Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Study protocol

Improving safety in care homes: protocol for evaluation of the Walsall and Wolverhampton care home improvement programme

Authors: Sarah Damery, Sarah Flanagan, Kiran Rai, Gill Combes

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Improving safety in care homes is becoming increasingly important. Care home residents typically have multiple physical and/or cognitive impairments, and adverse events like falls often lead to hospital attendance or admission. Developing a safety culture is associated with beneficial impacts on safety outcomes, but the complex needs of care home residents, coupled with staffing pressures in the sector, pose challenges for positive safety practices to become embedded at the individual and organisational levels. Staff training and education can positively enforce safety culture and reduce the incidence of harms, but improvement initiatives are often short lived and thorough evaluation is uncommon. This protocol outlines an evaluation of a large-scale care home improvement programme in the West Midlands.

Methods

The programme will run in 35 care homes across Walsall and Wolverhampton over 24 months, and we anticipate that 30 care homes will participate in the evaluation (n = 1500 staff). The programme will train staff and managers in service improvement techniques, with the aim of strengthening safety culture and reducing adverse safety event rates. The evaluation will use a pre-post design with mixed methods. Quantitative data will focus on: care home manager and staff surveys administered at several time points and analysis of adverse event rates. Data on hospital activity by residents at participating care homes will be compared to matched controls. Qualitative data on experience of training and the application of learning to practice will be collected via semi-structured interviews with staff (n = 48 to 64) and programme facilitators (n = 6), and staff focus groups (n = 36 to 48 staff). The primary outcome measure is the change in mean score on the safety climate domain of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire between baseline and programme end.

Discussion

This mixed methods evaluation of a large-scale care home improvement programme will allow a substantial amount of qualitative and quantitative data to be collected. This will enable an assessment of the extent to which care home staff training can effectively improve safety culture, lower the incidence of adverse safety events such as falls and pressure ulcers, and potentially reduce care home resident’s use of acute services.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Health Foundation. Measuring Safety Culture. London: The Health Foundation; 2011. Health Foundation. Measuring Safety Culture. London: The Health Foundation; 2011.
2.
go back to reference Shekelle P, Pronovost P, Wachter R, Taylor S, Dy S, Foy R, et al. Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(10):693–7.CrossRefPubMed Shekelle P, Pronovost P, Wachter R, Taylor S, Dy S, Foy R, et al. Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(10):693–7.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Arnetz JE, Zhdanova LS, Elsouhag D, Licthenberg P, Luborsky MR, Arnetz BB. Organizational climate determinants of resident safety culture in nursing homes. Gerontologist. 2011;51(6):739–49.CrossRefPubMed Arnetz JE, Zhdanova LS, Elsouhag D, Licthenberg P, Luborsky MR, Arnetz BB. Organizational climate determinants of resident safety culture in nursing homes. Gerontologist. 2011;51(6):739–49.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lievesley N, Crosby G, Bowman C. The changing role of care homes. London: BUPA and Centre for Policy on Ageing; 2011. Lievesley N, Crosby G, Bowman C. The changing role of care homes. London: BUPA and Centre for Policy on Ageing; 2011.
5.
go back to reference Centre for Policy on Ageing. A profile of residents in BUPA care homes: results from the 2012 BUPA census. London: Centre for Policy on Ageing; 2012. Centre for Policy on Ageing. A profile of residents in BUPA care homes: results from the 2012 BUPA census. London: Centre for Policy on Ageing; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Thomas K, Hyer K, Castle N, Branch L, Andel R, Weech-Maldonado R. Patient safety culture and the association with safe resident care in nursing homes. Gerontologist. 2012;52(6):802–11.CrossRefPubMed Thomas K, Hyer K, Castle N, Branch L, Andel R, Weech-Maldonado R. Patient safety culture and the association with safe resident care in nursing homes. Gerontologist. 2012;52(6):802–11.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Masotti P, McColl MA, Green M. Adverse events experienced by homecare patients: a scoping review of the literature. Int J Qual Health C. 2010;22:115–25.CrossRef Masotti P, McColl MA, Green M. Adverse events experienced by homecare patients: a scoping review of the literature. Int J Qual Health C. 2010;22:115–25.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rust TB, Wagner LM. Broadening the patient safety agenda to include safety in long-term care. Healthc Q. 2008;11:31–4.CrossRefPubMed Rust TB, Wagner LM. Broadening the patient safety agenda to include safety in long-term care. Healthc Q. 2008;11:31–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Barber ND, Alldred DP, Raynor DK, Dickinson R, Garfield S, Jesson B, et al. Care homes’ use of medicines study: prevalence, causes and potential harm of medication errors in care homes for older people. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:341–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barber ND, Alldred DP, Raynor DK, Dickinson R, Garfield S, Jesson B, et al. Care homes’ use of medicines study: prevalence, causes and potential harm of medication errors in care homes for older people. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:341–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Thompson T, Marks-Maran D. A programme to reduce acquired pressure ulcers in care homes. Br J Nurs. 2015;24(12):54–6. Thompson T, Marks-Maran D. A programme to reduce acquired pressure ulcers in care homes. Br J Nurs. 2015;24(12):54–6.
11.
go back to reference Bangova A. Prevention of pressure ulcers in nursing home residents. Nurs Stand. 2013;7(24):54. 56, 58–61.CrossRef Bangova A. Prevention of pressure ulcers in nursing home residents. Nurs Stand. 2013;7(24):54. 56, 58–61.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Horn S, Sharkey S, Hudak S, Gassaway J, James R, Spector W. Pressure ulcer prevention in long-term care facilities: a pilot study implementing standardized nurse aide documentation and feedback reports. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010;23(3):120–31.CrossRefPubMed Horn S, Sharkey S, Hudak S, Gassaway J, James R, Spector W. Pressure ulcer prevention in long-term care facilities: a pilot study implementing standardized nurse aide documentation and feedback reports. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010;23(3):120–31.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lynn J, West J, Hausmann S, Gifford D, Nelson R, McGann P, et al. Collaborative clinical quality improvement for pressure ulcers in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(10):1663–9.CrossRefPubMed Lynn J, West J, Hausmann S, Gifford D, Nelson R, McGann P, et al. Collaborative clinical quality improvement for pressure ulcers in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(10):1663–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Parry G, Carson-Stevens A, Luff D, McPherson M, Goldman D. Recommendations for evaluation of health care improvement initiatives. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(6 Suppl):S23–30.CrossRefPubMed Parry G, Carson-Stevens A, Luff D, McPherson M, Goldman D. Recommendations for evaluation of health care improvement initiatives. Acad Pediatr. 2013;13(6 Suppl):S23–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 2006. Kirkpatrick DL, Kirkpatrick JD. Evaluating training programs: The four levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 2006.
16.
go back to reference Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, Thomson R, Nicholl J, Franklin BD, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation part 2, study design. BMJ Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):163–9.CrossRef Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, Thomson R, Nicholl J, Franklin BD, et al. An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation part 2, study design. BMJ Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(3):163–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jha A, Pronovost P. Toward a safer health care system: the critical need to improve measurement. JAMA. 2016;315(17):1831–2.CrossRefPubMed Jha A, Pronovost P. Toward a safer health care system: the critical need to improve measurement. JAMA. 2016;315(17):1831–2.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Buljac-Samardzic M, van Wijngaarden JDH, Dekker-van Doorn CM. Safety culture in long-term care: a cross-sectional analysis of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire in nursing and residential homes in the Netherlands. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(6):424–31.CrossRefPubMed Buljac-Samardzic M, van Wijngaarden JDH, Dekker-van Doorn CM. Safety culture in long-term care: a cross-sectional analysis of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire in nursing and residential homes in the Netherlands. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(6):424–31.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wisniewski AM, Erdley WS, Singh R, Servoss TJ, Naughton BJ, Singh G. Assessment of safety attitudes in a skilled nursing facility. Geriatr Nurs. 2007;28(2):126–36.CrossRefPubMed Wisniewski AM, Erdley WS, Singh R, Servoss TJ, Naughton BJ, Singh G. Assessment of safety attitudes in a skilled nursing facility. Geriatr Nurs. 2007;28(2):126–36.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sexton J, Helmreich R, Neilands T, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sexton J, Helmreich R, Neilands T, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data and emerging research. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6(1):44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Smith P, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Ariti C, Bardsley M. Hospital admissions from care homes. London: Nuffield Trust; 2015. Smith P, Sherlaw-Johnson C, Ariti C, Bardsley M. Hospital admissions from care homes. London: Nuffield Trust; 2015.
23.
go back to reference Hussein S. The size, roles and stability of the social care workforce in England. London: Kings College London; 2009. Hussein S. The size, roles and stability of the social care workforce in England. London: Kings College London; 2009.
24.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research, design and method. London: Sage; 2009. Yin RK. Case study research, design and method. London: Sage; 2009.
26.
go back to reference Benning A, Ghaleb M, Suokas A, Dixon-Woods M, Dawson J, Barber N, et al. Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation. BMJ. 2011;342:d195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Benning A, Ghaleb M, Suokas A, Dixon-Woods M, Dawson J, Barber N, et al. Large scale organisational intervention to improve patient safety in four UK hospitals: mixed method evaluation. BMJ. 2011;342:d195.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Improving safety in care homes: protocol for evaluation of the Walsall and Wolverhampton care home improvement programme
Authors
Sarah Damery
Sarah Flanagan
Kiran Rai
Gill Combes
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2013-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue