Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

"Maybe we should talk about it anyway": a qualitative study of understanding expectations and use of an established technology innovation in caring practices

Author: Randi Stokke

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Technological innovations are strongly promoted to meet the demands posed by increased pressure on home care services and to assist ageing in place in western societies. Although heavily advocated as plug and play solutions, technologies have proven difficult and unpredictable when integrated into home care services. We need greater insight into what happens when technologies are integrated into caring practices. All technologies come with expectations as to their function. This study explores how actors who are involved with the social alarm, which is an established technology innovation, relate to, perceive and articulate these expectations of the technology in everyday living.

Methods

The article presents results from a two-case study, using a triangulation of qualitative methods in order to gain an in-depth understanding of technology in use in home care services through “thick descriptions”. The study was conducted in Norway and data were analysed using a stepwise deductive-inductive analysis.

Results

The empirical findings demonstrate that expectations regarding the social alarm, even though it represents a simple and well-established technology, are complex and multidimensional. The notion of script and domestication provided relevant tools for exploring these expectations and for understanding how actors interpret and adapt their practices of using the technology. This enabled a more comprehensive understanding of how technology opens up for different interpretations and puts values in play.

Conclusions

This article suggests exploring technology in use as scripted in multidimensional script, and offers a frame for doing so. It also reveals how technology scripts and articulation prove important for understanding the complex reality when integrated into home care practices, thus identifying how using the technology leads to the taming and unleashing of both technology and actors. The study offers an increased understanding of how and why technology is unpredictable and works differently in different contexts. Moreover, it stresses the importance of avoiding expectations of plug-and-play in a reality of complex interactions between different actors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Genet N, European Observatory on Health S, Policies. Home care across Europe: current structure and future challenges, vol. 27. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2012. Genet N, European Observatory on Health S, Policies. Home care across Europe: current structure and future challenges, vol. 27. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2012.
2.
go back to reference Blaschke CM, Freddolino PP, Mullen EE. Ageing and technology: a review of the research literature. Br J Soc Work. 2009;39(4):641–56.CrossRef Blaschke CM, Freddolino PP, Mullen EE. Ageing and technology: a review of the research literature. Br J Soc Work. 2009;39(4):641–56.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tarricone R, Tsouros AD. Home care in Europe: the solid facts: Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office Europe; 2008. Tarricone R, Tsouros AD. Home care in Europe: the solid facts: Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office Europe; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Daatland SO, Veenstra M, Kjelvik J, Otnes B, Aksøy H. Bærekraftig omsorg? Familien, velferdsstaten og aldringen av befolkningen (In Norwegian, Sustainable care) 2012. Daatland SO, Veenstra M, Kjelvik J, Otnes B, Aksøy H. Bærekraftig omsorg? Familien, velferdsstaten og aldringen av befolkningen (In Norwegian, Sustainable care) 2012.
5.
go back to reference Peine A, Neven L. Social-structural lag revisited. Gerontechnology. 2011;10(3):129–39.CrossRef Peine A, Neven L. Social-structural lag revisited. Gerontechnology. 2011;10(3):129–39.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Rouncefield M. What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1–15.CrossRef Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Rouncefield M. What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Med. 2015;13(1):1–15.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cook EJ, Randhawa G, Sharp C, Ali N, Guppy A, Barton G, Bateman A, Crawford-White J. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient ‘users’ and ‘non-users’. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cook EJ, Randhawa G, Sharp C, Ali N, Guppy A, Barton G, Bateman A, Crawford-White J. Exploring the factors that influence the decision to adopt and engage with an integrated assistive telehealth and telecare service in Cambridgeshire, UK: a nested qualitative study of patient ‘users’ and ‘non-users’. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93(0):86–94. Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93(0):86–94.
9.
go back to reference Östlund B, Olander E, Jonsson O, Frennert S. STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern aging. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015;93:82–90.CrossRef Östlund B, Olander E, Jonsson O, Frennert S. STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern aging. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015;93:82–90.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference López Gómez D. Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2015;93:91–101.CrossRef López Gómez D. Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2015;93:91–101.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pols J, Willems D. Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;33(3):484–98.CrossRefPubMed Pols J, Willems D. Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociol Health Illn. 2011;33(3):484–98.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pols J. Telecare What patients care about. In: Care in Practice. Edited by Mol A, Moser I, Pols J. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2010. p.171-194. Pols J. Telecare What patients care about. In: Care in Practice. Edited by Mol A, Moser I, Pols J. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag; 2010. p.171-194.
13.
go back to reference Halford S, Lotherington AT, Obstfelder A, Dyb K. Getting the whole picture? Information, Commun Soc. 2010;13(3):442–65.CrossRef Halford S, Lotherington AT, Obstfelder A, Dyb K. Getting the whole picture? Information, Commun Soc. 2010;13(3):442–65.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Andreassen HK, Kjekshus LE, Tjora A. Survival of the project: a case study of ICT innovation in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132(0):62–69. Andreassen HK, Kjekshus LE, Tjora A. Survival of the project: a case study of ICT innovation in health care. Soc Sci Med. 2015;132(0):62–69.
15.
go back to reference Berge M. Telecare acceptance as sticky entrapment: a realist review. Gerontechnology. 2016;15(2):98–108.CrossRef Berge M. Telecare acceptance as sticky entrapment: a realist review. Gerontechnology. 2016;15(2):98–108.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sánchez-Criado T, López D, Roberts C, Domènech M. Installing telecare, installing users: Felicity conditions for the instauration of usership. Sci Technol Hum Val. 2014;39(5):0162243913517011.CrossRef Sánchez-Criado T, López D, Roberts C, Domènech M. Installing telecare, installing users: Felicity conditions for the instauration of usership. Sci Technol Hum Val. 2014;39(5):0162243913517011.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stokke R. The personal emergency response system as a technology innovation in primary health care services: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(7):e187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stokke R. The personal emergency response system as a technology innovation in primary health care services: an integrative review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(7):e187.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Oudshoorn N. Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.CrossRef Oudshoorn N. Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nicolini D. The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(11):2754–67.CrossRefPubMed Nicolini D. The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(11):2754–67.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Gherardi S. Telemedicine: a practice-based approach to technology. Human Relations. 2010;63(4):501–24.CrossRef Gherardi S. Telemedicine: a practice-based approach to technology. Human Relations. 2010;63(4):501–24.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pols J. Good relations with technology: Empirical ethics and aesthetics in care. Nurs Philos. 2017;18(1):e12154. Pols J. Good relations with technology: Empirical ethics and aesthetics in care. Nurs Philos. 2017;18(1):e12154.
22.
go back to reference Heinbüchner B, Hautzinger M, Becker C, Pfeiffer K. Satisfaction and use of personal emergency response systems. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;43(4):219–23.CrossRefPubMed Heinbüchner B, Hautzinger M, Becker C, Pfeiffer K. Satisfaction and use of personal emergency response systems. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;43(4):219–23.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Pritchard GW, Brittain K. Alarm pendants and the technological shaping of older people's care: between (intentional) help and (irrational) nuisance. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2015;93:124–32.CrossRef Pritchard GW, Brittain K. Alarm pendants and the technological shaping of older people's care: between (intentional) help and (irrational) nuisance. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2015;93:124–32.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Fisk MJ. Social alarms to telecare: older peoples services in transition. Bristol: Policy Press; 2003.CrossRef Fisk MJ. Social alarms to telecare: older peoples services in transition. Bristol: Policy Press; 2003.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Sugarhood P, Wherton J, Procter R, Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9(1):79–87.CrossRefPubMed Sugarhood P, Wherton J, Procter R, Hinder S, Greenhalgh T. Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;9(1):79–87.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Melander-Wikman A, Fältholm Y, Gard G. Safety vs. privacy: elderly persons’ experiences of a mobile safety alarm. Health Soc Care Community. 2008;16(4):337–46.CrossRefPubMed Melander-Wikman A, Fältholm Y, Gard G. Safety vs. privacy: elderly persons’ experiences of a mobile safety alarm. Health Soc Care Community. 2008;16(4):337–46.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Mørk E. Kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester 2014 : statistikk om tjenester og tjenestemottakere, vol. 2015/42. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå; 2015. Mørk E. Kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester 2014 : statistikk om tjenester og tjenestemottakere, vol. 2015/42. Oslo: Statistisk sentralbyrå; 2015.
28.
go back to reference Pekkarinen S, Melkas H. Safety alarm systems and related services: from potholes to innovation opportunities. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering and Technology. 2010;1(4):53–70.CrossRef Pekkarinen S, Melkas H. Safety alarm systems and related services: from potholes to innovation opportunities. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering and Technology. 2010;1(4):53–70.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Joyce K, Mamo L. Graying the cyborg. In: Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. Edited by Calasanti TM, Slvein KF. New York: Routledge; 2006. Joyce K, Mamo L. Graying the cyborg. In: Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking. Edited by Calasanti TM, Slvein KF. New York: Routledge; 2006.
30.
go back to reference Berker T. Domesticating spaces sociotechnical studies and the built environment. Space and Culture. 2011;14(3):259–68.CrossRef Berker T. Domesticating spaces sociotechnical studies and the built environment. Space and Culture. 2011;14(3):259–68.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Akrich M. In: Bijker WE, Law J, editors. The de-scription of technical objects. In: Shaping technology/building society : studies in sociotechnical change ed; 1992. p. 205–24. Akrich M. In: Bijker WE, Law J, editors. The de-scription of technical objects. In: Shaping technology/building society : studies in sociotechnical change ed; 1992. p. 205–24.
32.
go back to reference Woolgar S. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociol Rev. 1990;38(S1):58–99.CrossRef Woolgar S. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociol Rev. 1990;38(S1):58–99.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Aune M. Users versus utilities: the domestication of an energy controlling technology. In: Jamison A, Rohracher H, editors. In: Technology studies & sustainable development, vol. 39. München: Profil; 2002. Aune M. Users versus utilities: the domestication of an energy controlling technology. In: Jamison A, Rohracher H, editors. In: Technology studies & sustainable development, vol. 39. München: Profil; 2002.
34.
go back to reference Pinch TJ, Bijker WE. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc Stud Sci. 1984;14(3):399–441.CrossRef Pinch TJ, Bijker WE. The social construction of facts and artefacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Soc Stud Sci. 1984;14(3):399–441.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Baron LF, Gomez R. The associations between technologies and societies: the utility of actor-network theory. Science Technology & Society. 2016;21(2):0971721816640615.CrossRef Baron LF, Gomez R. The associations between technologies and societies: the utility of actor-network theory. Science Technology & Society. 2016;21(2):0971721816640615.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Silverstone R. Domesticating domestication. Reflections on the life of a concept. In: Berker T, Hartmann M, Punie Y, editors. In: Domestication of media and technology. Berkshire, England: Open University Press; 2007. p. 229–47. Silverstone R. Domesticating domestication. Reflections on the life of a concept. In: Berker T, Hartmann M, Punie Y, editors. In: Domestication of media and technology. Berkshire, England: Open University Press; 2007. p. 229–47.
37.
go back to reference Silverstone R, Haddon L. Design and the domestication of ICTs: technical change and everyday life. In: Silverstone R, Mansell R, editors. In: Communicating by design: The politics of information and communication technologies; 1996. p. 44–74. Silverstone R, Haddon L. Design and the domestication of ICTs: technical change and everyday life. In: Silverstone R, Mansell R, editors. In: Communicating by design: The politics of information and communication technologies; 1996. p. 44–74.
38.
go back to reference Sørensen KH. Domestication: the enactment of technology. In: Berker T, Hartmann M, Punie Y, editors. In: Domestication of media and technology. England: Open University Press; 2007. Sørensen KH. Domestication: the enactment of technology. In: Berker T, Hartmann M, Punie Y, editors. In: Domestication of media and technology. England: Open University Press; 2007.
39.
go back to reference Sørensen KH, Aune M, Hatling M. Against linearity: On the cultural appropriation of science and technology. In: Dierkes M, Grote C, editors. In: Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology. Australia: Harwood Academic; 2000. p. 165–78. Sørensen KH, Aune M, Hatling M. Against linearity: On the cultural appropriation of science and technology. In: Dierkes M, Grote C, editors. In: Between understanding and trust: the public, science and technology. Australia: Harwood Academic; 2000. p. 165–78.
40.
go back to reference Flick U. Triangulation in qualitative research. In: Flick U, Kardoff E, Steinke I, editors. In: A companion to qualitative research; 2004. p. 178–83. Flick U. Triangulation in qualitative research. In: Flick U, Kardoff E, Steinke I, editors. In: A companion to qualitative research; 2004. p. 178–83.
41.
go back to reference Ponterotto JG. Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. Qual Rep. 2006;11(3):538–49. Ponterotto JG. Brief note on the origins, evolution, and meaning of the qualitative research concept thick description. Qual Rep. 2006;11(3):538–49.
43.
go back to reference Huber M, Rodrigues R, Hoffmann F, Gąsior K, Marin B: Facts and figures on longterm care for older people: Europe and North America; 2009. Huber M, Rodrigues R, Hoffmann F, Gąsior K, Marin B: Facts and figures on longterm care for older people: Europe and North America; 2009.
44.
go back to reference Butterfield LD, Borgen WA, Amundson NE, Maglio A-ST. Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qual Res. 2005;5(4):475–97.CrossRef Butterfield LD, Borgen WA, Amundson NE, Maglio A-ST. Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qual Res. 2005;5(4):475–97.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Fuglsang L. The critical incident technique and everyday innovation. In: Sørensen F, Lapenta F, editors. In: Service Innovation Research Methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2017. Fuglsang L. The critical incident technique and everyday innovation. In: Sørensen F, Lapenta F, editors. In: Service Innovation Research Methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2017.
46.
go back to reference Chell E, Pittaway L. A study of entrepreneurship in the restaurant and café industry: exploratory work using the critical incident technique as a methodology. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 1998;17(1):23–32.CrossRef Chell E, Pittaway L. A study of entrepreneurship in the restaurant and café industry: exploratory work using the critical incident technique as a methodology. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 1998;17(1):23–32.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Schluter J, Seaton P, Chaboyer W. Critical incident technique: a user’s guide for nurse researchers. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(1):107–14.CrossRefPubMed Schluter J, Seaton P, Chaboyer W. Critical incident technique: a user’s guide for nurse researchers. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61(1):107–14.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Chell E. The critical incident technique: philosophical underpinnings, method and application to a case of small business failure. In: Handbook of research on small business and entrepreneurship. Celtenham: Edward Elgar; 2014. Chell E. The critical incident technique: philosophical underpinnings, method and application to a case of small business failure. In: Handbook of research on small business and entrepreneurship. Celtenham: Edward Elgar; 2014.
49.
go back to reference Tjora AH. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis, 2. utg. edn. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2012. Tjora AH. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder i praksis, 2. utg. edn. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2012.
50.
go back to reference Brodersen S, Hansen M, Lindegaard H. Script of healthcare technology: do designs of robotic beds exclude or include users? Des Issues. 2015;31(2):16–28.CrossRef Brodersen S, Hansen M, Lindegaard H. Script of healthcare technology: do designs of robotic beds exclude or include users? Des Issues. 2015;31(2):16–28.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Orlikowski WJ. Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci. 2000;11(4):404–28.CrossRef Orlikowski WJ. Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci. 2000;11(4):404–28.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Thygesen H. Technology and good dementia care: a study of technology and ethics in everyday care practice, vol. no. 159. Unipub: Oslo; 2009. Thygesen H. Technology and good dementia care: a study of technology and ethics in everyday care practice, vol. no. 159. Unipub: Oslo; 2009.
53.
go back to reference Mort M, Roberts C, Pols J, Domenech M, Moser I. The Ei: ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expect. 2015;18(3):438–49.CrossRefPubMed Mort M, Roberts C, Pols J, Domenech M, Moser I. The Ei: ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expect. 2015;18(3):438–49.CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Aceros JC, Pols J, Domènech M. Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2015;93:102–11.CrossRef Aceros JC, Pols J, Domènech M. Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2015;93:102–11.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Oudshoorn N. How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare. Soc Stud Sci. 2012;42(1):121–42.CrossRefPubMed Oudshoorn N. How places matter: telecare technologies and the changing spatial dimensions of healthcare. Soc Stud Sci. 2012;42(1):121–42.CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Mort M, Roberts C, Callén B. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociol Health Illn. 2013;35 Mort M, Roberts C, Callén B. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociol Health Illn. 2013;35
57.
go back to reference Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Fitzpatrick R, Knapp M, Barlow J, Hendy J. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the whole system demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, Bower P, Hirani S, Cartwright M, Fitzpatrick R, Knapp M, Barlow J, Hendy J. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the whole system demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):220.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
"Maybe we should talk about it anyway": a qualitative study of understanding expectations and use of an established technology innovation in caring practices
Author
Randi Stokke
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2587-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue