Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Unfolding the values of work – therapists´ experience of addressing the return to work process in occupational rehabilitation based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Authors: Nina E. Klevanger, Marius S. Fimland, Roar Johnsen, Marit B. Rise

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Facilitating return to work can be challenging due to the complexity of work disability. Few studies have examined rehabilitation programs based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy that intend to support return to work, and none have investigated therapists’ experience with providing such programs. The aim of this study was therefore to explore therapists’ experience of addressing the return to work process in an inpatient occupational rehabilitation program based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy.

Methods

This was a qualitative interview study supported by participant observation. Therapists were interviewed regarding their experiences with addressing return to work in an inpatient occupational rehabilitation program based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. In addition, the rehabilitation program was investigated through participant observation. The interviews were analysed according to Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis and informed by an analysis of field notes from the participant observation.

Results

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy was experienced as a meaningful approach to facilitate return to work, as it allowed therapists to address all relevant aspects of the individual participant’s life that might influence work participation. The therapists’ twofold goal was to support participants in building both a meaningful life and sustainable work participation. To do so, they attempted to instil long-term and interrelated processes concerning ownership, causes of sick leave, relation to expectations, the values of work, and the scope of agency.

Conclusion

Unfolding values connected to work participation might reconcile the tension between work and family life by integrating work with other areas of life. Providing work participation with personal meaning also seems especially commensurable with a context where economy presents a poor incentive for return to work. Therapists should, however, be attentive to the need to secure the prominence of return to work by relating participants’ chosen themes explicitly to their return to work process. Therapists should also be aware of the dilemma that may arise when they attempt to refrain from providing advice while simultaneously encouraging actions they consider appropriate to facilitate sustainable work participation. In addition, having an individual-oriented approach to occupational rehabilitation may obscure the extent to which return to work is a multi-stakeholder process.
Literature
1.
Schultz I, Gatchel R. Where Do We Go From Here in Return to Work Research, Policy, and Practice: A Postscriptum. In: Schultz I, Gatchel R, editors. Handbook of Return to Work From Research to Practice. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 695–704.CrossRef
2.
Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl M, Biscardi M, Ammendolia C, Myburgh C, Cassidy J. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016;24(1):32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Müssener U, Ståhl C, Söderberg E. Does the quality of encounters affect return to work? Lay people describe their experiences of meeting various professionals during their rehabilitation process. Work (Reading, Mass). 2015;52(2):447–55.
4.
Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen LH. What Facilitates Return to Work? Patients Experiences 3 Years After Occupational Rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):573–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Andersen MF, Nielsen K, Brinkmann S. How do Workers with Common Mental Disorders Experience a Multidisciplinary Return-to-Work Intervention? A Qualitative Study. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(4):709–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Lynoe N, Wessel M, Olsson D, Alexanderson K, Helgesson G. Respectful encounters and return to work: empirical study of long-term sick-listed patients’ experiences of Swedish healthcare. BMJ Open. 2011;1(2):e000246.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–69.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Loisel P, Durand M-J, Berthelette D, Vézina N, Baril R, Gagnon D, Larivière C, Tremblay C. Disability Prevention. New Paradigm for the Management of Occupational Back Pain. Disease Management and Health Outcomes. 2001;9(7):351–60.CrossRef
9.
Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Corbiere M. Work and mental health: learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007;30(4–5):444–57.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Hw Frings-Dresen MH. What promotes sustained return to work of employees on long-term sick leave? Perspectives of vocational rehabilitation professionals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(6):481–93.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
13.
Christensen T, Lise Fimreite A, Lægreid P. Reform of the employment and welfare administrations — the challenges of co-coordinating diverse public organizations. Int Rev Adm Sci. 2007;73(3):389–408.CrossRef
14.
Fimland MS, Vasseljen O, Gismervik S, Rise MB, Halsteinli V, Jacobsen HB, Borchgrevink PC, Tenggren H, Johnsen R. Occupational rehabilitation programs for musculoskeletal pain and common mental health disorders: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:368.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Rise MB, Skagseth M, Klevanger NE, Aasdahl L, Borchgrevink P, Jensen C, Tenggren H, Halsteinli V, Jacobsen TN, Loland SB, et al. Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):219.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Hayes SC, Levin ME, Plumb-Vilardaga J, Villatte JL, Pistorello J. Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behav Ther. 2013;44(2):180–98.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1–25.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther. 2004;35(4):639–65.CrossRef
19.
Ost LG. The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2014;61:105–21.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Graham CD, Gouick J, Krahe C, Gillanders D. A systematic review of the use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in chronic disease and long-term conditions. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;46:46–58.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Powers MB, MB ZVSV, Emmelkamp PM. Acceptance and commitment therapy: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78(2):73–80.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Hughes LS, Clark J, Colclough JA, Dale E, McMillan D. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Clin J Pain. 2017;33(6):552–68.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Dahl J, Wilson KG, Nilsson A. Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: A preliminary randomized trial. Behav Ther. 2004;35(4):785–801.CrossRef
24.
Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, Johnsen R, Gismervik S, Jensen C, Fimland MS. Effects of Inpatient Multicomponent Occupational Rehabilitation versus Less Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation on Somatic and Mental Health: Secondary Outcomes of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):456–66.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, Johnsen R, Gismervik S, Halsteinli V, Fleten N, Nielsen CV, Fimland MS. Effect of Inpatient Multicomponent Occupational Rehabilitation Versus Less Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation on Sickness Absence in Persons with Musculoskeletal- or Mental Health Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):170–9.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Aasdahl L, Pape K, Jensen C, Vasseljen O, Braathen T, Johnsen R, Fimland MS. Associations Between the Readiness for Return to Work Scale and Return to Work: A Prospective Study. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):97–106.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Lytsy P, Carlsson L, Anderzen I. Effectiveness of two vocational rehabilitation programmes in women with long-term sick leave due to pain syndrome or mental illness: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(2):170–7.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Rise MB, Gismervik SO, Johnsen R, Fimland MS. Sick-listed persons’ experiences with taking part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: a qualitative focus group interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):526.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Hellman T, Jensen I, Bergstrom G, Busch H. Returning to work - a long-term process reaching beyond the time frames of multimodal non-specific back pain rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(6):499–505.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Stahl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, Ekberg K. The work ability divide: holistic and reductionistic approaches in Swedish interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(3):264–73.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Stenberg G, Pietila Holmner E, Stalnacke BM, Enthoven P. Healthcare professional experiences with patients who participate in multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary care - a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(21):2085–94.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Wesson M, Gould M. Can a ‘return-to-work’ agenda fit within the theory and practice of CBT for depression and anxiety disorders? The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist. 2010;3:27–42.CrossRef
33.
34.
Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Theory, Method and Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
35.
Kildal N. Workfare Tendencies in Scandinavian Welfare Policies. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2001.
36.
37.
Vilardaga R, Hayes SC. ACT and the Therapeutic Relationship. European Psychotherapy. 2009;9(1):1–23.
38.
Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: Principles in practice. 3rd ed. London: Routledge; 2007.
39.
NVivo qualitative data analysis Software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 11 Plus. 2015.
40.
41.
Lakoff G. Don't think of an elephant. Know your values and frame the debate. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing; 2014.
42.
Ward A, Barnes M, Stark S, Ryan S. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.CrossRef
43.
Eikenaar T, de Rijk AE, Meershoek A. What's in a Frame? How Professionals Assess Clients in Dutch Work Reintegration Practice. Soc Policy Admin. 2016;50(7):767–86.CrossRef
44.
Askheim OP. Empowerment as guidance for professional social work: an act of balancing on a slack rope. Eur J Soc Work. 2003;6(3):229–40.CrossRef
45.
Coutu MF, Baril R, Durand MJ, Côté D, Cadieux G. Health and illness representations of workers with a musculoskeletal disorder-related work disability during work rehabilitation: a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):591–600.CrossRefPubMed
46.
47.
Coutu M-F, Côté D, Baril R. The Work-Disabled Patient. In: Loisel P, Anema J, editors. Handbook of Work Disability Prevention and Management. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 15–20.CrossRef
48.
Ockander MK, Timpka T. Women's experiences of long term sickness absence: implications for rehabilitation practice and theory. Scand J Public Health. 2003;31(2):143–8.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Coutu MF, Baril R, Durand MJ, Côté D, Rouleau A, Cadieux G. Transforming the meaning of pain: an important step for the return to work. Work (Reading, Mass). 2010;35(2):209–19.
50.
Greenhaus JH, Powell GN. When Work and Family Are Allies: A Theory of Work-Family Enrichment. Acad Manag Rev. 2006;31(1):72–92.CrossRef
51.
Thompson JA, Bunderson JS. Work-Nonwork Conflict and the Phenomenology of Time. Work Occup. 2001;28(1):17–39.CrossRef
52.
Mæland J. Benfits or work? A social medical perspective on sickness absence and disability (Trygd eller arbeid? Et sosialmedisinsk perspektiv på sykefravær og uførhet). Cappelen Damm Akademisk: Oslo; 2014.
53.
Baldry C, Bain P, Taylor P, Hyman J, Scholarios D, Marks A, Watson A, Gilbert K, Gall G, Bunzel D. Back to the Future? Change and Continuity at Work. In: Nolan P, editor. The Meaning of Work in the New Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2007. p. 223–36.CrossRef
54.
Madsen OJ. Optimizing the self: Social representations of self-help. Hove: Routledge; 2015.
55.
Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, Cameron J, Hillage J. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–21.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJ. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):462–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
59.
Kitzinger J. The methodology of Focus Groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16(1):103–21.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Unfolding the values of work – therapists´ experience of addressing the return to work process in occupational rehabilitation based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Authors
Nina E. Klevanger
Marius S. Fimland
Roar Johnsen
Marit B. Rise
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3035-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue

Research article

The impact of telehealth remote patient monitoring on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials

Research article

Inspectors’ responses to adolescents’ assessment of quality of care: a case study on involving adolescents in inspections

Research article

The barriers and facilitators to the implementation of National Clinical Programmes in Ireland: using the MRC framework for process evaluations

Research article

A cross-sectional survey of work and income loss consideration among patients with herpes zoster when completing a quality of life questionnaire

Research article

Hospital length of stay variation and comorbidity of mental illness: a retrospective study of five common chronic medical conditions

Research article

Elusive implementation: an ethnographic study of intersectoral policymaking for health