Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research article

Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation

Authors: Lauren E. Birmingham, Willie H. Oglesby

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act established the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) to penalize hospitals with excessive 30-day hospital readmissions of Medicare enrollees for specific conditions. This policy was aimed at increasing the quality of care delivered to patients and decreasing the amount of money paid for potentially preventable hospital readmissions. While it has been established that the number of 30-day hospital readmissions decreased after program implementation, it is unknown whether this effect occurred equally between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not the HRRP decreased readmission rates equally between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals between 2010 and 2012.

Methods

Data on readmissions came from the Dartmouth Atlas and hospital ownership data came from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Data were joined using the Medicare provider number. Using a difference-in-differences approach, bivariate and regression analyses were conducted to compare readmission rates between not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals between 2010 and 2012 and were adjusted for hospital characteristics.

Results

In 2010, prior to program implementation, unadjusted readmission rates for proprietary and not-for-profit hospitals were 16.16% and 15.78%, respectively. In 2012, following program implementation, 30-day readmission rates dropped to 15.76% and 15.29% for proprietary and not-for-profit hospitals. The data suggest that the implementation of the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program had similar effects on not-for-profit and proprietary hospitals with respect to readmission rates, even after adjusting for confounders.

Conclusions

Although not-for-profit hospitals had lower 30-day readmission rates than proprietary hospitals in both 2010 and 2012, they both decreased after the implementation of the HRRP and the decreases were not statistically significantly different. Thus, this study suggests that the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program was equally effective in reducing readmission rates, despite ownership status.
Literature
1.
go back to reference The Advisory Board: Daily briefing primer: What's the difference between for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals? In: The Advisory Board Daily Briefing. advisory.com. Washington DC: The Advisory Board; 2015. The Advisory Board: Daily briefing primer: What's the difference between for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals? In: The Advisory Board Daily Briefing. advisory.​com. Washington DC: The Advisory Board; 2015.
2.
go back to reference Global Credit Research: Moody's: outlook for US not-for-profit hosptials remains negative for 2013. New York: In: Moody's Investors Service. moodys.com; 2013. Global Credit Research: Moody's: outlook for US not-for-profit hosptials remains negative for 2013. New York: In: Moody's Investors Service. moodys.​com; 2013.
3.
go back to reference Steingart D, Nelson JC. Announcement: Moody's: outlook for US not-for-profit hospitals remains negative for 2013. New York: In. Edited by Research GC: Moody's investor service; 2013. Steingart D, Nelson JC. Announcement: Moody's: outlook for US not-for-profit hospitals remains negative for 2013. New York: In. Edited by Research GC: Moody's investor service; 2013.
4.
go back to reference The Advisory Board: Moody's: not-for-profit hospitals' revenue growth reaches all-time low. Washington DC: In: The Advisory Board Daily Briefing. advisory.com: The Advisory Board; 2014. The Advisory Board: Moody's: not-for-profit hospitals' revenue growth reaches all-time low. Washington DC: In: The Advisory Board Daily Briefing. advisory.​com: The Advisory Board; 2014.
5.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Association between hospital conversions to for-profit status and clinical and economic outcomes. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(16):1644–52.CrossRefPubMed Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Association between hospital conversions to for-profit status and clinical and economic outcomes. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2014;312(16):1644–52.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rau J. Medicare to penalize 2,217 hospitals for excess readmissions. Menlo Park: In: Kaiser health news. khn.org: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2012. Rau J. Medicare to penalize 2,217 hospitals for excess readmissions. Menlo Park: In: Kaiser health news. khn.​org: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2012.
7.
go back to reference Zuckerman RB, Sheingold SH, Orav EJ, Ruhter J, Epstein AM. Readmissions, observation, and the hospital readmissions reduction program. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1543–51.CrossRefPubMed Zuckerman RB, Sheingold SH, Orav EJ, Ruhter J, Epstein AM. Readmissions, observation, and the hospital readmissions reduction program. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(16):1543–51.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference McClelland MB, Staiger DO. The changing hospital industry: comparing for-profit and not-for-profit institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000. McClelland MB, Staiger DO. The changing hospital industry: comparing for-profit and not-for-profit institutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000.
9.
go back to reference Jha AK, Li Z, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Care in U.S. hospitals--the hospital quality alliance program. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(3):265–74.CrossRefPubMed Jha AK, Li Z, Orav EJ, Epstein AM. Care in U.S. hospitals--the hospital quality alliance program. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(3):265–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK. Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1134–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsai TC, Joynt KE, Orav EJ, Gawande AA, Jha AK. Variation in surgical-readmission rates and quality of hospital care. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(12):1134–42.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Bai G, Anderson GF. A more detailed understanding of factors associated with hospital profitability. Health Aff. 2016;35(5):889–97.CrossRef Bai G, Anderson GF. A more detailed understanding of factors associated with hospital profitability. Health Aff. 2016;35(5):889–97.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Horwitz JR, Nichols A. Hospital ownership and medical services: market mix, spillover effects, and nonprofit objectives. J Health Econ. 2009;28(5):924–37.CrossRefPubMed Horwitz JR, Nichols A. Hospital ownership and medical services: market mix, spillover effects, and nonprofit objectives. J Health Econ. 2009;28(5):924–37.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Horwitz JR. Making profits and providing care: comparing nonprofit, for-profit, and government hospitals. Health Aff. 2005;24(3):790–801.CrossRef Horwitz JR. Making profits and providing care: comparing nonprofit, for-profit, and government hospitals. Health Aff. 2005;24(3):790–801.CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;310(18):1964–70.CrossRefPubMed Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;310(18):1964–70.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cuellar AE, Gertler PJ. Trends in hospital consolidation: the formation of local systems. Health Aff. 2003;22(6):77–87.CrossRef Cuellar AE, Gertler PJ. Trends in hospital consolidation: the formation of local systems. Health Aff. 2003;22(6):77–87.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Eccles M, Steen N. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Fam Pract. 2000;17(Suppl 1):S11–6.CrossRefPubMed Grimshaw J, Campbell M, Eccles M, Steen N. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for evaluating guideline implementation strategies. Fam Pract. 2000;17(Suppl 1):S11–6.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care: Post-Discharge Events. In. Edited by The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Lebanon: dartmouthatlas.org; 2017. The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care: Post-Discharge Events. In. Edited by The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. Lebanon: dartmouthatlas.​org; 2017.
20.
go back to reference Ammar W, Khalife J, El-Jardali F, Romanos J, Harb H, Hamadeh G, Dimassi H. Hospital accreditation, reimbursement and case mix: links and insights for contractual systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ammar W, Khalife J, El-Jardali F, Romanos J, Harb H, Hamadeh G, Dimassi H. Hospital accreditation, reimbursement and case mix: links and insights for contractual systems. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
22.
go back to reference Himmelstein D, Woolhandler S. Quality improvement: 'Become good at cheating and you never need to become good at anything Else, Health affairs blog, vol. 2017. Healthaffairs.org; 2015. Himmelstein D, Woolhandler S. Quality improvement: 'Become good at cheating and you never need to become good at anything Else, Health affairs blog, vol. 2017. Healthaffairs.​org; 2015.
23.
go back to reference Joynt KE, Jha AK. Who has higher readmission rates for heart failure, and why? Implications for efforts to improve care using financial incentives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(1):53–9.CrossRefPubMed Joynt KE, Jha AK. Who has higher readmission rates for heart failure, and why? Implications for efforts to improve care using financial incentives. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4(1):53–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Gerhardt G, Yemane A, Hickman P, Oelschlaeger A, Rollins E, Brennan N. Medicare readmission rates showed meaningful decline in 2012. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013;3:2.CrossRef Gerhardt G, Yemane A, Hickman P, Oelschlaeger A, Rollins E, Brennan N. Medicare readmission rates showed meaningful decline in 2012. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013;3:2.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Glass D, Lisk C, Stensland J: Refining the hospital readmissions reduction program. Medicare payment advisory commission; 2012. Glass D, Lisk C, Stensland J: Refining the hospital readmissions reduction program. Medicare payment advisory commission; 2012.
27.
go back to reference Cooper Z, Gibbons S, Jones S, Alistair M. Does hospital competition save lives? Evidence from the English NHS patient choice reforms. Econ J. 2011;121(554):F228–60.CrossRef Cooper Z, Gibbons S, Jones S, Alistair M. Does hospital competition save lives? Evidence from the English NHS patient choice reforms. Econ J. 2011;121(554):F228–60.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Readmission rates in not-for-profit vs. proprietary hospitals before and after the hospital readmission reduction program implementation
Authors
Lauren E. Birmingham
Willie H. Oglesby
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2840-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Go to the issue