Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes

Authors: Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Elise Cogo, Patricia Rios, Sharon E. Straus, Yaron Finkelstein, Ryan Kealey, Emily Reynen, Charlene Soobiah, Kednapa Thavorn, Brian Hutton, Brenda R. Hemmelgarn, Fatemeh Yazdi, Jennifer D’Souza, Heather MacDonald, Andrea C. Tricco

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pregnant women with epilepsy frequently experience seizures related to pregnancy complications and are often prescribed anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) to manage their symptoms. However, less is known about the comparative safety of AED exposure in utero. We aimed to compare the risk of congenital malformations (CMs) and prenatal outcomes of AEDs in infants/children who were exposed to AEDs in utero through a systematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to December 15, 2015. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full-text papers for experimental and observational studies comparing mono- or poly-therapy AEDs versus control (no AED exposure) or other AEDs, then abstracted data and appraised the risk of bias. The primary outcome was incidence of major CMs, overall and by specific type (cardiac malformations, hypospadias, cleft lip and/or palate, club foot, inguinal hernia, and undescended testes).

Results

After screening 5305 titles and abstracts, 642 potentially relevant full-text articles, and 17 studies from scanning reference lists, 96 studies were eligible (n = 58,461 patients). Across all major CMs, many AEDs were associated with higher risk compared to control. For major CMs, ethosuximide (OR, 3.04; 95% CrI, 1.23–7.07), valproate (OR, 2.93; 95% CrI, 2.36–3.69), topiramate (OR, 1.90; 95% CrI, 1.17–2.97), phenobarbital (OR, 1.83; 95% CrI, 1.35–2.47), phenytoin (OR, 1.67; 95% CrI, 1.30–2.17), carbamazepine (OR, 1.37; 95% CrI, 1.10–1.71), and 11 polytherapies were significantly more harmful than control, but lamotrigine (OR, 0.96; 95% CrI, 0.72–1.25) and levetiracetam (OR, 0.72; 95% CrI, 0.43–1.16) were not.

Conclusion

The newer generation AEDs, lamotrigine and levetiracetam, were not associated with significant increased risks of CMs compared to control, and were significantly less likely to be associated with children experiencing cardiac malformations than control. However, this does not mean that these agents are not harmful to infants/children exposed in utero. Counselling is advised concerning teratogenic risks when the prescription is written for a woman of childbearing age and before women continue with these agents when considering pregnancy, such as switching from polytherapy to monotherapy with evidence of lower risk and avoiding AEDs, such as valproate, that are consistently associated with CMs. These decisions must be balanced against the need for seizure control.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO CRD42014008925
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hauser W, Hesdorffer D. Epilepsy: Frequency, Causes and Consequences. New York: Demos Medical Pub; 1990. Hauser W, Hesdorffer D. Epilepsy: Frequency, Causes and Consequences. New York: Demos Medical Pub; 1990.
2.
go back to reference Wiebe S, Bellhouse DR, Fallahay C, Eliasziw M. Burden of epilepsy: the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Neurol Sci. 1999;26(4):263–70.CrossRefPubMed Wiebe S, Bellhouse DR, Fallahay C, Eliasziw M. Burden of epilepsy: the Ontario Health Survey. Can J Neurol Sci. 1999;26(4):263–70.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Morrell MJ. Epilepsy in women. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(8):1489–94.PubMed Morrell MJ. Epilepsy in women. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(8):1489–94.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Zahn CA, Morrell MJ, Collins SD, Labiner DM, Yerby MS. Management issues for women with epilepsy: a review of the literature. Neurology. 1998;51(4):949–56.CrossRefPubMed Zahn CA, Morrell MJ, Collins SD, Labiner DM, Yerby MS. Management issues for women with epilepsy: a review of the literature. Neurology. 1998;51(4):949–56.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Spina E, Perugi G. Antiepileptic drugs: indications other than epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2004;6(2):57–75.PubMed Spina E, Perugi G. Antiepileptic drugs: indications other than epilepsy. Epileptic Disord. 2004;6(2):57–75.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Harden CL, Pennell PB, Koppel BS, Hovinga CA, Gidal B, Meador KJ, et al. Management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): III. vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breast-feeding: report of the quality standards subcommittee and therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia. 2009;50(5):1247–55.CrossRefPubMed Harden CL, Pennell PB, Koppel BS, Hovinga CA, Gidal B, Meador KJ, et al. Management issues for women with epilepsy--focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): III. vitamin K, folic acid, blood levels, and breast-feeding: report of the quality standards subcommittee and therapeutics and technology assessment subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsia. 2009;50(5):1247–55.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Meador K, Reynolds MW, Crean S, Fahrbach K, Probst C. Pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published pregnancy registries and cohorts. Epilepsy Res. 2008;81(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Meador K, Reynolds MW, Crean S, Fahrbach K, Probst C. Pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published pregnancy registries and cohorts. Epilepsy Res. 2008;81(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Samren EB, van Duijn CM, Koch S, Hiilesmaa VK, Klepel H, Bardy AH, et al. Maternal use of antiepileptic drugs and the risk of major congenital malformations: a joint European prospective study of human teratogenesis associated with maternal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1997;38(9):981–90.CrossRefPubMed Samren EB, van Duijn CM, Koch S, Hiilesmaa VK, Klepel H, Bardy AH, et al. Maternal use of antiepileptic drugs and the risk of major congenital malformations: a joint European prospective study of human teratogenesis associated with maternal epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1997;38(9):981–90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Janz D, Fuchs U. Are anti-epileptic drugs harmful during pregnancy? Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1964;89:241–8.CrossRefPubMed Janz D, Fuchs U. Are anti-epileptic drugs harmful during pregnancy? Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1964;89:241–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Shorvon SD. Drug treatment of epilepsy in the century of the ILAE: the second 50 years, 1959-2009. Epilepsia. 2009;50 Suppl 3:93–130.CrossRefPubMed Shorvon SD. Drug treatment of epilepsy in the century of the ILAE: the second 50 years, 1959-2009. Epilepsia. 2009;50 Suppl 3:93–130.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Johannessen Landmark C, Patsalos PN. Drug interactions involving the new second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;10(1):119–40.CrossRefPubMed Johannessen Landmark C, Patsalos PN. Drug interactions involving the new second- and third-generation antiepileptic drugs. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;10(1):119–40.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Cogo E, Veroniki AA, Soobiah C, Hutton B, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs among infants and children exposed in utero or during breastfeeding: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014;3:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tricco AC, Cogo E, Veroniki AA, Soobiah C, Hutton B, Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs among infants and children exposed in utero or during breastfeeding: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014;3:68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, Daw J, Andes S, Eldessouki R, et al. Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health. 2014;17(2):157–73.CrossRefPubMed Jansen JP, Trikalinos T, Cappelleri JC, Daw J, Andes S, Eldessouki R, et al. Indirect treatment comparison/network meta-analysis study questionnaire to assess relevance and credibility to inform health care decision making: an ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force report. Value Health. 2014;17(2):157–73.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.CrossRefPubMed Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Harden C, Thomas S, Tomson T. Epilepsy in Women. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.CrossRef Harden C, Thomas S, Tomson T. Epilepsy in Women. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944–52.CrossRefPubMed Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C. An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):944–52.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
21.
go back to reference Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23(20):3105–24.CrossRefPubMed Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23(20):3105–24.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jansen JP, Naci H. Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers. BMC Med. 2013;11:159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jansen JP, Naci H. Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers. BMC Med. 2013;11:159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference White IR, Barrett JK, Jackson D, Higgins JPT. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):111–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral White IR, Barrett JK, Jackson D, Higgins JPT. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):111–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):98–110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;326(7387):472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;326(7387):472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
27.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 6 Apr 2017. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.​handbook.​cochrane.​org. Accessed 6 Apr 2017.
28.
go back to reference Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Sabers A, et al. Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(7):609–17.CrossRefPubMed Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Sabers A, et al. Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(7):609–17.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, et al. Dose-dependent teratogenicity of valproate in mono- and polytherapy: an observational study. Neurology. 2015;85(10):866–72.CrossRefPubMed Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, et al. Dose-dependent teratogenicity of valproate in mono- and polytherapy: an observational study. Neurology. 2015;85(10):866–72.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Vajda FJ, O’Brien TJ, Lander CM, Graham J, Eadie MJ. The teratogenicity of the newer antiepileptic drugs - an update. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130(4):234–8.CrossRefPubMed Vajda FJ, O’Brien TJ, Lander CM, Graham J, Eadie MJ. The teratogenicity of the newer antiepileptic drugs - an update. Acta Neurol Scand. 2014;130(4):234–8.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Martinez Ferri M, Pena Mayor P, Perez Lopez-Fraile I, Castro Vilanova MD, Escartin Siquier A, Martin Moro M, et al. Malformations and fetal death in the Spanish antiepileptic drug and pregnancy registry: results at 6 years. Neurologia. 2009;24(6):360–5.PubMed Martinez Ferri M, Pena Mayor P, Perez Lopez-Fraile I, Castro Vilanova MD, Escartin Siquier A, Martin Moro M, et al. Malformations and fetal death in the Spanish antiepileptic drug and pregnancy registry: results at 6 years. Neurologia. 2009;24(6):360–5.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Schmitz S, Adams R, Walsh C. Incorporating data from various trial designs into a mixed treatment comparison model. Stat Med. 2013;32(17):2935–49.CrossRefPubMed Schmitz S, Adams R, Walsh C. Incorporating data from various trial designs into a mixed treatment comparison model. Stat Med. 2013;32(17):2935–49.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2002;64(4):583–639.CrossRef Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, Van Der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2002;64(4):583–639.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Cooper N, Abrams KR, Ades A. Evidence synthesis for decision making in healthcare. New York: Wiley; 2012.CrossRef Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Cooper N, Abrams KR, Ades A. Evidence synthesis for decision making in healthcare. New York: Wiley; 2012.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.CrossRefPubMed Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Veroniki AA, Straus SE, Fyraridis A, Tricco AC. The rank-heat plot is a novel way to present the results from a network meta-analysis including multiple outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:193–9.CrossRefPubMed Veroniki AA, Straus SE, Fyraridis A, Tricco AC. The rank-heat plot is a novel way to present the results from a network meta-analysis including multiple outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;76:193–9.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N. The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3049–67.CrossRefPubMed Lunn D, Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N. The BUGS project: evolution, critique and future directions. Stat Med. 2009;28(25):3049–67.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Palmer T, Sterne J. Meta-Analysis in Stata: An Updated Collection from the Stata Journal. Texas: Stata Press; 2016. Palmer T, Sterne J. Meta-Analysis in Stata: An Updated Collection from the Stata Journal. Texas: Stata Press; 2016.
40.
41.
go back to reference Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549.CrossRefPubMed Riley RD, Higgins JP, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ. 2011;342:d549.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Babic M, Jovic N. Postnatal concerns in children born to women with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. In: European Congress on Epileptology, vol. 55. Stockholm: Epilepsia; 2014. p. 128. Babic M, Jovic N. Postnatal concerns in children born to women with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. In: European Congress on Epileptology, vol. 55. Stockholm: Epilepsia; 2014. p. 128.
43.
go back to reference Franchini AJ, Dias S, Ades AE, Jansen JP, Welton NJ. Accounting for correlation in network meta-analysis with multi-arm trials. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):142–60.CrossRefPubMed Franchini AJ, Dias S, Ades AE, Jansen JP, Welton NJ. Accounting for correlation in network meta-analysis with multi-arm trials. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3(2):142–60.CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Kibret T, Richer D, Beyene J. Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:451–60.PubMedPubMedCentral Kibret T, Richer D, Beyene J. Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:451–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
45.
go back to reference Trinquart L, Attiche N, Bafeta A, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Uncertainty in treatment rankings: reanalysis of network meta-analyses of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(10):666–73.CrossRefPubMed Trinquart L, Attiche N, Bafeta A, Porcher R, Ravaud P. Uncertainty in treatment rankings: reanalysis of network meta-analyses of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(10):666–73.CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Cameron C, Fireman B, Hutton B, Clifford T, Coyle D, Wells G, et al. Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities. Syst Rev. 2015;4:147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cameron C, Fireman B, Hutton B, Clifford T, Coyle D, Wells G, et al. Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities. Syst Rev. 2015;4:147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
go back to reference Veroniki AA, Straus SE, Soobiah C, Elliott MJ, Tricco AC. A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Veroniki AA, Straus SE, Soobiah C, Elliott MJ, Tricco AC. A scoping review of indirect comparison methods and applications using individual patient data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16(1):47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296.CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e296.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Campbell E, Kennedy F, Russell A, Smithson WH, Parsons L, Morrison PJ, et al. Malformation risks of antiepileptic drug monotherapies in pregnancy: updated results from the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Registers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(9):1029–34.CrossRefPubMed Campbell E, Kennedy F, Russell A, Smithson WH, Parsons L, Morrison PJ, et al. Malformation risks of antiepileptic drug monotherapies in pregnancy: updated results from the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Registers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(9):1029–34.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Hernandez-Diaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, Mittendorf R, Hauser WA, Yerby M, et al. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology. 2012;78(21):1692–9.CrossRefPubMed Hernandez-Diaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, Mittendorf R, Hauser WA, Yerby M, et al. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology. 2012;78(21):1692–9.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Kallen B, Borg N, Reis M. The use of central nervous system active drugs during pregnancy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6(10):1221–86.CrossRef Kallen B, Borg N, Reis M. The use of central nervous system active drugs during pregnancy. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6(10):1221–86.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Veiby G, Daltveit AK, Engelsen BA, Gilhus NE. Fetal growth restriction and birth defects with newer and older antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. J Neurol. 2014;261(3):579–88.CrossRefPubMed Veiby G, Daltveit AK, Engelsen BA, Gilhus NE. Fetal growth restriction and birth defects with newer and older antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. J Neurol. 2014;261(3):579–88.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes
Authors
Areti Angeliki Veroniki
Elise Cogo
Patricia Rios
Sharon E. Straus
Yaron Finkelstein
Ryan Kealey
Emily Reynen
Charlene Soobiah
Kednapa Thavorn
Brian Hutton
Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
Fatemeh Yazdi
Jennifer D’Souza
Heather MacDonald
Andrea C. Tricco
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0845-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Medicine 1/2017 Go to the issue