Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

The social accountability of doctors: a relationship based framework for understanding emergent community concepts of caring

Authors: Lionel P. Green-Thompson, Patricia McInerney, Bob Woollard

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Social accountability is defined as the responsibility of institutions to respond to the health priorities of a community. There is an international movement towards the education of health professionals who are accountable to communities. There is little evidence of how communities experience or articulate this accountability.

Methods

In this grounded theory study eight community based focus group discussions were conducted in rural and urban South Africa to explore community members’ perceptions of the social accountability of doctors. The discussions were conducted across one urban and two rural provinces. Group discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Results

Initial coding was done and three main themes emerged following data analysis: the consultation as a place of love and respect (participants have an expectation of care yet are often engaged with disregard); relationships of people and systems (participants reflect on their health priorities and the links with the social determinants of health) and Ubuntu as engagement of the community (reflected in their expectation of Ubuntu based relationships as well as part of the education system). These themes were related through a framework which integrates three levels of relationship:
  • a central community of reciprocal relationships with the doctor-patient relationship as core;
  • a level in which the systems of health and education interact and together with social determinants of health mediate the insertion of communities into a broader discourse.
  • An ubuntu framing in which the tensions between vulnerability and power interact and reflect rights and responsibility. The space between these concepts is important for social accountability.

Conclusion

Social accountability has been a concept better articulated by academics and centralized agencies. Communities bring a richer dimension to social accountability through their understanding of being human and caring. This study also creates the connection between ubuntu and social accountability and their mutual transformative capacity as agents for social justice
Literature
3.
go back to reference Woollard RF. Caring for a common future: medical schools’ social accountability. Med Educ. 2006;40(4):301–13.CrossRefPubMed Woollard RF. Caring for a common future: medical schools’ social accountability. Med Educ. 2006;40(4):301–13.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ritz S, Beatty K, Ellaway R. Accounting for social accountability: Developing critiques of social accountability within medical education. Educ Health. 2014;27(2):152–7.CrossRef Ritz S, Beatty K, Ellaway R. Accounting for social accountability: Developing critiques of social accountability within medical education. Educ Health. 2014;27(2):152–7.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sandhu G, Garcha I, Sleeth J, Yeates K, Walker R. AIDER: a model for social accountability in medical education and practice. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1403–8.CrossRefPubMed Sandhu G, Garcha I, Sleeth J, Yeates K, Walker R. AIDER: a model for social accountability in medical education and practice. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1403–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kwizera EN, Iputo JE. Addressing social responsibility in medical education: The African way. Med Teach. 2011;33(8):649–53.CrossRefPubMed Kwizera EN, Iputo JE. Addressing social responsibility in medical education: The African way. Med Teach. 2011;33(8):649–53.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Prideaux D, Worley P, Bligh J. Symbiosis: a new model for clinical education. Clin Teach. 2007;4:209–12.CrossRef Prideaux D, Worley P, Bligh J. Symbiosis: a new model for clinical education. Clin Teach. 2007;4:209–12.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Worley P, Murray R. Social accountability in medical education – An Australian rural and remote perspective. Med Teach. 2011;33(8):654–8.CrossRefPubMed Worley P, Murray R. Social accountability in medical education – An Australian rural and remote perspective. Med Teach. 2011;33(8):654–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Worley P, Prideaux D, Strasser R, Magarey A, March R. Empirical evidence for symbiotic medical education: a comparative analysis of community and tertiary-based programmes. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):109–16.CrossRefPubMed Worley P, Prideaux D, Strasser R, Magarey A, March R. Empirical evidence for symbiotic medical education: a comparative analysis of community and tertiary-based programmes. Med Educ. 2006;40(2):109–16.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Stalmeijer R, McNaughton N, van Mook W. Using focus groups in medical education reserach:AMEE Guide No. 91. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):923–39.CrossRefPubMed Stalmeijer R, McNaughton N, van Mook W. Using focus groups in medical education reserach:AMEE Guide No. 91. Med Teach. 2014;36(11):923–39.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten C, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47:585–94.CrossRefPubMed Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten C, Vanstone M, Lingard L. Beyond individualism: professional culture and its influence on feedback. Med Educ. 2013;47:585–94.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bryant A, Charmaz K. Introduction: Grounded theory research: methods and practices. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. 1st ed. London: SAGE Publishers; 2007. p. 620.CrossRef Bryant A, Charmaz K. Introduction: Grounded theory research: methods and practices. In: Bryant A, Charmaz K, editors. The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. 1st ed. London: SAGE Publishers; 2007. p. 620.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications Inc.; 2010. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications Inc.; 2010.
15.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers; 2008.CrossRef Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publishers; 2008.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Molefe M. What can the socio-political ethic of ubuntu contribute to contemporary conceptions of “development”? [Research Report]. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; 2011. Molefe M. What can the socio-political ethic of ubuntu contribute to contemporary conceptions of “development”? [Research Report]. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; 2011.
17.
go back to reference Mbigi L, Maree J. Ubuntu: The Spirit of African Transfromation Management. 10th Anniversary ed. Randburg: Knowres Publishing; 2005. Mbigi L, Maree J. Ubuntu: The Spirit of African Transfromation Management. 10th Anniversary ed. Randburg: Knowres Publishing; 2005.
18.
go back to reference Harris B, Eyles J, Penn-Kekana L, Fried J, Nyathela H, Thomas L, et al. Bringing Justice to Unacceptable Health Care Services? Street-Level Reflections from Urban South Africa. Int J Transit Justice. 2014.The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8, 141–161. 10.1093/ijtj/ijt028 Harris B, Eyles J, Penn-Kekana L, Fried J, Nyathela H, Thomas L, et al. Bringing Justice to Unacceptable Health Care Services? Street-Level Reflections from Urban South Africa. Int J Transit Justice. 2014.The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8, 141–161. 10.1093/ijtj/ijt028 
19.
go back to reference Harris B, Eyles J, Penn-Kekana L, Thomas L, Goudge J. Adverse or acceptable: negotiating access to a post-apartheid health care contract. Glob Health. 2014;10(1):35.CrossRef Harris B, Eyles J, Penn-Kekana L, Thomas L, Goudge J. Adverse or acceptable: negotiating access to a post-apartheid health care contract. Glob Health. 2014;10(1):35.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Coovadia H, Jewkes R, Barron P, Sanders P, McIntyre D. The health and health systems of South Africa: historical roots of current public health challenges. Lancet. 2009;374:817–34.CrossRefPubMed Coovadia H, Jewkes R, Barron P, Sanders P, McIntyre D. The health and health systems of South Africa: historical roots of current public health challenges. Lancet. 2009;374:817–34.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling T, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–9.CrossRefPubMed Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling T, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hirsh D, Worley P. Better learning, better doctors, better community: how transforming clinical education can help repair society. Med Educ. 2013;47(9):942–9.CrossRefPubMed Hirsh D, Worley P. Better learning, better doctors, better community: how transforming clinical education can help repair society. Med Educ. 2013;47(9):942–9.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Khoza R. Attuned leadership: Africn Humanism as compass. 1st ed. Johannesburg: Penguin; 2011. Khoza R. Attuned leadership: Africn Humanism as compass. 1st ed. Johannesburg: Penguin; 2011.
Metadata
Title
The social accountability of doctors: a relationship based framework for understanding emergent community concepts of caring
Authors
Lionel P. Green-Thompson
Patricia McInerney
Bob Woollard
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2239-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue