Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Improving outpatient satisfaction by extending expected waiting time

Authors: Wei-Min Ma, Hui Zhang, Neng-Li Wang

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Long waiting times result in low satisfaction. Although several methods are used to shorten the actual waiting time (AWT) in large hospitals of China, the outpatients still have a long actual waiting time. This study aimed to explore whether satisfaction could be improved by extending the expected waiting time (EWT) instead of shortening the AWT.

Methods

In October 2016, 257 students in grade one voluntarily participated in this study. They came from 6 classes, which were randomly divided into two groups: 3 classes comprised the control group (n = 125) and 3 classes comprised the experimental group (n = 132). Unfavorable information (UI) was given to the experimental group alone. Six distinct questionnaires were designed to explore the effects of UI on EWT and the effects of an extended EWT on satisfaction. Satisfaction scores ranged from 0 to 100: 0–25, very dissatisfied; 26–50, dissatisfied; 51–75, satisfied; 76–100, very satisfied. Each participant finished one of the 6 questionnaires online. Of the 257 questionnaires, 233 were valid.

Results

Before UI was given, the initial EWT (T0) was similar between the control and experimental groups (Z = -1.924, P = 0.054). Under the effects of UI, individuals in the experimental group extended their EWT (T1) from 121.0 to 180.0 min (Z = -6.367, P < 0.001). Females prolonged their EWT longer than males did (Z = -2.239, P = 0.025). Then, this study defined T0 = 1.5 h and T1 = 2.5 h, and compared the satisfaction scores between the control and experimental groups: a significant difference was found when AWT =2.0 h (t = − 3.568, P = 0.001), but not when AWT =3.0 h (t = − 0.718, P = 0.475) or when AWT =1.0 h (t = − 1.088, P = 0.280). When AWT =3.0 h, fewer individuals felt “very dissatisfied” in the experimental group (21.2%) than in the control group (44.7%) (χ2 = 4.368, P = 0.037).

Conclusions

EWT was found to be extended greatly by UI. An extended EWT could improve satisfaction scores.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Anderson RT, Camacho FT, Balkrishnan R. Willing to wait? The influence of patient wait time on satisfaction with primary care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:31.CrossRef
3.
Edlund MJ, Young AS, Kung FY, Sherbourne CD, Wells KB. Does satisfaction reflect the technical quality of mental health care. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:631–45.CrossRef
4.
Al-Harajin RS, Al-Subaie SA, Elzubair AG. The association between waiting time and patient satisfaction in outpatient clinics: findings from a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. 2019;26:17–22.CrossRef
5.
Ahmadi Kashkoli S, Zarei E, Daneshkohan A, Khodakarim S. Hospital responsiveness and its effect on overall patient satisfaction: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017;30:728–36.CrossRef
6.
Feddock CA, Hoellein AR, Griffith CH 3rd, Wilson JF, Bowerman JL, Becker NS, et al. Can physicians improve patient satisfaction with long waiting times? Eval Health Prof. 2005;28:40–52.CrossRef
7.
Su H, Wan G, Wang S. Online scheduling for outpatient services with heterogeneous patients and physicians. J Comb Optim. 2019;37:123–49.CrossRef
8.
Song J, Bai Y, Wen J. Optimal appointment rule Design in an Outpatient Department. IEEE T Autom Sci Eng. 2019;16:100–15.CrossRef
9.
Mazaheri Habibi MR, Abadi FM, Tabesh H, Vakili-Arki H, Abu-Hanna A, Eslami S. Evaluation of patient satisfaction of the status of appointment scheduling systems in outpatient clinics: identifying patients’ needs. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2018;9:51–5.CrossRef
10.
Tayal SC, Opaneye AA, Crinion S, Hildreth AJ. Reducing waiting times for GU medicine appointments: the impact of a new appointment system. Int J STD AIDS. 2006;17:173–5.CrossRef
11.
Godley M, Jenkins JB. Decreasing wait times and increasing patient satisfaction: a lean six sigma approach. J Nurs Care Qual. 2019;34:61–5.CrossRef
12.
Gijo EV, Antony J. Reducing patient waiting time in outpatient department using lean six sigma methodology. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2014;30:1481–91.CrossRef
13.
Jackson J, Woeste LA. Using lean six sigma to reduce patient wait times. Lab Med. 2008;39:134–6.CrossRef
14.
Monroe-Wise A, Reisner E, Sherr K, Ojakaa D, Mbau L, Kisia P, et al. Using lean manufacturing principles to evaluate wait times for HIV-positive patients in an urban clinic in Kenya. Int J STD AIDS. 2017;28:1410–8.CrossRef
15.
Ng D, Vail G, Thomas S, Schmidt N. Applying the lean principles of the Toyota production system to reduce wait times in the emergency department. CJEM. 2010;12:50–7.CrossRef
16.
Elamir H. Improving patient flow through applying lean concepts to emergency department. Leadersh Health Serv. 2018;31:293–309.CrossRef
17.
Srinivas S, Ravindran AR. Optimizing outpatient appointment system using machine learning algorithms and scheduling rules: a prescriptive analytics framework. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;102:245–61.CrossRef
18.
Vashi AA, Sheikhi FH, Nashton LA, Ellman J, Rajagopal P, Asch SM. Applying lean principles to reduce wait times in a VA emergency department. Mil Med. 2019;184:169–78.CrossRef
19.
Sun J, Lin Q, Zhao P, Zhang Q, Xu K, Chen H, et al. Reducing waiting time and raising outpatient satisfaction in a Chinese public tertiary general hospital-an interrupted time series study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:668.CrossRef
20.
Spaite DW, Bartholomeaux F, Guisto J, Lindberg E, Hull B, Eyherabide A, et al. Rapid process redesign in a university-based emergency department: decreasing waiting time intervals and improving patient satisfaction. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:168–77.CrossRef
21.
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty. 1992;5:297–323.CrossRef
22.
Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim SS. A cross-cultural study of reference point adaptation: evidence from China, Korea, and the US. Organ Behav Hum. 2010;112:99–111.CrossRef
23.
Peysakhovich A, Karmarkar UR. Asymmetric effects of favorable and unfavorable information on decision making under ambiguity. Manag Sci. 2016;62:2163–78.CrossRef
24.
Brous PA. Common stock offerings and earnings expectations: a test of the release of unfavorable information. J Financ. 1992;47:1517–36.CrossRef
25.
Bartling B, Brandes L, Schunk D. Expectations as reference points: field evidence from professional soccer. Manag Sci. 2015;61:2646–61.CrossRef
26.
Toma G, Triner W, McNutt LA. Patient satisfaction as a function of emergency department previsit expectations. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54:360–7.CrossRef
27.
Zarei E, Arab M, Tabatabaei SM, Rashidian A, Forushani AR, Khabiri R. Understanding patients’ behavioral intentions: evidence from Iran’s private hospitals industry. J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28:795–810.CrossRef
28.
Arkes HR, Hirshleifer D, Jiang D, Lim S. Reference point adaptation: tests in the domain of security trading. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 2008;105:67–81.CrossRef
29.
Baucells M, Weber M, Welfens F. Reference-point formation and updating. Manag Sci. 2011;57:506–19.CrossRef
30.
Paraschiv C, Chenavaz R. Sellers’ and buyers’ reference point dynamics in the housing market. Housing Stud. 2011;26:329–52.CrossRef
31.
Heje HN, Vedsted P, Sokolowski I, Olesen F. Patient characteristics associated with differences in patients’ evaluation of their general practitioner. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:178.CrossRef
32.
Danielsen K, Bjertnaes OA, Garratt A, Forland O, Iversen HH, Hunskaar S. The association between demographic factors, user reported experiences and user satisfaction: results from three casualty clinics in Norway. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:73.CrossRef
33.
Linghan S, Ye L, Ding D, Wu Q, Liu C, Jiao M, et al. Patient satisfaction with hospital inpatient care: effects of trust, medical insurance and perceived quality of care. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0164366.CrossRef
34.
Jalil A, Zakar R, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Patient satisfaction with doctor-patient interactions: a mixed methods study among diabetes mellitus patients in Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:155.CrossRef
35.
36.
Bar-dayan Y, Leiba A, Weiss Y, Carroll JS, Benedek P. Waiting time is a major predictor of patient satisfaction in a primary military clinic. Mil Med. 2002;167:842–5.CrossRef
37.
Zhu Z, Heng BH, Teow KL. Analysis of factors causing long patient waiting time and clinic overtime in outpatient clinics. J Med Syst. 2012;36:707–13.CrossRef
38.
Mehra P. Outpatient clinic waiting time, provider communication styles and satisfaction with healthcare in India. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016;29:759–77.CrossRef
39.
Coates D, Humphreys BR, Zhou L. Reference-dependent preferences, loss aversion, and live game attendance. Econ Inq. 2014;52:959–73.CrossRef
40.
Barberis NC, Nicholas C. Thirty years of Prospect theory in economics: a review and assessment. J Econ Perspect. 2013;27:173–95.CrossRef
41.
Skowronski JJ, Carlston DE. Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: a review of explanations. Psychol Bull. 1989;105:131–42.CrossRef
42.
Mizerski RW. An attribution explanation of the disproportionate influence of unfavorable information. J Consum Res. 1982;9:301–10.CrossRef
43.
Knox SA, Viney RC, Gu Y, Hole AR, Fiebig DG, Street DJ, et al. The effect of adverse information and positive information on women's preferences for prescribed contraceptive products. Soc Sci Med. 2013;83:70–80.CrossRef
44.
Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA. Gender differences in competition: evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica. 2009;77:1637–64.CrossRef
45.
Ordóñez LD, Connolly T, Coughlan R. Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. J Behav Decis Making. 2000;13:329–44.CrossRef
46.
Cherry B, Ordóñez LD, Gilliland SW. Grade expectations: the effects of expectations on fairness and satisfaction perceptions. J Behav Decis Making. 2003;16:375–95.CrossRef
47.
Cameron LA. Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: experimental evidence from Indonesia. Econ Inq. 1999;37:47–59.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improving outpatient satisfaction by extending expected waiting time
Authors
Wei-Min Ma
Hui Zhang
Neng-Li Wang
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4408-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue

Research article

Hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions as an indicator of access to primary care and excess of bed supply

Research article

“Implications of cost-sharing for observation care among Medicare beneficiaries: a pilot survey”

Research article

Barriers to cardiac rehabilitation delivery in a low-resource setting from the perspective of healthcare administrators, rehabilitation providers, and cardiac patients

Research article

Evaluation of the primary care for chronic diseases in the high coverage context of the Family Health Strategy

Research article

The MOWER (middle of the week everyone gets a re-chart) pilot study: reducing in-hospital charting error with a multi-intervention

Research article

Patient safety culture in Peking University Cancer Hospital in China: baseline assessment and comparative analysis for quality improvement