Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study

Authors: Richard Wakeford, Kasia Ludka, Katherine Woolf, I. C. McManus

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The predictive validity of postgraduate examinations, such as MRCGP and MRCP(UK) in the UK, is hard to assess, particularly for clinically relevant outcomes. The sanctions imposed on doctors by the UK’s General Medical Council (GMC), including erasure from the Medical Register, are indicators of serious problems with fitness to practise (FtP) that threaten patient safety or wellbeing. This data linkage study combined data on GMC sanctions with data on postgraduate examination performance.

Methods

Examination results were obtained for UK registered doctors taking the MRCGP Applied Knowledge Test (AKT; n = 27,561) or Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA; n = 17,365) at first attempt between 2010 and 2016 or taking MRCP(UK) Part 1 (MCQ; n = 37,358), Part 2 (MCQ; n = 28,285) or Practical Assessment of Clinical Examination Skills (PACES; n = 27,040) at first attempt between 2001 and 2016. Exam data were linked with GMC actions on a doctor’s registration from September 2008 to January 2017, sanctions including Erasure, Suspension, Conditions on Practice, Undertakings or Warnings (ESCUW). Examination results were only considered at first attempts. Multiple logistic regression assessed the odds ratio for ESCUW in relation to examination results. Multiple imputation was used for structurally missing values.

Results

Doctors sanctioned by the GMC performed substantially less well on MRCGP and MRCP(UK), with a mean Cohen’s d across the five exams of − 0.68. Doctors on the 2.5th percentile of exam performance were about 12 times more likely to have FtP problems than those on the 97.5th percentile. Knowledge assessments and clinical assessments were independent predictors of future sanctions, with clinical assessments predicting ESCUW significantly better. The log odds of an FtP sanction were linearly related to examination marks over the entire range of performance, additional performance increments lowering the risk of FtP sanctions at all performance levels.

Conclusions

MRCGP and MRCP(UK) performance are valid predictors of professionally important outcomes that transcend simple knowledge or skills and the GMC puts under the headings of conduct and trust. Postgraduate examinations may predict FtP sanctions because the psychological processes involved in successfully studying, understanding and practising medicine at a high level share similar mechanisms to those underlying conduct and trust.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Unwin E, Woolf K, Wadlow C, Dacre J. Disciplined doctors: does the sex of a doctor matter? A cross-sectional study examining the association between a doctor's sex and receiving sanctions against their medical registration. BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e005405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Unwin E, Woolf K, Wadlow C, Dacre J. Disciplined doctors: does the sex of a doctor matter? A cross-sectional study examining the association between a doctor's sex and receiving sanctions against their medical registration. BMJ Open. 2014;4(8):e005405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Archer J, Lynn N, Coombes L, Gale T, de Bere SR. The medical licensing examination debate. Regul Gov. 2016;11:315–22.CrossRef Archer J, Lynn N, Coombes L, Gale T, de Bere SR. The medical licensing examination debate. Regul Gov. 2016;11:315–22.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Flier LA, Henderson CR, Treasure CL. Time to eliminate the Step 2 Clinical Skills examination for US medical graduates. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:1245–6.CrossRefPubMed Flier LA, Henderson CR, Treasure CL. Time to eliminate the Step 2 Clinical Skills examination for US medical graduates. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:1245–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ludka-Stempien K, Woolf K, McManus IC. Poor performance on the MRCP(UK) examination predicts license limitations in subsequent medical practice. Prague: Proceedings of AMEE (Association for Medical Education in Europe), Prague August 2013; 2013. Ludka-Stempien K, Woolf K, McManus IC. Poor performance on the MRCP(UK) examination predicts license limitations in subsequent medical practice. Prague: Proceedings of AMEE (Association for Medical Education in Europe), Prague August 2013; 2013.
9.
go back to reference Ludka-Stempien K. The predictive validity of the MRCP(UK) examination (PhD thesis). London: University college London; 2015. Ludka-Stempien K. The predictive validity of the MRCP(UK) examination (PhD thesis). London: University college London; 2015.
11.
go back to reference Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. AP. 1995;50:749. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. AP. 1995;50:749.
12.
go back to reference Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37:830–7.CrossRefPubMed Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ. 2003;37:830–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lissitz RW. The concept of validity: revisions, new directions, and applications. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing; 2009. Lissitz RW. The concept of validity: revisions, new directions, and applications. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing; 2009.
14.
go back to reference Kane MT. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. JEM. 2014;50:1–73. Kane MT. Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. JEM. 2014;50:1–73.
15.
go back to reference American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2014.
16.
go back to reference Norcini JJ, Boulet JR, Opalek A, Dauphinee WD. The relationship between licensing examination performance and the outcomes of care by international medical school graduates. Acad Med. 2014;89:1–6.CrossRef Norcini JJ, Boulet JR, Opalek A, Dauphinee WD. The relationship between licensing examination performance and the outcomes of care by international medical school graduates. Acad Med. 2014;89:1–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Papadakis MA, Arnold J, Blanton H, Holmboe ES, Lipner RS. Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:869–76.CrossRefPubMed Papadakis MA, Arnold J, Blanton H, Holmboe ES, Lipner RS. Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:869–76.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cuddy MM, Young A, Gelman A, Swanson DB, Johnson DA, Dillon GF, et al. Exploring the relationships between USMLE performance and disciplinary action in practice: a validity study of score inferences from a licensure examination. Acad Med. 2017;92:1780–5.CrossRefPubMed Cuddy MM, Young A, Gelman A, Swanson DB, Johnson DA, Dillon GF, et al. Exploring the relationships between USMLE performance and disciplinary action in practice: a validity study of score inferences from a licensure examination. Acad Med. 2017;92:1780–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Cuddy MM, Winward ML, Johnston MM, Lipner RS, Clauser BE. Evaluating validity evidence for USMLE step 2 clinical skills data gathering and data interpretation scores: does performance predict history-taking and physical examination ratings for first-year internal medicine residents? Acad Med. 2016;91:133–9.CrossRefPubMed Cuddy MM, Winward ML, Johnston MM, Lipner RS, Clauser BE. Evaluating validity evidence for USMLE step 2 clinical skills data gathering and data interpretation scores: does performance predict history-taking and physical examination ratings for first-year internal medicine residents? Acad Med. 2016;91:133–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wakeford R, Denney ML, Ludka-Stempien K, Dacre J, McManus IC. Cross-comparison of MRCGP & MRCP(UK) in a database linkage study of 2,284 candidates taking both examinations: assessment of validity and differential performance by ethnicity. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wakeford R, Denney ML, Ludka-Stempien K, Dacre J, McManus IC. Cross-comparison of MRCGP & MRCP(UK) in a database linkage study of 2,284 candidates taking both examinations: assessment of validity and differential performance by ethnicity. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference McManus IC, Ludka K. Resitting a high-stakes postgraduate medical examination on multiple occasions: nonlinear multilevel modelling of performance in the MRCP(UK) examinations. BMC Med. 2012;10:60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McManus IC, Ludka K. Resitting a high-stakes postgraduate medical examination on multiple occasions: nonlinear multilevel modelling of performance in the MRCP(UK) examinations. BMC Med. 2012;10:60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Elder A, McAlpine L, Bateman N, Dacre J, Kopelman P, McManus IC. Changing PACES: developments to the examination in 2009. Clin Med. 2011;11:231–4.CrossRef Elder A, McAlpine L, Bateman N, Dacre J, Kopelman P, McManus IC. Changing PACES: developments to the examination in 2009. Clin Med. 2011;11:231–4.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hope D, Adamson K, McManus IC, Chis L, Elder A. Using differential item functioning to evaluate potential bias in a high stakes postgraduate knowledge based assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:1–7.CrossRef Hope D, Adamson K, McManus IC, Chis L, Elder A. Using differential item functioning to evaluate potential bias in a high stakes postgraduate knowledge based assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:1–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Arneson JJ, Sackett PR, Beatty AS. Ability-performance relationships in education and employment settings: critical tests of the more-is-better and good-enough hypotheses. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:1336–42.CrossRefPubMed Arneson JJ, Sackett PR, Beatty AS. Ability-performance relationships in education and employment settings: critical tests of the more-is-better and good-enough hypotheses. Psychol Sci. 2011;22:1336–42.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Outliers: the story of success. New York: Little, Brown; 2008. Outliers: the story of success. New York: Little, Brown; 2008.
32.
go back to reference Schwartz B. Top colleges should select randomly from a pool of ‘good enough’. Chron High Educ. 2005;2005:B20–5. Schwartz B. Top colleges should select randomly from a pool of ‘good enough’. Chron High Educ. 2005;2005:B20–5.
33.
go back to reference Major LE, Machin S. Social mobility and its enemies. London: Penguin Random House; 2018. Major LE, Machin S. Social mobility and its enemies. London: Penguin Random House; 2018.
34.
go back to reference McManus IC, Vincent CA. Can future poor performance be identified during selection? In: Lens P, van der Waal G, editors. Problem doctors: a conspiracy of silence. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1997. p. 213–36. McManus IC, Vincent CA. Can future poor performance be identified during selection? In: Lens P, van der Waal G, editors. Problem doctors: a conspiracy of silence. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1997. p. 213–36.
35.
go back to reference Handfield-Jones RS, Mann KV, Challis ME, Hobma SO, Klass DJ, McManus IC, et al. Linking assessment to learning: a new route to quality assurance in medical practice. Med Educ. 2002;36:949–58.CrossRefPubMed Handfield-Jones RS, Mann KV, Challis ME, Hobma SO, Klass DJ, McManus IC, et al. Linking assessment to learning: a new route to quality assurance in medical practice. Med Educ. 2002;36:949–58.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Cresswell M. Heaps, prototypes and ethics: the consequence of using judgments of student performance to set examination standards in a time of change. London: Institute of Education; 2003. Cresswell M. Heaps, prototypes and ethics: the consequence of using judgments of student performance to set examination standards in a time of change. London: Institute of Education; 2003.
38.
go back to reference Sainsbury RM. Departing from Frege. Essays in the philosophy of language. London: Routledge; 2018.CrossRef Sainsbury RM. Departing from Frege. Essays in the philosophy of language. London: Routledge; 2018.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Bassett K. Operating theatre. CAM. 1995:(14)7–11. Bassett K. Operating theatre. CAM. 1995:(14)7–11.
44.
go back to reference Elder A, Verghese A. Bedside matters – putting the patient at the centre of teaching and learning. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45:186–7.CrossRefPubMed Elder A, Verghese A. Bedside matters – putting the patient at the centre of teaching and learning. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45:186–7.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Elder A, McManus IC, Patrick A, Nair K, Vaughan L, Dacre J. The value of the physical examination in clinical practice: an international survey. Clin Med. 2017;17:490–8.CrossRef Elder A, McManus IC, Patrick A, Nair K, Vaughan L, Dacre J. The value of the physical examination in clinical practice: an international survey. Clin Med. 2017;17:490–8.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Reilly BM. Physical examination in the care of medical inpatients: an observational study. Lancet. 2003;362:1100–5.CrossRefPubMed Reilly BM. Physical examination in the care of medical inpatients: an observational study. Lancet. 2003;362:1100–5.CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Verghese A, Charlton B, Kassirer JP, Ramsey M, Ioannidis JPA. Inadequacies of physical examination as a cause of medical errors and adverse events: a collection of vignettes. AJM. 2015;128:1322–4.CrossRef Verghese A, Charlton B, Kassirer JP, Ramsey M, Ioannidis JPA. Inadequacies of physical examination as a cause of medical errors and adverse events: a collection of vignettes. AJM. 2015;128:1322–4.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Verghese A, Horwitz RI: In praise of the physical examination [Editorial]. Brit Med J 2009, 339b5448. Verghese A, Horwitz RI: In praise of the physical examination [Editorial]. Brit Med J 2009, 339b5448.
50.
go back to reference Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. Brit Med J. 1975;2:486–9.CrossRefPubMed Hampton JR, Harrison MJG, Mitchell JRA, Prichard JS, Seymour C. Relative contributions of history-taking, physical examination, and laboratory investigation to diagnosis and management of medical outpatients. Brit Med J. 1975;2:486–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study
Authors
Richard Wakeford
Kasia Ludka
Katherine Woolf
I. C. McManus
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1214-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue