRef Kahn K, Tollman SM, Garenne M, Gear JSS. Validation and application of verbal autopsies in a rural area of South Africa. Tropical Med Int Health. 2000;5(11):824–31.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goldman L. Diagnostic advances versus the value of the autopsy. 1912-1980. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984;108(6):501–5.PubMed Goldman L. Diagnostic advances versus the value of the autopsy. 1912-1980. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984;108(6):501–5.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post-mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology. 2005;47(6):551–9.CrossRef Roulson J, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post-mortem histology; a meta-analysis and review. Histopathology. 2005;47(6):551–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Validations of verbal autopsies – comment on ‘automated versus physician assignment of cause of death for verbal autopsies: randomized trial of 9374 deaths in 117 villages in India’
Author
Michel Garenne
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Autopsy
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1371-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Medicine 1/2019 Go to the issue