Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

The impact of service and hearing dogs on health-related quality of life and activity level: a Swedish longitudinal intervention study

Authors: Martina Lundqvist, Lars-Åke Levin, Kerstin Roback, Jenny Alwin

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Individuals with severe disability often require personal assistance and help from informal caregivers, in addition to conventional health care. The utilization of assistance dogs may decrease the need for health and social care and increase the independence of these individuals. Service and hearing dogs are trained to assist specific individuals and can be specialized to meet individual needs. The aim of this study was to describe and explore potential consequences for health-related quality of life, well-being and activity level, of having a certified service or hearing dog.

Methods

A longitudinal interventional study with a pre-post design was conducted. At inclusion, all participants in the study had a regular (untrained) companion dog. Data were collected before training of the dog started and three months after certification of the dog. Health-related quality of life was assessed with EQ-5D-3L, EQ-VAS and RAND-36. Well-being was measured with WHO-5 and self-esteem with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. In addition, questions were asked about physical activity and time spent away from home and on social activities. Subgroups were analyzed for physical service and diabetes alert dogs.

Results

Fifty-five owner-and-dog pairs completed the study (30 physical service dogs, 20 diabetes alert dogs, 2 epilepsy alert dogs, and 3 hearing dogs). Initially, study participants reported low health-related quality of life compared with the general population. At follow-up, health-related quality of life measured with the EQ-VAS, well-being and level of physical activity had improved significantly. In the subgroup analysis, physical service dog owners had lower health-related quality of life than diabetes alert dog owners. The improvement from baseline to follow-up measured with EQ-5D statistically differed between the subgroups.

Conclusions

The target population for service and hearing dogs has an overall low health-related quality of life. Our study indicates that having a certified service or hearing dog may have positive impact on health-related quality of life, well-being and activity level. Service and hearing dogs are a potentially important “wagging tail aid” for this vulnerable population, able to alleviate strain, increase independence, and decrease the risk of social isolation.

Trial Registration

The trial was retrospectively registered in http://​clinicaltrial.​gov, NCT03270592. September, 2017.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Tough H, Siegrist J, Fekete C. Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:414.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tough H, Siegrist J, Fekete C. Social relationships, mental health and wellbeing in physical disability: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:414.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Hubert G, Tousignant M, Routhier F, Corriveau H, Champagne N. Effect of service dogs on manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50:341–50.CrossRefPubMed Hubert G, Tousignant M, Routhier F, Corriveau H, Champagne N. Effect of service dogs on manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50:341–50.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shintani M, Senda M, Takayanagi T, Katayama Y, Furusawa K, Okutani T, et al. The effect of service dogs on the improvement of health-related quality of life. Acta Med Okayama. 2010;64:109–13.PubMed Shintani M, Senda M, Takayanagi T, Katayama Y, Furusawa K, Okutani T, et al. The effect of service dogs on the improvement of health-related quality of life. Acta Med Okayama. 2010;64:109–13.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hall SS, MacMichael J, Turner A, Mills DS. A survey of the impact of owning a service dog on quality of life for individuals with physical and hearing disability: A pilot study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2017;15:59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hall SS, MacMichael J, Turner A, Mills DS. A survey of the impact of owning a service dog on quality of life for individuals with physical and hearing disability: A pilot study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2017;15:59.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Camp MM. The use of service dogs as an adaptive strategy: a qualitative study. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:509–17.CrossRefPubMed Camp MM. The use of service dogs as an adaptive strategy: a qualitative study. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:509–17.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Allen K, Blascovich J. The value of service dogs for people with severe ambulatory disabilities. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996;275:1001–6.CrossRefPubMed Allen K, Blascovich J. The value of service dogs for people with severe ambulatory disabilities. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996;275:1001–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Collins DM, Fitzgerald SG, Sachs-Ericsson N, Scherer M, Cooper RA, Boninger ML. Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:41–8.CrossRefPubMed Collins DM, Fitzgerald SG, Sachs-Ericsson N, Scherer M, Cooper RA, Boninger ML. Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:41–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2:217–27.CrossRefPubMed Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2:217–27.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JEJ. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1349–58.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JEJ. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1349–58.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–92.CrossRefPubMed Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–92.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. 3rd ed. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 1972. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. 3rd ed. Princeton University Press: Princeton; 1972.
20.
go back to reference Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1523–32.CrossRefPubMed Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1523–32.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. L. Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale; 1988. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. L. Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale; 1988.
22.
go back to reference Burström K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. A comparison of individual and social time trade-off values for health states in the general population. Health policy. 2006;76:359–70.CrossRefPubMed Burström K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. A comparison of individual and social time trade-off values for health states in the general population. Health policy. 2006;76:359–70.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Van Den Berg B. SF-6D population norms. Health Economics (United Kingdom). 2012;21:1508–12. Van Den Berg B. SF-6D population norms. Health Economics (United Kingdom). 2012;21:1508–12.
24.
go back to reference Corp IBM. IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2015. Corp IBM. IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2015.
25.
go back to reference Fairman SK, Huebner RA. Service dogs: A compensatory resource to improve function. Occupational Therapy in Health Care. 2000;13:41–52.CrossRef Fairman SK, Huebner RA. Service dogs: A compensatory resource to improve function. Occupational Therapy in Health Care. 2000;13:41–52.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference White N, Mills D, Hall S. Attachment Style Is Related to Quality of Life for Assistance Dog Owners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14:658.CrossRefPubMedCentral White N, Mills D, Hall S. Attachment Style Is Related to Quality of Life for Assistance Dog Owners. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017;14:658.CrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The impact of service and hearing dogs on health-related quality of life and activity level: a Swedish longitudinal intervention study
Authors
Martina Lundqvist
Lars-Åke Levin
Kerstin Roback
Jenny Alwin
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3014-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue