Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Responding to excessive alcohol consumption in third-level (REACT): a study protocol

Authors: Martin P. Davoren, Susan Calnan, Judith Mulcahy, Emily Lynch, Ivan J. Perry, Michael Byrne

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Problem alcohol use is an ongoing, worldwide phenomenon of considerable concern. Throughout the past 20 years, national policies have noted the importance of students when tackling alcohol consumption. Considering alcohol is a multifaceted issue, a multi-component response is required to combat its excessive use. This protocol sets out the approach used for developing, implementing and evaluating the REACT (Responding to Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Third-level) Programme.

Methods/design

This evaluation will provide the evidence base for programme development, implementation and improvement. Stage one involved defining the multi-component intervention. This was developed following a systematic review of existing literature and a Delphi-consensus workshop involving university students, staff and relevant stakeholders. Following this, the programme is being implemented across the Higher Education sector in Ireland. A number of Higher Education Institutes have declined the invitation to participate in the programme. These institutions will act as control sites. Each intervention site will have a steering committee whose membership will include a mix of students and academic and student service staff. This steering committee will report to the REACT research team on the implementation of mandatory and optional action points at local sites. An online cross-sectional study at baseline and two-years post intervention will be utilised to determine the impact of the REACT programme. The impact assessment will focus on (1) whether the intervention has reduced alcohol consumption among third-level students (2); whether the programme altered students attitudes toward alcohol and (3) whether the programme has decreased the second-hand effects associated with excessive consumption. Finally, qualitative research will focus on factors influencing the take-up and implementation of this programme as well as students’ views on the initiative.

Discussion

Alcohol consumption has remained on the policy agenda at both national and international level over recent decades. Students are regularly among the highest alcohol consumers, yet university management and public policymakers struggle to tackle this burgeoning issue. The REACT Programme provides a structure to translate policy into practice for those seeking to reduce hazardous alcohol consumption and related harms among third-level students.
Literature
1.
Babor T, Caetano R, Casswell S, et al. Alcohol no ordinary commodity - research and public policy. Second Edition ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
2.
Eurobarometer. EU citizens’ attitudes towards alcohol. Brussels: European Commission; 2010.
3.
Leifman H. Six-country survey of the European comparative alcohol study: comparing patterns and assessing validity. Contemp Drug Probs. 2002;29:477.CrossRef
4.
Morgan K, McGee H, Dicker P, Brugha R, Ward M, Shelley E, Van Lente E, Harrington J, Barry M, Perry I, Watson D. SLÁN 2007: survey of lifestyle, attitudes and nutrition in Ireland. In: Alcohol use in Ireland: a profile of drinking patterns and alcohol-related harm from SLÁN 2007. Dublin: SLÁN 2007: Department of Health and Children; 2009.
5.
OECD. OECD Factbook 2013: economic, environmental and social statistics. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2013.
6.
Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, et al. Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2009. Volume II: College Students and Adults Ages 19-50. NIH Publication No. 10-7585. Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); 2010.
7.
Heather N, Partington S, Partington E, et al. Alcohol use disorders and hazardous drinking among undergraduates at English universities. Alcohol Alcohol. 2011;46(3):270–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Health Research Board. I MRBI, editor. Alcohol diary study 2013: technical report. Dublin: Health Research Board. p. 2014.
9.
Dantzer C, Warclle J, Fuller R, et al. International study of heavy drinking: attitudes and sociodemographic factors in university students. J Am Coll Heal. 2006:55(2).
10.
Wechsler H, Lee JE, Kuo M, et al. Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: findings from 4 Harvard School of Public Health College alcohol study surveys: 1993–2001. J Am Coll Heal. 2002;50(5):203–17.CrossRef
11.
Murphy F, Murphy M. The use of social marketing messages to reduce binge drinking among Irish third level female students: academic public administration studies archive-APAS, 2010.
12.
McCabe SE. Gender differences in collegiate risk factors for heavy episodic drinking. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2002;63(1):49.
13.
Webb E, Ashton C, Kelly P, et al. Alcohol and drug use in UK university students. Lancet. 1996;348(9032):922–5.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Hope A, Dring C, Dring J. College lifestyle and attitudinal national (CLAN) survey. Dublin: The Health of Irish Students, Health Service Executive; 2005.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Department of Health. Steering group report on a National Substance Misuse Strategy. Dublin: Department of Health; 2012.
19.
20.
Health PromotioWn Unit DoHaC, National Working Group on alcohol consumption in higher education,. Framework for developing a college alcohol policy: health service executive, 2002.
21.
22.
Royal College of Physicians of Ireland. In: RPGo A, editor. RCPI policy group on alcohol reducing alcohol health harm. Dublin: Royal College or Physicians of Ireland; 2013.
23.
24.
Carey D, Davoren MP, Byrne M. Reducing excessive alcohol consumption in third-level (REACT). Health Service Executive: University College Cork; 2015.
25.
26.
Darnton A, Evans D. Influencing Behaviours: a technical guide to the ISM tool. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2013.
27.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Behaviour change at population, community and individual levels. London: NICE Public Health Guidance; 2007.
28.
Coleman P, Nicholl J. Consensus methods to identify a set of potential performance indicators for systems of emergency and urgent care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15:12–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Elso S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–15.CrossRef
30.
31.
Medical Research Council. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council; 2000.
32.
Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions. London: New guidance; 2006.
33.
Tsouros A, Dowding G, Thompson J, Dooris M (eds.). Health Promoting Universities: Concept, experience and framework for action. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 1998.
34.
DeJong W, Vince-Whitman C, Colthurst T, et al. Environmental Management: A Comprehensive Strategy for Reducing Alcohol and Other Drug Use on College Campuses. Institute of Education Sciences; 1998.
35.
Davies M, Macdowall W. Health promotion theory. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2006.
36.
Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, et al. The alcohol use disorders identification test: guidelines for use in primary care. In: Dependence DoMHaS, editor. . 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
37.
38.
Department of Health & Children. Survey of lifestyle, attitudes and nutrition. Ireland: Department of Health; 2007.
39.
Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam T, et al. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a process-evaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6(2):134–47.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
Doumas DM, Andersen LL. Reducing alcohol use in first-year university students: evaluation of a web-based personalized feedback program. J Coll Couns. 2009;12(1):18–32.CrossRef
47.
Doumas DM, Haustveit T, Coll KM. Reducing heavy drinking among first year intercollegiate athletes: a randomized controlled trial of web-based normative feedback. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2010;22(3):247–61.CrossRef
48.
Doumas DM, Kane CM, Navarro TB, et al. Decreasing heavy drinking in first-year students: evaluation of a web-based personalized feedback program administered during orientation. J Coll Couns. 2011;14(1):5–20.CrossRef
49.
Asiedu M, Sarfo JO, Adjei D. Organisational commitment and citizenship behaviour: tools to improve employee performance; an internal marketing approach. Eur Sci J. 2014;10:4.
50.
Butler S, Ryder N. Reducing alcohol - related harm in Irish colleges: a qualitative evaluation of the college alcohol policy initiative. In: The health of Irish students : college lifestyle and attitudinal national (CLAN) survey; a qualitative evaluation of the college alcohol policy initiative. Dublin: Health Promotion Unit, Department of Health and Children; 2005. p. 55–83.
51.
52.
Hope A. Research evidence to prevent alcohol-related harm: what communities can do in Ireland. In: Galway Healthy Cities, ed. Galway City alcohol strategy to prevent and reduce alcohol-related harm (2013–2017). Galway, 2015.
Metadata
Title
Responding to excessive alcohol consumption in third-level (REACT): a study protocol
Authors
Martin P. Davoren
Susan Calnan
Judith Mulcahy
Emily Lynch
Ivan J. Perry
Michael Byrne
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3173-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

National implementation of a trauma-informed intervention for intimate partner violence in the Department of Veterans Affairs: first year outcomes

Research article

Experiences of primary care physicians and staff following lean workflow redesign

Research article

Prescription of lipid-lowering medications for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk-associated LDL cholesterol: a nationwide study of guideline adherence from the Swedish National Diabetes Register

Technical advance

A multicriteria resource allocation model for the redesign of services following birth

Research article

Rationing cancer treatment: a qualitative study of perceptions of legitimate limit-setting

Research article

Multiple policy approaches in improving community pharmacy practice: the case in Indonesia