Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

A network perspective on patient experiences and health status: the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2004 to 2011

Authors: Yi-Sheng Chao, Hau-tieng Wu, Marco Scutari, Tai-Shen Chen, Chao-Jung Wu, Madeleine Durand, Antoine Boivin

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a growing emphasis on the need to engage patients in order to improve the quality of health care and improve health outcomes. However, we are still lacking a comprehensive understanding on how different measures of patient experiences interact with one another or relate to health status. This study takes a network perspective to 1) study the associations between patient characteristics and patient experience in health care and 2) identify factors that could be prioritized to improve health status.

Methods

This study uses data from the two-year panels from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) initiated between 2004 and 2011 in the United States. The 88 variables regarding patient health and experience with health care were identified through the MEPS documentation. Sex, age, race/ethnicity, and years of education were also included for analysis. The bnlearn package within R (v3.20) was used to 1) identify the structure of the network of variables, 2) assess the model fit of candidate algorithms, 3) cross-validate the network, and 4) fit conditional probabilities with the given structure.

Results

There were 51,023 MEPS interviewees aged 18 to 85 years (mean = 44, 95% CI = 43.9 to 44.2), with years of education ranging from 1 to 19 (mean = 7.4, 95% CI = 7.40 to 7.46). Among all, 55% and 74% were female and white, respectively. There were nine networks identified and 17 variables not linked to others, including death in the second years, sex, entry years to the MEPS, and relations of proxies. The health status in the second years was directly linked to that in the first years. The health care ratings were associated with how often professionals listened to them and whether professionals’ explanation was understandable.

Conclusions

It is feasible to construct Bayesian networks with information on patient characteristics and experiences in health care. Network models help to identify significant predictors of health care quality ratings. With temporal relationships established, the structure of the variables can be meaningful for health policy researchers, who search for one or a few key priorities to initiate interventions or health care quality improvement programs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hays, RD, et al. Psychometric Properties of the CAHPS™ 1.0 Survey Measures. Med Care. 1999;37(3 Suppl):MS22–31. Hays, RD, et al. Psychometric Properties of the CAHPS™ 1.0 Survey Measures. Med Care. 1999;37(3 Suppl):MS22–31.
3.
go back to reference Brousseau DC, et al. Quality of Primary Care and Subsequent Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1131.CrossRefPubMed Brousseau DC, et al. Quality of Primary Care and Subsequent Pediatric Emergency Department Utilization. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1131.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Raphael JL, et al. Associations between quality of primary care and health care use among children with special health care needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(5):399–404.CrossRefPubMed Raphael JL, et al. Associations between quality of primary care and health care use among children with special health care needs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(5):399–404.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boivin A, et al. What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation. Milbank Q. 2014;92(2):319–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boivin A, et al. What are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation. Milbank Q. 2014;92(2):319–50.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
7.
8.
go back to reference Simmons LA, et al. Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease. Genome Med. 2014;6(2):16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simmons LA, et al. Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: a systematic review of the literature on chronic disease. Genome Med. 2014;6(2):16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Phillips NM, Street M, Haesler E. A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015:2015–004357. Phillips NM, Street M, Haesler E. A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015:2015–004357.
10.
go back to reference Herrin J, et al. Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospital practices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015:2015–004006. Herrin J, et al. Patient and family engagement: a survey of US hospital practices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015:2015–004006.
11.
go back to reference McKinlay JB, Marceau LD. Upstream healthy public policy: lessons from the battle of tobacco. Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(1):49–69.CrossRefPubMed McKinlay JB, Marceau LD. Upstream healthy public policy: lessons from the battle of tobacco. Int J Health Serv. 2000;30(1):49–69.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Williams DR, et al. Moving Upstream: How Interventions that Address the Social Determinants of Health can Improve Health and Reduce Disparities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(Suppl):S8–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Williams DR, et al. Moving Upstream: How Interventions that Address the Social Determinants of Health can Improve Health and Reduce Disparities. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(Suppl):S8–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Cohen SB, Cohen JW. The capacity of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to inform the Affordable Care Act. Inquiry. 2013;50(2):124–34.PubMed Cohen SB, Cohen JW. The capacity of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to inform the Affordable Care Act. Inquiry. 2013;50(2):124–34.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Cohen JW, et al. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry. 1996;33(4):373–89. Cohen JW, et al. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry. 1996;33(4):373–89.
15.
go back to reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, MEPS HC-147 2011 Full Year Consolidated Data File, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Editor. 2013, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,: Rockville, MD. p. C-29. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, MEPS HC-147 2011 Full Year Consolidated Data File, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Editor. 2013, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,: Rockville, MD. p. C-29.
16.
go back to reference Scutari M, Strimmer K. Introduction to Graphical Modelling, in Handbook of Statistical Systems Biology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011. Scutari M, Strimmer K. Introduction to Graphical Modelling, in Handbook of Statistical Systems Biology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011.
17.
go back to reference Scutari M. Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;35(3):1–22.CrossRef Scutari M. Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package. J Stat Softw. 2010;35(3):1–22.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gevaert O, et al. Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer by integrating clinical and microarray data with Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(14):e184–90.CrossRefPubMed Gevaert O, et al. Predicting the prognosis of breast cancer by integrating clinical and microarray data with Bayesian networks. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(14):e184–90.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jansen R, et al. A Bayesian Networks Approach for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Genomic Data. Science. 2003;302(5644):449–53.CrossRefPubMed Jansen R, et al. A Bayesian Networks Approach for Predicting Protein-Protein Interactions from Genomic Data. Science. 2003;302(5644):449–53.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Conati C, et al. On-Line Student Modeling for Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian Networks. In: Jameson A, Paris C, Tasso C, editors. User Modeling. Vienna: Springer; 1997. p. 231–42.CrossRef Conati C, et al. On-Line Student Modeling for Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian Networks. In: Jameson A, Paris C, Tasso C, editors. User Modeling. Vienna: Springer; 1997. p. 231–42.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sambo F, et al. A Bayesian Network analysis of the probabilistic relations between risk factors in the predisposition to type 2 diabetes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:2119–22.PubMed Sambo F, et al. A Bayesian Network analysis of the probabilistic relations between risk factors in the predisposition to type 2 diabetes. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:2119–22.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Constantinou AC, et al. From complex questionnaire and interviewing data to intelligent Bayesian network models for medical decision support. Artif Intell Med. 2016;67:75–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Constantinou AC, et al. From complex questionnaire and interviewing data to intelligent Bayesian network models for medical decision support. Artif Intell Med. 2016;67:75–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Fuster-Parra P, et al. Bayesian network modeling: A case study of an epidemiologic system analysis of cardiovascular risk. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2016;126:128–42.CrossRef Fuster-Parra P, et al. Bayesian network modeling: A case study of an epidemiologic system analysis of cardiovascular risk. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2016;126:128–42.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Andreassen S, et al. A Model-Based Approach to Insulin Adjustment. In: Stefanelli M, et al., editors. AIME 91: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Maastricht, June 24–27, 1991. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1991. p. 239–48.CrossRef Andreassen S, et al. A Model-Based Approach to Insulin Adjustment. In: Stefanelli M, et al., editors. AIME 91: Proceedings of the Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Maastricht, June 24–27, 1991. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1991. p. 239–48.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nagarajan R, Scutari M, Lèbre S. Bayesian Networks in R: with Applications in Systems Biology. Use R! 2013. New York: Springer. Nagarajan R, Scutari M, Lèbre S. Bayesian Networks in R: with Applications in Systems Biology. Use R! 2013. New York: Springer.
26.
go back to reference Bailis DS, Segall A, Chipperfield JG. Two views of self-rated general health status. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):203–17.CrossRefPubMed Bailis DS, Segall A, Chipperfield JG. Two views of self-rated general health status. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(2):203–17.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Osborn R, Squires D. International perspectives on patient engagement: results from the 2011 Commonwealth Fund Survey. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012;35(2):118–28.CrossRefPubMed Osborn R, Squires D. International perspectives on patient engagement: results from the 2011 Commonwealth Fund Survey. J Ambul Care Manage. 2012;35(2):118–28.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Cox ED, et al. Influence of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Engagement in Pediatric Primary Care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87(3):319–26.CrossRefPubMed Cox ED, et al. Influence of Race and Socioeconomic Status on Engagement in Pediatric Primary Care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87(3):319–26.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health : New Understanding, New Hope. 2001, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health : New Understanding, New Hope. 2001, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
30.
go back to reference Pei B, Shin DG. Reconstruction of biological networks by incorporating prior knowledge into Bayesian network models. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(12):1324–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pei B, Shin DG. Reconstruction of biological networks by incorporating prior knowledge into Bayesian network models. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(12):1324–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Shin J, Moon S. HMO plans, self-selection and utilization of health care services. Appl Econ. 2007;39(21):2769–84.CrossRef Shin J, Moon S. HMO plans, self-selection and utilization of health care services. Appl Econ. 2007;39(21):2769–84.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference O'Connor SJ. Listening to patients: the best way to improve the quality of cancer care and survivorship. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(2):141–3.CrossRef O'Connor SJ. Listening to patients: the best way to improve the quality of cancer care and survivorship. Eur J Cancer Care. 2011;20(2):141–3.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A network perspective on patient experiences and health status: the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2004 to 2011
Authors
Yi-Sheng Chao
Hau-tieng Wu
Marco Scutari
Tai-Shen Chen
Chao-Jung Wu
Madeleine Durand
Antoine Boivin
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2496-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue