Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Vaccination | Research article

Effects of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on child mortality and vaccination rates: a synthetic control analysis

Author: Gary W. Reinbold

Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Scholars have long been sceptical about the effectiveness of human rights treaties in changing the behaviour of states parties and prior empirical research has often justified that scepticism. However, only a few prior studies have considered the effects of adoption of core human rights treaties on health outcomes and only one prior study has analysed the effects of adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) on children’s health outcomes.

Methods

In this study, we estimated the effects of CRC adoption on child mortality rates and vaccination rates in less developed countries. In particular, we compared 43 less developed countries that adopted the CRC in 1990 with synthetic control groups drawn from 21 less developed countries that adopted it after 1992.

Results

We find that CRC adoption may be related to additional reductions in infant and under-5 mortality rates of about 1 to 2 deaths per 1000 live births, on average, during the first three years after adoption, although those relationships are not statistically significant. And we find that CRC adoption is related to additional increases in vaccination rates for the five vaccines that we considered of about 4 to 5%, on average, during the first three years after adoption and that those relationships remain significant for up to seven years after adoption.

Conclusion

From a policy perspective, our results further support the effectiveness of CRC adoption in promoting children’s right to health in less developed countries. And from a research perspective, our results show the advantages of using synthetic control methods in these types of studies, because our analyses using other methods that have most commonly been used in these studies did not find any consistent, significant relationships between CRC adoption and mortality or vaccination rates.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Alston P, Tobin J. (with Darrow, M.). an independent study of some key legal and institutional aspects of the convention on the rights of the child. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2005. Alston P, Tobin J. (with Darrow, M.). an independent study of some key legal and institutional aspects of the convention on the rights of the child. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2005.
7.
go back to reference Lundy L. Children's rights and educational policy in Europe: the implementation of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Oxf Rev Educ. 2012;38(4):393–411.CrossRef Lundy L. Children's rights and educational policy in Europe: the implementation of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Oxf Rev Educ. 2012;38(4):393–411.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lundy L, Kilkelly U, Byrne B. Incorporation of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child in law: a comparative review. Int J Child Rights. 2013;21(3):442–63.CrossRef Lundy L, Kilkelly U, Byrne B. Incorporation of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child in law: a comparative review. Int J Child Rights. 2013;21(3):442–63.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lundy L, Kilkelly U, Byrne B, Kang J. The UN convention on the rights of the child: a study of legal implementation in 12 countries. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Queen’s University Belfast; 2012. Lundy L, Kilkelly U, Byrne B, Kang J. The UN convention on the rights of the child: a study of legal implementation in 12 countries. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Queen’s University Belfast; 2012.
10.
go back to reference Reinbold G. Realising young children’s right to health under the convention on the rights of the child. Int J Child Rights. 2014;22(3):502–51.CrossRef Reinbold G. Realising young children’s right to health under the convention on the rights of the child. Int J Child Rights. 2014;22(3):502–51.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rios-Kohn R. The Convention on the Rights of the Child: progress and challenges. Georgetown J Fighting Poverty 1998;V (2):139–160. Rios-Kohn R. The Convention on the Rights of the Child: progress and challenges. Georgetown J Fighting Poverty 1998;V (2):139–160.
12.
go back to reference Theytaz-Bergman L. What happened? A study on the impact of the convention on the rights of the child in five countries: Estonia, Nepal, Peru, Uganda and Yemen. Save the Children Sweden: Stockholm; 2009. Theytaz-Bergman L. What happened? A study on the impact of the convention on the rights of the child in five countries: Estonia, Nepal, Peru, Uganda and Yemen. Save the Children Sweden: Stockholm; 2009.
13.
go back to reference UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. The general measures of the convention on the rights of the child: the process in Europe and Central Asia. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2006. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. The general measures of the convention on the rights of the child: the process in Europe and Central Asia. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2006.
14.
go back to reference UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. Law reform and implementation of the convention on the rights of the child. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2007. UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre. Law reform and implementation of the convention on the rights of the child. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2007.
15.
go back to reference Woll L. The convention on the rights of the child impact study: a study to assess the effect of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child on the institutions and actors who have the responsibility and the ability to advance child rights. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden; 2000. Woll L. The convention on the rights of the child impact study: a study to assess the effect of the United Nations convention on the rights of the child on the institutions and actors who have the responsibility and the ability to advance child rights. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden; 2000.
16.
go back to reference Cole W. Human rights as myth and ceremony? Reevaluating the effectiveness of human rights treaties, 1981–2007. AJS. 2012;117(4):1131–71.PubMed Cole W. Human rights as myth and ceremony? Reevaluating the effectiveness of human rights treaties, 1981–2007. AJS. 2012;117(4):1131–71.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Cole W. Mind the gap: state capacity and the implementation of human rights treaties. Int Organ. 2015;69(2):405–41.CrossRef Cole W. Mind the gap: state capacity and the implementation of human rights treaties. Int Organ. 2015;69(2):405–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hafner-Burton E, Tsutsui K. Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. J Peace Res. 2007;44(4):407–25.CrossRef Hafner-Burton E, Tsutsui K. Justice lost! The failure of international human rights law to matter where needed most. J Peace Res. 2007;44(4):407–25.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hathaway O. Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law J. 2002;111(8):1935–2042.CrossRef Hathaway O. Do human rights treaties make a difference? Yale Law J. 2002;111(8):1935–2042.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hill D. Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. J Polit. 2010;72(4):1161–74.CrossRef Hill D. Estimating the effects of human rights treaties on state behavior. J Polit. 2010;72(4):1161–74.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Keith L. The United Nations international covenant on civil and political rights: does it make a difference in human rights behavior? J Peace Res. 1999;36(1):95–118.CrossRef Keith L. The United Nations international covenant on civil and political rights: does it make a difference in human rights behavior? J Peace Res. 1999;36(1):95–118.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lupu Y. The informative power of treaty commitment: using the spatial model to address selection effects. Am J Pol Sci. 2013;57(4):912–25. Lupu Y. The informative power of treaty commitment: using the spatial model to address selection effects. Am J Pol Sci. 2013;57(4):912–25.
23.
go back to reference Lupu Y. Best evidence: the role of information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements. Int Organ. 2013;67(3):469–503.CrossRef Lupu Y. Best evidence: the role of information in domestic judicial enforcement of international human rights agreements. Int Organ. 2013;67(3):469–503.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lupu Y. Legislative veto players and the effects of international human rights agreements. Am J Pol Sci. 2015;59(3):578–94.CrossRef Lupu Y. Legislative veto players and the effects of international human rights agreements. Am J Pol Sci. 2015;59(3):578–94.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Neumayer E. Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? J Confl Resolut. 2005;49(6):925–53.CrossRef Neumayer E. Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? J Confl Resolut. 2005;49(6):925–53.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Simmons B. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.CrossRef Simmons B. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Conrad C, Ritter E. Treaties, tenure, and torture: the conflicting domestic effects of international law. J Polit. 2013;75(2):397–409.CrossRef Conrad C, Ritter E. Treaties, tenure, and torture: the conflicting domestic effects of international law. J Polit. 2013;75(2):397–409.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Fariss C. Respect for human rights has improved over time: modeling the changing standard of accountability. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2014;108(2):297–318.CrossRef Fariss C. Respect for human rights has improved over time: modeling the changing standard of accountability. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2014;108(2):297–318.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Powell E, Staton J. Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. Int Stud Q. 2009;53(1):149–74.CrossRef Powell E, Staton J. Domestic judicial institutions and human rights treaty violation. Int Stud Q. 2009;53(1):149–74.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Englehart N, Miller M. The CEDAW effect: international law's impact on women's rights. J Hum Rights. 2014;13(1):22–47.CrossRef Englehart N, Miller M. The CEDAW effect: international law's impact on women's rights. J Hum Rights. 2014;13(1):22–47.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Gray M, Kittilson M, Sandholtz W. Women and globalization: a study of 180 countries, 1975–2000. Int Organ. 2006;60(2):293–333.CrossRef Gray M, Kittilson M, Sandholtz W. Women and globalization: a study of 180 countries, 1975–2000. Int Organ. 2006;60(2):293–333.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dancy G, Sikkink K. Ratification and human rights prosecutions: toward a transnational theory of treaty compliance. N Y Univ J Int Law Polit. 2012;44(3):751–90. Dancy G, Sikkink K. Ratification and human rights prosecutions: toward a transnational theory of treaty compliance. N Y Univ J Int Law Polit. 2012;44(3):751–90.
33.
go back to reference Hafner-Burton E, Tsutsui K. Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises. AJS. 2005;110(5):1373–411. Hafner-Burton E, Tsutsui K. Human rights in a globalizing world: the paradox of empty promises. AJS. 2005;110(5):1373–411.
34.
go back to reference Palmer A, Tomkinson J, Phung C, Ford N, Joffres M, Fernandes K, et al. Does ratification of human-rights treaties have effects on population health? Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1987–92.PubMedCrossRef Palmer A, Tomkinson J, Phung C, Ford N, Joffres M, Fernandes K, et al. Does ratification of human-rights treaties have effects on population health? Lancet. 2009;373(9679):1987–92.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Abadie A, Gardeazabal J. The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country. Am Econ Rev. 2003;93(1):113–32.CrossRef Abadie A, Gardeazabal J. The economic costs of conflict: a case study of the Basque Country. Am Econ Rev. 2003;93(1):113–32.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010;105(490):493–505.CrossRef Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program. J Am Stat Assoc. 2010;105(490):493–505.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Cavallo E, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J. Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Rev Econ Stat. 2013;95(5):1549–61.CrossRef Cavallo E, Galiani S, Noy I, Pantano J. Catastrophic natural disasters and economic growth. Rev Econ Stat. 2013;95(5):1549–61.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Athey S, Imbens G. The state of applied econometrics: causality and policy evaluation. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(2):3–32.CrossRef Athey S, Imbens G. The state of applied econometrics: causality and policy evaluation. J Econ Perspect. 2017;31(2):3–32.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Gauri V, Khaleghian P. Immunization in developing countries: its political and organizational determinants. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2002.CrossRef Gauri V, Khaleghian P. Immunization in developing countries: its political and organizational determinants. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2002.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Mosley W, Chen L. An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. Popul Dev Rev 1984;10 Suppl:25–45.CrossRef Mosley W, Chen L. An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. Popul Dev Rev 1984;10 Suppl:25–45.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Brenzel L, Wolfson L, Fox-Rushby J, Miller M, Halsey N. Vaccine-preventable diseases. In: Jamison D, Brennan J, Measham A, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans D et al., editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 389–411. Brenzel L, Wolfson L, Fox-Rushby J, Miller M, Halsey N. Vaccine-preventable diseases. In: Jamison D, Brennan J, Measham A, Alleyne G, Claeson M, Evans D et al., editors. Disease control priorities in developing countries. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. p. 389–411.
54.
go back to reference Samartsidis P, Seaman S, Presanis A, Hickman M, De Angelis D. Review of methods for assessing the causal effect of binary interventions from aggregate time-series observational data. 2018. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.07683. Accessed 11 Jul 2019. Samartsidis P, Seaman S, Presanis A, Hickman M, De Angelis D. Review of methods for assessing the causal effect of binary interventions from aggregate time-series observational data. 2018. https://​arxiv.​org/​pdf/​1804.​07683. Accessed 11 Jul 2019.
55.
go back to reference Brodersen K, Gallusser F, Koehler J, Remy N, Scott S. Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Ann Appl Stat. 2015;9(1):247–74.CrossRef Brodersen K, Gallusser F, Koehler J, Remy N, Scott S. Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Ann Appl Stat. 2015;9(1):247–74.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference King G, Lucas C, Nielsen R. The balance-sample size frontier in matching methods for causal inference. Am J Pol Sci. 2016;61(2):473–89.CrossRef King G, Lucas C, Nielsen R. The balance-sample size frontier in matching methods for causal inference. Am J Pol Sci. 2016;61(2):473–89.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effects of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on child mortality and vaccination rates: a synthetic control analysis
Author
Gary W. Reinbold
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Vaccination
Published in
BMC International Health and Human Rights / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-698X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-019-0211-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2019 Go to the issue