Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on sleep in brain health

LIVE: Thursday 2nd May 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

Quality sleep is essential for health. But what happens to our brains when sleep patterns are disturbed? Join our experts to explore the interplay between sleep disruption and neurological diseases, and the questions that you need to be asking your patients to help you prevent the harmful effects of sleep deprivation.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy

Authors: Manila Bonciani, Sara Barsanti, Anna Maria Murante

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several countries have co-located General Practitioners (GPs) in Primary Care Centres (PCCs) with other health and social care professionals in order to improve integrated care. It is not clear whether the co-location of a multidisciplinary team actually facilitates a positive patient experience concerning GP care. The aim of this study was to verify whether the co-location of GPs in PCCs is associated positively with patient satisfaction with their GP when patients have experience of a multidisciplinary team. We also investigated whether patients who frequently use health services, due to their complex needs, benefitted the most from the co-location of a multidisciplinary team.

Methods

The study used data from a population survey carried out in Tuscany (central Italy) at the beginning of 2015 to evaluate the patients’ experience and satisfaction with their GPs. Multilevel linear regression models were implemented to verify the relationship between patient satisfaction and co-location. This key explanatory variable was measured by considering both the list of GPs working in PCCs and the answers of surveyed patients who had experienced the co-location of their GP in a multidisciplinary team. We also explored the effect modification on patient satisfaction due to the use of hospitalisation, access to emergency departments and visits with specialists, by performing the multilevel modelling on two strata of patient data: frequent and non-frequent health service users.

Results

A sample of 2025 GP patients were included in the study, 757 of which were patients of GPs working in a PCC. Patient satisfaction with their GP was generally positive. Results showed that having a GP working within a PCC and the experience of the co-located multidisciplinary team were associated with a higher satisfaction (p < 0.01). For non-frequent users of health services on the other hand, the co-location of multidisciplinary team in PCCs was not significantly associated with patient satisfaction, whereas for frequent users, the strength of relationships identified in the overall model increased (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The co-location of GPs with other professionals and their joint working as experienced in PCCs seems to represent a greater benefit for patients, especially for those with complex needs who use primary care, hospitals, emergency care and specialized care frequently.
Literature
1.
Bourgueil Y, Marek A, Mousquès J. Three models of primary care organisation in Europe, Canada, Australia and New-Zealand. Questions d’économie de la santé. 2009;189:1–6.
2.
3.
Afrite A, Bourgueil Y, Daniel F, Mousquèsa F, Couralet PE, Chevillard G. The impact of multi-professional group practices on healthcare supply. Evaluation aims and methods for “maisons”, “pôles de santé” and “centres de santé” within the framework of experiments with new mechanisms of remuneration. Questions d’économie de la santé. 2013;189:1–6.
4.
Bonciani M, Barsanti S, Matarrese D. Esperienze di integrazione nell’assistenza primaria basate sulla co-location dei servizi: quali prospettive per il modello della Casa della Salute? Mecosan. 2015;96:81–122.
5.
Campbell H, Hotchkiss R, Bradshaw N, Porteous M. Critical care pathways. Br Med J. 1998;316:133–7.CrossRef
6.
Hern T, Talen M, Babiuch C, Durazo-Arvizu R. Patient care management teams: improving continuity, office efficiency, and teamwork in a residency clinic. J Grad Med Educ. 2009;1(1):67–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
OECD. Doing Better for Families. OECD Publishing; 2011. ISBN 978-92-64-09872-5.
8.
Øvretveit J. Coordinating community care: multidisciplinary teams and care management. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1993.
9.
Carter S, Garside P, Black A. Multidisciplinary team working, clinical networks, and chambers; opportunities to work differently in the NHS. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12 Suppl 1:i25–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Mitchell GK, Tieman JJ, Shelby-James TM. Multidisciplinary care planning and teamwork in primary care. MJA. 2008;188:S61–4.PubMed
11.
Tanaka M. Multidisciplinary team approach. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2003;3:69–72.CrossRef
12.
13.
Codispoti C, Douglas MR, McCallister T, Zuniga A. The use of a multidisciplinary team care approach to improve glycemic control and quality of life by the prevention of complications among diabetic patients. J Okla State Med Assoc. 2004;97(5):201–4.PubMed
14.
Liberman RP, Hilty D, Drake R, Tsang H. Requirements for multidisciplinary teamwork in psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52(10):1331–42.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Taylor C, Munro SJ, Glynne-Jones R, Griffith C, Trevatt P, Richards M, Ramirez AM. Multidisciplinary team working in cancer: what is the evidence? BMJ. 2010;340:c951.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Taylor C, Finnegan-John J, Green JSA. “No decision about me without me” in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:488.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Lamb BW, Jalil RZ, Sevdalis n, Vincent C, Green JSA. Strategies to improve the efficiency and utility of multidisciplinary team meetings in urology cancer care: a survey study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Clarke DJ. The role of multidisciplinary team care in stroke rehabilitation. Prog Neurol Psychiatry. 2013;17(4):5–10.CrossRef
19.
Maneze D, Dennis S, Chen HY, Taggart J, Vagholkar S, Bunker J, Liaw ST. Multidisciplinary care: experience of patients with complex needs. Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(1):20–6.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Coburn AF. Models for integrating and managing acute and long-term care services in rural areas. J Appl Gerontol. 2001;20:386–408.CrossRef
21.
Suter E, Oelke ND, Adair CE, Armitage GD. Ten Key principles for successful health systems integration. Healthc Q (Toronto, Ont). 2009;13:16–23.CrossRef
22.
Watson D, Townsley R, Abbot D. Exploring multi-agency working in services to disabled children with complex healthcare needs and their families. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11(3):367–75.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Holtom M. The partnership imperative: joint working between social services and health. J Manag Med. 2001;15(6):430–45.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Hubbard G, Themessl–Huber M. Professional perceptions of joint working in primary care and social care services for older people in Scotland. J Interprof Care. 2005;14(3):8–18.
25.
Hudson B. Integrated team working: You can get it if you really want it: part 1. J Integrated Care. 2006;14(1):14–2.CrossRef
26.
Blount A. Integrated Primary Care: Organizing the Evidence. Fam Syst Health. 2003;21(2):121–3.CrossRef
27.
Collins C, Hewson DL, Munger R, Wade T. Evolving models of behavioral health integration in primary care. New York: Milbank Memorial Fund; 2010.CrossRef
28.
Cameron A, Lart R, Bostock L, Coomber C. Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: a review of research literature. Health Soc Care Community. 2014;22(3):225–33.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Imison C, Naylor C, Maybin J. Under One roof: will polyclinics deliver integrated care? London: The King’s Fund; 2008.
30.
Lawn S, Lloyd A, King A, Sweet L, Gum L. Integration of primary health services: being put together does not mean they will work together. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Davey B, Levin E, Iliffe S, Kharicha K. Integrating health and social care: implications for joint working and community care outcomes for older people. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(19):22–34.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Ginsburg S. Colocating health services: a way to improve coordination of children’s health care? Commonwealth Fund pub. 2008;1153(41):1–12.
33.
Gibb C, Morrow M, Clarke C, Cook G, Gertig P, Ramprogus V. Transdisciplinary working: evaluating the development of health and social care provision in mental health. J Ment Health. 2002;11(3):339–50.CrossRef
34.
Frost N. Professionalism, partnership and joined-up thinking: a research review of front-line working with children and families. Research in practice. 2005. ISBN 0-904984-04-5
35.
Vuori H. Patient satisfaction-an attribute or indicator of the quality of care? QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1987;13(3):106–8.CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Lewis JR. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1995;39(5):655–70.CrossRef
38.
39.
Baker R, Streatfield J. What type of general practice do patients prefer? exploration of practice characteristics influencing patient satisfaction. Br J Gen Pract. 1995;45(401):654–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Baker R. Characteristics of practices, general practitioners and patients related to levels of patients’satisfaction with consultation. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:601–50.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Branson C, Badger B, Dobbs F. Patient satisfaction with skill mix in primary care: a review of the literature. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2003;4:329–39.CrossRef
42.
Jung HP, Baerveldt C, Olesen F, Grol R, Wensing M. Patient charactristics as predictors of primary health care preferences: a systematic literature analysis. Health Expect. 2003;6:160–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Haddad S, Potvin L, Roberge D, Pineault R, Remondin M. Patient perception of quality following a visit to a doctor in a primary care unit. Fam Pract. 2000;17:21–9.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Berchtold P, Kunzi B, Busato A. Differences of the quality of care experience: the perception of patients with either network or conventional health plans. Fam Pract. 2011;28:406–13.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Jung HP, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, et al. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(460):882–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Kroneman MW, Maarse H, van der Zee J. Direct access in primary care and patient satisfaction: a European study. Health Policy. 2006;76:72–9.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Schäfer WLA, Boerma WGW, Murante AM, Sixma HJM, Schellevis FG, Groenewegen PP. Assessing the potential for improvement of primary care in 34 countries: a cross-sectional survey. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93:161–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
48.
Odone A, Saccani E, Chiesa V, Brambilla A, Brianti E, Fabi M, Curcetti C, Donatini A, Balestrino A, Lombardi M, Rossi G, Saccenti E, Signorelli C. The implementation of a Community Health Centre-based primary care model in Italy. The experience of the Case della Salute in the Emilia-Romagna Region. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016;52(1):70–7.PubMed
49.
Barsanti S, Bonciani M, Roti L. Il Quaderno delle Case della Salute. Firenze, 2016 Edizioni Polistampa ISBN 978-88-596-1625-2
50.
Barsanti S, Nuti S. Il Sistema di valutazione della performance delle AFT toscane. Report 2014. Pisa, 2015 Edizioni ETS ISBN 978-88-8250-162-4
51.
Barsanti S, Bonciani M, Vola F, Pirisi L. Innovatori, indecisi, bisognosi o autonomi. I medici di medicina generale tra integrazione e accountability. Mecosan. 2016;98:9–39.CrossRef
52.
Murante AM, Vainieri M, Rojas DC, Nuti S. Does feedback influence patient - professional communication? Empirical evidence from Italy. Health Policy. 2014;116(2-3):273–80.CrossRefPubMed
53.
De Rosis S, Barsanti S. Patient satisfaction, e-health and the evolution of the patient-general practitioner relationship: Evidence from an Italian survey. Health Policy. 2016;120(11):1279–92.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Nuti S, Murante AM, Matarrese D. Report of the maternity pathway. Edizioni Polistampa. 2015. ISBN 978-88-596-1571-2
55.
Murante AM. Indagine sull’esperienza degli utenti della medicina generale 2014-2015. Pisa: Tipografia Editrice Pisana snc; 2015. ISBN 978-88-8250-170-9.
56.
Coulter A, Fitzpatrick R, Cornowell J. The Point of Care. Measures of Patients’ Experience in Hospital: Purpose, Methods and Uses. London: The King’s fund; 2009.
57.
Brown AD, Sandoval GA, Murray M. Comparing patient reports about hospital care across a Canadian–US border. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008;20(2):95–104.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Murante AM, Seghieri C, Brown S, Nuti S. How do hospitalization experience and institutional characteristics in fluence inpatient satisfac tion? A multilevel approach. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2014;29:e247–60.CrossRef
59.
Sjetne IS, Veenstra M, Stavem K. The effect of hospital size and teaching status on patient experiences with hospital care: a multilevel analysis. Med Care. 2007;45(3):252–8.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Sixma HJ, Spreeuwenberg PM, van der Pasch MA. Patient satisfaction with the general practitioner: a two-level analysis. Med Care. 1998;36(2):212–29.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Berhane A, Enquselassie F. Patient expectations and their satisfaction in the context of public hospitals. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1919–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
62.
63.
Sheaff R, Halliday J, Øvretveit J, Byng R, Exworthy M, Peckham S, Asthana S. Integration and continuity of primary care: polyclinics and alternatives – a patient-centred analysis of how organisation constrains care co-ordination. Health Services and Delivery Research. 2015;3(35). doi:10.​3310/​hsdr03350.
64.
Schoen C, Osborn R, How S, Doty M, Peugh J. In chronic condition: experiences of patients with complex health care needs, in eight countries, 2008. Health Aff. 2009;28(1):w1–w16.CrossRef
65.
Oandasan IF, Gotlib Conn L, Lingard L, Karim A, Jakubovicz D, Whitehead C, Miller K-L, Kennie N, Reeves S. The impact of space and time on interprofessional teamwork in Canadian primary health care settings: implications for health care reform. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2009;10(2):151–62.CrossRef
66.
Cameron A, Lart R. Revisiting joint working. J Integrated Care. 2012;20(2):89–93.CrossRef
67.
Ham C. Only connect. Policy options for integrating health and social care. The Nuffield Trust. 2009.
68.
Rumball-Smith J, Wodchis WP, Koné A, Kenealy T, Barnsley J, Ashton T. Under the same roof: co-location of practitioners within primary care is associated with specialized chronic care management. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
69.
Poot AJ, Wendy P. J. den Elzen, Jeanet W. Blom, Jacobijn Gussekloo. Level of Satisfaction of Older Persons with Their General Practitioner and Practice: Role of Complexity of Health Problems. Plos One. 2014;9(4):e94326. doi:10.​1371/​journal.​pone.​0094326.
70.
Sloper P. Factors and barriers for co-ordinated multi agency services. Child Care Health Dev. 2004;30(6):571–80.CrossRefPubMed
71.
Van Houdt S, Heyrman J, Vanhaecht K, Sermeus W, De Lepeleire J. Care pathways across the primary-hospital care continuum: using the multi-level framework in explaining care coordination. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:296.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Is the co-location of GPs in primary care centres associated with a higher patient satisfaction? Evidence from a population survey in Italy
Authors
Manila Bonciani
Sara Barsanti
Anna Maria Murante
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2187-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue

Research article

Gender differences in job quality and job satisfaction among doctors in rural western China

Research article

Got spirit? The spiritual climate scale, psychometric properties, benchmarking data and future directions

Research article

The effectiveness of emergency nurse practitioner service in the management of patients presenting to rural hospitals with chest pain: a multisite prospective longitudinal nested cohort study

Research article

Interventions following a high violence risk assessment score: a naturalistic study on a Finnish psychiatric admission ward

Research article

Criteria for prioritization of HIV programs in Viet Nam: a discrete choice experiment

Research article

Evaluation of community provision of a preventive cardiovascular programme - the National Health Service Health Check in reaching the under-served groups by primary care in England: cross sectional observational study