Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Economic evaluations of health technologies in Dutch healthcare decision-making: a qualitative study of the current and potential use, barriers, and facilitators

Authors: Kitty J. Roseboom, Johanna M. van Dongen, Emile Tompa, Maurits W. van Tulder, Judith E. Bosmans

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The use of economic evaluations in healthcare decision-making can potentially help decision-makers in allocating scarce resources as efficiently as possible. Over a decade ago, the use of such studies was found to be limited in Dutch healthcare decision-making, but their current use is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to provide insight into the current and potential use of economic evaluations in Dutch healthcare decision-making and to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of such studies.

Methods

Interviews containing semi-structured and structured questions were conducted among Dutch healthcare decision-makers. Participants were purposefully selected and special efforts were made to include decision-makers working at the macro- (national), meso- (local/regional), and micro-level (patient setting). During the interviews, a topic list was used that was based on the research questions and a literature search, and was developed in consultation with the Dutch National Healthcare Institute. Responses to the semi-structured questions were analyzed using a constant comparative approach. As for the structured questions, participants’ definitions of various economic evaluation concepts were scored as either being “correct” or “incorrect” by two researchers, and summary statistics were prepared.

Results

Sixteen healthcare decision-makers were interviewed and two health economists. Decision-makers’ knowledge of economic evaluations was only modest, and their current use appeared to be limited. Nonetheless, decision-makers recognized the importance of economic evaluations and saw several opportunities for extending their use at the macro- and meso-level, but not at the micro-level. The disparity between the limited use and recognition of the importance of economic evaluations is likely due to the many barriers decision-makers experience preventing their use (e.g. lack of resources, lack of formal willingness-to-pay threshold). Possible facilitators for extending the use of economic evaluations include, amongst others, educating decision-makers and the general population about economic evaluations and presenting economic evaluation results in a clearer and more understandable way.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the current use and impact of economic evaluations in Dutch healthcare decision-making is limited at best. Therefore, strategies are needed to overcome the barriers that currently prevent economic evaluations from being used extensively.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 1: seeking an explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(10):847–54.CrossRefPubMed Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 1: seeking an explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(10):847–54.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Garber S, Gates SM, Keeler EK, Vaiana ME, Mulcahy AW, Lau C, et al. Redirecting Innovation in U.S. Health Care. Options to Decrease Spending and Increase Value. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2014. Garber S, Gates SM, Keeler EK, Vaiana ME, Mulcahy AW, Lau C, et al. Redirecting Innovation in U.S. Health Care. Options to Decrease Spending and Increase Value. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation; 2014.
4.
go back to reference Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs, Part 2: technologic innovation. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(11):932–7.CrossRefPubMed Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs, Part 2: technologic innovation. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(11):932–7.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Chernew ME, Newhouse JP. Health Care Spending Growth. In: Pita Barros P, McGuire T, Pauly M, editors. Handbook of Health Economics, vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier B.V; 2012. Chernew ME, Newhouse JP. Health Care Spending Growth. In: Pita Barros P, McGuire T, Pauly M, editors. Handbook of Health Economics, vol. 2. Oxford: Elsevier B.V; 2012.
6.
go back to reference Pauly MV. Should we be worried about high real medical spending growth in the United States? Health Aff. 2003;W3:15–27. Pauly MV. Should we be worried about high real medical spending growth in the United States? Health Aff. 2003;W3:15–27.
7.
go back to reference Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
8.
go back to reference Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2011;342. Petrou S, Gray A. Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2011;342.
9.
go back to reference Hakkaart - van Roijen L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek. Methoden en standaardkostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Diemen: College voor zorgverzekeringen; 2010. Hakkaart - van Roijen L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM. Handleiding voor kostenonderzoek. Methoden en standaardkostprijzen voor economische evaluaties in de gezondheidszorg. Diemen: College voor zorgverzekeringen; 2010.
10.
go back to reference Portrait FRM, van der Galiën O, van den Berg B. Measuring healthcare providers‘ performance within managed competition using multidimensional quality and cost indicators. Health Econ. 2015 [Epub ahead of print]. Portrait FRM, van der Galiën O, van den Berg B. Measuring healthcare providers‘ performance within managed competition using multidimensional quality and cost indicators. Health Econ. 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
12.
go back to reference Eddama O, Coast J. A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making. Health Policy. 2008;86:129–41.CrossRefPubMed Eddama O, Coast J. A systematic review of the use of economic evaluation in local decision-making. Health Policy. 2008;86:129–41.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hoffmann C. Graf von der Schulenburg JM. The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making. A European survey. The EUROMET group. Health Policy. 2000;52(3):179–92.CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann C. Graf von der Schulenburg JM. The influence of economic evaluation studies on decision making. A European survey. The EUROMET group. Health Policy. 2000;52(3):179–92.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hoffmann C, Stoykova BA, Nixon J, Glanville JM, Misso K, Drummond MF. Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities. Value Health. 2002;5(2):71–8.CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann C, Stoykova BA, Nixon J, Glanville JM, Misso K, Drummond MF. Do health-care decision makers find economic evaluations useful? The findings of focus group research in UK health authorities. Value Health. 2002;5(2):71–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Erntoft S. Pharmaceutical Priority Setting and the Use of Health Economic Evaluations: A Systematic Literature Review. Value Health. 2011;14:587–99.CrossRefPubMed Erntoft S. Pharmaceutical Priority Setting and the Use of Health Economic Evaluations: A Systematic Literature Review. Value Health. 2011;14:587–99.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wu O, Knill-Jones R, Wilson P, Craig N. The impact of economic information on medical decision making in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(3):407–11.CrossRefPubMed Wu O, Knill-Jones R, Wilson P, Craig N. The impact of economic information on medical decision making in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(3):407–11.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Zwart-van Rijkom JE, Leufkens HG, Busschbach JJ, Broekmans AW, Rutten FFH. Differences in attitudes, knowledge and use of economic evaluations in decision-making in The Netherlands. The Dutch results from the EUROMET Project. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;18(2):149–60.CrossRefPubMed Zwart-van Rijkom JE, Leufkens HG, Busschbach JJ, Broekmans AW, Rutten FFH. Differences in attitudes, knowledge and use of economic evaluations in decision-making in The Netherlands. The Dutch results from the EUROMET Project. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;18(2):149–60.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schäfer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Westert G, Devillé W, et al. The Netherlands: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):1–229. Schäfer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Westert G, Devillé W, et al. The Netherlands: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):1–229.
19.
go back to reference Hak T. Data collection in qualitative research. Huisarts Wet. 2004;47(11):502–8.CrossRef Hak T. Data collection in qualitative research. Huisarts Wet. 2004;47(11):502–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Morse JM. Strategies for sampling. Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991.CrossRef Morse JM. Strategies for sampling. Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1991.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1990. Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1990.
22.
go back to reference Richie JLJ. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications; 2003. Richie JLJ. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage Publications; 2003.
23.
go back to reference Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12:436–45.CrossRef Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12:436–45.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lichtman M. Making Meaning From Your Data. Qualitative Research in Education. A User’s Guide. Third ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013. Lichtman M. Making Meaning From Your Data. Qualitative Research in Education. A User’s Guide. Third ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2013.
25.
go back to reference van Dongen JM, Tompa E, Clune L, Sarnocinska-Hart A, Bongers PM, van Tulder MW, et al. Bridging the gap between the economic evaluation literature and daily practice in occupational health: a qualitative study among decision-makers in the healthcare sector. Implement Sci. 2013;8:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Dongen JM, Tompa E, Clune L, Sarnocinska-Hart A, Bongers PM, van Tulder MW, et al. Bridging the gap between the economic evaluation literature and daily practice in occupational health: a qualitative study among decision-makers in the healthcare sector. Implement Sci. 2013;8:57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Coyle D. Increasing the Impact of Economic Evaluations on Health-Care Decision-Making. York: University of York. Centre for health economics; 1993. Coyle D. Increasing the Impact of Economic Evaluations on Health-Care Decision-Making. York: University of York. Centre for health economics; 1993.
27.
go back to reference Nixon J, Stoykova B, Christie J, Glanville J, Kleijnen J, Drummond M. NHS Economic Evaluation Database for healthcare decision makers. BMJ. 2000;321:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nixon J, Stoykova B, Christie J, Glanville J, Kleijnen J, Drummond M. NHS Economic Evaluation Database for healthcare decision makers. BMJ. 2000;321:32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Clancy CM, Kronin K. Evidence-based decision-making: global evidence. Local decisions. Health Aff. 2005;24(1):151–62.CrossRef Clancy CM, Kronin K. Evidence-based decision-making: global evidence. Local decisions. Health Aff. 2005;24(1):151–62.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Drummond MF. Economic evaluation and the rational diffusion and use of health technology. Health Policy. 1987;7(3):309–24.CrossRefPubMed Drummond MF. Economic evaluation and the rational diffusion and use of health technology. Health Policy. 1987;7(3):309–24.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ. 2013;25(346):f1049.CrossRef Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. BMJ. 2013;25(346):f1049.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Tan-Torres Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, et al. Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. Tan-Torres Edejer T, Baltussen R, Adam T, Hutubessy R, Acharya A, Evans DB, et al. Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
32.
go back to reference Brouwer WB, van Exel NJ, Baltussen RM, Rutten FF. A dollar is a dollar is a dollar--or is it? Value Health. 2006;9(5):341–7.CrossRefPubMed Brouwer WB, van Exel NJ, Baltussen RM, Rutten FF. A dollar is a dollar is a dollar--or is it? Value Health. 2006;9(5):341–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Eijkenaar F. Pay for performance in health care: an international overview of initiatives. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69(3):251–76.CrossRefPubMed Eijkenaar F. Pay for performance in health care: an international overview of initiatives. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69(3):251–76.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Metadata
Title
Economic evaluations of health technologies in Dutch healthcare decision-making: a qualitative study of the current and potential use, barriers, and facilitators
Authors
Kitty J. Roseboom
Johanna M. van Dongen
Emile Tompa
Maurits W. van Tulder
Judith E. Bosmans
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-1986-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Health Services Research 1/2017 Go to the issue