Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics

Authors: Jennifer Coury, Jennifer L. Schneider, Jennifer S. Rivelli, Amanda F. Petrik, Evelyn Seibel, Brieshon D’Agostini, Stephen H. Taplin, Beverly B. Green, Gloria D. Coronado

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is a commonly used improvement process in health care settings, although its documented use in pragmatic clinical research is rare. A recent pragmatic clinical research study, called the Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations (STOP CRC), used this process to optimize the research implementation of an automated colon cancer screening outreach program in intervention clinics. We describe the process of using this PDSA approach, the selection of PDSA topics by clinic leaders, and project leaders’ reactions to using PDSA in pragmatic research.

Methods

STOP CRC is a cluster-randomized pragmatic study that aims to test the effectiveness of a direct-mail fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) program involving eight Federally Qualified Health Centers in Oregon and California. We and a practice improvement specialist trained in the PDSA process delivered structured presentations to leaders of these centers; the presentations addressed how to apply the PDSA process to improve implementation of a mailed outreach program offering colorectal cancer screening through FIT tests. Center leaders submitted PDSA plans and delivered reports via webinar at quarterly meetings of the project’s advisory board. Project staff conducted one-on-one, 45-min interviews with project leads from each health center to assess the reaction to and value of the PDSA process in supporting the implementation of STOP CRC.

Results

Clinic-selected PDSA activities included refining the intervention staffing model, improving outreach materials, and changing workflow steps. Common benefits of using PDSA cycles in pragmatic research were that it provided a structure for staff to focus on improving the program and it allowed staff to test the change they wanted to see. A commonly reported challenge was measuring the success of the PDSA process with the available electronic medical record tools.

Conclusion

Understanding how the PDSA process can be applied to pragmatic trials and the reaction of clinic staff to their use may help clinics integrate evidence-based interventions into their everyday care processes.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.​gov NCT01742065. Registered October 31, 2013.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Greene SM, Reid RJ, Larson EB. Implementing the learning health system: from concept to action. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(3):207–10.CrossRefPubMed Greene SM, Reid RJ, Larson EB. Implementing the learning health system: from concept to action. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(3):207–10.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Luce BR, et al. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(3):206–9.CrossRefPubMed Luce BR, et al. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(3):206–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Califf RM, Sanderson I, Miranda ML. The future of cardiovascular clinical research: informatics, clinical investigators, and community engagement. JAMA. 2012;308(17):1747–8.CrossRefPubMed Califf RM, Sanderson I, Miranda ML. The future of cardiovascular clinical research: informatics, clinical investigators, and community engagement. JAMA. 2012;308(17):1747–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25(Suppl 1):i20–4.CrossRefPubMed Green LW. Making research relevant: if it is an evidence-based practice, where's the practice-based evidence? Fam Pract. 2008;25(Suppl 1):i20–4.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chalkidou K, et al. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials. 2012;9(4):436–46.CrossRefPubMed Chalkidou K, et al. The role for pragmatic randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) in comparative effectiveness research. Clin Trials. 2012;9(4):436–46.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nallamothu BK, Hayward RA, Bates ER. Beyond the randomized clinical trial: the role of effectiveness studies in evaluating cardiovascular therapies. Circulation. 2008;118(12):1294–303.CrossRefPubMed Nallamothu BK, Hayward RA, Bates ER. Beyond the randomized clinical trial: the role of effectiveness studies in evaluating cardiovascular therapies. Circulation. 2008;118(12):1294–303.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Vetter MJ. The influence of clinical decision support on diagnostic accuracy in nurse practitioners. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2015;12(6):355–63.CrossRefPubMed Vetter MJ. The influence of clinical decision support on diagnostic accuracy in nurse practitioners. Worldviews Evid-Based Nurs. 2015;12(6):355–63.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hendricks CB. Improving adherence with oral antiemetic agents in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):216–8.CrossRefPubMed Hendricks CB. Improving adherence with oral antiemetic agents in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):216–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Stevens DP, et al. A multi-institutional quality improvement initiative to transform education for chronic illness care in resident continuity practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(Suppl 4):S574–80.CrossRefPubMed Stevens DP, et al. A multi-institutional quality improvement initiative to transform education for chronic illness care in resident continuity practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(Suppl 4):S574–80.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Malloy C, Little BB, Michael M. Improving wait times in primary care using the Dartmouth microsystem improvement curriculum. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013;28(3):250–6.CrossRefPubMed Malloy C, Little BB, Michael M. Improving wait times in primary care using the Dartmouth microsystem improvement curriculum. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013;28(3):250–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2017–2019. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2017. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2017–2019. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2017.
13.
go back to reference Baker DW, et al. Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(8):1235–41.CrossRefPubMed Baker DW, et al. Comparative effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(8):1235–41.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Baker DW, et al. Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(11):1685–90.CrossRefPubMed Baker DW, et al. Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(11):1685–90.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Gupta S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1725–32.PubMedPubMedCentral Gupta S, et al. Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(18):1725–32.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Coronado GD, et al. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coronado GD, et al. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Coronado GD, et al. Effectiveness of a clinic-based colorectal cancer screening promotion program for underserved Hispanics. Cancer. 2011;117(8):1745–54.CrossRefPubMed Coronado GD, et al. Effectiveness of a clinic-based colorectal cancer screening promotion program for underserved Hispanics. Cancer. 2011;117(8):1745–54.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wolcott HF. Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994. Wolcott HF. Transforming qualitative data: description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994.
19.
go back to reference Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research Strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1996. Coffey A, Atkinson P. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research Strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc; 1996.
20.
go back to reference Lofland L, Lofland J. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Wadsworth Publishing, Inc; 1995. Lofland L, Lofland J. Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Wadsworth Publishing, Inc; 1995.
21.
go back to reference Riessman C. Narrative analysis: qualitative research methods series 30. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993. Riessman C. Narrative analysis: qualitative research methods series 30. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993.
22.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Third ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Third ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2008.
23.
go back to reference Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Third ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2002. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Third ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.; 2002.
24.
go back to reference Langley GJ, et al. The improvement guide—a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009. Langley GJ, et al. The improvement guide—a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
25.
go back to reference Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
26.
go back to reference Scott SD, et al. Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian heart health kit (HHK). Implement Sci. 2008;3:41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scott SD, et al. Factors influencing the adoption of an innovation: an examination of the uptake of the Canadian heart health kit (HHK). Implement Sci. 2008;3:41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
29.
go back to reference Scoville R, Little K. Comparing Lean and quality improvement. IHI white paper. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2014. Available at: ihi.Org. Scoville R, Little K. Comparing Lean and quality improvement. IHI white paper. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2014. Available at: ihi.​Org.
Metadata
Title
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics
Authors
Jennifer Coury
Jennifer L. Schneider
Jennifer S. Rivelli
Amanda F. Petrik
Evelyn Seibel
Brieshon D’Agostini
Stephen H. Taplin
Beverly B. Green
Gloria D. Coronado
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2364-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue