Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Care | Research article

An audit of dementia education and training in UK health and social care: a comparison with national benchmark standards

Authors: S. J. Smith, S. Parveen, C. Sass, M. Drury, J. R. Oyebode, C. A. Surr

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite people living with dementia representing a significant proportion of health and social care users, until recently in the United Kingdom (UK) there were no prescribed standards for dementia education and training. This audit sought to review the extent and nature of dementia education and training offered to health and social care staff in the UK against the standards described in the 2015 Dementia Training Standards Framework, which describes the knowledge and skills required of the UK dementia workforce.

Methods

This audit presents national data concerning the design, delivery, target audience, length, level, content, format of training, number of staff trained and frequency of delivery within existing dementia training programmes offered to health and social care staff. The Dementia Training Standards Framework was used as a reference for respondents to describe the subjects and learning outcomes associated with their training.

Results

The findings are presented from 614 respondents offering 386 training packages, which indicated variations in the extent and quality of training. Many training packages addressed the subjects of ‘person-centred care’, ‘communication’, ‘interaction and behaviour in dementia care’, and ‘dementia awareness’. Few training packages addressed subjects concerning ‘pharmacological interventions in dementia care’, ‘leadership’ and ‘end of life care’. Fewer than 40% of The Dementia Training Standards Framework learning outcomes targeted to staff with regular contact with people with dementia or in leadership roles were covered by the reported packages. However, for training targeted at increasing dementia awareness more than 70% of the learning outcomes identified in The Dementia Training Standards Framework were addressed. Many training packages are not of sufficient duration to derive impact; although the majority employed delivery methods likely to be effective.

Conclusions

The development of new and existing training and education should take account of subjects that are currently underrepresented and ensure that training reflects the Training Standard Framework and evidence regarding best practice for delivery. Lessons regarding the limitations of training in the UK serve as a useful illustration of the challenge of implementing national dementia training standards; particularly for countries who are developing or have recently implemented national dementia strategies.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Routing was employed in the online version based on participants’ responses; respondents would not have been shown all questions. Questions regarding coverage of subjects and learning outcomes were repeated for each training package provided.
 
Literature
8.
go back to reference Finnema E, Dröes RM, Ettema T, Ooms M, Adèr H, Ribbe M, van Tilburg W. The effect of integrated emotion-oriented care versus usual care on elderly persons with dementia in the nursing home and on nursing assistants: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20:330–43.CrossRef Finnema E, Dröes RM, Ettema T, Ooms M, Adèr H, Ribbe M, van Tilburg W. The effect of integrated emotion-oriented care versus usual care on elderly persons with dementia in the nursing home and on nursing assistants: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005;20:330–43.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Surr C, Gates C, Irving D, Oyebode J, Smith SJ, Parveen S, et al. Effective dementia education and training for the health and social care workforce: a systematic review of the literature. Rev Educ Res. 2015;87(5):966–1002.CrossRef Surr C, Gates C, Irving D, Oyebode J, Smith SJ, Parveen S, et al. Effective dementia education and training for the health and social care workforce: a systematic review of the literature. Rev Educ Res. 2015;87(5):966–1002.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 1984. Kirkpatrick DL. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 1984.
19.
go back to reference Banerjee S, Farina N, Daley S, Grosvenor W, Hughes L, Hebditch M, Mackrell S, Niforooshan R, Wyatt C, de Vries K, Haq I, Wright J. How do we enhance undergraduate healthcare education in dementia? A review of the role of innovative approaches and development of the time for dementia programme. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32:68–75.CrossRef Banerjee S, Farina N, Daley S, Grosvenor W, Hughes L, Hebditch M, Mackrell S, Niforooshan R, Wyatt C, de Vries K, Haq I, Wright J. How do we enhance undergraduate healthcare education in dementia? A review of the role of innovative approaches and development of the time for dementia programme. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32:68–75.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Biggs J, Tang K. Teaching for quality learning at university. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Oxford University Press; 2011. Biggs J, Tang K. Teaching for quality learning at university. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Oxford University Press; 2011.
21.
go back to reference Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. & bloom BSA. Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Allyn & Bacon; 2001. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. & bloom BSA. Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
23.
go back to reference Kitwood T. Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Berkshire: Open University Press; 1997. Kitwood T. Dementia reconsidered: The person comes first. Berkshire: Open University Press; 1997.
Metadata
Title
An audit of dementia education and training in UK health and social care: a comparison with national benchmark standards
Authors
S. J. Smith
S. Parveen
C. Sass
M. Drury
J. R. Oyebode
C. A. Surr
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4510-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue