Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Study protocol

Developing human rights based indicators to support country monitoring of rehabilitation services and programmes for people with disabilities: a study protocol

Authors: Dimitrios Skempes, Jerome Bickenbach

Published in: BMC International Health and Human Rights | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rehabilitation care is fundamental to health and human dignity and a human right enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The provision of rehabilitation is important for reducing the need for formal support and enabling persons with disabilities to lead an independent life. Increasingly scholars and advocacy groups voice concerns over the significant barriers facing people with disabilities in accessing appropriate and quality rehabilitation. A growing body of research highlights a “respond-need” gap in the provision of rehabilitation and assistive technologies and underscore the lack of indicators for assessing performance of rehabilitation systems and monitoring States compliance with human rights standards in rehabilitation service planning and programming. While research on human rights and health monitoring has increased exponentially over the last decade far too little attention has been paid to rehabilitation services. The proposed research aims to reduce this knowledge gap by developing a human rights based monitoring framework with indicators to support human rights accountability and performance assessment in rehabilitation.

Methods/Design

Concept mapping, a stakeholder-driven approach will be used as the core method to identify rights based indicators and develop the rehabilitation services monitoring framework. Concept mapping requires participants from various stakeholders groups to generate a list of the potential indicators through on line brainstorming, sort the indicators for conceptual similarity into clusters and rate them against predefined criteria. Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster data analysis will be performed to develop the monitoring framework while bridging analysis will provide useful insights about patterns of agreement or disagreement among participants views on indicators.

Discussion

This study has the potential to influence future practices on data collection and measurement of compliance with human rights standards in rehabilitation service delivery and organization. The development of a valid and universally applicable set of indicators will have a profound impact on the design and implementation of evidence informed disability policies and programs as it can support countries in strengthening performance measurement through documentation of comparative information on rehabilitation care systems. Most importantly, the resulting indicators can be used by disabled people’s organizations as well as national and international institutions to define a minimal standard for monitoring and reporting progress on the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the area of rehabilitation.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; (In press). Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015; (In press).
3.
go back to reference Chamberlain JD, Meier S, Mader L, von Groote PM, Brinkhof MWG. Mortality and longevity after a spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44(3):182–98.PubMed Chamberlain JD, Meier S, Mader L, von Groote PM, Brinkhof MWG. Mortality and longevity after a spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44(3):182–98.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Palmer M. Disability and poverty: a conceptual review. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2011;21(4):210–8. Palmer M. Disability and poverty: a conceptual review. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2011;21(4):210–8.
6.
go back to reference Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Melvin J, Stucki G. Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(9):765–9.PubMed Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Melvin J, Stucki G. Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(9):765–9.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health-related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states’ obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(1):163–73.PubMed Skempes D, Stucki G, Bickenbach J. Health-related rehabilitation and human rights: analyzing states’ obligations under the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(1):163–73.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Turner-Stokes L, McCrone P, Jackson DM, Siegert RJ. The needs and provision complexity scale: a multicentre prospective cohort analysis of met and unmet needs and their cost implications for patients with complex neurological disability. BMJ Open. 2013;3:2. Turner-Stokes L, McCrone P, Jackson DM, Siegert RJ. The needs and provision complexity scale: a multicentre prospective cohort analysis of met and unmet needs and their cost implications for patients with complex neurological disability. BMJ Open. 2013;3:2.
10.
go back to reference Eide AH, Mannan H, Khogali M, van Rooy G, Swartz L, Munthali A, et al. Perceived barriers for accessing health services among individuals with disability in four African countries. PLoS One. 2015;10(5), e0125915. Eide AH, Mannan H, Khogali M, van Rooy G, Swartz L, Munthali A, et al. Perceived barriers for accessing health services among individuals with disability in four African countries. PLoS One. 2015;10(5), e0125915.
11.
go back to reference New PW, Scivoletto G, Smith E, Townson A, Gupta A, Reeves RK, et al. International survey of perceived barriers to admission and discharge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation units. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(12):893–7.PubMed New PW, Scivoletto G, Smith E, Townson A, Gupta A, Reeves RK, et al. International survey of perceived barriers to admission and discharge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation units. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(12):893–7.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Tistad M, Tham K, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Unfulfilled rehabilitation needs and dissatisfaction with care 12 months after a stroke: an explorative observational study. BMC Neurol. 2012;12(1):40. Tistad M, Tham K, von Koch L, Ytterberg C. Unfulfilled rehabilitation needs and dissatisfaction with care 12 months after a stroke: an explorative observational study. BMC Neurol. 2012;12(1):40.
13.
go back to reference Jaffe KM, Jimenez N. Disparity in rehabilitation: another inconvenient truth. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015, 96(8):1371-1374. Jaffe KM, Jimenez N. Disparity in rehabilitation: another inconvenient truth. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015, 96(8):1371-1374.
14.
go back to reference Meade MA, Mahmoudi E, Lee SY. The intersection of disability and healthcare disparities: a conceptual framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):632–41.PubMed Meade MA, Mahmoudi E, Lee SY. The intersection of disability and healthcare disparities: a conceptual framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):632–41.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Palmer M, Harley D. Models and measurement in disability: an international review. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(5):357–64.PubMed Palmer M, Harley D. Models and measurement in disability: an international review. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(5):357–64.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Van Brakel WH, Officer A. Approaches and tools for measuring disability in low and middle-income countries. Lepr Rev. 2008;79(1):50–64.PubMed Van Brakel WH, Officer A. Approaches and tools for measuring disability in low and middle-income countries. Lepr Rev. 2008;79(1):50–64.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Goujon N, Devine A, Baker SM, Sprunt B, Edmonds TJ, Booth JK, et al. A comparative review of measurement instruments to inform and evaluate effectiveness of disability inclusive development. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(10):804–12.PubMed Goujon N, Devine A, Baker SM, Sprunt B, Edmonds TJ, Booth JK, et al. A comparative review of measurement instruments to inform and evaluate effectiveness of disability inclusive development. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(10):804–12.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Philibert M, Pampalon R, Daniel M. Conceptual and operational considerations in identifying socioenvironmental factors associated with disability among community-dwelling adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(4):3814–34.PubMedPubMedCentral Philibert M, Pampalon R, Daniel M. Conceptual and operational considerations in identifying socioenvironmental factors associated with disability among community-dwelling adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(4):3814–34.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostansjek N, Bickenbach J. WHO’s ICF and functional status information in health records. Health Care Financ Rev. 2003;24(3):77–88. Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostansjek N, Bickenbach J. WHO’s ICF and functional status information in health records. Health Care Financ Rev. 2003;24(3):77–88.
22.
go back to reference Madden R, Ferreira M, Einfeld S, Emerson E, Manga R, Refshauge K, et al. New directions in health care and disability: the need for a shared understanding of human functioning. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36(5):458–61.PubMed Madden R, Ferreira M, Einfeld S, Emerson E, Manga R, Refshauge K, et al. New directions in health care and disability: the need for a shared understanding of human functioning. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012;36(5):458–61.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Skempes D, Bickenbach J. Strengthening rehabilitation for people with disabilities: a human rights approach as the essential next step to accelerating global progress. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2015;Publish Ahead of Print. Skempes D, Bickenbach J. Strengthening rehabilitation for people with disabilities: a human rights approach as the essential next step to accelerating global progress. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2015;Publish Ahead of Print.
24.
go back to reference Madans JH, Loeb ME, Altman BM. Measuring disability and monitoring the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: the work of the Washington group on disability statistics. BMC Public Health. 2011;11 Suppl 4:S4.PubMed Madans JH, Loeb ME, Altman BM. Measuring disability and monitoring the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: the work of the Washington group on disability statistics. BMC Public Health. 2011;11 Suppl 4:S4.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Mitra S. A data revolution for disability-inclusive development. Lancet Global Health. 2013;1(4):e178–9.PubMed Mitra S. A data revolution for disability-inclusive development. Lancet Global Health. 2013;1(4):e178–9.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Hammonds R, Ooms G. World Bank policies and the obligation of its members to respect, protect and fulfill the right to health. Health Hum Rights. 2004;8(1):27–60. Hammonds R, Ooms G. World Bank policies and the obligation of its members to respect, protect and fulfill the right to health. Health Hum Rights. 2004;8(1):27–60.
28.
go back to reference Yousafzai AK, Lynch P, Gladstone M. Moving beyond prevalence studies: screening and interventions for children with disabilities in low-income and middle-income countries. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(9):840–8. Yousafzai AK, Lynch P, Gladstone M. Moving beyond prevalence studies: screening and interventions for children with disabilities in low-income and middle-income countries. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(9):840–8.
29.
go back to reference Landman T, Carvalho E. Measuring human rights: Routledge; 2009. Landman T, Carvalho E. Measuring human rights: Routledge; 2009.
30.
go back to reference Tobin J. The right to health in international Law. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. Tobin J. The right to health in international Law. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
31.
go back to reference Gupta N, Castillo-Laborde C, Landry M. Health-related rehabilitation services: assessing the global supply of and need for human resources. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):276.PubMedPubMedCentral Gupta N, Castillo-Laborde C, Landry M. Health-related rehabilitation services: assessing the global supply of and need for human resources. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):276.PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D, Evans T, Kieny M-P, Wagstaff A. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9), e1001731.PubMedPubMedCentral Boerma T, Eozenou P, Evans D, Evans T, Kieny M-P, Wagstaff A. Monitoring progress towards universal health coverage at country and global levels. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9), e1001731.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Boerma T, AbouZahr C, Evans D, Evans T. Monitoring intervention coverage in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9), e1001728.PubMedPubMedCentral Boerma T, AbouZahr C, Evans D, Evans T. Monitoring intervention coverage in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS Med. 2014;11(9), e1001728.PubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Backman G, Hunt P, Khosla R, Jaramillo-Strouss C, Fikre BM, Rumble C, Pevalin D, et al. Health systems and the right to health: an assessment of 194 countries. Lancet, 372(9655):2047–2085. Backman G, Hunt P, Khosla R, Jaramillo-Strouss C, Fikre BM, Rumble C, Pevalin D, et al. Health systems and the right to health: an assessment of 194 countries. Lancet, 372(9655):2047–2085.
36.
go back to reference Gruskin S, Ferguson L, Alfven T, Rugg D, Peersman G. Identifying structural barriers to an effective HIV response: using the National Composite Policy Index data to evaluate the human rights, legal and policy environment. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16:18000.PubMedPubMedCentral Gruskin S, Ferguson L, Alfven T, Rugg D, Peersman G. Identifying structural barriers to an effective HIV response: using the National Composite Policy Index data to evaluate the human rights, legal and policy environment. J Int AIDS Soc. 2013;16:18000.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Randall J, Thornicroft G, Burti L, Katschnig H, Lewis O, Russo J, et al. Development of the ITHACA Toolkit for monitoring human rights and general health care in psychiatric and social care institutions. Epidemiol Psychiatric Sci. 2013;22(03):241–54. Randall J, Thornicroft G, Burti L, Katschnig H, Lewis O, Russo J, et al. Development of the ITHACA Toolkit for monitoring human rights and general health care in psychiatric and social care institutions. Epidemiol Psychiatric Sci. 2013;22(03):241–54.
38.
go back to reference Amin M, MacLachlan M, Mannan H, El Tayeb S, El Khatim A, Swartz L, et al. EquiFrame: a framework for analysis of the inclusion of human rights and vulnerable groups in health policies. Health Hum Rights. 2011;13(2):1–20.PubMed Amin M, MacLachlan M, Mannan H, El Tayeb S, El Khatim A, Swartz L, et al. EquiFrame: a framework for analysis of the inclusion of human rights and vulnerable groups in health policies. Health Hum Rights. 2011;13(2):1–20.PubMed
39.
go back to reference French P, Chan J, Carracher R. Realizing human rights in clinical practice and service delivery to persons with cognitive impairment who engage in behaviours of concern. Psychiatr Psycholo Law. 2010;17(2):245–72. French P, Chan J, Carracher R. Realizing human rights in clinical practice and service delivery to persons with cognitive impairment who engage in behaviours of concern. Psychiatr Psycholo Law. 2010;17(2):245–72.
40.
go back to reference Fujiura GT, Rutkowski-Kmitta V, Owen R. Make measurable what is not so: national monitoring of the status of persons with intellectual disability. J Intellec Dev Disabil. 2010;35(4):244–58. Fujiura GT, Rutkowski-Kmitta V, Owen R. Make measurable what is not so: national monitoring of the status of persons with intellectual disability. J Intellec Dev Disabil. 2010;35(4):244–58.
44.
go back to reference Brinkerhoff DW. Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(6):371–9.PubMed Brinkerhoff DW. Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(6):371–9.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Watchirs H. Review of methodologies measuring human rights implementation. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(4):716–33.PubMed Watchirs H. Review of methodologies measuring human rights implementation. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(4):716–33.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Gruskin S, Ferguson L. Using indicators to determine the contribution of human rights to public health efforts. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:714–9. Gruskin S, Ferguson L. Using indicators to determine the contribution of human rights to public health efforts. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:714–9.
47.
go back to reference Fukuda-Parr S, Yamin AE, Greenstein J. The power of numbers: a critical review of millennium development goal targets for human development and human rights. J Human Dev Capabil. 2014;15(2–3):105–17. Fukuda-Parr S, Yamin AE, Greenstein J. The power of numbers: a critical review of millennium development goal targets for human development and human rights. J Human Dev Capabil. 2014;15(2–3):105–17.
48.
go back to reference Fukuda-Parr S. Global goals as a policy tool: intended and unintended consequences. J Human Dev Capabil. 2014;15(2–3):118–31. Fukuda-Parr S. Global goals as a policy tool: intended and unintended consequences. J Human Dev Capabil. 2014;15(2–3):118–31.
49.
go back to reference Andersen EA, Sano H-O. Human rights indicators at programme and project level: guidelines for defining indicators. Danish Institute for Human Rights: Monitoring and Evaluation; 2006. Andersen EA, Sano H-O. Human rights indicators at programme and project level: guidelines for defining indicators. Danish Institute for Human Rights: Monitoring and Evaluation; 2006.
51.
go back to reference Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. International J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(3):187–91. Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. International J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(3):187–91.
52.
go back to reference Kane M, Trochim WM. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Volume 50. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc. Sage; 2007. Kane M, Trochim WM. Concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Volume 50. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc. Sage; 2007.
53.
go back to reference Burke JG, O’Campo P, Peak GL, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, Trochim WM. An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(10):1392–410.PubMed Burke JG, O’Campo P, Peak GL, Gielen AC, McDonnell KA, Trochim WM. An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(10):1392–410.PubMed
54.
go back to reference Petrucci CJ, Quinlan KM. Bridging the research-practice Gap: concept mapping as a mixed-methods strategy in practice-based research and evaluation. J Soc Service Res. 2007;34(2):25–42. Petrucci CJ, Quinlan KM. Bridging the research-practice Gap: concept mapping as a mixed-methods strategy in practice-based research and evaluation. J Soc Service Res. 2007;34(2):25–42.
55.
go back to reference Kagan JM, Kane M, Quinlan KM, Rosas S, Trochim WM. Developing a conceptual framework for an evaluation system for the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7:12.PubMedPubMedCentral Kagan JM, Kane M, Quinlan KM, Rosas S, Trochim WM. Developing a conceptual framework for an evaluation system for the NIAID HIV/AIDS clinical trials networks. Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7:12.PubMedPubMedCentral
56.
go back to reference Groenewoud AS, van Exel NJ, Berg M, Huijsman R. Building quality report cards for geriatric care in The Netherlands: using concept mapping to identify the appropriate “building blocks” from the consumer’s perspective. Gerontologist. 2008;48(1):79–92.PubMed Groenewoud AS, van Exel NJ, Berg M, Huijsman R. Building quality report cards for geriatric care in The Netherlands: using concept mapping to identify the appropriate “building blocks” from the consumer’s perspective. Gerontologist. 2008;48(1):79–92.PubMed
57.
go back to reference Iris M, DeBacker NA, Benner R, Hammerman J, Ridings J. Creating a quality of life assessment measure for residents in long term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(5):438–47.PubMed Iris M, DeBacker NA, Benner R, Hammerman J, Ridings J. Creating a quality of life assessment measure for residents in long term care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(5):438–47.PubMed
58.
go back to reference Sjodahl Hammarlund C, Nilsson MH, Hagell P. Measuring outcomes in Parkinson’s disease: a multi-perspective concept mapping study. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(3):453–63.PubMed Sjodahl Hammarlund C, Nilsson MH, Hagell P. Measuring outcomes in Parkinson’s disease: a multi-perspective concept mapping study. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(3):453–63.PubMed
59.
go back to reference Hammarlund CS, Nilsson MH, Idvall M, Rosas SR, Hagell P. Conceptualizing and prioritizing clinical trial outcomes from the perspectives of people with Parkinson’s disease versus health care professionals: a concept mapping study. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(6):1687–700. Hammarlund CS, Nilsson MH, Idvall M, Rosas SR, Hagell P. Conceptualizing and prioritizing clinical trial outcomes from the perspectives of people with Parkinson’s disease versus health care professionals: a concept mapping study. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(6):1687–700.
60.
go back to reference Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann. 2012;35(2):236–45.PubMed Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: a pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann. 2012;35(2):236–45.PubMed
64.
go back to reference Jackson KM, Trochim WMK. Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organ Res Methods. 2002;5(4):307–36. Jackson KM, Trochim WMK. Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organ Res Methods. 2002;5(4):307–36.
65.
go back to reference Concept Systems Inc (CSI). Concept systems global MAX™ [computer program]. 2013 edition. Ithaca, NY: Concept Systems Inc. Concept Systems Inc (CSI). Concept systems global MAX™ [computer program]. 2013 edition. Ithaca, NY: Concept Systems Inc.
66.
go back to reference Shekelle PG. Quality indicators and performance measures: methods for development need more standardization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(12):1338–9.PubMed Shekelle PG. Quality indicators and performance measures: methods for development need more standardization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(12):1338–9.PubMed
67.
go back to reference Priestley M, Waddington L, Bessozi C. Towards an agenda for disability research in Europe: learning from disabled people’s organisations. Disabil Soc. 2010;25(6):731–46. Priestley M, Waddington L, Bessozi C. Towards an agenda for disability research in Europe: learning from disabled people’s organisations. Disabil Soc. 2010;25(6):731–46.
69.
go back to reference Delnoij D, Rademakers J, Groenewegen P. The Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):88.PubMedPubMedCentral Delnoij D, Rademakers J, Groenewegen P. The Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10(1):88.PubMedPubMedCentral
70.
go back to reference Bennett S, Peters DH. Assessing national health systems: Why and How. Health Syst Reform. 2015;1(1):9–17. Bennett S, Peters DH. Assessing national health systems: Why and How. Health Syst Reform. 2015;1(1):9–17.
71.
go back to reference Muñoz-Leiva F, Sánchez-Fernández J, Montoro-Ríos F, Ibáñez-Zapata J. Improving the response rate and quality in Web-based surveys through the personalization and frequency of reminder mailings. Qual Quant. 2010;44(5):1037–52. Muñoz-Leiva F, Sánchez-Fernández J, Montoro-Ríos F, Ibáñez-Zapata J. Improving the response rate and quality in Web-based surveys through the personalization and frequency of reminder mailings. Qual Quant. 2010;44(5):1037–52.
72.
go back to reference Cho YI, Johnson TP, VanGeest JB. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(3):382–407.PubMed Cho YI, Johnson TP, VanGeest JB. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response. Eval Health Prof. 2013;36(3):382–407.PubMed
73.
go back to reference Bristo M, Blauwet CA, Frontera W, Tolchin DW, Stein MA, Hoppe KM, et al. The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: what is at stake for physiatrists and the patients we serve. PM R. 2014;6(4):356–62.PubMed Bristo M, Blauwet CA, Frontera W, Tolchin DW, Stein MA, Hoppe KM, et al. The convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: what is at stake for physiatrists and the patients we serve. PM R. 2014;6(4):356–62.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Developing human rights based indicators to support country monitoring of rehabilitation services and programmes for people with disabilities: a study protocol
Authors
Dimitrios Skempes
Jerome Bickenbach
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC International Health and Human Rights / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-698X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-015-0063-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC International Health and Human Rights 1/2015 Go to the issue