Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Resilience, trust, and civic engagement in the post-CCSVI era

Authors: Shelly Benjaminy, Andrew Schepmyer, Judy Illes, Anthony Traboulsee

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Scientific and financial investments in chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) research have been made to address both the hope for and scepticism over this interventional strategy for MS. Despite limited evidence in support of the CCSVI hypothesis, the funding of clinical research was responsive to a demand by the public rarely seen in the history of medicine. We characterize patient perspectives about the CCSVI research trajectory, with particular attention to its impact on other non-pharmaceutical areas of MS research with a focus on stem cell interventions.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with 20 MS patients across Canada who did not have CCSVI interventions. Interviews were analysed for recurring themes and individual variations using the constant comparative approach.

Results

Participants had a critical view of the divestment of funds from longstanding research to support CCSVI trials. They retain a sense of optimism, however, about emerging evidence for stem cell interventions for MS, and highlight the need for greater caution and conscientious communication of advances in medicine and science.

Conclusions

The unrealized hopes for CCSVI challenged but did not undermine the resilience of patient communities. The narrative that unfolded highlights the importance of drawing a socially-minded space for public participation in science.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:392–9.CrossRefPubMed Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:392–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, et al. A prospective open-label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:1348–58.CrossRefPubMed Zamboni P, Galeotti R, Menegatti E, et al. A prospective open-label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:1348–58.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Doepp F, Paul F, Valdueza JM, Schmierer K, Schreiber SJ. No cerebrocervical venous congestion in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:173–83.CrossRefPubMed Doepp F, Paul F, Valdueza JM, Schmierer K, Schreiber SJ. No cerebrocervical venous congestion in patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:173–83.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Traboulsee AL, Knox KB, Machan L, et al. Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case-control study. Lancet. 2014;383:138–45.CrossRefPubMed Traboulsee AL, Knox KB, Machan L, et al. Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case-control study. Lancet. 2014;383:138–45.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pullman D, Zarzeczny A, Picard A. Media, politics and science policy: MS and evidence from the CCSVI trenches. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14:1–9.CrossRef Pullman D, Zarzeczny A, Picard A. Media, politics and science policy: MS and evidence from the CCSVI trenches. BMC Med Ethics. 2013;14:1–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Samson K. Experimental multiple sclerosis vascular shunting procedure halted at Stanford. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:A13–5.CrossRef Samson K. Experimental multiple sclerosis vascular shunting procedure halted at Stanford. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:A13–5.CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Burt RK, Burns W, Hess A. Bone marrow transplantation for multiple sclerosis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;16:1–6.PubMed Burt RK, Burns W, Hess A. Bone marrow transplantation for multiple sclerosis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;16:1–6.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Connick P, Kolappan M, Crawley C, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:150–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Connick P, Kolappan M, Crawley C, et al. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:150–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Atkins HL, Bowman M, Allan D, et al. Immunoablation and autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive multiple sclerosis: a multicentre single-group phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016;388:576–85.CrossRefPubMed Atkins HL, Bowman M, Allan D, et al. Immunoablation and autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for aggressive multiple sclerosis: a multicentre single-group phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016;388:576–85.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cote DJ, Bredenoord AL, Smith TR, et al. Ethical clinical translation of stem cell interventions for neurologic disease. Neurology. 2016;10:1212. Cote DJ, Bredenoord AL, Smith TR, et al. Ethical clinical translation of stem cell interventions for neurologic disease. Neurology. 2016;10:1212.
14.
go back to reference Benjaminy S, MacDonald I, Bubela T. “Is a cure in my sight?” multi-stakeholder perspectives on phase I choroideremia gene transfer clinical trials. Genet Med. 2013;16:379–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Benjaminy S, MacDonald I, Bubela T. “Is a cure in my sight?” multi-stakeholder perspectives on phase I choroideremia gene transfer clinical trials. Genet Med. 2013;16:379–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Illes J, Reimer JC, Kwon BK. Stem cell clinical trials for spinal cord injury: readiness, reluctance, redefinition. Stem Cell Rev. 2011;7:997–1005.CrossRefPubMed Illes J, Reimer JC, Kwon BK. Stem cell clinical trials for spinal cord injury: readiness, reluctance, redefinition. Stem Cell Rev. 2011;7:997–1005.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing; 2014. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing; 2002. Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing; 2002.
18.
19.
go back to reference Evans JP, Meslin EM, Marteau TM, Caulfield T. Deflating the genomic bubble. Science. 2011;331:861–2.CrossRefPubMed Evans JP, Meslin EM, Marteau TM, Caulfield T. Deflating the genomic bubble. Science. 2011;331:861–2.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Petersen A. The ethics of expectations: biobanks and the promise of personalised medicine. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009;28:5.1–12.CrossRef Petersen A. The ethics of expectations: biobanks and the promise of personalised medicine. Monash Bioeth Rev. 2009;28:5.1–12.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kamenova K, Caulfield T. Stem cell hype: media portrayal of therapy translation. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:278ps4.CrossRefPubMed Kamenova K, Caulfield T. Stem cell hype: media portrayal of therapy translation. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:278ps4.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bubela T, Li MD, Hafez M, Bieber M, Atkins H. Is belief larger than fact: expectations, optimism and reality for translational stem cell research. BMC Med. 2012;10:1–10.CrossRef Bubela T, Li MD, Hafez M, Bieber M, Atkins H. Is belief larger than fact: expectations, optimism and reality for translational stem cell research. BMC Med. 2012;10:1–10.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Illes J, Moser MA, McCormick JB, et al. Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:61–9.CrossRefPubMed Illes J, Moser MA, McCormick JB, et al. Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11:61–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hyun I. Therapeutic hope, spiritual distress, and the problem of stem cell tourism. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:505–7.CrossRefPubMed Hyun I. Therapeutic hope, spiritual distress, and the problem of stem cell tourism. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12:505–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Downey R, Geransar R. Stem cell research, publics’ and stakeholder views. Health Law Rev. 2008;16:69–85. Downey R, Geransar R. Stem cell research, publics’ and stakeholder views. Health Law Rev. 2008;16:69–85.
27.
go back to reference Ogbogu U. A review of pressing ethical issues relevant to stem cell translational research. Health Law Rev. 2006;14:39–43. Ogbogu U. A review of pressing ethical issues relevant to stem cell translational research. Health Law Rev. 2006;14:39–43.
28.
29.
go back to reference Snyder J, Adams K, Crooks VA, Whitehurst D, Vallee J. “I knew what was going to happen if I did nothing and so I was going to do something”: faith, hope, and trust in the decisions of Canadians with multiple sclerosis to seek unproven interventions abroad. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Snyder J, Adams K, Crooks VA, Whitehurst D, Vallee J. “I knew what was going to happen if I did nothing and so I was going to do something”: faith, hope, and trust in the decisions of Canadians with multiple sclerosis to seek unproven interventions abroad. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, et al. Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Q. 2008;86:125–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tetroe JM, Graham ID, Foy R, Robinson N, Eccles MP, Wensing M, et al. Health research funding agencies’ support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. Milbank Q. 2008;86:125–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Illes J, Blakemore C, Hansson MG, Hensch TK, Leshner A, Maestre G, et al. International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethics. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;6:977–82.CrossRef Illes J, Blakemore C, Hansson MG, Hensch TK, Leshner A, Maestre G, et al. International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethics. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;6:977–82.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Burgess MM, Tansey J. Technology, democracy and ethics: democratic deficit and the ethics of public engagement. In: Einseidel E, editor. Emerging technologies: hindsight and foresight, technology, democracy and ethics. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2006b. Burgess MM, Tansey J. Technology, democracy and ethics: democratic deficit and the ethics of public engagement. In: Einseidel E, editor. Emerging technologies: hindsight and foresight, technology, democracy and ethics. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2006b.
33.
go back to reference Secko DM, Burgess M, O'Doherty K. Perspectives on engaging the public in the ethics of emerging biotechnologies: from salmon to biobanks to neuroethics. Account Res. 2008;15:283–302.CrossRefPubMed Secko DM, Burgess M, O'Doherty K. Perspectives on engaging the public in the ethics of emerging biotechnologies: from salmon to biobanks to neuroethics. Account Res. 2008;15:283–302.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Benjaminy S, Lo C, Illes J. Social responsibility in stem cell research-is the news all bad? Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2016;12:269–75.CrossRef Benjaminy S, Lo C, Illes J. Social responsibility in stem cell research-is the news all bad? Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2016;12:269–75.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Bubela T, Nisbet MC, Borchelt R, et al. Science communication reconsidered. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:514–8.CrossRefPubMed Bubela T, Nisbet MC, Borchelt R, et al. Science communication reconsidered. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:514–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Mazanderani F, O’Neill B, Powell J. “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93:420–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mazanderani F, O’Neill B, Powell J. “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93:420–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE. Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(3):426–31.CrossRefPubMed Antheunis ML, Tates K, Nieboer TE. Patients’ and health professionals’ use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;92(3):426–31.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Resilience, trust, and civic engagement in the post-CCSVI era
Authors
Shelly Benjaminy
Andrew Schepmyer
Judy Illes
Anthony Traboulsee
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3130-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue