Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Chronic morbidity, deprivation and primary medical care spending in England in 2015-16: a cross-sectional spatial analysis

Authors: Evangelos Kontopantelis, Mamas A. Mamas, Harm van Marwijk, Andrew M. Ryan, Peter Bower, Bruce Guthrie, Tim Doran

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Primary care provides the foundation for most modern health-care systems, and in the interests of equity, it should be resourced according to local need. We aimed to describe spatially the burden of chronic conditions and primary medical care funding in England at a low geographical level, and to measure how much variation in funding is explained by chronic condition prevalence and other patient and regional factors.

Methods

We used multiple administrative data sets including chronic condition prevalence and management data (2014/15), funding for primary-care practices (2015-16), and geographical and area deprivation data (2015). Data were assigned to a low geographical level (average 1500 residents). We investigated the overall morbidity burden across 19 chronic conditions and its regional variation, spatial clustering and association with funding and area deprivation. A linear regression model was used to explain local variation in spending using patient demographics, morbidity, deprivation and regional characteristics.

Results

Levels of morbidity varied within and between regions, with several clusters of very high morbidity identified. At the regional level, morbidity was modestly associated with practice funding, with the North East and North West appearing underfunded. The regression model explained 39% of the variability in practice funding, but even after adjusting for covariates, a large amount of variability in funding existed across regions. High morbidity and, especially, rural location were very strongly associated with higher practice funding, while associations were more modest for high deprivation and older age.

Conclusions

Primary care funding in England does not adequately reflect the contemporary morbidity burden. More equitable resource allocation could be achieved by making better use of routinely available information and big data resources. Similar methods could be deployed in other countries where comparable data are collected, to identify morbidity clusters and to target funding to areas of greater need.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Starfield B. Primary care: concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992. Starfield B. Primary care: concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 1992.
5.
go back to reference Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Ashworth M, Webb RT, Buchan IE, Doran T. Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study. Br Med J. 2015;350:h904.CrossRef Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Ashworth M, Webb RT, Buchan IE, Doran T. Investigating the relationship between quality of primary care and premature mortality in England: a spatial whole-population study. Br Med J. 2015;350:h904.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mons U, Muezzinler A, Gellert C, Schottker B, Abnet CC, Bobak M, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on cardiovascular events and mortality among older adults: meta-analysis of individual participant data from prospective cohort studies of the CHANCES consortium. Br Med J. 2015;350:h1551.CrossRef Mons U, Muezzinler A, Gellert C, Schottker B, Abnet CC, Bobak M, et al. Impact of smoking and smoking cessation on cardiovascular events and mortality among older adults: meta-analysis of individual participant data from prospective cohort studies of the CHANCES consortium. Br Med J. 2015;350:h1551.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dixon A, Le Grand J, Henderson J, Murray R, Poteliakhoff E. Is the British National Health Service equitable? The evidence on socioeconomic differences in utilization. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(2):104–9.CrossRefPubMed Dixon A, Le Grand J, Henderson J, Murray R, Poteliakhoff E. Is the British National Health Service equitable? The evidence on socioeconomic differences in utilization. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12(2):104–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference BMA. focus on the global sum allocation formula (Carr–Hill Formula). England: BMA; 2015. BMA. focus on the global sum allocation formula (Carr–Hill Formula). England: BMA; 2015.
10.
go back to reference Elliot R, Sutton M, Gravelle H, Hole A, Ma A, Morris S, et al. Adjusting the General Medical Services Allocation Formula to reflect recruitment and retention difficulties. 2006. Elliot R, Sutton M, Gravelle H, Hole A, Ma A, Morris S, et al. Adjusting the General Medical Services Allocation Formula to reflect recruitment and retention difficulties. 2006.
11.
go back to reference Roland M. Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care – a major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448–54.CrossRefPubMed Roland M. Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care – a major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448–54.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Asaria M, Ali S, Doran T, Ferguson B, Fleetcroft R, Goddard M, et al. How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England. J Epidemiol Commun H. 2016;70(7):637–43.CrossRef Asaria M, Ali S, Doran T, Ferguson B, Fleetcroft R, Goddard M, et al. How a universal health system reduces inequalities: lessons from England. J Epidemiol Commun H. 2016;70(7):637–43.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Young R, Leese B. Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in the UK: what are the problems and solutions? Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(447):829–33.PubMedPubMedCentral Young R, Leese B. Recruitment and retention of general practitioners in the UK: what are the problems and solutions? Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49(447):829–33.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Goddard M, Smith P. Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(9):1149–62.CrossRefPubMed Goddard M, Smith P. Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(9):1149–62.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Doran T, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Lancet. 2008;372(9640):728–36.CrossRefPubMed Doran T, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis E, Reeves D. Effect of financial incentives on inequalities in the delivery of primary clinical care in England: analysis of clinical activity indicators for the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Lancet. 2008;372(9640):728–36.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Doran T, Campbell S, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis E, Roland M. Performance of small general practices under the UK's Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(578):e335–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Doran T, Campbell S, Fullwood C, Kontopantelis E, Roland M. Performance of small general practices under the UK's Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60(578):e335–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Ashworth M, Medina J, Morgan M. Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br Med J. 2008;337:a2030.CrossRef Ashworth M, Medina J, Morgan M. Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br Med J. 2008;337:a2030.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gillam SJ, Siriwardena AN, Steel N. Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):461–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillam SJ, Siriwardena AN, Steel N. Pay-for-performance in the United Kingdom: impact of the Quality and Outcomes Framework: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):461–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Ryan AM, Krinsky S, Kontopantelis E, Doran T. Long-term evidence for the effect of pay-for-performance in primary care on mortality in the UK: a population study. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):268–74.CrossRefPubMed Ryan AM, Krinsky S, Kontopantelis E, Doran T. Long-term evidence for the effect of pay-for-performance in primary care on mortality in the UK: a population study. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):268–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Iacobucci G. MPIG set to be phased out within seven years in sweeping overhaul of GP funding. In: PULSE. London: 2012 Iacobucci G. MPIG set to be phased out within seven years in sweeping overhaul of GP funding. In: PULSE. London: 2012
22.
go back to reference England N. General practice forward view. 2016. London: NHS England; 2016. p. 60. England N. General practice forward view. 2016. London: NHS England; 2016. p. 60.
23.
go back to reference Communities and Local Government: The English Indices of Deprivation 2015: Technical Report. In. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2015. Communities and Local Government: The English Indices of Deprivation 2015: Technical Report. In. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2015.
25.
go back to reference McLean G, Guthrie B, Mercer SW, Watt GCM. General practice funding underpins the persistence of the inverse care law: cross-sectional study in Scotland. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(641):E799–805.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McLean G, Guthrie B, Mercer SW, Watt GCM. General practice funding underpins the persistence of the inverse care law: cross-sectional study in Scotland. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(641):E799–805.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Soljak M, Samarasundera E, Indulkar T, Walford H, Majeed A. Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disor. 2011;11:12.CrossRef Soljak M, Samarasundera E, Indulkar T, Walford H, Majeed A. Variations in cardiovascular disease under-diagnosis in England: national cross-sectional spatial analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disor. 2011;11:12.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.CrossRefPubMed Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Car J, Millett C, Khunti K, Mainous A, Majeed A. Diabetes prevalence, process of care and outcomes in relation to practice size, caseload and deprivation: national cross-sectional study in primary care. Diabetic Med. 2007;24:78. Car J, Millett C, Khunti K, Mainous A, Majeed A. Diabetes prevalence, process of care and outcomes in relation to practice size, caseload and deprivation: national cross-sectional study in primary care. Diabetic Med. 2007;24:78.
30.
go back to reference Public Health England. The NHS atlas of variation in healthcare. 2016. p. 284. Public Health England. The NHS atlas of variation in healthcare. 2016. p. 284.
31.
go back to reference Buchan IE, Kontopantelis E, Sperrin M, Chandola T, Doran T. North-South disparities in English mortality1965-2015: longitudinal population study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(9):928–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buchan IE, Kontopantelis E, Sperrin M, Chandola T, Doran T. North-South disparities in English mortality1965-2015: longitudinal population study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(9):928–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Levene LS, Baker R, Wilson A, Walker N, Boomla K, Bankart MJG. Population health needs as predictors of variations in NHS practice payments: a cross-sectional study of English general practices in 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(654):E10–19.CrossRefPubMed Levene LS, Baker R, Wilson A, Walker N, Boomla K, Bankart MJG. Population health needs as predictors of variations in NHS practice payments: a cross-sectional study of English general practices in 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(654):E10–19.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference van de Ven WPMM, Beck K, van de Voordec C, Wasem J, Zmora I. Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: 6 years later. Health Policy. 2007;83(2-3):162–79.CrossRefPubMed van de Ven WPMM, Beck K, van de Voordec C, Wasem J, Zmora I. Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: 6 years later. Health Policy. 2007;83(2-3):162–79.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Buck D, Dixon A. Improving the allocation of health resources in England. London: Kings Fund; 2013. Buck D, Dixon A. Improving the allocation of health resources in England. London: Kings Fund; 2013.
Metadata
Title
Chronic morbidity, deprivation and primary medical care spending in England in 2015-16: a cross-sectional spatial analysis
Authors
Evangelos Kontopantelis
Mamas A. Mamas
Harm van Marwijk
Andrew M. Ryan
Peter Bower
Bruce Guthrie
Tim Doran
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0996-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Medicine 1/2018 Go to the issue