Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Central intake to improve access to physiotherapy for children with complex needs: a mixed methods case report

Authors: Kristy D. M. Wittmeier, Gayle Restall, Kathy Mulder, Brenden Dufault, Marie Paterson, Matthew Thiessen, Lisa M. Lix

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Children with complex needs can face barriers to system access and navigation related to their need for multiple services and healthcare providers. Central intake for pediatric rehabilitation was developed and implemented in 2008 in Winnipeg Manitoba Canada as a means to enhance service coordination and access for children and their families. This study evaluates the process and impact of implementing a central intake system, using pediatric physiotherapy as a case example.

Methods

A mixed methods instrumental case study design was used. Interviews were completed with 9 individuals. Data was transcribed and analyzed for themes. Quantitative data (wait times, referral volume and caregiver satisfaction) was collected for children referred to physiotherapy with complex needs (n = 1399), and a comparison group of children referred for orthopedic concerns (n = 3901). Wait times were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, caregiver satisfaction was analyzed using Fisher exact test and change point modeling was applied to examine referral volume over the study period.

Results

Interview participants described central intake implementation as creating more streamlined processes. Factors that facilitated successful implementation included 1) agreement among stakeholders, 2) hiring of a central intake coordinator, 3) a financial commitment from the government and 4) leadership at the individual and organization level. Mean (sd) wait times improved for children with complex needs (12.3(13.1) to 8.0(6.9) days from referral to contact with family, p < 0.0001; 29.8(17.9) to 24.3(17.0) days from referral to appointment, p < 0.0001) while referral volumes remained consistent. A small but significant increase in wait times was observed for the comparison group (9.6(8.6) to 10.1(6.6) days from referral to contact with family, p < 0.001; 20.4(14.3) to 22.1(13.1) days from referral to appointment, p < 0.0001), accompanied by an increasing referral volume for this group. Caregiver satisfaction remained high throughout the process (p = 0.48).

Conclusions

Central intake implementation achieved the intended outcomes of streamlining processes and improving transparency and access to pediatric physiotherapy (i.e., decreasing wait times) for families of children with complex needs. Future research is needed to build on this single discipline case study approach to examine changes in wait times, therapy coordination and stakeholder satisfaction within the context of continuing improvements for pediatric therapy services within the province.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clow D, Mustafa A, Snollar J, Wood N, Reid J, Sinden S. Reducing waiting times associated with integrated child health service. J R Soc Promot Health. 2002;122(4):245–50.CrossRefPubMed Clow D, Mustafa A, Snollar J, Wood N, Reid J, Sinden S. Reducing waiting times associated with integrated child health service. J R Soc Promot Health. 2002;122(4):245–50.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Miller AR, Armstrong RW, Masse LC, Klassen AF, Shen J, O’Donnell ME. Waiting for child developmental and rehabilitation services: an overview of issues and needs. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(11):815–21.CrossRefPubMed Miller AR, Armstrong RW, Masse LC, Klassen AF, Shen J, O’Donnell ME. Waiting for child developmental and rehabilitation services: an overview of issues and needs. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(11):815–21.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Martin T. Message from the Chair: Access and advocacy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1989;1(4):173–4.CrossRef Martin T. Message from the Chair: Access and advocacy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 1989;1(4):173–4.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Camden C, Swaine B, Tetreault S, Brodeur MM. Reorganizing pediatric rehabilitation services to improve accessibility: do we sacrifice quality? BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Camden C, Swaine B, Tetreault S, Brodeur MM. Reorganizing pediatric rehabilitation services to improve accessibility: do we sacrifice quality? BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Cloutier P, Cappelli M, Glennie JE, Charron G, Thatte S. Child and youth mental health service referrals: physicians’ knowledge of mental health services and perceptions of a centralized intake model. Healthc Policy. 2010;5(3):e144–61.PubMedPubMedCentral Cloutier P, Cappelli M, Glennie JE, Charron G, Thatte S. Child and youth mental health service referrals: physicians’ knowledge of mental health services and perceptions of a centralized intake model. Healthc Policy. 2010;5(3):e144–61.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Barber CE, Patel JN, Woodhouse L, Smith C, Weiss S, Homik J, et al. Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Barber CE, Patel JN, Woodhouse L, Smith C, Weiss S, Homik J, et al. Development of key performance indicators to evaluate centralized intake for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17(1):322.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Novak K, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten S, Pendharkar SR. Improving access in gastroenterology: the single point of entry model for referrals. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(11):633–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Novak K, Veldhuyzen Van Zanten S, Pendharkar SR. Improving access in gastroenterology: the single point of entry model for referrals. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27(11):633–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Stake R. Qualitative case studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2005. p. 443–66. Stake R. Qualitative case studies. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2005. p. 443–66.
15.
go back to reference Flyyberg B. Case Study. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2011. p. 301–15. Flyyberg B. Case Study. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2011. p. 301–15.
16.
go back to reference Miles M, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2014. Miles M, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2014.
17.
go back to reference Creswell JW, Miller D. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000;39:124–30.CrossRef Creswell JW, Miller D. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000;39:124–30.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lix L, Smith M, Azimaee M, Dahl M, Nicol P, Burchill C, et al. A Systematic Investigation of Manitoba’s Provincial Laboratory Data. Winnipeg: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy; 2012. Lix L, Smith M, Azimaee M, Dahl M, Nicol P, Burchill C, et al. A Systematic Investigation of Manitoba’s Provincial Laboratory Data. Winnipeg: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy; 2012.
19.
go back to reference Julious SA. Inference and estimation in a changepoint regression problem. The Statistician. 2001;50(Part 1):51–61. Julious SA. Inference and estimation in a changepoint regression problem. The Statistician. 2001;50(Part 1):51–61.
20.
go back to reference CTI Winnipeg-Central Intake Working Groups Project Charter. Version October 22 2012. CTI Winnipeg-Central Intake Working Groups Project Charter. Version October 22 2012.
21.
go back to reference Kotter J. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Brighton: Harvard Business Review; 2007. Kotter J. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Brighton: Harvard Business Review; 2007.
22.
go back to reference Phoenix M, Rosenbaum P, Watson D, Camden C. The “5Rs of Reorganization”: A Case Report on Service Delivery Reorganization within a Pediatric Rehabilitation Organization. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;36(2):217–28.PubMed Phoenix M, Rosenbaum P, Watson D, Camden C. The “5Rs of Reorganization”: A Case Report on Service Delivery Reorganization within a Pediatric Rehabilitation Organization. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2016;36(2):217–28.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Camden C, Swaine B, Tetreault S, Carriere M. Going beyond the identification of change facilitators to effectively implement a new model of services: lessons learned from a case example in paediatric rehabilitation. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14(4):247–60.CrossRefPubMed Camden C, Swaine B, Tetreault S, Carriere M. Going beyond the identification of change facilitators to effectively implement a new model of services: lessons learned from a case example in paediatric rehabilitation. Dev Neurorehabil. 2011;14(4):247–60.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Central intake to improve access to physiotherapy for children with complex needs: a mixed methods case report
Authors
Kristy D. M. Wittmeier
Gayle Restall
Kathy Mulder
Brenden Dufault
Marie Paterson
Matthew Thiessen
Lisa M. Lix
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1700-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Health Services Research 1/2016 Go to the issue