Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Adverse events and in-hospital mortality: an analysis of all deaths in a Norwegian health trust during 2011

Authors: Hans Flaatten, Guttorm Brattebø, Bjørn Alme, Kjersti Berge, Jan H. Rosland, Asgaut Viste, Bjørn Bertelsen, Stig Harthug, Sidsel Aardal

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The estimated number of in-hospitals deaths due to adverse events is often different when using data from deceased patients compared with that of a population experiencing adverse events.

Methods

The study was conducted at three hospitals in the Bergen Hospital Trust, including a 950-bed university hospital. The objective was to study the reported deaths and investigate the probable number of deaths caused by adverse events. Information about all patients who died in the hospitals during 2011 was retrieved from the electronic patient data management system and the medical records. All deaths were classified into two groups according to Norwegian law based on whether or not the death was sudden and/or unexpected. The cause of death in the latter group was further classified as being due to either natural or unnatural causes according to national requirements. An expert review panel screened the patient records for information regarding adverse events and possible (≥ 50%) preventability. Age, length of hospital stay, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were also registered.

Results

There were 59,605 unique patients admitted in 2011 and 1185 registered deaths (1.98%). The mean and median ages of the deceased were 73,8 and 78 years, respectively, and the median length of stay was 5.6 days (range). Of these deaths, 290 (24.5%) were considered sudden and/or unexpected and 218 were considered to be due to natural causes. Of the 72 unnatural deaths, 16 (1.4%) were classified as preventable or probably preventable. For 18 deaths (%) it was impossible to confirm or rule out preventability.

Conclusions

Using this method, we identified a small proportion of hospital deaths that could be classified as unnatural. Furthermore, there was a ≥ 50% chance or more that 34 deaths (2.9%) were due to causes that could have been prevented.
Literature
2.
go back to reference McDonald C. Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in the Institute of Medicine Report. JAMA. 2000;284:93–5.CrossRefPubMed McDonald C. Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in the Institute of Medicine Report. JAMA. 2000;284:93–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hogan H, Healey F, Neale G, et al. Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:737–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hogan H, Healey F, Neale G, et al. Preventable deaths due to problems in care in English acute hospitals: a retrospective case record review study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:737–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, et al. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:297–302.CrossRefPubMed Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C, et al. Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:297–302.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-M and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;42:1130–9.CrossRef Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-M and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;42:1130–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Alfsen GC, Lyckander LG, Lindboe AW, Svaar H. Kvalitetssikring ved dødsfall i sykehus. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130:476–9.CrossRefPubMed Alfsen GC, Lyckander LG, Lindboe AW, Svaar H. Kvalitetssikring ved dødsfall i sykehus. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2010;130:476–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Griffin FA, Resar RK. IHI Global Trigger Tool for measuring adverse events. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Innovation Series …, 2009. Griffin FA, Resar RK. IHI Global Trigger Tool for measuring adverse events. Institute for Healthcare Improvement Innovation Series …, 2009.
10.
go back to reference Sousa P, Uva AS, Serranheira F. Estimating the incidence of adverse events in Portuguese hospitals: a contribution to improving quality and patient safety. BMC health services. 2014;14:311.CrossRef Sousa P, Uva AS, Serranheira F. Estimating the incidence of adverse events in Portuguese hospitals: a contribution to improving quality and patient safety. BMC health services. 2014;14:311.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Deilkås ET. Report from a national medical record-review using the global trigger tool. Report from Kunnskapssenteret no. [XX]−2010. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2010. Deilkås ET. Report from a national medical record-review using the global trigger tool. Report from Kunnskapssenteret no. [XX]−2010. Oslo: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services; 2010.
12.
13.
go back to reference Plessen C, Kodal AM, Anhøj J. Experiences with global trigger tool reviews in five Danish hospitals: an implementation study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001324.CrossRef Plessen C, Kodal AM, Anhøj J. Experiences with global trigger tool reviews in five Danish hospitals: an implementation study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001324.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Adverse events and in-hospital mortality: an analysis of all deaths in a Norwegian health trust during 2011
Authors
Hans Flaatten
Guttorm Brattebø
Bjørn Alme
Kjersti Berge
Jan H. Rosland
Asgaut Viste
Bjørn Bertelsen
Stig Harthug
Sidsel Aardal
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2417-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue