Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Exploring the solutions to the inherent perils of (the multitude of) guidelines – a focus group study of stakeholders’ perceptions

Authors: Louise H. K. Blume, Jamiu O. Busari, Nico J. H. W. van Weert, Diana M. J. Delnoij

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hospital boards have the responsibility to ensure compliance of hospital staff with guidelines and other norms, but they have struggled to do so. The current study aims to identify possible solutions that address the whole chain of guideline and norm production, use and enforcement and that could help hospital boards and management cope with norms and guidelines.

Methods

We performed a qualitative study of three focus groups involving a total of 28 participants. In the third focus group, no new themes emerged, indicating that saturation was achieved. Focus group discussions were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Results were coded, and three themes emerged from the results. Thick description with selected key quotes is used to display the items in the result section.

Results

In the first instance, norm developers, norm enforcers, and norm users acknowledged and reformulated the problem before they suggested solutions. The proposed concrete solutions, such as a clear description of the division of tasks within guidelines, clarity about the purpose of guideline recommendations, a maximum number of quality indicators for hospitals and implementation of an ensuring proper Information Technology (IT) infrastructure.

Conclusions

This study aimed to find solutions for the problems that hospitals encounter in managing a multitude of norms and guidelines. Participants in this study acknowledged the fact that norms and guidelines have become difficult to manage at the hospital level and four potential solutions were identified.

Trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered on the 21st of July in 2016 in the Dutch Trial Register as NL4061.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pope C. Resisting evidence: the study of evidence-based medicine as a contemporary social movement. Health. 2003;7:267–82.CrossRef Pope C. Resisting evidence: the study of evidence-based medicine as a contemporary social movement. Health. 2003;7:267–82.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Haynes RB. What kind of evidence is it that evidence-based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:3.CrossRef Haynes RB. What kind of evidence is it that evidence-based medicine advocates want health care providers and consumers to pay attention to? BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ. 2014;348:g3725.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ. 2014;348:g3725.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–30.CrossRef Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change. Lancet. 2003;362:1225–30.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Blume LHK, van Weert NJHW, Delnoij DMJ. How to manage external demands in hospitals – the case of atrium MC. Healthcare. 2015;3(3):157.CrossRef Blume LHK, van Weert NJHW, Delnoij DMJ. How to manage external demands in hospitals – the case of atrium MC. Healthcare. 2015;3(3):157.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Blume LHK, van Weert NJHW, Busari JO, Delnoij DMJ. Good intentions getting out of hand – is there a future for health care guidelines? Risk Manage Healthcare Policy. 2017;10:81–5.CrossRef Blume LHK, van Weert NJHW, Busari JO, Delnoij DMJ. Good intentions getting out of hand – is there a future for health care guidelines? Risk Manage Healthcare Policy. 2017;10:81–5.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation- a scoping review. Healthcare. 2016;4:36.CrossRef Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation- a scoping review. Healthcare. 2016;4:36.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–51.CrossRef O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–51.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mortelmans D. Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco; 2009. Mortelmans D. Handboek kwalitatieve onderzoeksmethoden. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco; 2009.
15.
go back to reference Blume LHK, van Weert NJHW, Busari JO, Delnoij DMJ. Guideline adherence: how do boards of directors deal with it? A survey in Dutch hospitals. J Hosp Admin. 2016;5(5):21. Blume LHK, van Weert NJHW, Busari JO, Delnoij DMJ. Guideline adherence: how do boards of directors deal with it? A survey in Dutch hospitals. J Hosp Admin. 2016;5(5):21.
16.
go back to reference Boeije H. Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. Denken en doen. Amsterdam: Boom onderwijs; 2008. Boeije H. Analyseren in kwalitatief onderzoek. Denken en doen. Amsterdam: Boom onderwijs; 2008.
17.
go back to reference Clancy CM, Cronin K. Evidence-based decision making: Global evidence, local decisions. Health Aff. 2005;24(1):151–62.CrossRef Clancy CM, Cronin K. Evidence-based decision making: Global evidence, local decisions. Health Aff. 2005;24(1):151–62.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Neely JG, Paniello RC, Graboyes EM, Sharon JD, Grindler DJ, Nussenbaum B. Practical guide to understanding clinical research compliance. Otolarynogolgy-Head and Neck Surgery. 2014. Published electronically ahead of print DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814524895. Published in print: Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2014; 150(5): 716–721.CrossRef Neely JG, Paniello RC, Graboyes EM, Sharon JD, Grindler DJ, Nussenbaum B. Practical guide to understanding clinical research compliance. Otolarynogolgy-Head and Neck Surgery. 2014. Published electronically ahead of print DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​0194599814524895​. Published in print: Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2014; 150(5): 716–721.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference van der Veer SN, de Vos ML, Jager KJ, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care. Implement Sci. 2011;6:119.CrossRef van der Veer SN, de Vos ML, Jager KJ, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored multifaceted performance feedback intervention to improve the quality of care: protocol for a cluster randomized trial in intensive care. Implement Sci. 2011;6:119.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6:26.CrossRef Gagliardi AR, Brouwers MC, Palda VA, Lemieux-Charles L, Grimshaw JM. How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implement Sci. 2011;6:26.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sola I, Carrasco JM, Diaz Del Campo P, Gracia J, Orrego C, Martinez F, et al. Attitudes and perceptions about clinical guidelines: a qualitative study with Spanish physicians. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86065.CrossRef Sola I, Carrasco JM, Diaz Del Campo P, Gracia J, Orrego C, Martinez F, et al. Attitudes and perceptions about clinical guidelines: a qualitative study with Spanish physicians. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86065.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Marcee A, Grannemann B, Kleiber B, Bettinger T, et al. Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions. Methods Inf Med. 2002;41:435–42.CrossRef Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Marcee A, Grannemann B, Kleiber B, Bettinger T, et al. Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions. Methods Inf Med. 2002;41:435–42.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Damiani G, Pinnarelli L, Colosimo SC, Almiento R, Sicuro L, et al. The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:1472–6963.CrossRef Damiani G, Pinnarelli L, Colosimo SC, Almiento R, Sicuro L, et al. The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:1472–6963.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring the solutions to the inherent perils of (the multitude of) guidelines – a focus group study of stakeholders’ perceptions
Authors
Louise H. K. Blume
Jamiu O. Busari
Nico J. H. W. van Weert
Diana M. J. Delnoij
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4261-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue