Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Telemedicine | Research article

The prospectively-reported implementation update and score (PRIUS): a new method for capturing implementation-related developments over time

Authors: Edward J. Miech, Nicholas A. Rattray, Dawn M. Bravata, Barbara J. Homoya, Jennifer Myers, Teresa M. Damush

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Implementation of new programs within healthcare systems can be extraordinarily complex. Individuals within the same healthcare organization often have different perspectives on how implementation of a new program unfolds over time, and it is not always clear in the midst of implementation what issues are most important or how to address them. An implementation support team within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) sought to develop an efficient method for eliciting an ongoing, detailed and nuanced account of implementation progress from multiple viewpoints that could support and inform active implementation of two new VHA programs.

Methods

The new Prospectively-Reported Implementation Update and Score (“PRIUS”) provided a quick, structured, prospective and open-ended method for individuals to report on implementation progress. PRIUS updates were submitted approximately twice a month. Responding to the prompt “What are some things that happened over the past two weeks that seem relevant from your perspective to the implementation of this project?”, individuals scored each update with a number ranging from + 3 to − 3.

Results

In 2016–17, individuals submitted over 600 PRIUS updates across the two QI projects. PRIUS-based findings included that staff from different services reported fundamentally different perspectives on program implementation. Rapid analysis and reporting of the PRIUS data led directly to changes in implementation.

Conclusions

The PRIUS provided an efficient, structured method for developing a granular and context-sensitive account of implementation progress. The approach appears to be highly adaptable to a wide range of settings and interventions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Conklin J. Wicked problems and social complexity. CogNexus Institute; 2001. Conklin J. Wicked problems and social complexity. CogNexus Institute; 2001.
2.
go back to reference Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Huber TP, Mohr JJ, Godfrey MM, Headrick LA, Wasson JH. Microsystems in health care: part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28(9):472–93.PubMed Nelson EC, Batalden PB, Huber TP, Mohr JJ, Godfrey MM, Headrick LA, Wasson JH. Microsystems in health care: part 1. Learning from high-performing front-line clinical units. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002;28(9):472–93.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Damschroder L, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013;8:51.CrossRef Damschroder L, Lowery JC. Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implement Sci. 2013;8:51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Strous and Giroux; 2013. Kahneman D. Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Strous and Giroux; 2013.
6.
go back to reference Beebe J. Rapid assessment process: an introduction. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira; 2001. Beebe J. Rapid assessment process: an introduction. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira; 2001.
7.
go back to reference McNall M, Foster-Fishman PG. Methods of rapid evaluation, assessment, and appraisal. Am J Eval. 2007;28:151–68.CrossRef McNall M, Foster-Fishman PG. Methods of rapid evaluation, assessment, and appraisal. Am J Eval. 2007;28:151–68.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Green CA, Duan N, Gibbons RD, Hoagwood KE, Palinkas LA, Wisdom JP. Approaches to mixed methods dissemination and implementation research: methods, strengths, caveats, and opportunities. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2015;42:508–23.CrossRef Green CA, Duan N, Gibbons RD, Hoagwood KE, Palinkas LA, Wisdom JP. Approaches to mixed methods dissemination and implementation research: methods, strengths, caveats, and opportunities. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2015;42:508–23.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Averill JB. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2002;12:855–66.CrossRef Averill JB. Matrix analysis as a complementary analytic strategy in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2002;12:855–66.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nadin S, Cassell C. Using data matrices. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Essential guide to qualitative research methods in organizational research. London: Sage Publications; 2004. Nadin S, Cassell C. Using data matrices. In: Cassell C, Symon G, editors. Essential guide to qualitative research methods in organizational research. London: Sage Publications; 2004.
11.
go back to reference Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, Proctor EK, Kirchner JE. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.CrossRef Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, Proctor EK, Kirchner JE. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The prospectively-reported implementation update and score (PRIUS): a new method for capturing implementation-related developments over time
Authors
Edward J. Miech
Nicholas A. Rattray
Dawn M. Bravata
Barbara J. Homoya
Jennifer Myers
Teresa M. Damush
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Telemedicine
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-3927-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Health Services Research 1/2019 Go to the issue