Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

“It’s a complex mesh”- how large-scale health system reorganisation affected the delivery of the immunisation programme in England: a qualitative study

Authors: Tracey Chantler, Saumu Lwembe, Vanessa Saliba, Thara Raj, Nicholas Mays, Mary Ramsay, Sandra Mounier-Jack

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The English health system experienced a large-scale reorganisation in April 2013. A national tri-partite delivery framework involving the Department of Health, NHS England and Public Health England was agreed and a new local operational model applied. Evidence about how health system re-organisations affect constituent public health programmes is sparse and focused on low and middle income countries. We conducted an in-depth analysis of how the English immunisation programme adapted to the April 2013 health system reorganisation, and what facilitated or hindered the delivery of immunisation services in this context.

Methods

A qualitative case study methodology involving interviews and observations at national and local level was applied. Three sites were selected to represent different localities, varying levels of immunisation coverage and a range of changes in governance. Study participants included 19 national decision-makers and 56 local implementers. Two rounds of interviews and observations (immunisation board/committee meetings) occurred between December 2014 and June 2015, and September and December 2015. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim and written accounts of observed events compiled. Data was imported into NVIVO 10 and analysed thematically.

Results

The new immunisation programme in the new health system was described as fragmented, and significant effort was expended to regroup. National tripartite arrangements required joint working and accountability; a shift from the simpler hierarchical pre-reform structure, typical of many public health programmes. New local inter-organisational arrangements resulted in ambiguity about organisational responsibilities and hindered data-sharing. Whilst making immunisation managers responsible for larger areas supported equitable resource distribution and strengthened service commissioning, it also reduced their ability to apply clinical expertise, support and evaluate immunisation providers’ performance. Partnership working helped staff adapt, but the complexity of the health system hindered the development of consistent approaches for training and service evaluation.

Conclusion

The April 2013 health system reorganisation in England resulted in significant fragmentation in the way the immunisation programme was delivered. Some of this was a temporary by-product of organisational change, other more persistent challenges were intrinsic to the complex architecture of the new health system. Partnership working helped immunisation leaders and implementers reconnect and now the challenge is to assess how inter-agency collaboration can be strengthened.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Haddad S, et al. System-level determinants of immunization coverage disparities among health districts in Burkina Faso: a multiple case study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009;9 Suppl 1:S15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Haddad S, et al. System-level determinants of immunization coverage disparities among health districts in Burkina Faso: a multiple case study. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2009;9 Suppl 1:S15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ayaya SO, et al. Training needs for mid-level managers and immunisation coverage in western Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2007;84(7):342–52.PubMed Ayaya SO, et al. Training needs for mid-level managers and immunisation coverage in western Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2007;84(7):342–52.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Semali IA. Trends in immunization completion and disparities in the context of health reforms: the case study of Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Semali IA. Trends in immunization completion and disparities in the context of health reforms: the case study of Tanzania. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
20.
go back to reference Hunter DJ. Change of government: one more big bang health care reform in England’s National Health Service. Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed Hunter DJ. Change of government: one more big bang health care reform in England’s National Health Service. Int J Health Serv. 2011;41(1):159–74.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Iles V, Sutherland K. Managing change in the NHS: organizational change: NIHR Service Delivery and Organization Programme. 2001. Iles V, Sutherland K. Managing change in the NHS: organizational change: NIHR Service Delivery and Organization Programme. 2001.
22.
go back to reference Todnem R. Organisational change management: a critical review. J Change Manag. 2005;5(4):369–80.CrossRef Todnem R. Organisational change management: a critical review. J Change Manag. 2005;5(4):369–80.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Fulop N, et al. Changing organisations: a study of the context and processes of mergers of health care providers in England. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(1):119–30.CrossRefPubMed Fulop N, et al. Changing organisations: a study of the context and processes of mergers of health care providers in England. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(1):119–30.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Coid DR, Davies HTO. Health care workers’ well-being and the therapeutic relationship: does organizational change do damage? Public Money Manag. 2007;27(2):93–4.CrossRef Coid DR, Davies HTO. Health care workers’ well-being and the therapeutic relationship: does organizational change do damage? Public Money Manag. 2007;27(2):93–4.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Edwards N. The triumph of hope over experience, lessons from the history of reorganisation, N. confederation, Editor. The NHS Confederation: London; 2010. Edwards N. The triumph of hope over experience, lessons from the history of reorganisation, N. confederation, Editor. The NHS Confederation: London; 2010.
26.
go back to reference Harrison MI, Kimani J. Building capacity for a transformation initiative: system redesign at Denver Health. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009;34(1):42–53.CrossRefPubMed Harrison MI, Kimani J. Building capacity for a transformation initiative: system redesign at Denver Health. Health Care Manage Rev. 2009;34(1):42–53.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2009. Yin RK. Case study research: design and methods. 4th ed. London: Sage; 2009.
30.
go back to reference Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13(4):544–59. Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13(4):544–59.
31.
32.
go back to reference Weick KE. Making sense of the organization. Chichester: Wiley; 2009. Weick KE. Making sense of the organization. Chichester: Wiley; 2009.
33.
go back to reference Marnoch G, McKee L, Dinnie N. Between organisations and institutions: legitimacy and medical managers. Public Adm. 2000;78(4):967–87.CrossRef Marnoch G, McKee L, Dinnie N. Between organisations and institutions: legitimacy and medical managers. Public Adm. 2000;78(4):967–87.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Boyatizis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Lodnon: Sage; 1998. Boyatizis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Lodnon: Sage; 1998.
36.
go back to reference Screening and Immunisations Team. NHS Immunisation Statistics England, 2014-15. Health and Social Care Information Centre. 2015. (Accessed: 3 Nov 2015). Screening and Immunisations Team. NHS Immunisation Statistics England, 2014-15. Health and Social Care Information Centre. 2015. (Accessed: 3 Nov 2015).
37.
go back to reference Jenkins LM, et al. Integration, influence and change in public health: findings from a survey of Directors of Public Health in England. J Public Health. 2015. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdv139. Jenkins LM, et al. Integration, influence and change in public health: findings from a survey of Directors of Public Health in England. J Public Health. 2015. doi:10.​1093/​pubmed/​fdv139.
38.
go back to reference Lambert MF, Sowden S. Revisiting the risks associated with health and healthcare reform in England: perspective of Faculty of Public Health members. J Public Health. 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. Lambert MF, Sowden S. Revisiting the risks associated with health and healthcare reform in England: perspective of Faculty of Public Health members. J Public Health. 2016. [Epub ahead of print].
40.
go back to reference Glasby J, Dickinson H, Miller R. Partnership working in England—where we are now and where we’ve come from. Int J Integr Care. 2011;11(5):e002. (Special 10th Anniversary Edition). Glasby J, Dickinson H, Miller R. Partnership working in England—where we are now and where we’ve come from. Int J Integr Care. 2011;11(5):e002. (Special 10th Anniversary Edition).
Metadata
Title
“It’s a complex mesh”- how large-scale health system reorganisation affected the delivery of the immunisation programme in England: a qualitative study
Authors
Tracey Chantler
Saumu Lwembe
Vanessa Saliba
Thara Raj
Nicholas Mays
Mary Ramsay
Sandra Mounier-Jack
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1711-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue